{"id":22196,"date":"2026-04-21T05:07:03","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T05:07:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=22196"},"modified":"2026-04-21T05:10:10","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T05:10:10","slug":"delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court Allows Wife To Extract Sperm Of Army Soldier Husband In Persistent Vegetative State To Enable IVF Procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"main-title\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Does_The_Right_To_Parenthood_And_Reproductive_Choice_Continue_Even_When_The_Husband_Loses_Decision-Making_Capacity\"><\/span>Does The Right To Parenthood And Reproductive Choice Continue Even When The Husband Loses Decision-Making Capacity?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The Delhi High Court held that there is no legal bar on posthumous or incapacitated reproduction if prior consent is evident.<\/strong><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Does_The_Right_To_Parenthood_And_Reproductive_Choice_Continue_Even_When_The_Husband_Loses_Decision-Making_Capacity\" >Does The Right To Parenthood And Reproductive Choice Continue Even When The Husband Loses Decision-Making Capacity?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Case_Background\" >Case Background<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Courts_Legal_Analysis\" >Court\u2019s Legal Analysis<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Objective_Of_The_Law\" >Objective Of The Law<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Procedure_Vs_Justice\" >Procedure Vs. Justice<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#On_Medical_Uncertainty\" >On Medical Uncertainty<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Posthumous_Reproduction_Principle\" >Posthumous Reproduction Principle<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Key_Judicial_Observations\" >Key Judicial Observations<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Legality_Of_Gamete_Retrieval\" >Legality Of Gamete Retrieval<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Legal_Implications\" >Legal Implications<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Explanatory_Table_Laws_Provisions_Involved\" >Explanatory Table: Laws &amp; Provisions Involved<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Case_Details\" >Case Details<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Counsels\" >Counsels<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Key_Takeaways\" >Key Takeaways<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delhi-high-court-allows-wife-to-extract-sperm-of-army-soldier-husband-in-persistent-vegetative-state-to-enable-ivf-procedure\/#Disclaimer\" >Disclaimer<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p>:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"case-background\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Background\"><\/span>Case Background<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court, in a judgement dated 13 April 2026, delivered by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, dealt with a sensitive legal issue involving IVF and consent where the husband was in a vegetative state. The Court examined whether strict legal requirements should override the couple\u2019s earlier decision to have a child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The case started when a wife approached the court after her husband, an army personnel, suffered a severe brain injury and went into a persistent vegetative state. Before this unfortunate incident, the couple had already decided to have a child through IVF and had even started the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After the accident, the husband became incapable of giving fresh written consent, which created a legal hurdle under the Assisted Reproductive Technology law, forcing the wife to seek permission from the court to continue the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"legal-analysis\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Courts_Legal_Analysis\"><\/span>Court\u2019s Legal Analysis<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The court analysed the provisions of the Assisted Reproductive Technology law and clarified that although written consent is generally required, such procedural rules cannot be applied blindly when fundamental rights are at stake.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"objective-of-law\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Objective_Of_The_Law\"><\/span>Objective Of The Law<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cFor addressing the issues of reproductive health where assisted reproductive technology is required for becoming a parent or for freezing gametes, embryos or embryonic tissues for further use due to infertility, disease or social or medical concerns and for regulation and supervision of research and development and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"procedure-vs-justice\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Procedure_Vs_Justice\"><\/span>Procedure Vs. Justice<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cProcedure is indeed the handmaiden of justice.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>It emphasised that reproductive autonomy is part of the right to life under Article 21 and must be protected through a liberal interpretation of the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"medical-uncertainty\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"On_Medical_Uncertainty\"><\/span>On Medical Uncertainty<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cWhether or not the petitioner herein and her husband, Mr Kumar, are to beget a child is not in human hands. It is destiny that determines whether or not the fortune of parenthood shall get bestowed upon persons.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"posthumous-reproduction\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Posthumous_Reproduction_Principle\"><\/span>Posthumous Reproduction Principle<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cThere is no prohibition against posthumous reproduction if the consent of the sperm owner or egg owner can be demonstrated.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"key-observations\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Judicial_Observations\"><\/span>Key Judicial Observations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Earlier intention must be respected even if current consent cannot be obtained.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>IVF is a continuous process, not a single-step procedure.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Law should recognise continuity rather than isolating stages.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Unforeseen tragedy should not defeat prior reproductive decisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"gamete-legality\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legality_Of_Gamete_Retrieval\"><\/span>Legality Of Gamete Retrieval<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cIt was lawful for a doctor to retrieve his gametes and lawful for those gametes to be stored both before and after his death.