{"id":28529,"date":"2026-07-27T07:50:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T07:50:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=28529"},"modified":"2026-07-27T07:58:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T07:58:13","slug":"deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 id=\"h-legal-issue\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legal_Issue\"><\/span>Legal Issue<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whether under a service rule that (i) fixes a maximum permissible period of probation and (ii) provides that if no order of confirmation, discharge, or reversion is issued within eight weeks of the expiry of that maximum period, the employee is deemed to have successfully completed probation\u2014such a rule falls within the line of authority recognizing &#8220;deemed confirmation&#8221; or within the line requiring a positive act of confirmation by the employer.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_85 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Legal_Issue\" >Legal Issue<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Short_Answer\" >Short Answer<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Legal_Principles\" >Key Legal Principles<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#III_The_Type_of_Provision_in_Question\" >III. The Type of Provision in Question<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Discussion\" >Discussion<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#The_Governing_Framework_%E2%80%94_Three_Lines_of_Authority\" >The Governing Framework \u2014 Three Lines of Authority<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Three_Categories_of_Deemed_Confirmation_Cases\" >Three Categories of Deemed Confirmation Cases<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Constitution_Bench_and_Subsequent_Authorities\" >Constitution Bench and Subsequent Authorities<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Legal_Principles-2\" >Key Legal Principles<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Three_Categories_of_Probation_and_Deemed_Confirmation\" >Three Categories of Probation and Deemed Confirmation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Category_One_%E2%80%94_No_Maximum_Period_Prescribed_No_Deemed_Confirmation\" >Category One \u2014 No Maximum Period Prescribed: No Deemed Confirmation<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Principle\" >Key Principle<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Category_Two_%E2%80%94_Maximum_Period_Prescribed_No_Further_Positive_Act_Required_Deemed_Confirmation\" >Category Two \u2014 Maximum Period Prescribed, No Further Positive Act Required: Deemed Confirmation<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Principle-2\" >Key Principle<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Category_Three_%E2%80%94_Maximum_Period_Prescribed_but_a_Positive_Act_Required_No_Deemed_Confirmation\" >Category Three \u2014 Maximum Period Prescribed but a Positive Act Required: No Deemed Confirmation<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Principle-3\" >Key Principle<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Comparison_of_the_Three_Categories\" >Comparison of the Three Categories<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#The_Karnataka_High_Courts_Application_of_the_Framework_%E2%80%94_Khazia_Mohammed_Muzammil_v_State_of_Karnataka_2010\" >The Karnataka High Court&#8217;s Application of the Framework \u2014 Khazia Mohammed Muzammil v. State of Karnataka (2010)<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Principles_from_Khazia_Mohammed_Muzammil\" >Key Principles from Khazia Mohammed Muzammil<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Comparison_of_the_Rule_Types\" >Comparison of the Rule Types<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Direct_Authority_on_a_Rule_of_This_Kind_%E2%80%94_Debrup_Hui_v_Union_of_India_2025\" >Direct Authority on a Rule of This Kind \u2014 Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Legal_Significance_of_Debrup_Hui_v_Union_of_India_2025\" >Legal Significance of Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Judicial_Distinction_Between_the_Precedents\" >Judicial Distinction Between the Precedents<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Application_of_the_Framework\" >Application of the Framework<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Key_Framework_Observations\" >Key Framework Observations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Analysis_Under_the_Satya_Narayan_Jhavar_Wasim_Beg_Framework\" >Analysis Under the Satya Narayan Jhavar \/ Wasim Beg Framework<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Opinion_on_Deemed_Confirmation\" >Opinion on Deemed Confirmation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#What_Counts_as_Deemed_Confirmation_%E2%80%94_and_What_Does_Not\" >What Counts as Deemed Confirmation \u2014 and What Does Not<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Counts_as_Deemed_Confirmation_Category_Two\" >Counts as Deemed Confirmation (Category Two)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Does_Not_Count_as_Deemed_Confirmation_Category_One\" >Does Not Count as Deemed Confirmation (Category One)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#Does_Not_Count_as_Deemed_Confirmation_Category_Three\" >Does Not Count as Deemed Confirmation (Category Three)<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-short-answer\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Short_Answer\"><\/span>Short Answer<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes, ordinarily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Where a rule contains express &#8220;deemed&#8221; language tied to a defined outer limit on probation (such as double the normal probationary period) and a further defined grace window (such as eight weeks) within which the employer may act, such a rule falls within the second of three recognized categories of probation rules identified by the Supreme Court in <em>High Court of M.P. v. Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em> and <em>Wasim Beg v. State of <\/em>U.P.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These are rules that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Fix a maximum period beyond which extension of probation is impermissible.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Do not condition confirmation on any further positive act by the employer, such as:\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A fitness assessment.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A departmental examination.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Any other formal order of confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is also the precise question decided on rule language of this kind in <em>Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/em>, where deemed confirmation was upheld.