{"id":27378,"date":"2026-07-08T07:03:13","date_gmt":"2026-07-08T07:03:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=27378"},"modified":"2026-07-08T07:10:06","modified_gmt":"2026-07-08T07:10:06","slug":"delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/","title":{"rendered":"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 id=\"h-introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introduction\"><\/span>Introduction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court\u2019s decision in <strong>Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Sudhir Bhatia &amp; Ors.<\/strong> is a significant ruling in trademark and copyright litigation because it strongly reinforces a familiar but important principle: where infringement or passing off is prima facie shown, an interim injunction should ordinarily follow, and mere delay by the plaintiff is not enough to protect a dishonest defendant. The case is especially relevant to businesses, brand owners, and litigants because it protects goodwill, trade dress, and packaging from imitation at the interim stage, when continued misuse can cause irreversible market harm.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_85 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Introduction\" >Introduction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Factual_and_Procedural_Background\" >Factual and Procedural Background<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Key_Findings_of_the_Single_Judge\" >Key Findings of the Single Judge<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Dispute_Before_the_Court\" >Dispute Before the Court<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Arguments_of_the_Appellants\" >Arguments of the Appellants<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Arguments_of_the_Respondents\" >Arguments of the Respondents<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\" >Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Final_Decision_of_the_Court\" >Final Decision of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Point_of_Law_Settled\" >Point of Law Settled<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Case_Information\" >Case Information<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#Disclaimer\" >Disclaimer<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-factual-and-procedural-background\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Factual_and_Procedural_Background\"><\/span>Factual and Procedural Background<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dispute arose out of the use of the mark and packaging associated with insecticides and repellents sold under the expression <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha&#8221;.<\/strong> The appellants, Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd and another, filed a suit for passing off and infringement of copyright, along with an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking an interim injunction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Single Judge of the High Court noted several facts that weighed heavily in favour of the appellants. The respondent had admittedly worked with the appellants before starting his own business.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-findings-of-the-single-judge\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Findings_of_the_Single_Judge\"><\/span>Key Findings of the Single Judge<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The appellants had produced advertisements from at least 1991 showing prior and prominent use of the phrase <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha&#8221;.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The respondent had not denied the appellants\u2019 assertion in a notice dated 28 February 1992 that the phrase was being used on their product.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The appellants also asserted copyright in the packaging containing the words <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha&#8221;.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The respondent did not explain why he adopted the expression <strong>\u201cMagic Laxman Rekha&#8221;.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In another suit and in an application before the Trade Mark Registry dated 30 May 1996, the respondent claimed continuous use from 1992.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On 31 July 2001, the Single Judge granted an interim injunction restraining the respondents, their agents, distributors, and others acting for them from manufacturing or selling insecticides, pesticides, or insect repellent under the name <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha\u201d<\/strong> and from using packaging with a similar colour scheme, get-up, background, and colour combination to that of the appellants\u2019 copyrighted packaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The respondents appealed. The Division Bench, while noting the facts recorded by the Single Judge, vacated the injunction by judgement dated 20 September 2001 on the ground that there had been delay and laches in filing the suit. It, however, directed the respondents to file regular accounts of sales in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-dispute-before-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dispute_Before_the_Court\"><\/span>Dispute Before the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The core issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Division Bench was right in setting aside the interim injunction merely because the appellants had allegedly delayed filing the suit, despite prima facie materials suggesting prior use, copyright ownership, and dishonest adoption of a similar mark and carton design by the respondents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-arguments-of-the-appellants\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Arguments_of_the_Appellants\"><\/span>Arguments of the Appellants<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>They were prior and prominent users of the mark <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha&#8221;.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>They had copyright in the relevant packaging.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The respondents copied the mark and trade dress after working with them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-arguments-of-the-respondents\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Arguments_of_the_Respondents\"><\/span>Arguments of the Respondents<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The appellants had delayed filing the suit.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The delay and laches disentitled the appellants from obtaining interlocutory relief.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-reasoning-and-analysis-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court held that the law was well settled: in cases of infringement of either trademark or copyright, an injunction normally should follow, and mere delay in approaching the court is not enough to defeat such relief. The court treated the interim stage as one where protection of legal rights and prevention of continued misuse were paramount, especially when the adoption of the mark itself appeared dishonest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A key factor for the Court was the respondent\u2019s association with the appellants before launching his own business. The court also relied on the appellants\u2019 advertisements from 1991 showing use of <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha\u201d<\/strong> on their products, together with the registered and renewed copyright in the mark <strong>\u201cLaxman Rekha&#8221;,<\/strong> effective from 19 November 1991 and renewed on 23 April 1999. These facts supported the conclusion that the appellants were prior users and had a protectable interest in the mark and packaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court further observed that the respondent initially used cartons with red, white, and blue colours in 1992 but later changed the carton to look almost identical to that of the appellants. The Court found that no explanation was offered for this change. That silence, combined with the visual similarity of the cartons, created a prima facie indication of dishonest intention to pass off the respondent\u2019s goods as those of the appellants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court therefore disagreed with the Division Bench\u2019s approach. It held that the Division Bench had erred in vacating the injunction solely on delay and laches, especially when the material on record showed prior use by the appellants and a prima facie dishonest adoption by the respondents. The Court restored the trial court\u2019s injunction and clarified that all observations made by the High Court and the Supreme Court were only prima facie and would not affect the final trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgement did not rely on an extended chain of precedents in the text provided, but it firmly reiterated the established equitable principle that dishonest imitation receives no indulgence at the interim stage. The Court\u2019s treatment of delay is important because it shows that laches cannot override a strong prima facie case of infringement or passing off, particularly where the defendant\u2019s conduct suggests bad faith.