{"id":24893,"date":"2026-05-27T07:56:56","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T07:56:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=24893"},"modified":"2026-05-27T07:59:48","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T07:59:48","slug":"hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 id=\"h-introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introduction\"><\/span>Introduction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement delivered by the <strong><a href=\"\/lawyers\/chennai.htm\">High Court of Judicature at Madras<\/a><\/strong> in <em>Firoz A Nadiadwala vs Seven Arts International Limited<\/em> is an important decision concerning copyright assignment, remake rights in cinematographic films, and the scope of rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_83 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Introduction\" >Introduction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Factual_and_Procedural_Background\" >Factual and Procedural Background<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Key_Events_in_the_Dispute\" >Key Events in the Dispute<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Dispute_Before_the_Court\" >Dispute Before the Court<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Major_Legal_Issues_Raised\" >Major Legal Issues Raised<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Important_Statutes_Discussed\" >Important Statutes Discussed<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Firoz_A_Nadiadwala_Vs_Seven_Arts_International_Limited\" >Firoz A Nadiadwala Vs Seven Arts International Limited<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\" >Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Issue_of_Assignment_Agreement\" >Issue of Assignment Agreement<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Validity_of_Assignment_Under_Section_19_of_the_Copyright_Act\" >Validity of Assignment Under Section 19 of the Copyright Act<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Powers_of_Attorney_and_Agency_Law\" >Powers of Attorney and Agency Law<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Reliance_on_Precedent\" >Reliance on Precedent<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Defendants_Reliance_on_Supreme_Court_Judgments\" >Defendant\u2019s Reliance on Supreme Court Judgments<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Final_Decision_of_the_Court\" >Final Decision of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#Point_of_Law_Settled_in_the_Case\" >Point of Law Settled in the Case<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dispute arose in relation to remake and derivative rights connected with the Malayalam cult films <em>\u201cRamji Rao Speaking\u201d<\/em> and <em>\u201cMannar Mathai Speaking&#8221;,<\/em> which later inspired the highly successful Hindi film franchise <em>\u201cHera Pheri&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement delivered on 24 April 2026 clarifies that at the stage of considering an application for rejection of a plaint, the Court is only required to determine whether the plaint discloses a cause of action and not whether the plaintiff will ultimately succeed in proving its claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court also examined issues relating to limitation; assignment of copyright under Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957; powers of attorney coupled with interest under the Indian Contract Act, 1872; and the legal effect of the death of one of several principals in an agency arrangement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-factual-and-procedural-background\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Factual_and_Procedural_Background\"><\/span>Factual and Procedural Background<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dispute relates to the Malayalam films <em>\u201cRamji Rao Speaking\u201d<\/em> and <em>\u201cMannar Mathai Speaking&#8221;,<\/em> which acquired substantial popularity and later inspired the Hindi remake <em>\u201cHera Pheri&#8221;,<\/em> released in 2000, and its sequel <em>\u201cPhir Hera Pheri&#8221;,<\/em> released in 2006.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff, <strong>Seven Arts International Limited<\/strong>, claimed that by virtue of an Assignment Agreement dated 12 May 2022, it acquired remake rights and derivative rights, including rights to create sequels, prequels, spin-offs, and adaptations in Hindi and other North Indian languages in relation to the original Malayalam films.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The assignment agreement was allegedly executed between original screenplay authors <strong>K.I. Siddique<\/strong> and <strong>M. Paul Michael<\/strong>, together with producer <strong>Mani C. <\/strong>Kappan and <strong>G.P. Vijayakumar<\/strong>, Managing Director of Seven Arts International Limited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Subsequently, disputes arose concerning the proposed production of <em>\u201cHera Pheri 3&#8243;.<\/em> The plaintiff alleged that the defendant, film producer <strong>Firoz A. Nadiadwala<\/strong>, was infringing the plaintiff\u2019s copyright and derivative rights in relation to the film franchise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A commercial suit was therefore instituted before the Madras High Court seeking remedies for copyright infringement. In response, the defendant filed Application No. 1827 of 2026 under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC, seeking rejection of the plaint on the grounds that it disclosed no cause of action and was barred by law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-events-in-the-dispute\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Events_in_the_Dispute\"><\/span>Key Events in the Dispute<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Event<\/th><th>Details<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Original Malayalam Films<\/td><td><em>Ramji Rao Speaking<\/em> and <em>Mannar Mathai Speaking<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Hindi Remake<\/td><td><em>Hera Pheri<\/em> (2000)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Sequel<\/td><td><em>Phir Hera Pheri<\/em> (2006)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Assignment Agreement<\/td><td>Executed on 12 May 2022<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Main Allegation<\/td><td>Infringement of remake and derivative