{"id":23341,"date":"2026-05-03T02:51:13","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T02:51:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=23341"},"modified":"2026-05-03T02:55:37","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T02:55:37","slug":"marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Marital Rape in India: Constitutional Validity, Legal Framework &amp; Supreme Court Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<article id=\"marital-rape-constitutional-analysis-india\">\n\n  <h2 id=\"understanding-marital-rape\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Understanding_Marital_Rape\"><\/span>Understanding Marital Rape<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <p>Marital rape, broadly understood as non-consensual sexual intercourse by a husband with his wife, continues to remain one of the most debated and sensitive issues in Indian criminal law. While several jurisdictions across the world have recognized it as a violation of bodily autonomy and human dignity, Indian law still retains an exception that excludes such acts from the definition of rape.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Understanding_Marital_Rape\" >Understanding Marital Rape<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Constitutional_Status\" >Constitutional Status<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Article_14_Equality_Before_Law\" >Article 14: Equality Before Law<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Article_21_Right_to_Life_and_Personal_Liberty\" >Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Article_15_Prohibition_of_Discrimination\" >Article 15: Prohibition of Discrimination<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Judicial_Developments\" >Judicial Developments<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Legislative_Framework\" >Legislative Framework<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Statutory_Position\" >Statutory Position<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Limited_Recognition\" >Limited Recognition<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Civil_Remedies\" >Civil Remedies<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Judicial_Approach\" >Judicial Approach<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Challenges_and_Issues\" >Challenges and Issues<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Tension_With_Constitutional_Morality\" >Tension With Constitutional Morality<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Colonial_Origins\" >Colonial Origins<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Absence_of_Criminal_Remedy\" >Absence of Criminal Remedy<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Social_and_Cultural_Barriers\" >Social and Cultural Barriers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Concerns_of_Misuse\" >Concerns of Misuse<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Need_for_Judicial_Clarity\" >Need for Judicial Clarity<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Final_Observations\" >Final Observations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/marital-rape-in-india-constitutional-validity-legal-framework-supreme-court-debate\/#Footnotes_ILI_Style\" >Footnotes (ILI Style)<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n  <p>Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 provides that sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, provided she is not under eighteen years of age, does not constitute rape. This provision traces its origins to the colonial understanding of marriage, where consent was presumed to be irrevocably given upon entering into the marital relationship.<\/p>\n\n  <p>In contemporary constitutional discourse, however, such a presumption appears increasingly difficult to justify. With the expansion of fundamental rights jurisprudence particularly in relation to privacy, dignity, and autonomy the continued existence of this exception raises serious constitutional concerns. The issue has therefore evolved from being merely a matter of criminal law to a significant question of constitutional validity.<\/p>\n\n  <hr\/>\n\n  <h2 id=\"constitutional-status\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Constitutional_Status\"><\/span>Constitutional Status<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <p>The marital rape exception must be examined in light of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, especially Articles 14, 15, and 21.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"article-14-equality-before-law\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Article_14_Equality_Before_Law\"><\/span>Article 14: Equality Before Law<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>Article 14 ensures equality before law and equal protection of laws. The marital rape exception creates a distinction between married and unmarried women, where only the latter are afforded full protection under rape laws. This classification appears arbitrary, as it lacks a rational nexus with the object of the law, which is to protect individuals from non-consensual sexual acts.<\/p>\n\n  <p>The Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India emphasized that legal provisions rooted in patriarchal assumptions cannot be sustained in a constitutional framework committed to equality.\u00b2 In this light, the marital rape exception seems to rest on outdated notions of marriage that are inconsistent with modern constitutional values.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"article-21-right-to-life-and-personal-liberty\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Article_21_Right_to_Life_and_Personal_Liberty\"><\/span>Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>The scope of Article 21 has been significantly expanded to include the right to live with dignity, bodily integrity, and personal autonomy. In Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, the Supreme Court recognized the right to privacy as an intrinsic part of personal liberty, encompassing decisional autonomy in intimate matters.<\/p>\n\n  <p>Against this backdrop, the marital rape exception raises serious concerns. By presuming continuous consent within marriage, it effectively denies a woman control over her own body, thereby undermining her dignity and autonomy.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"article-15-prohibition-of-discrimination\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Article_15_Prohibition_of_Discrimination\"><\/span>Article 15: Prohibition of Discrimination<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>The exception disproportionately impacts women and reinforces structural inequality within marriage. It reflects a gendered understanding of marital relations, where the wife\u2019s consent is either assumed or rendered irrelevant. Such a position appears inconsistent with the constitutional mandate against discrimination on the grounds of sex.<\/p>\n\n  <hr\/>\n\n  <h2 id=\"judicial-developments\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judicial_Developments\"><\/span>Judicial Developments<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <p>The judiciary has, on certain occasions, attempted to address aspects of this issue.<\/p>\n\n  <ul>\n    <li><strong>Independent Thought v. Union of India:<\/strong> The Supreme Court read down Exception 2 to criminalize sexual intercourse with a wife below eighteen years of age.\u2074<\/li>\n    <li><strong>Hrishikesh Sahoo v. State of Karnataka:<\/strong> The constitutional validity of the exception is currently under consideration before the Supreme Court.<\/li>\n  <\/ul>\n\n  <p>This decision marked an important step, though it stopped short of addressing the broader question of marital rape. The outcome of the pending case is likely to have far-reaching implications for gender justice in India.<\/p>\n\n  <hr\/>\n\n  <h2 id=\"legislative-framework\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legislative_Framework\"><\/span>Legislative Framework<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <h3 id=\"statutory-position\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Statutory_Position\"><\/span>Statutory Position<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>Section 375 of the IPC defines rape but expressly excludes marital rape through Exception 2. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which replaces the IPC, retains this exception, thereby continuing the existing legal position.