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-final-decision-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Decision_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Final Decision of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgement of the Division Bench, and restored the interim injunction granted by the trial court. The Court also clarified that all observations in the judgement were prima facie only and would not influence the final adjudication of the suit. No order as to costs was made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-point-of-law-settled\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Point_of_Law_Settled\"><\/span>Point of Law Settled<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This judgement reaffirmed that in trademark and copyright infringement cases, interim injunctions should ordinarily be granted when the plaintiff establishes a strong prima facie case, especially where the defendant\u2019s adoption of the mark or packaging appears dishonest. It also clarified that mere delay or laches, by itself, is not enough to deny injunction relief when continued misuse would undermine the plaintiff\u2019s rights and goodwill. The ruling remains widely cited for the proposition that equity does not protect dishonest imitation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-case-information\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Information\"><\/span>Case Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Particular<\/th><th>Details<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Title of the Case<\/strong><\/td><td>Midas Hygiene Industries P. Ltd and Anr. Vs Sudhir Bhatia and Ors.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Date of Judgment\/Order<\/strong><\/td><td>22.01.2004<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Case Number<\/strong><\/td><td>MANU\/SC\/0186\/2004<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Citation<\/strong><\/td><td>(2004) 3 SCC 90<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Name of Court<\/strong><\/td><td>Supreme Court of India<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Name of the Honourable Judge<\/strong><\/td><td>S.N. Variava and H.K. Sema, JJ.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Written By:<\/strong> Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman, IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney], High Court of Delhi<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-disclaimer\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Disclaimer\"><\/span>Disclaimer<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Images used herein do not reflect actual images used in Judgement, and the same are for illustrative purposes only. Readers are advised not to treat this as a substitute for legal advice, as it may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/negligence-in-healthcare-legal-implications-and-patient-rights\/\">Negligence In Healthcare: Legal Implications and Patient Rights<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/what-really-amounts-to-theft-a-simple-understanding-of-section-303-of-the-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita\/\">What Really Amounts to Theft? A Simple Understanding of Section 303 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/when-failure-is-not-fraud-criminalising-commercial-risk\/\">When Failure Is Not Fraud: Criminalising Commercial Risk<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/property-crimes-theft-vs-extortion-under-the-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-bns\/\">Understanding Property Crimes: Theft vs. Extortion under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/heinz-italia-v-dabur-india-supreme-court-on-trade-dress-passing-off\/\">Heinz Italia v. Dabur India: Supreme Court on Trade Dress &amp; Passing Off<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Sudhir Bhatia &amp; Ors. is a significant ruling in trademark and copyright litigation because it strongly reinforces a familiar but important principle: where infringement or passing off is prima facie shown, an interim injunction should ordinarily follow, and mere delay by the plaintiff<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[5873],"tags":[5969],"class_list":["post-27378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-trademark-law","tag-trademark-laws"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v28.0) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that delay cannot defeat interim injunctions in trademark, copyright infringement and passing off cases.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that delay cannot defeat interim injunctions in trademark, copyright infringement and passing off cases.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-08T07:03:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-08T07:10:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\"},\"headline\":\"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-08T07:03:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-08T07:10:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1190,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Trademark Laws\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Trademark Laws\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-08T07:03:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-08T07:10:06+00:00\",\"description\":\"Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that delay cannot defeat interim injunctions in trademark, copyright infringement and passing off cases.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trademark Laws > Midas Hygiene v Sudhir Bhatia (2004): Trademark Injunction Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\",\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\"},\"description\":\"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/ajayamitabhsuman\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that delay cannot defeat interim injunctions in trademark, copyright infringement and passing off cases.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption","og_description":"Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that delay cannot defeat interim injunctions in trademark, copyright infringement and passing off cases.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-07-08T07:03:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-08T07:10:06+00:00","author":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/"},"author":{"name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305"},"headline":"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption","datePublished":"2026-07-08T07:03:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-08T07:10:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/"},"wordCount":1190,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"keywords":["Trademark Laws"],"articleSection":["Trademark Laws"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/","name":"Delay Is No Defence in Dishonest Trademark Adoption - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-08T07:03:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-08T07:10:06+00:00","description":"Learn how the Supreme Court ruled that delay cannot defeat interim injunctions in trademark, copyright infringement and passing off cases.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/delay-is-no-defence-in-dishonest-trademark-adoption\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trademark Laws > Midas Hygiene v Sudhir Bhatia (2004): Trademark Injunction Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305","name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN"},"description":"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/ajayamitabhsuman\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27378"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27378\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27543,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27378\/revisions\/27543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}