{"id":15932,"date":"2026-02-19T11:53:17","date_gmt":"2026-02-19T11:53:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=15932"},"modified":"2026-02-19T12:08:08","modified_gmt":"2026-02-19T12:08:08","slug":"political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Examines ED Powers in I-PAC Raid Case: Political Confidentiality vs Criminal Investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"federal-power-political-privilege-and-evidentiary-standards-collide\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Federal_Power_Political_Privilege_And_Evidentiary_Standards_Collide_In_A_High-Stakes_Constitutional_Courtroom\"><\/span>Federal Power, Political Privilege And Evidentiary Standards Collide In A High-Stakes Constitutional Courtroom<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>India\u2019s continuing confrontation between investigative agencies and elected governments has now entered yet another constitutional theatre \u2014 the Supreme Court. In a striking submission during hearings relating to the Enforcement Directorate\u2019s search at political consultancy firm I-PAC, the ED told the Court that it cannot assume that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee removed only Trinamool Congress\u2019 confidential political material from the premises during the raid.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#Federal_Power_Political_Privilege_And_Evidentiary_Standards_Collide_In_A_High-Stakes_Constitutional_Courtroom\" >Federal Power, Political Privilege And Evidentiary Standards Collide In A High-Stakes Constitutional Courtroom<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#Background_The_I-PAC_Search_And_Political_Sensitivity\" >Background: The I-PAC Search And Political Sensitivity<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#The_States_Position_Broadly_Implied\" >The State\u2019s Position Broadly Implied:<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#The_ED_Countered\" >The ED Countered:<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#The_Legal_Core_Can_Political_Confidentiality_Override_Investigation\" >The Legal Core: Can Political Confidentiality Override Investigation?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#1_Search_And_Seizure_Under_The_Prevention_Of_Money_Laundering_Act_PMLA\" >1. Search And Seizure Under The Prevention Of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#2_Privilege_Vs_Investigative_Necessity\" >2. Privilege Vs Investigative Necessity<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#3_Federalism_And_Agency_Power\" >3. Federalism And Agency Power<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#The_Evidentiary_Question_Burden_Of_Proof\" >The Evidentiary Question: Burden Of Proof<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#Why_This_Case_Matters_Beyond_Politics\" >Why This Case Matters Beyond Politics<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#1_Data-Driven_Politics\" >1. Data-Driven Politics<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#2_Political_Parties_As_Legal_Entities\" >2. Political Parties As Legal Entities<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#3_Expanding_Scope_Of_Digital_Evidence\" >3. Expanding Scope Of Digital Evidence<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#Possible_Outcomes_Before_The_Supreme_Court\" >Possible Outcomes Before The Supreme Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#The_Larger_Constitutional_Question\" >The Larger Constitutional Question<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/political-confidentiality-vs-criminal-investigation-ipac-ed-supreme-court\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p>The statement may appear narrow, but legally it carries sweeping implications: it touches privilege, federalism, seizure procedure, and the constitutional limits of criminal investigation in political spaces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This dispute is no longer about a raid \u2014 it is about who controls political information in a democracy when criminal law steps inside the political arena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"background-i-pac-search-and-political-sensitivity\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Background_The_I-PAC_Search_And_Political_Sensitivity\"><\/span>Background: The I-PAC Search And Political Sensitivity<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Enforcement Directorate conducted searches at the office of political consultancy organization I-PAC (Indian Political Action Committee), a firm known for managing election campaigns for several political parties, including the Trinamool Congress (TMC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During the operation, the presence of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee at the premises \u2014 and allegations regarding removal of documents \u2014 transformed what would otherwise be a routine financial investigation into a constitutional controversy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"states-position\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_States_Position_Broadly_Implied\"><\/span>The State\u2019s Position Broadly Implied:<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Political campaign material belonged to the party<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It was confidential electoral data<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Investigators had no right to seize it<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"eds-position\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_ED_Countered\"><\/span>The ED Countered:<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Investigators cannot verify that only political party material was removed \u2014 therefore the act cannot be insulated from investigation merely by labeling it \u201cparty confidential data.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This single line has now triggered questions about the boundary between political secrecy and criminal evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"legal-core-political-confidentiality-vs-investigation\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Legal_Core_Can_Political_Confidentiality_Override_Investigation\"><\/span>The Legal Core: Can Political Confidentiality Override Investigation?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The controversy sits at the intersection of three doctrines:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"search-and-seizure-pmla\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"1_Search_And_Seizure_Under_The_Prevention_Of_Money_Laundering_Act_PMLA\"><\/span>1. Search And Seizure Under The Prevention Of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Under Section 17 of the PMLA, authorities may search premises and seize records if they have reason to believe that material is connected to proceeds of crime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Crucially:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The statute does not exempt political consultancy firms or political party-related data.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, the legal test becomes evidentiary \u2014 not political.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Courts have repeatedly held that the character of premises does not determine immunity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Relevant Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (1974), the Supreme Court held that evidence obtained during search is not automatically inadmissible merely because the search is disputed, unless constitutional rights are violated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"privilege-vs-investigative-necessity\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_Privilege_Vs_Investigative_Necessity\"><\/span>2. Privilege Vs Investigative Necessity<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Indian law recognises certain privileges \u2014 for example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Attorney-client privilege<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Parliamentary privilege<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Self-incrimination protection under Article 20(3)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>But political strategy documents have no statutory privilege class.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The ED\u2019s argument therefore becomes jurisprudentially significant:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Political confidentiality is not a recognized evidentiary privilege in criminal law.