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"limited-recognition\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Limited_Recognition\"><\/span>Limited Recognition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>The law does recognize certain limited situations. Section 376B IPC penalizes sexual intercourse by a husband with his wife during separation. While this provision acknowledges the possibility of non-consensual acts within marriage, it does so only in exceptional circumstances.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"civil-remedies\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Civil_Remedies\"><\/span>Civil Remedies<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>In the absence of criminal recognition, victims may seek civil remedies. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, recognizes sexual abuse as a form of domestic violence and provides for protection and relief. Additionally, acts of marital rape may constitute cruelty and serve as grounds for divorce under personal laws.<\/p>\n\n  <p>However, it may be argued that these remedies are insufficient, as they do not carry the same deterrent effect or societal condemnation as criminal sanctions.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"judicial-approach\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judicial_Approach\"><\/span>Judicial Approach<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>Courts have generally adhered to the statutory framework. In Vivek Singh Bhadoriya v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2024), the High Court reiterated that, under existing law, sexual intercourse by a husband with his wife does not amount to rape.\u2077 Such decisions highlight the limitations of judicial intervention in the absence of legislative reform.<\/p>\n\n  <hr\/>\n\n  <h2 id=\"challenges-and-issues\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Challenges_and_Issues\"><\/span>Challenges and Issues<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <h3 id=\"tension-with-constitutional-morality\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tension_With_Constitutional_Morality\"><\/span>Tension With Constitutional Morality<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>One of the central challenges lies in reconciling the marital rape exception with constitutional morality. While society may hold varying views on the issue, constitutional principles prioritize individual dignity and autonomy over traditional norms.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"colonial-origins\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Colonial_Origins\"><\/span>Colonial Origins<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>The exception is a product of colonial-era legal thinking, particularly the doctrine of coverture, which treated a wife as subordinate to her husband. In a modern constitutional democracy, the continued reliance on such doctrines appears increasingly untenable.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"absence-of-criminal-remedy\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Absence_of_Criminal_Remedy\"><\/span>Absence of Criminal Remedy<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>The lack of criminal recognition leaves victims without adequate legal recourse. Civil remedies, though important, may not fully address the gravity of the harm involved.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"social-and-cultural-barriers\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Social_and_Cultural_Barriers\"><\/span>Social and Cultural Barriers<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>Marital rape remains deeply underreported. Social stigma, lack of awareness, and economic dependence often prevent women from seeking legal remedies. The normalization of forced sexual relations within marriage further complicates the issue.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"concerns-of-misuse\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Concerns_of_Misuse\"><\/span>Concerns of Misuse<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>A frequently raised concern is the potential misuse of laws criminalizing marital rape. However, similar concerns exist in relation to other offences, and the legal system addresses them through procedural safeguards rather than denying protection altogether.<\/p>\n\n  <h3 id=\"need-for-judicial-clarity\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Need_for_Judicial_Clarity\"><\/span>Need for Judicial Clarity<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n  <p>The absence of a definitive ruling from the Supreme Court has resulted in a lack of doctrinal clarity. Divergent judicial opinions reflect the ongoing tension between preserving marital institutions and protecting individual rights.<\/p>\n\n  <hr\/>\n\n  <h2 id=\"final-observations\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Observations\"><\/span>Final Observations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <p>The marital rape exception represents a significant inconsistency within Indian criminal law. It stands in contrast to the constitutional guarantees of equality, dignity, and personal liberty, which have been progressively interpreted by the judiciary.<\/p>\n\n  <p>While judicial pronouncements have expanded the scope of fundamental rights, the persistence of this exception reflects a gap between constitutional ideals and statutory law. The pending decision before the Supreme Court provides a crucial opportunity to address this issue and bring the law in line with contemporary constitutional values.<\/p>\n\n  <p>Ultimately, the question is not merely about criminalization, but about recognizing that marriage cannot be used as a justification to override an individual\u2019s autonomy. A legal framework that respects dignity and equality must ensure that consent remains central, irrespective of marital status.<\/p>\n\n  <hr\/>\n\n  <h2 id=\"footnotes\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Footnotes_ILI_Style\"><\/span>Footnotes (ILI Style)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n  <table border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"8\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n    <thead>\n      <tr>\n        <th>Reference No.<\/th>\n        <th>Citation<\/th>\n      <\/tr>\n    <\/thead>\n    <tbody>\n      <tr>\n        <td>1<\/td>\n        <td>Indian Penal Code, 1860, \u00a7 375 Exception 2.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n      <tr>\n        <td>2<\/td>\n        <td>Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n      <tr>\n        <td>3<\/td>\n        <td>Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n      <tr>\n        <td>4<\/td>\n        <td>Independent Thought v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 800.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n      <tr>\n        <td>5<\/td>\n        <td>Hrishikesh Sahoo v. State of Karnataka, W.P. (Crl.) Pending before Supreme Court.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n      <tr>\n        <td>6<\/td>\n        <td>Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n      <tr>\n        <td>7<\/td>\n        <td>Vivek Singh Bhadoriya v. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2024 SCC OnLine MP.<\/td>\n      <\/tr>\n    <\/tbody>\n  <\/table>\n\n<\/article>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Understanding Marital Rape Marital rape, broadly understood as non-consensual sexual intercourse by a husband with his wife, continues to remain one of the most debated and sensitive issues in Indian criminal law. While several jurisdictions across the world have recognized it as a violation of bodily autonomy and human dignity, Indian law still retains an<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1441,"featured_media":23335,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,101],"tags":[28,651],"class_list":{"0":"post-23341","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-constitutional-law","8":"category-woman-law","9":"tag-top-news","10":"tag-woman-law"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1000067290.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1441"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23341"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23428,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23341\/revisions\/23428"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}