{"id":28182,"date":"2026-07-19T07:27:38","date_gmt":"2026-07-19T07:27:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=28182"},"modified":"2026-07-19T07:37:11","modified_gmt":"2026-07-19T07:37:11","slug":"attaching-what-was-acquired-before-the-offence-examining-pmla-attachment-of-pre-offence-property","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/attaching-what-was-acquired-before-the-offence-examining-pmla-attachment-of-pre-offence-property\/","title":{"rendered":"Attaching What Was Acquired Before the Offence? Examining PMLA Attachment of Pre-Offence Property"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/span>Introduction<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Enforcement action under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (\u2018PMLA\u2019<\/strong>) has grown markedly more aggressive in recent years, especially with respect to the provisional attachment power conferred by Section 5. A question that keeps resurfacing is whether property acquired before a scheduled offense was even committed can be treated as \u2018proceeds of crime\u2019 or attached as property of equivalent value. This is not simply a matter of dates. It touches the fundamental design of the statute, the structure of its provisions, and how far interpretation may be stretched in enforcing economic-offence law.<\/p>

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n