{"id":17458,"date":"2026-03-19T11:34:50","date_gmt":"2026-03-19T11:34:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=17458"},"modified":"2026-03-19T11:41:23","modified_gmt":"2026-03-19T11:41:23","slug":"supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court: High Courts Must Decide FIR Quashing Petitions on Merits, Not Avoid Adjudication"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"strong-message-supreme-court\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Strong_Message_From_The_Supreme_Court\"><\/span>A Strong Message From The Supreme Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In a significant ruling that strengthens procedural justice, the Supreme Court has categorically held that High Courts must decide petitions for quashing FIRs on their merits, rather than disposing of them with routine directions to the police.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#A_Strong_Message_From_The_Supreme_Court\" >A Strong Message From The Supreme Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Legal_Provisions_And_Holding\" >Legal Provisions And Holding<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Code_Of_Criminal_Procedure_1973_%E2%80%94_Section_482_%E2%80%94_Quashing_Of_FIR\" >Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2014 Section 482 \u2014 Quashing Of FIR<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Ratio_Decidendi\" >Ratio Decidendi<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Key_Legal_Principles\" >Key Legal Principles<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Why_This_Judgment_Matters\" >Why This Judgment Matters<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Judicial_Duty_Vs_Procedural_Shortcut\" >Judicial Duty Vs. Procedural Shortcut<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Reinforcing_The_Bhajan_Lal_Principles\" >Reinforcing The Bhajan Lal Principles<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Impact_on_Stakeholders\" >Impact on Stakeholders<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#1_For_Litigants\" >1. For Litigants<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#2_For_Lawyers\" >2. For Lawyers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#3_For_High_Courts\" >3. For High Courts<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#4_For_Police_Authorities\" >4. For Police Authorities<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Stakeholder_Summary\" >Stakeholder Summary<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#A_Step_Toward_Judicial_Accountability\" >A Step Toward Judicial Accountability<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Editorial_Perspective\" >Editorial Perspective<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-fir-quashing-on-merits-section-482-crpc\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p>This judgment addresses a growing trend where courts, instead of engaging with the substance of the case, issue directions such as \u201cno coercive steps\u201d or \u201cfollow arrest guidelines,\u201d effectively postponing justice rather than delivering it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court\u2019s message is clear: judicial responsibility cannot be outsourced to procedural formalities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"legal-provisions-and-holding\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legal_Provisions_And_Holding\"><\/span>Legal Provisions And Holding<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"section-482-crpc-quashing-fir\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Code_Of_Criminal_Procedure_1973_%E2%80%94_Section_482_%E2%80%94_Quashing_Of_FIR\"><\/span>Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2014 Section 482 \u2014 Quashing Of FIR<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Exercise of inherent powers by High Courts<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Duty to decide on merits<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Impermissibility of disposal by directing compliance with arrest guidelines<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Held, High Courts must adjudicate petitions seeking quashing of FIRs on merits and cannot dispose of such petitions merely by directing police authorities to follow arrest guidelines or statutory procedures \u2014 Such an approach amounts to abdication of judicial responsibility \u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Reaffirmed, inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Practice of relegating parties to procedural safeguards without examining legality of FIR deprecated<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>High Courts directed to pass reasoned orders reflecting application of mind to facts and law<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"ratio-decidendi\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ratio_Decidendi\"><\/span>Ratio Decidendi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Judicial discretion under Section 482 CrPC cannot be substituted by executive compliance assurances; merits-based adjudication is mandatory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"key-legal-principles\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Legal_Principles\"><\/span>Key Legal Principles<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Area<\/th><th>Principle<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Criminal Procedure \u2014 Inherent Powers \u2014 Quashing Of FIR \u2014 Judicial Duty<\/td><td>High Courts are obligated to examine whether the allegations in the FIR disclose a cognizable offence or constitute abuse of process. Disposal of petitions by directing adherence to arrest guidelines, without adjudicating legality of proceedings, is unsustainable.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Criminal Law \u2014 Abuse Of Process \u2014 Preventive Jurisdiction<\/td><td>Section 482 CrPC is a safeguard against misuse of criminal machinery; courts must actively intervene where continuation of proceedings is unjustified.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Constitutional Principles \u2014 Separation Of Powers \u2014 Judicial Review<\/td><td>Courts cannot defer their adjudicatory function to executive authorities by issuing routine compliance directions.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Practice &amp; Procedure \u2014 Reasoned Orders<\/td><td>Orders must reflect judicial application of mind; cryptic disposal undermines fairness and accountability.