{"id":27452,"date":"2026-07-15T05:16:49","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T05:16:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=27452"},"modified":"2026-07-15T05:25:15","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T05:25:15","slug":"supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 id=\"h-introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introduction\"><\/span>Introduction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Disputes over possession of property often escalate quickly, especially in family matters involving inheritance and shared homes. The Supreme Court\u2019s judgment in <strong>Mohd. Mehtab Khan v. Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan<\/strong> addresses a sensitive situation where a widow and her son sought urgent court help to regain possession of a flat and office after the sudden death of the family head.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_85 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Introduction\" >Introduction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Factual_and_Procedural_Background\" >Factual and Procedural Background<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Dispute_Before_the_Court\" >Dispute Before the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\" >Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Limits_on_Appellate_Interference\" >Limits on Appellate Interference<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Precedents_Relied_Upon\" >Precedents Relied Upon<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Final_Decision_of_the_Court\" >Final Decision of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Point_of_Law_Settled\" >Point of Law Settled<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Case_Details\" >Case Details<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Key_Legal_Principles\" >Key Legal Principles<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#Disclaimer\" >Disclaimer<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case highlights the delicate balance courts must strike when granting interim relief in summary proceedings under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This ruling is significant for litigants, lawyers, and property owners because it reinforces limits on appellate interference in discretionary orders and clarifies when mandatory interim injunctions\u2014orders requiring positive action like handing over possession\u2014should be granted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It serves as a practical guide for families, businesses, and authorities dealing with urgent possession disputes, emphasizing judicial restraint to prevent premature decisions that could prejudice the final trial outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision promotes fairness by protecting the trial court\u2019s role while ensuring justice is not delayed indefinitely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-factual-and-procedural-background\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Factual_and_Procedural_Background\"><\/span>Factual and Procedural Background<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dispute arose after the death of Ibrahim Khan in early December 2011.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">His third wife, Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan, and their son claimed they were residing in a flat at Noor-e-Jahan Complex, Kurla (West), Mumbai, and using an office at the Big 3 Building, Marine Lines, Mumbai.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to them, these properties belonged to Ibrahim Khan, with the flat gifted to the wife and a power of attorney for the office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While in Delhi for a wedding, Ibrahim Khan suffered a brain hemorrhage and passed away on 1 December 2011.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The family took his body to Bhagalpur, Bihar, for last rites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Upon returning to Mumbai, the plaintiffs alleged that certain relatives had forcibly taken possession of the flat and office by changing locks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They lodged a police complaint and filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking to recover possession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The trial court appointed a court receiver who inspected the premises and took formal possession of the flat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After considering detailed documents and pleadings from both sides, the trial court refused the plaintiffs\u2019 request for interim mandatory relief to be put back in possession, citing inconsistencies in their case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aggrieved, the plaintiffs appealed to the Bombay High Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The appellate bench reversed the trial court\u2019s order and directed the Receiver to hand over possession to the plaintiffs as agents of the Receiver.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This led to the appeal before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-dispute-before-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dispute_Before_the_Court\"><\/span>Dispute Before the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The core issue was whether the plaintiffs were entitled to immediate interim mandatory relief restoring possession pending the final decision in the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiffs argued they had been in lawful possession of the properties until illegally dispossessed shortly after Ibrahim Khan\u2019s death and needed urgent court intervention to prevent irreparable harm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The defendants, including sons from other marriages and other relatives, contended that the plaintiffs had separated from the deceased years earlier and were not in possession of the suit properties at the relevant time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They presented their own set of documents to support their claim of inheritance and continued occupation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The key factual question was whether the plaintiffs had established a strong enough case of recent dispossession to justify a mandatory interim order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Legally, the matter turned on the scope of appellate interference with a trial court\u2019s discretionary refusal of interim relief and the high threshold required for granting mandatory injunctions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-reasoning-and-analysis-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Reasoning_and_Analysis_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Reasoning and Analysis of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court carefully examined the principles governing interim relief in suits under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, which provides a summary remedy for recovery of possession when a person is dispossessed without consent within six months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court noted that such proceedings focus only on possession, not title or better rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court emphasized that granting mandatory interim relief\u2014requiring a party to hand over possession\u2014is rare and demands a much higher degree of satisfaction than prohibitory injunctions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It drew guidance from established principles requiring the plaintiff to show the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A strong case.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Risk of irreparable injury.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Balance of convenience.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-limits-on-appellate-interference\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Limits_on_Appellate_Interference\"><\/span>Limits on Appellate Interference<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A major part of the reasoning dealt with the limits of appellate interference in discretionary orders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court held that an appellate court should not substitute its own view merely because it might have reached a different conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Interference is justified only if the trial court\u2019s exercise of discretion is palpably incorrect, arbitrary, or untenable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As long as the trial court\u2019s view is a possible one based on the material, the appellate court should refrain from interfering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-precedents-relied-upon\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Precedents_Relied_Upon\"><\/span>Precedents Relied Upon<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court relied on several key precedents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Wander Ltd. v. Antox India (P) Ltd., 1990 Supp SCC 727<\/strong>, which laid down principles for appeals against discretionary orders on interim injunctions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Dorab Cawasji Warden v. Coomi Sorab Warden, (1990) 2 SCC 117<\/strong>, for the stringent standards of mandatory interim injunctions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court found that the trial court had reasonably considered the documents; noted inconsistencies in the plaintiffs\u2019 version (such as timing of alleged dispossession and addresses in records); and concluded that the entitlement to interim relief was in serious doubt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The High Court had erred by re-appreciating the same evidence and substituting its view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court stressed the need for judicial discipline to avoid interim orders that effectively decide the main suit prematurely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-final-decision-of-the-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Decision_of_the_Court\"><\/span>Final Decision of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court allowed the appeal with costs of Rs 50,000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It set aside the High Court\u2019s order granting interim relief and restored the trial court\u2019s order refusing the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court directed expeditious disposal of the main suit, preferably within six months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The costs were to be deposited in the SCBA Lawyers\u2019 Welfare Fund.