{"id":25910,"date":"2026-06-11T12:29:35","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T12:29:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=25910"},"modified":"2026-06-11T12:44:54","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T12:44:54","slug":"slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/","title":{"rendered":"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 id=\"h-introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introduction\"><\/span>Introduction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The protection of packaging, labels, and overall trade dress has become increasingly important in modern commerce, particularly in the food and consumer goods industry where visual appearance significantly influences consumer choice. The decision of the Bombay High Court in <em>Anil Srichand Kundnani, Proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Tea Centre v. Pruthvi Ishwar Patel, Proprietor of Maa Bahucharaji Sales &amp; Anr.,<\/em> is an important ruling dealing with copyright in artistic labels and the law of passing off.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_84 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Introduction\" >Introduction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Factual_And_Procedural_Background\" >Factual And Procedural Background<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Key_Events_Timeline\" >Key Events Timeline<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Dispute_Before_The_Court\" >Dispute Before The Court<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Plaintiff_Contentions\" >Plaintiff Contentions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Defendants_Contentions\" >Defendants&#8217; Contentions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Core_Legal_Issues\" >Core Legal Issues<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\" >Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Court_Findings_on_Trade_Dress_Similarity\" >Court Findings on Trade Dress Similarity<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Admission_Through_Trademark_Opposition\" >Admission Through Trademark Opposition<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Ownership_and_Assignment_Deed_Objection\" >Ownership and Assignment Deed Objection<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Application_of_Rule_703_of_the_Copyright_Rules_2013\" >Application of Rule 70(3) of the Copyright Rules, 2013<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Similar_Defect_in_Defendants_Copyright_Registration\" >Similar Defect in Defendants&#8217; Copyright Registration<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Interpretation_of_Section_451_of_the_Copyright_Act_1957\" >Interpretation of Section 45(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Substantial_Similarity_Test_for_Copyright_Infringement\" >Substantial Similarity Test for Copyright Infringement<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Cropped_Artwork_and_Packaging_Discrepancies\" >Cropped Artwork and Packaging Discrepancies<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Goodwill_Reputation_and_Misrepresentation\" >Goodwill, Reputation and Misrepresentation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Key_Legal_Principles_Applied_by_the_Court\" >Key Legal Principles Applied by the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Precedents_Relied_Upon_by_the_Court\" >Precedents Relied Upon by the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Defendants_Reliance_on_Abdul_Cadur_Allibhoy_Case\" >Defendants&#8217; Reliance on Abdul Cadur Allibhoy Case<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Final_Decision_of_the_Court\" >Final Decision of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Point_of_Law_Settled\" >Point of Law Settled<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Key_Legal_Principles_Emerging_from_the_Judgment\" >Key Legal Principles Emerging from the Judgment<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#Case_Details\" >Case Details<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case involved allegations that the defendants had copied the overall packaging and artistic features of the plaintiff&#8217;s well-known \u201cUMANG\u201d tea products and marketed their own tea under the label \u201cUTSAHA\u201d. Apart from issues relating to copyright infringement and passing off, the dispute also raised interesting questions concerning the interplay between the Copyright Act, 1957, and the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the effect of refusal of trademark applications, ownership of artistic works, and the relevance of copyright registrations obtained by rival parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement is significant for businesses dealing with packaged goods, intellectual property practitioners, and brand owners because it reiterates that copyright protection extends not merely to ideas but to the manner in which those ideas are expressed through distinctive artistic arrangements and trade dress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-factual-and-procedural-background\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Factual_And_Procedural_Background\"><\/span>Factual And Procedural Background<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff, proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Tea Centre, claimed to have adopted the mark \u201cUMANG\u201d in 2009 for manufacturing and marketing premium packaged tea and related products. Over the years, several trademark registrations and applications relating to \u201cUMANG\u201d, \u201cUMANGAM\u201d, and associated device marks were obtained. The plaintiff also secured copyright registration in respect of one of the artistic labels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the plaintiff, the label and artwork had been conceived and created by him and had acquired substantial goodwill through continuous use and extensive sales. Sales turnover for the period from 2021 to 2024 was stated to be approximately \u20b919.58 crores.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In January 2024, the plaintiff allegedly discovered tea products marketed under the label \u201cUTSAHA\u201d. A complaint was lodged, and a cease-and-desist notice dated 15 February 2024 was issued to the defendants. Investigation revealed that the first defendant had applied for registration of the \u201cUTSAHA\u201d device mark on 27 June 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commercial IP Suit No. 434 of 2025 was instituted before the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court, seeking remedies for copyright infringement and passing off. On 14 June 2024, the Court granted ex parte ad interim protection restraining the defendants from using the impugned label and directed disclosure by the defendants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendants thereafter filed affidavits opposing continuation of the interim order. They alleged suppression of material facts by the plaintiff and contended that the plaintiff&#8217;s copyright registration itself was invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-events-timeline\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Events_Timeline\"><\/span>Key Events Timeline<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Year\/Date<\/th><th>Event<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>2009<\/td><td>Plaintiff adopted the \u201cUMANG\u201d mark for tea products.