{"id":10490,"date":"2025-10-21T10:34:19","date_gmt":"2025-10-21T10:34:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=10490"},"modified":"2025-10-21T10:42:04","modified_gmt":"2025-10-21T10:42:04","slug":"written-statement-can-not-be-filed-beyond-120-days-in-a-commercial-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/written-statement-can-not-be-filed-beyond-120-days-in-a-commercial-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"Written Statement can not be filed beyond 120 days in a Commercial Dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/span>Fact of the Case<\/span><\/h2>\n

This case arises from a dispute between Ms. Rajilaxmi Oils<\/b> and Kriti Nutrients Ltd.<\/b> involving trademark and copyright claims. The petitioner, Ms. Rajilaxmi Oils, filed a civil suit under Section 142 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/b> and Section 60 of the Copyright Act, 1957<\/b>, in 2020 before the Commercial Court, Indore. Subsequently, the respondent filed another suit against the petitioner in 2021, also in the Commercial Court, Indore. During the pendency of these suits, the respondent obtained an ex-parte injunction<\/b> from the Commercial Court, Delhi, which led to the seizure of the petitioner\u2019s products. The petitioner alleged wrongful seizure and continued non-release of their goods even after the dismissal of the Delhi suit.<\/p>

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n