rights<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Application Filed<\/td><td>Application No.1827 of 2026 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-dispute-before-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dispute_Before_the_Court\"><\/span>Dispute Before the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The principal dispute before the Court was whether the plaint deserved to be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendant argued that the plaint failed to disclose a valid cause of action because the assignment agreement did not actually confer enforceable rights upon Seven Arts International Limited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was contended that the assignment agreement identified <strong>G.P. Vijayakumar<\/strong> personally as the assignee and not the company itself. Therefore, according to the defendant, the plaintiff company lacked locus standi to sue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendant further argued that the suit was barred by limitation because the alleged remake films <em>\u201cHera Pheri\u201d<\/em> and <em>\u201cPhir Hera Pheri\u201d<\/em> had already been released years earlier in 2000 and 2006, respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was submitted that the present proceedings had been instituted after an inordinate delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendant also challenged the validity of the assignment agreement under Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957. It was argued that the agreement imposed conditions and obligations upon the assignors and therefore did not constitute a valid statutory assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An additional issue arose because one of the original assignors, <strong>K.I. Siddique<\/strong>, had passed away on 8 August 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendant contended that the power of attorney executed in favour of <strong>G.P. Vijayakumar<\/strong> stood automatically revoked under Section 201 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, upon the death of one of the principals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff, however, argued that the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC required the Court to assume the averments in the plaint to be true.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was submitted that the issue of limitation involved mixed questions of fact and law and could not be conclusively decided at the threshold stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff further argued that the production of <em>\u201cHera Pheri 3\u201d<\/em> constituted a continuing cause of action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-major-legal-issues-raised\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Major_Legal_Issues_Raised\"><\/span>Major Legal Issues Raised<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Whether the plaint disclosed a valid cause of action under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether Seven Arts International Limited had locus standi to institute the suit.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether the suit was barred by limitation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether the assignment agreement satisfied Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether the power of attorney stood revoked after the death of K.I. Siddique.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether the alleged infringement constituted a continuing cause of action.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-important-statutes-discussed\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Important_Statutes_Discussed\"><\/span>Important Statutes Discussed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Statute<\/th><th>Relevant Provision<\/th><th>Issue Involved<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/td><td>Order VII Rule 11<\/td><td>Rejection of plaint<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Copyright Act, 1957<\/td><td>Section 19<\/td><td>Validity of copyright assignment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Indian Contract Act, 1872<\/td><td>Section 201<\/td><td>Termination of agency on death of principal<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-firoz-a-nadiadwala-vs-seven-arts-international-limited\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Firoz_A_Nadiadwala_Vs_Seven_Arts_International_Limited\"><\/span>Firoz A Nadiadwala Vs Seven Arts International Limited<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Date of Order:<\/strong> 24 April 2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Particulars<\/th><th>Details<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Case Number<\/td><td>Application No.1827 of 2026 in C.S. (Comm Div) No. 267 of 2025<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Neutral Citation<\/td><td>2026: MHC: 1658<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Court<\/td><td>High Court of Judicature at Madras<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Honourable Judge<\/td><td>Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-reasoning-and-analysis-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court observed that paragraph 17 of the plaint specifically referred to the execution of the assignment agreement dated 12 May 2022 and also referred to a cease-and-desist notice issued on 27 December 2024 in relation to the announcement of \u201cHera Pheri 3&#8243;. Since the plaintiff asserted that the cause of action was continuing and recurring, the court held that limitation could not be conclusively determined at the preliminary stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court thus accepted the plaintiff\u2019s argument that limitation in the present case was a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence and adjudication during trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-issue-of-assignment-agreement\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Issue_of_Assignment_Agreement\"><\/span>Issue of Assignment Agreement<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court next considered the argument that Seven Arts International Limited was not a party to the assignment agreement. The defendant relied upon the principle that a company is a separate juristic entity distinct from its directors and officers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the court carefully examined the plaint and noted that the assignment agreement