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"why-this-judgment-matters\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_This_Judgment_Matters\"><\/span>Why This Judgment Matters<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>At the heart of the ruling lies Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)\u2014a provision that grants High Courts inherent powers to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Over time, however, a pattern emerged:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Petitions for FIR quashing were frequently disposed of without adjudication<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Courts relied on executive compliance mechanisms<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Litigants were left in legal uncertainty, with FIRs continuing to loom over them<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court has now decisively corrected this approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"judicial-duty-vs-procedural-shortcut\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judicial_Duty_Vs_Procedural_Shortcut\"><\/span>Judicial Duty Vs. Procedural Shortcut<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court emphasized that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>High Courts cannot avoid deciding whether an FIR is legally sustainable<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Directions to \u201cfollow guidelines\u201d do not resolve the core grievance of the petitioner<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Such disposal amounts to judicial abdication, not judicial discretion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>By insisting on merits-based adjudication, the Court has restored the true scope of Section 482 CrPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"reinforcing-bhajan-lal-principles\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reinforcing_The_Bhajan_Lal_Principles\"><\/span>Reinforcing The Bhajan Lal Principles<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Though not reinventing the law, the judgment reinforces the classic principles laid down in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, which outline when FIRs may be quashed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court implicitly reminds High Courts that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Bhajan Lal framework remains the governing standard<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Courts must evaluate whether:<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Allegations disclose an offence<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Proceedings are malicious or abusive<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Continuation would result in injustice<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Skipping this analysis is no longer acceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"impact-on-stakeholders\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Impact_on_Stakeholders\"><\/span>Impact on Stakeholders<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"for-litigants\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"1_For_Litigants\"><\/span>1. For Litigants<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Individuals seeking relief from false or motivated FIRs can now expect:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A definitive judicial determination<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Reduced uncertainty and prolonged litigation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"for-lawyers\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_For_Lawyers\"><\/span>2. For Lawyers<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The ruling provides:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Strong precedent to insist on merits-based hearings<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A tool to challenge non-speaking or evasive orders<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"for-high-courts\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_For_High_Courts\"><\/span>3. For High Courts<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Courts must now:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Deliver reasoned, speaking orders<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Engage substantively with legal issues<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Avoid routine or mechanical disposal<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"for-police-authorities\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"4_For_Police_Authorities\"><\/span>4. For Police Authorities<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The judgment clarifies that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Compliance with arrest guidelines cannot substitute judicial scrutiny<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Investigative powers remain subject to judicial oversight<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"stakeholder-summary-table\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Stakeholder_Summary\"><\/span>Stakeholder Summary<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Stakeholder<\/th><th>Key Impact<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Litigants<\/td><td>Definitive judicial determination; reduced uncertainty<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lawyers<\/td><td>Stronger precedent; ability to challenge non-speaking orders<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>High Courts<\/td><td>Duty to pass reasoned, speaking orders and avoid mechanical disposal<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Police Authorities<\/td><td>Subject to judicial scrutiny despite compliance with arrest guidelines<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"a-step-toward-judicial-accountability\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Step_Toward_Judicial_Accountability\"><\/span>A Step Toward Judicial Accountability<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>One of the most powerful aspects of the ruling is its emphasis on accountability in judicial decision-making.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By rejecting cryptic or evasive orders, the Supreme Court reinforces:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Transparency in judicial reasoning<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Confidence in the justice system<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The constitutional role of courts as guardians against misuse of power<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"editorial-perspective\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Editorial_Perspective\"><\/span>Editorial Perspective<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This decision is not merely procedural\u2014it is structural.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It recalibrates the balance between:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Judicial duty and executive function<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Substantive justice and procedural convenience<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In doing so, it sends a broader signal:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Courts exist to decide, not to defer.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"conclusion\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court\u2019s ruling marks a decisive shift in FIR quashing jurisprudence. By mandating that High Courts decide on merits rather than sidestep adjudication, it strengthens both individual rights and institutional integrity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For the legal system, this is more than a correction\u2014it is a reaffirmation of first principles:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Justice must not only be done, but must be decisively and transparently delivered.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Strong Message From The Supreme Court In a significant ruling that strengthens procedural justice, the Supreme Court has categorically held that High Courts must decide petitions for quashing FIRs on their merits, rather than disposing of them with routine directions to the police. This judgment addresses a growing trend where courts, instead of engaging<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[4798,28],"class_list":{"0":"post-17458","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-criminal-law","7":"tag-criminal-law","8":"tag-top-news"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}