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-key-legal-principles\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Legal_Principles\"><\/span>Key Legal Principles<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Principle<\/th><th>Position<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Maximum probation period prescribed<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Express-deemed confirmation clause<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>The employer is required to issue confirmation order<\/td><td>No, if the rule itself provides deemed confirmation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Further fitness test or departmental examination required<\/td><td>No<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Applicable Supreme Court category<\/td><td>Second category of probation rules recognising deemed confirmation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Leading supporting precedent<\/td><td><em>Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-iii-the-type-of-provision-in-question\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"III_The_Type_of_Provision_in_Question\"><\/span>III. The Type of Provision in Question<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The provision under consideration is one which, in substance, states that a probationer should not be retained on probation beyond twice the normal prescribed period and that if no order confirming, discharging, or reverting the officer is issued within eight weeks of the expiry of that maximum period, the officer is deemed to have successfully completed probation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A provision of this kind was construed by the Calcutta High Court in <em>Debrup Hui (2025)<\/em> as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;If no order confirming, discharging, or reverting the probationer is issued within eight weeks after completion of double the prescribed period, the officer is deemed confirmed.&#8221; \u2014 <strong>Debrup Hui<\/strong>, Para 28<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-discussion\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Discussion\"><\/span>Discussion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-the-governing-framework-three-lines-of-authority\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Governing_Framework_%E2%80%94_Three_Lines_of_Authority\"><\/span>The Governing Framework \u2014 Three Lines of Authority<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctrine of &#8220;deemed confirmation&#8221; has been the subject of repeated consideration by the Supreme Court. The applicable test is entirely dependent on the language of the governing service rules rather than any freestanding principle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most authoritative synthesis is found in <em>High Court of Madhya Pradesh v. Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em>, (2001) 7 SCC 161, which organized the case law into three distinct categories:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;One line of cases is where in the service rules or the letter of appointment a period of probation is specified and power to extend the same is also conferred upon the authority without prescribing any maximum period of probation, and if the officer is continued beyond the prescribed or extended period, he cannot be deemed to be confirmed&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another line of cases is where, while there is a provision in the rules for initial probation and extension thereof, a maximum period for such extension is also provided beyond which it is not permissible to extend probation. The inference in such cases is that the officer concerned is deemed to have been confirmed upon expiry of the maximum period of probation in case, before its expiry, an order of termination has not been passed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The last line of cases is where, though under the rules, the maximum period of probation is prescribed, the same requires a specific act on the part of the employer by issuing an order of confirmation and of passing a test for the purposes of confirmation. In such cases, even if the maximum period of probation has expired and neither any order of confirmation has been passed nor the person concerned has passed the requisite test, he cannot be deemed to have been confirmed merely because the said period has expired.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-three-categories-of-deemed-confirmation-cases\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Three_Categories_of_Deemed_Confirmation_Cases\"><\/span>Three Categories of Deemed Confirmation Cases<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Category<\/th><th>Service Rule Position<\/th><th>Legal Consequence<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Category One<\/td><td>Probation period specified, with power to extend, but no maximum limit prescribed.<\/td><td>No deemed confirmation merely because the employee continues in service.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Category Two<\/td><td>Initial probation and extension permitted, but a maximum probation period is prescribed.<\/td><td>An employee is deemed confirmed if no termination order is passed before the expiry of the maximum period.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Category Three<\/td><td>The maximum probation period is prescribed, but confirmation requires a specific act such as an order of confirmation or passing a prescribed test.<\/td><td>No deemed confirmation unless the required positive act is completed.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-constitution-bench-and-subsequent-authorities\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Constitution_Bench_and_Subsequent_Authorities\"><\/span>Constitution Bench and Subsequent Authorities<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The same tripartite classification was independently arrived at by the Supreme Court in <em>Wasim Beg v. State of U.P.<\/em>, which traced the first (&#8220;deemed confirmation&#8221;) line to the Constitution Bench decision in <em>State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh<\/em>, [1968] 3 SCR 1, and the contrary (&#8220;no deemed confirmation absent a positive act&#8221;) line to <em>Sukhbans Singh v. State of Punjab<\/em> and its progeny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-legal-principles-0\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Legal_Principles-2\"><\/span>Key Legal Principles<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The doctrine of deemed confirmation depends entirely upon the wording of the applicable service rules.