described G.P. Vijayakumar as managing director of Seven Arts International Limited. The plaint specifically asserted that the plaintiff company had acquired remake and derivative rights under the assignment agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justice Ramamoorthy held that for purposes of Order VII Rule 11 CPC, such assertions must be presumed to be correct. Whether the plaintiff would ultimately succeed in proving the assignment was a matter for trial and not a ground for rejection of the plaint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-validity-of-assignment-under-section-19-of-the-copyright-act\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Validity_of_Assignment_Under_Section_19_of_the_Copyright_Act\"><\/span>Validity of Assignment Under Section 19 of the Copyright Act<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court then examined the defendant\u2019s argument that the assignment agreement was invalid under Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 19 of the Copyright Act prescribes the mode and requirements for valid assignment of copyright. The defendant argued that Clauses 5 and 6 of the agreement imposed contingent obligations, and therefore the agreement did not qualify as a statutory assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Clause 5 allegedly required the assignors to initiate legal proceedings against third parties.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Clause 6 provided that only token consideration had been paid and the remaining consideration was contingent upon fulfilment of certain obligations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court refused to enter into a conclusive determination regarding the validity of the assignment at the stage of Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Justice Ramamoorthy held that such issues involve examination of contractual rights and obligations and require full adjudication either during final disposal of the suit or in appropriate proceedings where evidence can be considered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court observed that Section 55 of the Copyright Act permits the owner or assignee of copyright to seek remedies for infringement. Since the plaint asserted that the plaintiff was the assignee, the Court held that the plaint disclosed a sufficient cause of action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-powers-of-attorney-and-agency-law\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Powers_of_Attorney_and_Agency_Law\"><\/span>Powers of Attorney and Agency Law<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement also contains an important discussion on powers of attorney and agency law under Sections 201 and 202 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendant argued that because one of the principals, K.I. Siddique, had died, the power of attorney automatically stood revoked under Section 201 of the Contract Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court, however, referred to Section 202 of the Contract Act, which deals with \u201cagency coupled with interest&#8221;. Section 202 provides that where the agent has an interest in the subject matter of the agency, the agency cannot ordinarily be terminated to the prejudice of such interest even by death of the principal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court reproduced Illustration (a) in Section 202, which explains that where an agent has authority to sell property and recover debts from sale proceeds, such authority is not terminated by the death of the principal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court held that the assignment agreement and power of attorney required joint examination to determine whether the agency was coupled with interest. Such determination could not properly be made at the preliminary stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-reliance-on-precedent\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reliance_on_Precedent\"><\/span>Reliance on Precedent<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court also discussed the Division Bench judgement of the Madras High Court in <em>K.A. Meeran Mohideen vs Sheikh Amjad<\/em> reported in 2024 (5) CTC 613. In that case, the division bench held that the death of one of several principals does not necessarily terminate a contract of agency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court relied upon this precedent to reject the defendant\u2019s argument that the death of one assignor automatically extinguished all rights flowing from the arrangement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-defendant-s-reliance-on-supreme-court-judgments\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Defendants_Reliance_on_Supreme_Court_Judgments\"><\/span>Defendant\u2019s Reliance on Supreme Court Judgments<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendant relied upon several authorities, including <em>T. Arivandandam vs T.V. Satyapal<\/em> reported in (1977) 4 SCC 467 and <em>S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath<\/em> reported in (1994) 1 SCC 1, to argue that frivolous litigation should be rejected at the threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the Court distinguished those authorities and observed that the present case involved substantive disputes regarding assignment, copyright ownership, and contractual interpretation, which required adjudication on merits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court ultimately concluded that the defendant had attempted to equate \u201cdisclosure of cause of action\u201d with \u201cproof of cause of action&#8221;. According to the Court, a plaint cannot be rejected merely because the defendant disputes the strength or validity of the plaintiff\u2019s claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-final-decision-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Decision_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Final Decision of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Madras High Court dismissed the application seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court held that none of the objections raised by the defendant justified rejection of the plaint at the threshold stage. The issues relating to validity of assignment, limitation, agency, power of attorney, and enforceability of rights required detailed examination during the trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court therefore permitted the copyright infringement suit relating to remake and sequel rights connected with the \u201cHera Pheri\u201d franchise to proceed further before the Commercial Division.