{"id":22444,"date":"2026-04-20T11:34:49","date_gmt":"2026-04-20T11:34:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=22444"},"modified":"2026-04-20T11:41:39","modified_gmt":"2026-04-20T11:41:39","slug":"madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/","title":{"rendered":"\u20b9100 Crore Disclosure Row: Madras High Court Notice To TVK Chief Vijay Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"100-crores-not-disclosed-judicial-red-flag-electoral-transparency\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Madras_High_Court_Flags_%E2%80%9CIrregularity%E2%80%9D_In_TVK_Chief_Vijays_Election_Affidavit\"><\/span>Madras High Court Flags \u201cIrregularity\u201d In TVK Chief Vijay\u2019s Election Affidavit<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Introduction: The Constitutional Weight Of Disclosure<\/strong><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#Madras_High_Court_Flags_%E2%80%9CIrregularity%E2%80%9D_In_TVK_Chief_Vijays_Election_Affidavit\" >Madras High Court Flags \u201cIrregularity\u201d In TVK Chief Vijay\u2019s Election Affidavit<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#Case_Details\" >Case Details<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#I_Factual_Matrix_The_Anatomy_Of_The_Alleged_Discrepancy\" >I. Factual Matrix: The Anatomy Of The Alleged Discrepancy<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#II_The_Statutory_Scheme_Mandatory_Disclosure_Under_Election_Law\" >II. The Statutory Scheme: Mandatory Disclosure Under Election Law<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#1_Representation_Of_The_People_Act_1951\" >1. Representation Of The People Act, 1951<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#2_Conduct_Of_Elections_Rules_1961\" >2. Conduct Of Elections Rules, 1961<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#3_Role_Of_Returning_Officer\" >3. Role Of Returning Officer<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#III_Constitutional_Jurisprudence_Voters_Right_To_Know\" >III. Constitutional Jurisprudence: Voter\u2019s Right To Know<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#Key_Supreme_Court_Precedents\" >Key Supreme Court Precedents<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#IV_Suppression_Vs_Discrepancy_A_Lawyers_Lens\" >IV. Suppression Vs. Discrepancy: A Lawyer\u2019s Lens<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#V_The_Income_Tax_Angle_Convergence_Of_Legal_Regimes\" >V. The Income Tax Angle: Convergence Of Legal Regimes<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#VI_Maintainability_Of_The_Writ_Petition\" >VI. Maintainability Of The Writ Petition<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#VII_Possible_Legal_Trajectories\" >VII. Possible Legal Trajectories<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#VIII_Broader_Democratic_Implications\" >VIII. Broader Democratic Implications<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#IX_Limits_Of_The_Current_Framework\" >IX. Limits Of The Current Framework<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity\/#Conclusion_Transparency_As_A_Democratic_Imperative\" >Conclusion: Transparency As A Democratic Imperative<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p>In electoral law, disclosure is not a formality \u2014 it is the lifeblood of democratic choice. The recent proceedings before the writ petition questioning the veracity of financial disclosures made by Vijay (popularly known as \u201cVijay\u201d) marks a critical moment in the continuing evolution of India\u2019s election jurisprudence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court&#8217;s pointed oral observation \u2014 <em>\u201c\u20b9100 crores not disclosed; this is an irregularity\u201d<\/em> \u2014 is far more than a passing remark. It is a judicial signal that the integrity of affidavit-based disclosures, a cornerstone of voter awareness, may have been compromised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"case-details\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Details\"><\/span>Case Details<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Case Title<\/strong><\/td><td>V. Vignesh v. Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) &amp; Ors.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Case No.<\/strong><\/td><td>WP No. 15673 of 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Citation<\/strong><\/td><td>\u2018\u20b9100 Crores Not Disclosed; This Is An Irregularity\u2019: Madras High Court While Issuing Notice On Plea Against TVK Chief Vijay (LiveLaw, 2026)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"factual-matrix-anatomy-of-discrepancy\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"I_Factual_Matrix_The_Anatomy_Of_The_Alleged_Discrepancy\"><\/span>I. Factual Matrix: The Anatomy Of The Alleged Discrepancy<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The writ petition, instituted by V. Vignesh, alleges <strong>material inconsistencies between election affidavits filed by Vijay from two constituencies<\/strong> \u2014 Perambur and Tiruchirappalli (East).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the threshold stage, the Division Bench comprising Chief Justice S.A. Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan found sufficient prima facie grounds to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Issue notice to the candidate<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Call for responses from the<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Involve the Income Tax Investigation Wing<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Core Allegation:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>An amount approximating \u20b9100 crores appears to have been omitted in one affidavit<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The same amount is disclosed or reflected differently in another affidavit<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This is not merely a discrepancy of accounting style; it potentially constitutes <strong>suppression of material facts<\/strong>, which strikes at the root of electoral transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"statutory-scheme-mandatory-disclosure\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"II_The_Statutory_Scheme_Mandatory_Disclosure_Under_Election_Law\"><\/span>II. The Statutory Scheme: Mandatory Disclosure Under Election Law<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"representation-of-people-act\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"1_Representation_Of_The_People_Act_1951\"><\/span>1. Representation Of The People Act, 1951<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Candidates must file a <strong>sworn affidavit (Form 26)<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>False statements or concealment attract <strong>criminal liability<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"conduct-of-elections-rules\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_Conduct_Of_Elections_Rules_1961\"><\/span>2. Conduct Of Elections Rules, 1961<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Prescribes format and scope of disclosures<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Requires detailing of:<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Movable assets<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Immovable assets<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Liabilities<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Financial interests<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"role-of-returning-officer\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_Role_Of_Returning_Officer\"><\/span>3. Role