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There is no universal principle that continuation in service automatically results in confirmation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Supreme Court recognizes three distinct categories of probation cases.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where the rules prescribe a maximum probation period without requiring any further act, deemed confirmation may arise.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where the rules require a formal order of confirmation or fulfillment of additional conditions, mere expiry of the probation period does not confer confirmed status.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Constitution Bench decision in <em>State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh<\/em> remains the leading authority for the deemed confirmation doctrine.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-three-categories-of-probation-and-deemed-confirmation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Three_Categories_of_Probation_and_Deemed_Confirmation\"><\/span>Three Categories of Probation and Deemed Confirmation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The law relating to deemed confirmation during probation has evolved into three distinct categories based on the applicable service rules. The following discussion explains each category and the judicial principles governing them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-category-one-no-maximum-period-prescribed-no-deemed-confirmation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Category_One_%E2%80%94_No_Maximum_Period_Prescribed_No_Deemed_Confirmation\"><\/span>Category One \u2014 No Maximum Period Prescribed: No Deemed Confirmation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Where the rules permit extension of probation without fixing any outer limit, courts have consistently declined to infer confirmation merely from continuance in the post. This line includes <em>Sukhbans Singh v. State of Punjab<\/em> (1962), <em>G.S. Ramaswamy v. Inspector-General of Police<\/em> (1966), <em>State of U.P. v. Akbar Ali Khan<\/em> (1966), <em>Kedar Nath Bahl v. State of Punjab<\/em> (1974), and <em>Tarsem Lal Verma v. Union of India<\/em> (1997). This category is not directly relevant to a rule of the kind under consideration here, since such a rule does fix a maximum period\u2014double the normal prescribed probation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-principle\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Principle\"><\/span>Key Principle<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>No maximum probation period is prescribed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Probation may be extended indefinitely under the rules.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Continuation in service alone does <strong>not<\/strong> result in deemed confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-category-two-maximum-period-prescribed-no-further-positive-act-required-deemed-confirmation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Category_Two_%E2%80%94_Maximum_Period_Prescribed_No_Further_Positive_Act_Required_Deemed_Confirmation\"><\/span>Category Two \u2014 Maximum Period Prescribed, No Further Positive Act Required: Deemed Confirmation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the operative category for the present question. The foundational authority is the Constitution Bench decision in <em>State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;&#8230;when a first appointment or promotion is made on probation for a specific period and the employee is allowed to continue in the post after the expiry of the period without any specific order of confirmation, he should be deemed to continue in his post as a probationer only, in the absence of any indication to the contrary in the original order of appointment or promotion or the service rules&#8230; The reason is that such an implication is negatived by the service rule forbidding extension of the probationary period beyond the maximum period fixed by it. In such a case, it is permissible to draw the inference that the employee allowed to continue in the post on completion of the maximum period of probation has been confirmed in the post by implication.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <em>Dharam Singh<\/em> principle was subsequently applied in <em>Om Prakash Maurya v. U.P. Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation<\/em>, where Regulation 17 capped probation at two years:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Since Regulation 17 does not permit the continuation of an employee on probation for a period more than two years, the necessary result would follow that after the expiry of the two-year probationary period, the employee stands confirmed by implication. This is implicit in the scheme of regulations 17 and 18.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Wasim Beg v. State of U.P.<\/em> confirms that this line requires only (i) a fixed maximum beyond which extension is barred, and (ii) the absence of any rule to the contrary\u2014no further act, such as a test or fitness certification, is required to be performed by the employee or employer for confirmation to arise by operation of law:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;In those cases where the rules provide for a maximum period of probation beyond which probation cannot be extended, this court has held that at the end of the maximum probationary period there will be deemed confirmation of the employee unless the rules provide to the contrary.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-principle-0\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Principle-2\"><\/span>Key Principle<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A maximum probation period is expressly prescribed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Extension beyond that maximum is prohibited.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No further examination, fitness certificate, or confirmation order is required.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Confirmation arises automatically by implication after expiry of the maximum period.