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on these principles, the Court concluded that earlier participation in IVF treatment reflects valid consent, and the absence of fresh written consent due to medical incapacity cannot be used to deny the right to parenthood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"legal-implications\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legal_Implications\"><\/span>Legal Implications<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The ruling reinforces that fundamental rights, dignity, and intent will prevail over rigid procedural technicalities, while also leaving open an important legal question \u2014 whether such an interpretation will be equally applied if a man seeks similar relief in a reversed situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"explanatory-table\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Explanatory_Table_Laws_Provisions_Involved\"><\/span>Explanatory Table: Laws &amp; Provisions Involved<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Law \/ Provision<\/th><th>Purpose<\/th><th>How Applied in This Case<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 \u2013 Section 22(1)<\/td><td>Mandates written informed consent before IVF procedures<\/td><td>The court held this is procedural and cannot override prior consent already given through conduct (starting IVF)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 \u2013 Section 22(2)<\/td><td>Requires written consent for cryopreservation in case of incapacity or death<\/td><td>Relaxed due to exceptional facts; incapacity cannot defeat reproductive rights<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Constitution of India \u2013 Article 21<\/td><td>Guarantees right to life, dignity, and personal liberty<\/td><td>Interpreted to include reproductive autonomy and right to motherhood<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>X v. Principal Secretary, Health Dept., GNCTD (2023) 9 SCC 433<\/td><td>Recognizes reproductive choice as a fundamental right<\/td><td>Used to support liberal interpretation of ART Act in favour of the petitioner<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Gurvinder Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6902<\/td><td>Clarifies no legal prohibition on posthumous reproduction if consent exists<\/td><td>Applied to justify inferred consent in absence of written consent<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Simi Rajan v. Union of India (Kerala High Court, 2026)<\/td><td>Allowed gamete extraction when consent could not be obtained due to medical condition<\/td><td>Used as persuasive precedent for allowing sperm retrieval<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Y v. A Healthcare NHS Trust (UK, 2018)<\/td><td>Recognizes prior intention for reproduction even without express consent at later stage<\/td><td>Used to emphasize importance of intention and continuity of IVF process<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"case-details\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Details\"><\/span>Case Details<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Case Title:<\/strong> Ms X v. Union of India &amp; Ors.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Delhi High Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Case Number:<\/strong> W.P.(C) 4469\/2026<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Date of Judgment:<\/strong> 13 April 2026<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Bench:<\/strong> Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Neutral Citation:<\/strong> 2026:DHC:3086<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"counsels\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Counsels\"><\/span>Counsels<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For Petitioner:<\/strong> Mr Arjeet Gaur, Mr Atul Yadav, Mr Jasbir Singh Balhara, Mr Sidarth Yadav, Mr Prince Sharma, Mr Subhan Singh Sejwal, Mr Saurabh Bharti, Mr Mayank Dev, Mr Pawan Yadav, Ms Kiran, Ms Himanshi, Mr Himanshu Dutt, and Ms Deepshikha<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>For Respondents:<\/strong> Mr Ayush Gaur (SPC), Ms Riddhi Kapoor, Mr Harshit Joshi (Government Pleader)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"key-takeaways\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Takeaways\"><\/span>Key Takeaways<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Reproductive rights are being interpreted very broadly, where even absence of written consent is being overlooked based on presumed intention.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Courts are increasingly prioritising subjective intent over clear statutory safeguards, which can create scope for misuse in future disputes.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The principle that \u201cprocedure is secondary to rights\u201d may weaken legal protections that exist to prevent unauthorised use of a person\u2019s body or genetic material.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There is a clear risk of gender imbalance, as similar relief may not be equally accessible or interpreted in favour of men in reversed situations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Such interpretations raise serious concerns about consent, bodily autonomy, and legal certainty, especially when the individual is incapable of expressing their will.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"disclaimer\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Disclaimer\"><\/span>Disclaimer<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of \u201cShoneeKapoor.com\u201d or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>References:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does The Right To Parenthood And Reproductive Choice Continue Even When The Husband Loses Decision-Making Capacity? The Delhi High Court held that there is no legal bar on posthumous or incapacitated reproduction if prior consent is evident. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0} Case Background NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court, in a judgement dated 13 April 2026, delivered by<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1371,"featured_media":22195,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[921,28],"class_list":{"0":"post-22196","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-medico-legal","8":"tag-medico-legal","9":"tag-top-news"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/HC-Allows-Wife-to-Retrieve-Soldier-Husbands-Sperm-for-IVF.jpeg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1371"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22196"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22488,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22196\/revisions\/22488"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}