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court must therefore decide whether political functioning can create a new category of protected communication \u2014 a step that could radically alter investigative powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"federalism-and-agency-power\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_Federalism_And_Agency_Power\"><\/span>3. Federalism And Agency Power<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The larger constitutional tension lies beneath the surface:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>State governments increasingly argue central agencies are being used for political intrusion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Courts have dealt with similar tensions before.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (2010), the Supreme Court held that central agencies can investigate even without state consent if constitutional courts order it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Thus the doctrine today is clear:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Federalism cannot become a shield against criminal investigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>But investigation cannot become a weapon against federal autonomy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This case tests exactly where that balance lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"evidentiary-question-burden-of-proof\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Evidentiary_Question_Burden_Of_Proof\"><\/span>The Evidentiary Question: Burden Of Proof<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The ED\u2019s submission subtly shifts burden:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th>Party<\/th><th>Position<\/th><\/tr><tr><td>The State<\/td><td>Suggests removed files were political<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>The ED<\/td><td>Says investigators cannot assume that<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Legally, criminal procedure favors preservation of potential evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Courts generally adopt the principle:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>When relevance cannot be ruled out, seizure is justified; admissibility can be decided later.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>This follows the investigative logic recognized in V.S. Kuttan Pillai v. Ramakrishnan (1980) \u2014 searches are meant to discover truth, not confirm pre-declared categories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"why-this-case-matters-beyond-politics\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_This_Case_Matters_Beyond_Politics\"><\/span>Why This Case Matters Beyond Politics<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This dispute may create precedent in three emerging areas of law:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"data-driven-politics\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"1_Data-Driven_Politics\"><\/span>1. Data-Driven Politics<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Modern campaigns rely on:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>voter profiling<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>behavioral analytics<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>demographic databases<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If courts recognize political consulting data as privileged, future financial investigations into election funding may become nearly impossible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"political-parties-as-legal-entities\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_Political_Parties_As_Legal_Entities\"><\/span>2. Political Parties As Legal Entities<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Indian law still treats parties ambiguously \u2014 not quite private bodies, not quite public authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The case may clarify:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Are political campaign databases private intellectual property or potential financial evidence?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"expanding-scope-of-digital-evidence\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_Expanding_Scope_Of_Digital_Evidence\"><\/span>3. Expanding Scope Of Digital Evidence<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court may need to determine whether:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>electoral data analytics<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>campaign communication records<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>can constitute proceeds-of-crime linked evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"possible-outcomes-before-the-supreme-court\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Possible_Outcomes_Before_The_Supreme_Court\"><\/span>Possible Outcomes Before The Supreme Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court has multiple doctrinal paths:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Doctrine<\/th><th>Meaning<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>A. Agency-Favoured View<\/td><td>Political confidentiality does not override seizure powers; admissibility decided later.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>B. Limited Protection Doctrine<\/td><td>Certain campaign-related data protected unless direct financial nexus shown.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>C. New Political Privilege Doctrine<\/td><td>Creation of a restricted privilege for electoral strategy \u2014 least likely but constitutionally transformative.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"the-larger-constitutional-question\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Larger_Constitutional_Question\"><\/span>The Larger Constitutional Question<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>At its heart, the case asks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>In a democracy, when law enforcement enters the political sphere, should criminal law pause \u2014 or should politics submit to the rule of law like any other domain?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court is not merely deciding about a raid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is defining the legal status of political information itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"conclusion\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The ED\u2019s statement \u2014 that it cannot assume only TMC\u2019s confidential files were removed \u2014 is not a technical objection but a constitutional assertion: labeling documents as \u201cpolitical\u201d cannot immunize them from investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If accepted, it reinforces the principle that no democratic actor exists outside evidentiary scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If rejected, India may see the birth of a new legal doctrine \u2014 political confidentiality privilege \u2014 reshaping criminal investigation in electoral democracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Either way, the judgment will likely become a landmark precedent in the law of search, seizure, and the constitutional relationship between politics and prosecution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Federal Power, Political Privilege And Evidentiary Standards Collide In A High-Stakes Constitutional Courtroom India\u2019s continuing confrontation between investigative agencies and elected governments has now entered yet another constitutional theatre \u2014 the Supreme Court. In a striking submission during hearings relating to the Enforcement Directorate\u2019s search at political consultancy firm I-PAC, the ED told the Court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":317,"featured_media":15939,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[95],"tags":[5162,28],"class_list":{"0":"post-15932","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-supreme-court","8":"tag-supreme-court","9":"tag-top-news"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/ipac-raid-supreme-court-ed-mamata-lsi.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/317"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15932\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15939"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}