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-category-three-maximum-period-prescribed-but-a-positive-act-required-no-deemed-confirmation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Category_Three_%E2%80%94_Maximum_Period_Prescribed_but_a_Positive_Act_Required_No_Deemed_Confirmation\"><\/span>Category Three \u2014 Maximum Period Prescribed but a Positive Act Required: No Deemed Confirmation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The third category, while superficially similar to the second (a maximum period does exist), is distinguished by the presence of an additional substantive precondition to confirmation. <em>Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab<\/em> is the leading illustration: although Rule 7 fixed a maximum three-year probation, an Explanation to Rule 7(1) provided that the period would be deemed extended if the officer was not confirmed by its expiry, converting the maximum into a directory rather than a mandatory ceiling:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;&#8230;the provision regarding the maximum period of probation for three years is directory and not mandatory, unlike in Dharam Singh&#8217;s case (supra), and that a probationer is not in fact confirmed till an order of confirmation is made.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Similarly, in <em>Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em> itself, Rule 24 of the M.P. Judicial Service Rules conditioned confirmation on the probationer&#8217;s fitness and on passing prescribed departmental examinations and further empowered the Governor to dispense with services &#8220;at any time thereafter&#8221; if the probationer was found unsuitable. The Court held that reading a deemed confirmation into such a rule would render the Governor&#8217;s power under sub-rule (3) otiose and expressly overruled its earlier (contrary) decision in <em>Dayaram Dayal v. State of M.P.<\/em> (1997):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Mere expiry of the initial period of probation does not automatically have the effect of deemed confirmation&#8230; Rule 24, on a plain grammatical meaning being given to the words used therein, does not provide for a deemed confirmation on expiry of the maximum period of probation, and on the other hand, it contemplates a positive order of confirmation to be passed by the appropriate authority if the authority concerned is satisfied about the fitness of the probationer for confirmation and if the probationer has passed the departmental examination, as prescribed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Other decisions in this category \u2014 <em>Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Misra<\/em>, <em>Jai Kishan v. Commissioner of Police<\/em>, and <em>State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh Khosla<\/em> \u2014 similarly turned on rules requiring a departmental examination, a fitness assessment, or an equivalent positive act, none of which would be present in a rule of the kind under consideration here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-principle-1\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Principle-3\"><\/span>Key Principle<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A maximum probation period is prescribed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>However, confirmation depends upon an additional statutory requirement.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The additional requirement may include:\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Passing a departmental examination.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A fitness assessment.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A formal confirmation order.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Any other mandatory positive act prescribed by the rules.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Expiry of the probation period alone does <strong>not<\/strong> result in deemed confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-comparison-of-the-three-categories\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Comparison_of_the_Three_Categories\"><\/span>Comparison of the Three Categories<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Category<\/th><th>Maximum Period Prescribed<\/th><th>Positive Act Required<\/th><th>Deemed Confirmation<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Category One<\/strong><\/td><td>No<\/td><td>Not Applicable<\/td><td>No<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Category Two<\/strong><\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>No<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Category Three<\/strong><\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>No<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-the-karnataka-high-court-s-application-of-the-framework-khazia-mohammed-muzammil-v-state-of-karnataka-2010\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Karnataka_High_Courts_Application_of_the_Framework_%E2%80%94_Khazia_Mohammed_Muzammil_v_State_of_Karnataka_2010\"><\/span>The Karnataka High Court&#8217;s Application of the Framework \u2014 <em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil v. State of Karnataka (2010)<\/em><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court in <em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil<\/em> endorsed the fact- and rule-specific character of the doctrine, describing two competing streams without pronouncing a universal rule:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;&#8230;there can be deemed confirmation&#8217; after an employee has completed the maximum probation period provided under the Rules, whereupon his entitlement and conditions of service are placed at parity with the confirmed employee. Secondly, that there would be no deemed confirmation&#8230;&#8221; His period of probation remains in force till a written document of successful completion of probation is issued by the competent authority&#8230; it is not possible for this bench to state which view is the correct enunciation of law or otherwise&#8230; it will depend upon the facts of a given case and the relevant rules in force.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the facts before it, the Court held that Rule 5(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Probation) Rules, 1977, contained express negative language precluding deemed confirmation even after the maximum period:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;This Rule mandates that a probationer shall not be deemed to have satisfactorily completed the probation unless a specific order to that effect is passed. The rule does not stop at that but further more specifically states that any delay in issuance of order shall not entitle the probationer to be deemed to have satisfactorily completed his probation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A rule of the kind under consideration here contains no such negative language; on the contrary, it contains affirmative &#8220;deemed confirmed&#8221; language upon the expiry of a defined window, which places it on the opposite side of the line drawn in <em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-principles-from-khazia-mohammed-muzammil\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Principles_from_Khazia_Mohammed_Muzammil\"><\/span>Key Principles from <em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil<\/em><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The doctrine of deemed confirmation depends upon the specific statutory rule.