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>2021\u20132024<\/td><td>Sales turnover is claimed to be approximately \u20b919.58 crores.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>27 June 2023<\/td><td>Defendant applied for registration of the \u201cUTSAHA\u201d device mark.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>January 2024<\/td><td>Plaintiff discovered \u201cUTSAHA\u201d tea products in the market.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>15 February 2024<\/td><td>Cease-and-desist notice issued by the plaintiff.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>14 June 2024<\/td><td>The Bombay High Court granted ex parte ad interim protection.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>2025<\/td><td>Commercial IP Suit No. 434 of 2025 was instituted.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-dispute-before-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dispute_Before_The_Court\"><\/span>Dispute Before The Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The principal issue before the court was whether the defendants had copied the plaintiff&#8217;s original artistic work embodied in the \u201cUMANG\u201d tea label and whether such copying amounted to copyright infringement and passing off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff contended that the impugned \u201cUTSAHA\u201d packaging was a slavish reproduction of its own label and that the overall colour combination, arrangement of features, depiction of tea cups and cardamom, stylised fonts and trade dress had been copied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendants argued that the plaintiff had concealed material facts, including refusal of an earlier trademark application. They further submitted that the plaintiff was not the owner of copyright because the registration certificate mentioned another person as the author of the artistic work and no assignment deed had been produced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was also argued that the plaintiff&#8217;s copyright registration was invalid in view of Section 45 of the Copyright Act, 1957. According to the defendants, the common features such as green colour, teacups and cardamom were generic elements ordinarily used in tea packaging, and, therefore, no monopoly could be claimed over them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-plaintiff-contentions\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Plaintiff_Contentions\"><\/span>Plaintiff Contentions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The \u201cUTSAHA\u201d label copied the overall packaging and artistic features of the \u201cUMANG\u201d label.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The colour combination, trade dress, stylised fonts, teacups, and cardamom imagery were substantially reproduced.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The plaintiff had acquired substantial goodwill through continuous use and extensive sales.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The defendants&#8217; conduct amounted to copyright infringement and passing off.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-defendants-contentions\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Defendants_Contentions\"><\/span>Defendants&#8217; Contentions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The plaintiff had suppressed material facts, including refusal of an earlier trademark application.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The plaintiff was not the owner of the copyright because another person was shown as the author of the artistic work.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No assignment deed had been produced to establish ownership.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The copyright registration was allegedly invalid under Section 45 of the Copyright Act, 1957.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Features such as green colour, tea cups, and cardamom were generic elements commonly used in tea packaging.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No monopoly could be claimed over common packaging elements.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-core-legal-issues\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Core_Legal_Issues\"><\/span>Core Legal Issues<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Issue<\/th><th>Question Before The Court<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Copyright Infringement<\/td><td>Whether the \u201cUTSAHA\u201d label copied the plaintiff&#8217;s original artistic work.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Passing Off<\/td><td>Whether the defendants&#8217; packaging was likely to mislead consumers.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Ownership of Copyright<\/td><td>Whether the plaintiff could claim ownership despite authorship objections.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Validity of Registration<\/td><td>Whether the copyright registration suffered from legal defects.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Generic Features<\/td><td>Whether common tea-packaging elements could receive protection when arranged in a distinctive manner.