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-point-of-law-settled\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Point_of_Law_Settled\"><\/span>Point of Law Settled<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This judgment reaffirms that appellate courts must show restraint while reviewing a trial court\u2019s discretionary order on interim injunctions, particularly mandatory ones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Interference is permissible only when the trial court\u2019s view is palpably incorrect or untenable, not merely because another view is possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It clarifies the high threshold for mandatory interim relief in possession suits and underscores the summary nature of Section 6 proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling is likely to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Reduce frivolous appeals against interim orders.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Promote faster trial of main suits.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Guide lower courts in balancing urgency with fairness in property disputes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-case-details\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Details\"><\/span>Case Details<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><th>Particulars<\/th><th>Details<\/th><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Title of the Case<\/strong><\/td><td>Mohd. Mehtab Khan and Others v. Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and Others<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Date of Judgment\/Order<\/strong><\/td><td>January 24, 2013<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Case Number<\/strong><\/td><td>Civil Appeal No. 678 of 2013<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Citation<\/strong><\/td><td>(2013) 9 Supreme Court Cases 221<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Name of Court<\/strong><\/td><td>Supreme Court of India<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Name of Honorable Judge<\/strong><\/td><td>P.Sathasivam and Ranjan Gogoi, JJ.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Written By<\/strong><\/td><td>Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman, IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney], High Court of Delhi<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-key-legal-principles\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Legal_Principles\"><\/span>Key Legal Principles<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act provides a summary remedy for recovery of possession.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Section 6 proceedings determine possession and not title.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Mandatory interim injunctions require a higher threshold than prohibitory injunctions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Appellate courts should not interfere with discretionary orders unless they are palpably incorrect, arbitrary, or untenable.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Judicial restraint is essential to avoid prejudging the final outcome of the suit.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-disclaimer\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Disclaimer\"><\/span>Disclaimer<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Disclaimer:<\/strong> Images used herein do not reflect actual images used in Judgement, and the same are for illustrative purposes only. Readers are advised not to treat this as a substitute for legal advice, as it may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/banks-liability-in-joint-accounts-a-landmark-ruling-on-the-either-or-survivor-mandate\/\">Bank&#8217;s Liability in Joint Accounts: A Landmark Ruling on the Either or Survivor Mandate<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/extradition-law-terrorism-legal-barriers-global-gaps-indias-struggle-for-justice\/\">Extradition Law &amp; Terrorism: Legal Barriers, Global Gaps &amp; India\u2019s Struggle for Justice<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/examining-the-competitive-effects-of-online-platforms\/\">Examining the Competitive Effects of Online Platforms<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/to-search-or-not-to-search-the-unceasing-confusion-surrounding-section-50-of-ndps-act\/\">To Search Or Not To Search: The Unceasing Confusion Surrounding Section 50 Of NDPS Act<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/adverse-possession-in-indian-law-key-aspects\/\">Adverse Possession in Indian Law: Key Aspects<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction Disputes over possession of property often escalate quickly, especially in family matters involving inheritance and shared homes. The Supreme Court\u2019s judgment in Mohd. Mehtab Khan v. Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan addresses a sensitive situation where a widow and her son sought urgent court help to regain possession of a flat and office after the sudden<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[1008],"class_list":["post-27452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-civil-law","tag-civil-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v28.0) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Supreme Court explains Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, mandatory interim injunctions, possession disputes, and appellate restraint.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court explains Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, mandatory interim injunctions, possession disputes, and appellate restraint.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-15T05:16:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-15T05:25:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-15T05:16:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-15T05:25:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1290,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Civil Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Civil Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-15T05:16:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-15T05:25:15+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Supreme Court explains Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, mandatory interim injunctions, possession disputes, and appellate restraint.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Civil Law > Mohd. Mehtab Khan v. Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan: Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Interim Injunctions in Property Possession Cases\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305\",\"name\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN\"},\"description\":\"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/ajayamitabhsuman\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"The Supreme Court explains Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, mandatory interim injunctions, possession disputes, and appellate restraint.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference","og_description":"The Supreme Court explains Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, mandatory interim injunctions, possession disputes, and appellate restraint.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-07-15T05:16:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-15T05:25:15+00:00","author":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/"},"author":{"name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305"},"headline":"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference","datePublished":"2026-07-15T05:16:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-15T05:25:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/"},"wordCount":1290,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"keywords":["Civil Law"],"articleSection":["Civil Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/","name":"Supreme Court on Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act: Limits on Mandatory Interim Injunctions &amp; Appellate Interference - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-15T05:16:49+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-15T05:25:15+00:00","description":"The Supreme Court explains Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, mandatory interim injunctions, possession disputes, and appellate restraint.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-section-6-specific-relief-act-mandatory-interim-injunction-property-possession\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Civil Law > Mohd. Mehtab Khan v. Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan: Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Interim Injunctions in Property Possession Cases"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/96ae33c2330691e5b3ccd88cf127a305","name":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b894b0814afe1239db393e20da4b2e76?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN"},"description":"Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United &amp; United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar &amp; Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/ajayamitabhsuman\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27452"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27452\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27950,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27452\/revisions\/27950"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}