{"id":15824,"date":"2026-02-17T12:01:41","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T12:01:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=15824"},"modified":"2026-02-17T12:11:32","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T12:11:32","slug":"sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/","title":{"rendered":"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"constitutional-crossroads-faith-equality-judicial-review\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Constitutional_Crossroads_Faith_Equality_and_the_Limits_of_Judicial_Review\"><\/span>A Constitutional Crossroads: Faith, Equality and the Limits of Judicial Review<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">India\u2019s constitutional law jurisprudence is once again at a historic inflection point. The Supreme Court\u2019s nine-judge Constitution Bench is not merely reconsidering Sabarimala \u2014 it is re-examining the very architecture of religious freedom in the Indian Constitution.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_83 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#A_Constitutional_Crossroads_Faith_Equality_and_the_Limits_of_Judicial_Review\" >A Constitutional Crossroads: Faith, Equality and the Limits of Judicial Review<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#Case_Details\" >Case Details<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#Background_%E2%80%94_From_Sabarimala_to_a_Pan-India_Religious_Rights_Question\" >Background \u2014 From Sabarimala to a Pan-India Religious Rights Question<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#The_Constitutional_Questions_Before_the_9-Judge_Bench\" >The Constitutional Questions Before the 9-Judge Bench<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#A_Essential_Religious_Practices_Doctrine_ERP\" >A. Essential Religious Practices Doctrine (ERP)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#B_Gender_Equality_vs_Religious_Freedom\" >B. Gender Equality vs Religious Freedom<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#C_Interplay_of_Articles_14_15_and_25\" >C. Interplay of Articles 14, 15 and 25<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#Why_This_Case_Is_Historically_Significant\" >Why This Case Is Historically Significant<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#Potential_Impact_Across_Religions\" >Potential Impact Across Religions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#The_Larger_Jurisprudential_Question\" >The Larger Jurisprudential Question<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The reference moves far beyond the question:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Can women enter the Sabarimala temple?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Instead, the Court now asks:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>How should courts decide what religion itself protects?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"case-details\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Details\"><\/span>Case Details<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th>Particular<\/th><th>Information<\/th><\/tr><tr><td>Case name<\/td><td>Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association (Review Reference in the Sabarimala matter)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Connected original judgment<\/td><td>Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bench strength<\/td><td>Nine-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Reference order date<\/td><td>14 November 2019<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Review orders continuing reference<\/td><td>2020\u20132023 procedural listings; matter still pending for final constitutional adjudication<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"background-sabarimala-to-pan-india-question\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Background_%E2%80%94_From_Sabarimala_to_a_Pan-India_Religious_Rights_Question\"><\/span>Background \u2014 From Sabarimala to a Pan-India Religious Rights Question<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2018, the Supreme Court in Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (5-judge bench) held that the exclusion of women aged 10\u201350 from the Sabarimala Temple violated constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The judgment relied heavily on:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Article 14 \u2014 Equality before law<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Article 15 \u2014 Non-discrimination<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Article 25 \u2014 Freedom of religion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, intense legal, theological and social debate followed. Review petitions raised a deeper issue:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Should courts decide what constitutes an essential religious practice?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Recognising that similar disputes exist across religions \u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Mosques<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Temples<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dargahs<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Parsi fire temples<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Other denominational institutions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court referred the matter to a nine-judge bench in 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"constitutional-questions-nine-judge-bench\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Constitutional_Questions_Before_the_9-Judge_Bench\"><\/span>The Constitutional Questions Before the 9-Judge Bench<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court framed issues that go to the heart of Indian secularism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"essential-religious-practices-doctrine\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Essential_Religious_Practices_Doctrine_ERP\"><\/span>A. Essential Religious Practices Doctrine (ERP)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For decades, courts have tested religious practices by asking:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Is the practice essential to the religion?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Now the Court must reconsider:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Should judges interpret theology?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Who defines religion \u2014 believers or the Constitution?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Can constitutional morality override denominational autonomy?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This could redefine precedents dating back to Shirur Mutt (1954).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"gender-equality-vs-religious-freedom\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"B_Gender_Equality_vs_Religious_Freedom\"><\/span>B. Gender Equality vs Religious Freedom<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The core tension:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th>Equality Model<\/th><th>Religious Autonomy Model<\/th><\/tr><tr><td>Constitution transforms society<\/td><td>Constitution protects diversity<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>State reforms religion<\/td><td>State stays neutral<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Individual rights prevail<\/td><td>Community rights prevail<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court must decide whether faith-based exclusion automatically becomes unconstitutional discrimination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"interplay-articles-14-15-25\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"C_Interplay_of_Articles_14_15_and_25\"><\/span>C. Interplay of Articles 14, 15 and 25<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most complex doctrinal question:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Are religious rights subject to equality \u2014 or are they independent freedoms?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Possible interpretations:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th>Model<\/th><th>Meaning<\/th><\/tr><tr><td>Equality-First Model<\/td><td>Article 25 subject to Article 14 \u2014 Any exclusion = unconstitutional<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Group-Rights Model<\/td><td>Denominations protected under Article 26 \u2014 Autonomy of religious communities preserved<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Harmonisation Model<\/td><td>Courts intervene only when practice violates dignity in a civil sense<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This case will determine India\u2019s future model of secularism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"historical-significance\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_This_Case_Is_Historically_Significant\"><\/span>Why This Case Is Historically Significant<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This reference is considered among the most consequential constitutional cases since:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Basic Structure doctrine<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Privacy judgment<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Decriminalisation of homosexuality<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Because the Court will decide:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Can courts reform religion?