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-reasoning-and-analysis-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Upon comparing the rival products, the Court found striking similarities between the competing labels. It observed that the background consisting of shaded green colour, the bed of cardamoms, the placement of the teacup, the stylised font, the colour arrangement and the positioning of various elements were almost identical. The court concluded that the dispute was not confined merely to common features such as teacups or cardamom but involved copying the entire trade dress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-court-findings-on-trade-dress-similarity\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Court_Findings_on_Trade_Dress_Similarity\"><\/span>Court Findings on Trade Dress Similarity<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Shaded green background<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bed of cardamoms<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Placement of the tea cup<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Stylized font design<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Colour arrangement<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Positioning of visual elements<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court held that copyright protects the expression of an idea and not the idea itself. While the concept of depicting tea and cardamom may be common, the particular manner in which those elements had been arranged and expressed constituted protectable artistic expression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-admission-through-trademark-opposition\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Admission_Through_Trademark_Opposition\"><\/span>Admission Through Trademark Opposition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An important circumstance noticed by the Court was that the defendants themselves had opposed registration of the plaintiff&#8217;s \u201cUMANGAM\u201d label by alleging deceptive similarity with their own label. According to the Court, such opposition amounted to an implicit admission that the rival artworks were deceptively similar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-ownership-and-assignment-deed-objection\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ownership_and_Assignment_Deed_Objection\"><\/span>Ownership and Assignment Deed Objection<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendants had argued that the copyright certificate showed a third party as the author and no assignment deed had been produced. The Court rejected this argument on the ground that such a defence had not been pleaded in the affidavits and could not be raised for the first time during oral arguments. Since ownership pleaded by the plaintiff had never been specifically denied, the defendants could not advance an entirely new case at the hearing stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-application-of-rule-70-3-of-the-copyright-rules-2013\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Application_of_Rule_703_of_the_Copyright_Rules_2013\"><\/span>Application of Rule 70(3) of the Copyright Rules, 2013<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court referred to Rule 70(3) of the Copyright Rules, 2013, which permits an owner of copyright to seek registration upon furnishing a no objection certificate from the author. Since registration had been granted, the court presumed, at the interlocutory stage, that all necessary documents had been produced before the registrar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-similar-defect-in-defendants-copyright-registration\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Similar_Defect_in_Defendants_Copyright_Registration\"><\/span>Similar Defect in Defendants&#8217; Copyright Registration<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Interestingly, the court noticed that the defendants&#8217; own copyright certificate also showed a third party as author, and no assignment deed had been placed on record. Therefore, the same objection raised against the plaintiff would equally affect the defendants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-interpretation-of-section-45-1-of-the-copyright-act-1957\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Interpretation_of_Section_451_of_the_Copyright_Act_1957\"><\/span>Interpretation of Section 45(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court then examined Section 45(1) of the Copyright Act, 1957, which requires a certificate from the Registrar of Trade Marks certifying that no identical or deceptively similar trademark application has been made by a third party. The Court held that the purpose of the proviso is to avoid conflict between competing claims over identical artistic works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the court, the expression used in Section 45 focuses on the similarity of artistic works and applications made by third parties. Since the trademark applications in question had been filed by the plaintiff itself and the objection raised by the Trade Marks Registry concerned the word mark \u201cUMANG\u201d under Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the copyright registration could not be regarded as invalid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-substantial-similarity-test-for-copyright-infringement\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Substantial_Similarity_Test_for_Copyright_Infringement\"><\/span>Substantial Similarity Test for Copyright Infringement<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court emphasised that copyright infringement is determined by applying the substantial similarity test. A lay observer examining both products would immediately notice the resemblance between them. The Court held that the defendants had failed to explain how such extensive similarities had arisen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-cropped-artwork-and-packaging-discrepancies\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Cropped_Artwork_and_Packaging_Discrepancies\"><\/span>Cropped Artwork and Packaging Discrepancies<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also observed that the defendants had obtained copyright registration only in respect of a cropped version of the artwork and not for the entire packaging actually used by them. Several features appearing on the actual packaging and resembling the plaintiff&#8217;s artwork were absent from the registered artwork. The absence of any explanation for this discrepancy persuaded the Court to infer dishonest conduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-goodwill-reputation-and-misrepresentation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Goodwill_Reputation_and_Misrepresentation\"><\/span>Goodwill, Reputation and Misrepresentation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court further held that the plaintiff had established goodwill and reputation in the market since 2009 and had demonstrated substantial sales figures. Consequently, use of deceptively similar artwork by the defendants constituted misrepresentation likely to cause damage to the plaintiff&#8217;s business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-legal-principles-applied-by-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Legal_Principles_Applied_by_the_Court\"><\/span>Key Legal Principles Applied by the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Issue<\/th><th>Court&#8217;s Finding<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Trade Dress Similarity<\/td><td>The entire trade dress was copied, not merely common elements.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Copyright Protection<\/td><td>Protects expression of an idea, not the idea itself.