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-point-of-law-settled-in-the-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Point_of_Law_Settled_in_the_Case\"><\/span>Point of Law Settled in the Case<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement settles the important principle that while deciding an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the court is only concerned with whether the plaint discloses a cause of action and not whether the plaintiff can conclusively establish such cause of action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling further clarifies that disputes relating to the validity of copyright assignments under Section 19 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/copyright\/register.htm\">Copyright<\/a> Act, limitations in continuing infringement actions, and powers of attorney coupled with interest under Sections 201 and 202 of the Indian Contract Act ordinarily require detailed adjudication and cannot usually be decided summarily at the stage of rejection of plaint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision also reinforces that in intellectual property disputes involving film rights and derivative rights, courts should ordinarily permit matters to proceed to trial where complex contractual and factual issues are involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The judgement delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Firoz A Nadiadwala vs Seven Arts International Limited is an important decision concerning copyright assignment, remake rights in cinematographic films, and the scope of rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The dispute arose<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":24892,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[5149,28],"class_list":["post-24893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-intellectual-property","tag-intellectual-property","tag-top-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6.1 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Madras High Court allows the Hera Pheri 3 copyright suit to proceed, clarifying remake rights and copyright assignment law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Madras High Court allows the Hera Pheri 3 copyright suit to proceed, clarifying remake rights and copyright assignment law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-27T07:56:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-27T07:59:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1170\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"658\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\"},\"headline\":\"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-27T07:56:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-27T07:59:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1904,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/160101.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Intellectual Property\",\"Top News\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Intellectual Property\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/160101.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-27T07:56:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-27T07:59:48+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Madras High Court allows the Hera Pheri 3 copyright suit to proceed, clarifying remake rights and copyright assignment law.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/160101.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/160101.jpg\",\"width\":1170,\"height\":658,\"caption\":\"Hera Pheri 3 copyright case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Intellectual Property > Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake & Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\",\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\"},\"description\":\"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/ajayamitabhsuman\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"The Madras High Court allows the Hera Pheri 3 copyright suit to proceed, clarifying remake rights and copyright assignment law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment","og_description":"The Madras High Court allows the Hera Pheri 3 copyright suit to proceed, clarifying remake rights and copyright assignment law.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-05-27T07:56:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-27T07:59:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1170,"height":658,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305"},"headline":"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment","datePublished":"2026-05-27T07:56:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-27T07:59:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/"},"wordCount":1904,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg","keywords":["Intellectual Property","Top News"],"articleSection":["Intellectual Property"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/","name":"Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake &amp; Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-27T07:56:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-27T07:59:48+00:00","description":"The Madras High Court allows the Hera Pheri 3 copyright suit to proceed, clarifying remake rights and copyright assignment law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg","width":1170,"height":658,"caption":"Hera Pheri 3 copyright case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/hera-pheri-3-copyright-remake-rights-madras-high-court-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Intellectual Property > Hera Pheri 3 Copyright Battle: Madras High Court Protects Remake & Sequel Rights in Landmark 2026 Judgment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305","name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN"},"description":"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/ajayamitabhsuman\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/160101.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24893"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24893\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25090,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24893\/revisions\/25090"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}