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are constitutional rights purely individual?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What is the role of constitutional morality?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where does pluralism end and discrimination begin?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"impact-across-religions\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Potential_Impact_Across_Religions\"><\/span>Potential Impact Across Religions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling will not remain confined to Sabarimala.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It will influence disputes involving:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Entry restrictions in temples<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Denominational control over rituals<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Mosque entry issues<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Parsi fire temple access rules<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Women\u2019s participation in religious ceremonies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, the judgment will determine the constitutional limits of faith-based exclusion in India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"larger-jurisprudential-question\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Larger_Jurisprudential_Question\"><\/span>The Larger Jurisprudential Question<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At stake is a philosophical question:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Is the Constitution a social reformer or a neutral referee?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The nine-judge bench must decide whether India follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Approach<\/th><th>Meaning<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Transformative constitutionalism<\/td><td>Rights reshape tradition<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Pluralistic constitutionalism<\/td><td>Tradition coexists with rights<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"conclusion\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Sabarimala reference is no longer a temple entry dispute \u2014 it is a foundational inquiry into the relationship between faith and the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whatever the Court decides will redefine:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Religious autonomy<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Anti-discrimination law<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Judicial power in matters of belief<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For constitutional lawyers, this case may become the new cornerstone precedent governing Articles 14, 15, 25 and 26 for decades to come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The judgment will not just decide who may enter a temple \u2014 it will decide how India understands freedom itself.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Constitutional Crossroads: Faith, Equality and the Limits of Judicial Review India\u2019s constitutional law jurisprudence is once again at a historic inflection point. The Supreme Court\u2019s nine-judge Constitution Bench is not merely reconsidering Sabarimala \u2014 it is re-examining the very architecture of religious freedom in the Indian Constitution. The reference moves far beyond the question:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":555,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[24],"class_list":["post-15824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-supreme-court","tag-just-in"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6.1 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Explainer on the Supreme Court Sabarimala 9-judge bench case examining equality, religious freedom and essential religious practices doctrine.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Explainer on the Supreme Court Sabarimala 9-judge bench case examining equality, religious freedom and essential religious practices doctrine.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-17T12:01:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-17T12:11:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ameeta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ameeta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ameeta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b552d5a51fa5e31c462e3fb0ce4b5055\"},\"headline\":\"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-17T12:01:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-17T12:11:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":658,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Just In\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/\",\"name\":\"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-17T12:01:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-17T12:11:32+00:00\",\"description\":\"Explainer on the Supreme Court Sabarimala 9-judge bench case examining equality, religious freedom and essential religious practices doctrine.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court > Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b552d5a51fa5e31c462e3fb0ce4b5055\",\"name\":\"Ameeta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/555\\\/1768981662-bpfull.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/555\\\/1768981662-bpfull.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/555\\\/1768981662-bpfull.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Ameeta\"},\"description\":\"Adv.Ameeta Sinha Calcutta High Court, Advocate\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/ameeta\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Explainer on the Supreme Court Sabarimala 9-judge bench case examining equality, religious freedom and essential religious practices doctrine.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution","og_description":"Explainer on the Supreme Court Sabarimala 9-judge bench case examining equality, religious freedom and essential religious practices doctrine.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-02-17T12:01:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-17T12:11:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Ameeta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ameeta","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/"},"author":{"name":"Ameeta","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/b552d5a51fa5e31c462e3fb0ce4b5055"},"headline":"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution","datePublished":"2026-02-17T12:01:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-17T12:11:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/"},"wordCount":658,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"keywords":["Just In"],"articleSection":["Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/","name":"Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-02-17T12:01:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-17T12:11:32+00:00","description":"Explainer on the Supreme Court Sabarimala 9-judge bench case examining equality, religious freedom and essential religious practices doctrine.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/sabarimala-9-judge-bench-equality-vs-religious-freedom\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court > Sabarimala 9-Judge Bench Case: Equality vs Religious Freedom in the Indian Constitution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/b552d5a51fa5e31c462e3fb0ce4b5055","name":"Ameeta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/555\/1768981662-bpfull.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/555\/1768981662-bpfull.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/555\/1768981662-bpfull.jpg","caption":"Ameeta"},"description":"Adv.Ameeta Sinha Calcutta High Court, Advocate","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/ameeta\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/555"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15824\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}