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Trademark Opposition<\/td><td>Opposition by defendants indicated admission of similarity.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Ownership Challenge<\/td><td>Cannot be raised for the first time during oral arguments.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Rule 70(3)<\/td><td>Registration is presumed valid at the interlocutory stage.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 45(1)<\/td><td>Designed to prevent conflicts regarding identical artistic works.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Infringement Test<\/td><td>Substantial similarity test applied.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Defendants&#8217; Packaging<\/td><td>Discrepancies suggested dishonest conduct.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Passing Off<\/td><td>Goodwill and reputation of plaintiff established.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-precedents-relied-upon-by-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Precedents_Relied_Upon_by_the_Court\"><\/span>Precedents Relied Upon by the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While considering authorities cited by the parties, the court referred to the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Sanjay Soya Private Limited v. Narayani Trading Company<\/em>, IA (L) No. 5011 of 2020, decided on 9 March 2021<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Hiralal Prabhudas v. Ganesh Trading Co.<\/em>, 1983 SCC OnLine Bom 284<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>ITC Limited v. Britannia Industries Limited<\/em>, 2023 SCC OnLine Mad 6972<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Colgate Palmolive Company v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. <\/em>Ltd, 2003 SCC OnLine Del 1005<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Xotik Frujus Pvt. Ltd. v. Bubalus Beverages<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Marico Ltd v. Zee Hygiene Products Pvt. <\/em>Ltd, IA(L) No. 24055 of 2021, decided on 25th November, 2022, by Bombay High Court<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Hugo Boss Trademark Management GmbH v. Sandeep Arora<\/em>, 2023:DHC:8930<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Jagdish Gopal Kamath v. Lime &amp; Chilli Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd.<\/em>, MANU\/MH\/0384\/2015<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Ltd.<\/em>, AIR 1960 SC 142<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Hygienic Research Institute Pvt. Ltd v. Chandan and Shah Trading LLP<\/em>, (2025) 1 HCC (Bom) 25<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-defendants-reliance-on-abdul-cadur-allibhoy-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Defendants_Reliance_on_Abdul_Cadur_Allibhoy_Case\"><\/span>Defendants&#8217; Reliance on Abdul Cadur Allibhoy Case<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendants had relied upon <em>Abdul Cadur Allibhoy v. Mahomedally Hyderally<\/em>, Vol. III Bombay Law Reporter 218. The Court held that the principles laid down therein were not applicable to the facts of the present case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-final-decision-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Decision_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Final Decision of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bombay High Court held that the plaintiff had established a strong prima facie case of copyright infringement and passing off. It found that the impugned \u201cUTSAHA\u201d label constituted a substantial and slavish reproduction of the plaintiff&#8217;s original \u201cUMANG\u201d artwork.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court confirmed the ad interim injunction granted on 14 June 2024 and made the interim application absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Consequently, the defendants were restrained from using the impugned label and from infringing the plaintiff&#8217;s artistic work and passing off their products as those of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-point-of-law-settled\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Point_of_Law_Settled\"><\/span>Point of Law Settled<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement reiterates that copyright protects the expression of an idea rather than the underlying idea itself. Common elements may individually be incapable of protection, but their distinctive arrangement and overall trade dress can constitute protectable artistic expression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision also clarifies that refusal of a trademark application does not automatically invalidate copyright registration under Section 45 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The proviso to Section 45 is concerned with conflicting claims by third parties and not with applications filed by the same applicant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling further emphasises the importance of the substantial similarity test and the perspective of an ordinary observer in determining copyright infringement. It reinforces that dishonest imitation of overall packaging and trade dress can give rise to both copyright infringement and passing off even where individual features are commonly used in the trade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-legal-principles-emerging-from-the-judgment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Legal_Principles_Emerging_from_the_Judgment\"><\/span>Key Legal Principles Emerging from the Judgment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Copyright protects the expression of an idea, not the idea itself.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A distinctive arrangement of common elements may qualify for copyright protection.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Overall trade dress and artistic presentation can constitute protectable expression.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Trademark refusal does not automatically invalidate copyright registration under Section 45 of the Copyright Act, 1957.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The substantial similarity test remains central to determining copyright infringement.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The perspective of an ordinary observer is relevant in assessing infringement.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Dishonest imitation of packaging and trade dress may amount to both copyright infringement and passing off.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-case-details\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Details\"><\/span>Case Details<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Particulars<\/th><th>Details<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title of the Case<\/strong><\/td><td>Anil Srichand Kundnani v. Pruthvi Ishwar Patel &amp; Anr.