Of Returning Officer<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Scrutinizes nominations<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Cannot conduct a <strong>roving inquiry<\/strong> into correctness<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"constitutional-jurisprudence-voters-right\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"III_Constitutional_Jurisprudence_Voters_Right_To_Know\"><\/span>III. Constitutional Jurisprudence: Voter\u2019s Right To Know<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The foundation of disclosure requirements lies in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"key-supreme-court-precedents\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Supreme_Court_Precedents\"><\/span>Key Supreme Court Precedents<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\u00a0Established voter\u2019s <strong>right to know<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Reinforced free and fair elections<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Suppression can invalidate elections<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Core Principle:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Transparency is a constitutional mandate<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Voters must make informed choices<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"suppression-vs-discrepancy-legal-analysis\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"IV_Suppression_Vs_Discrepancy_A_Lawyers_Lens\"><\/span>IV. Suppression Vs. Discrepancy: A Lawyer\u2019s Lens<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th>Category<\/th><th>Nature<\/th><th>Legal Consequence<\/th><\/tr><tr><td>Innocent Discrepancy<\/td><td>Clerical errors, valuation differences<\/td><td>Often curable<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Material Suppression<\/td><td>Deliberate omission of assets<\/td><td>Serious legal consequences<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The figure involved \u2014 \u20b9100 crore \u2014 strongly tilts the matter toward <strong>materiality<\/strong>, which courts treat with far greater seriousness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"income-tax-angle-legal-convergence\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"V_The_Income_Tax_Angle_Convergence_Of_Legal_Regimes\"><\/span>V. The Income Tax Angle: Convergence Of Legal Regimes<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Source of funds scrutiny<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Consistency with tax filings<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Possible undisclosed income<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>This reflects a judicial approach where electoral integrity and fiscal transparency are interconnected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"maintainability-of-writ-petition\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"VI_Maintainability_Of_The_Writ_Petition\"><\/span>VI. Maintainability Of The Writ Petition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Election disputes are typically addressed post-results through election petitions. However, exceptions arise where:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Pre-election illegality is involved<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Urgent voter awareness is required<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Relief does not halt elections<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The present case fits within this limited exception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"possible-legal-trajectories\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"VII_Possible_Legal_Trajectories\"><\/span>VII. Possible Legal Trajectories<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Clarification<\/strong> \u2014 If discrepancy is explained<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Disclosure Direction<\/strong> \u2014 Updated affidavit ordered<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Election Petition<\/strong> \u2014 Post-result challenge<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Criminal Proceedings<\/strong> \u2014 False affidavit liability<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"broader-democratic-implications\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"VIII_Broader_Democratic_Implications\"><\/span>VIII. Broader Democratic Implications<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Increasing financial complexity in politics<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dependence on self-disclosure<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Limited verification mechanisms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Judicial intervention acts as a safeguard against misuse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"limits-of-current-framework\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"IX_Limits_Of_The_Current_Framework\"><\/span>IX. Limits Of The Current Framework<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Key Structural Issue:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>No real-time verification of affidavits<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Possible Reforms:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Cross-verification with tax databases<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Independent audit systems<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Stricter penalties<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"conclusion-transparency-democracy\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion_Transparency_As_A_Democratic_Imperative\"><\/span>Conclusion: Transparency As A Democratic Imperative<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Madras High Court has not delivered a verdict \u2014 it has issued a warning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Affidavits are not ritualistic documents<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Financial opacity invites scrutiny<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Public office demands transparency<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In the final analysis, this case is not about one candidate. It reaffirms a foundational democratic truth:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The right to contest elections is statutory \u2014 but the duty to be transparent is constitutional.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court Flags \u201cIrregularity\u201d In TVK Chief Vijay\u2019s Election Affidavit Introduction: The Constitutional Weight Of Disclosure In electoral law, disclosure is not a formality \u2014 it is the lifeblood of democratic choice. The recent proceedings before the writ petition questioning the veracity of financial disclosures made by Vijay (popularly known as \u201cVijay\u201d) marks a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":317,"featured_media":22447,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[4984],"tags":[4985,5160,28],"class_list":{"0":"post-22444","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-election-law","8":"tag-election-law","9":"tag-picks","10":"tag-top-news"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/madras-high-court-vijay-100-crore-affidavit-irregularity.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/317"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22444"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22448,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22444\/revisions\/22448"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22447"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}