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Date of Judgment\/Order<\/strong><\/td><td>08 June 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Case Number<\/strong><\/td><td>Interim Application (L) No. 13908 of 2024 in Commercial IP Suit No. 434 of 2025, along with Interim Application No. 5393 of 2025<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Neutral Citation<\/strong><\/td><td>2026:BHC-OS:12554<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Name of Court<\/strong><\/td><td>High Court of Judicature at Bombay<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Name of the Honourable Judge<\/strong><\/td><td>Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/choose-correct-ip-law-india-copyright-trademark-patent-design\/\">How to Differentiate Whether a Case Should Be Initiated Under the Copyright Act, the Trade Marks Act, the Patents Act, or the Designs Act<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/geographical-indications-gis-in-india-law-landmark-cases-strategic-significance\/\">Geographical Indications (GIs) in India: Law, Landmark Cases &amp; Strategic Significance<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/constructs-of-criminal-liability-a-jurisprudential-and-critical-inquiry\/\">Constructs of Criminal Liability: A Jurisprudential and Critical Inquiry<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/guardian-of-origin-the-gi-act-of-1999\/\">Guardian of Origin: The GI Act of 1999<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/copyright-registration-process-in-india-a-complete-step-by-step-guide\/\">Copyright Registration Process in India: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The protection of packaging, labels, and overall trade dress has become increasingly important in modern commerce, particularly in the food and consumer goods industry where visual appearance significantly influences consumer choice. The decision of the Bombay High Court in Anil Srichand Kundnani, Proprietor of Bhagyalaxmi Tea Centre v. Pruthvi Ishwar Patel, Proprietor of Maa<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":25909,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[5149],"class_list":["post-25910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-intellectual-property","tag-intellectual-property"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.7 (Yoast SEO v27.8) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court explains copyright in trade dress, tea packaging, passing off, and artistic labels in the UMANG vs UTSAHA case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court explains copyright in trade dress, tea packaging, passing off, and artistic labels in the UMANG vs UTSAHA case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T12:29:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T12:44:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"737\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"474\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\"},\"headline\":\"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-11T12:29:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-11T12:44:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2280,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Capture-13.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Intellectual Property\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Intellectual Property\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/\",\"name\":\"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Capture-13.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-11T12:29:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-11T12:44:54+00:00\",\"description\":\"Bombay High Court explains copyright in trade dress, tea packaging, passing off, and artistic labels in the UMANG vs UTSAHA case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Capture-13.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/Capture-13.jpg\",\"width\":737,\"height\":474,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court trade dress copyright case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Intellectual Property > Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\",\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\"},\"description\":\"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/ajayamitabhsuman\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Bombay High Court explains copyright in trade dress, tea packaging, passing off, and artistic labels in the UMANG vs UTSAHA case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off","og_description":"Bombay High Court explains copyright in trade dress, tea packaging, passing off, and artistic labels in the UMANG vs UTSAHA case.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-06-11T12:29:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-11T12:44:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":737,"height":474,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/"},"author":{"name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305"},"headline":"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off","datePublished":"2026-06-11T12:29:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-11T12:44:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/"},"wordCount":2280,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg","keywords":["Intellectual Property"],"articleSection":["Intellectual Property"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/","name":"Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-11T12:29:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-11T12:44:54+00:00","description":"Bombay High Court explains copyright in trade dress, tea packaging, passing off, and artistic labels in the UMANG vs UTSAHA case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg","width":737,"height":474,"caption":"Bombay High Court trade dress copyright case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/slavish-reproduction-of-packaging-artwork-and-passing-off\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Intellectual Property > Slavish Reproduction of Packaging Artwork and Passing Off"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305","name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN"},"description":"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/ajayamitabhsuman\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Capture-13.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25910"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25918,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25910\/revisions\/25918"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}