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There is no universal principle applicable to every probation rule.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rules containing express negative language can prevent deemed confirmation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rules containing affirmative deeming provisions are treated differently.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-comparison-of-the-rule-types\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Comparison_of_the_Rule_Types\"><\/span>Comparison of the Rule Types<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Feature<\/th><th>Rule in <em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil<\/em><\/th><th>Rule Under Consideration<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Language regarding confirmation<\/td><td>Express negative language<\/td><td>Express &#8220;deemed confirmed&#8221; language<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Requirement of written order<\/td><td>Mandatory<\/td><td>Not required after expiry of the prescribed period<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Effect of delay<\/td><td>Delay does not create deemed confirmation<\/td><td>Expiry of the statutory period results in deemed confirmation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Legal position<\/td><td>Falls within the restrictive category<\/td><td>Falls on the opposite side of the principle recognised in the judgment<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-direct-authority-on-a-rule-of-this-kind-debrup-hui-v-union-of-india-2025\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Direct_Authority_on_a_Rule_of_This_Kind_%E2%80%94_Debrup_Hui_v_Union_of_India_2025\"><\/span>Direct Authority on a Rule of This Kind \u2014 <em>Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/em><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The precise question posed has already been answered by the rule language of this kind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Debrup Hui v. Union of India<\/em>, the Delhi High Court construed a provision worded in materially identical terms to the one under consideration and held that its express deeming language brings it within the first (<em>Dharam Singh<\/em>) category rather than the third (<em>Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em>) category:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;If no order confirming, discharging, or reverting the probationer is issued within eight weeks after completion of double the prescribed period, the officer is deemed confirmed&#8230; In light of this, it leaves no room for doubt that the petitioner&#8217;s services must be considered confirmed upon the expiry of the initial probationary period, and in any event, not later than four years and eight weeks from the date of joining.&#8221; \u2014 Paras 28, 31<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court further considered, and distinguished, the Union of India&#8217;s reliance on <em>State of U.P. v. Akbar Ali Khan (1966)<\/em>\u2014a Category One\/Three-type authority requiring a formal confirmation order\u2014on the specific ground that <em>Akbar Ali Khan<\/em> did not involve a rule containing express deeming language of the kind under consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Given the express provision contained in [the rule in question], the judgment in the Akbar Ali Khan case&#8230; has no application to the facts of the present case.&#8221; \u2014 Para 31<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Union&#8217;s reliance on <em>Bank of India v. Avinash D. Mandivikar (2005)<\/em>\u2014for the general proposition that a probationer does not become permanent by mere lapse of time absent a formal act of confirmation\u2014is subject to the same distinction: that proposition governs Category One and Category Three rules and does not displace the express deeming mechanism of a Category Two rule of the kind under consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-legal-significance-of-debrup-hui-v-union-of-india-2025\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legal_Significance_of_Debrup_Hui_v_Union_of_India_2025\"><\/span>Legal Significance of <em>Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/em><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Court interpreted a rule containing express deeming language.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The provision was held to fall within the <em>Dharam Singh<\/em> category.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Court recognized automatic confirmation upon fulfillment of the statutory conditions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Akbar Ali Khan<\/em> was distinguished because it involved no express deeming provision.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The principle in <em>Bank of India v. Avinash D. Mandivikar<\/em> was held applicable only to rules requiring formal confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-judicial-distinction-between-the-precedents\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judicial_Distinction_Between_the_Precedents\"><\/span>Judicial Distinction Between the Precedents<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Judgment<\/th><th>Nature of Rule<\/th><th>Court&#8217;s Finding<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil v. State of Karnataka (2010)<\/em><\/td><td>Rule containing express negative language<\/td><td>No deemed confirmation without a specific order.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Debrup Hui v. Union of India (2025)<\/em><\/td><td>Rule containing express deeming language<\/td><td>A probationer is deemed confirmed after the expiry of the prescribed statutory period.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>State of U.P. v. Akbar Ali Khan (1966)<\/em><\/td><td>Rule requiring formal confirmation<\/td><td>Held distinguishable because it lacked an express deeming provision.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Bank of India v. Avinash D. Mandivikar (2005)<\/em><\/td><td>General rule requiring formal confirmation<\/td><td>Applicable only to Category One and Category Three rules.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-application-of-the-framework\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Application_of_the_Framework\"><\/span>Application of the Framework<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Applying the <strong>Satya Narayan Jhavar \/ Wasim Beg<\/strong> taxonomy to a rule of the kind under consideration:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Feature of the Rule<\/th><th>Present?<\/th><th>Consequence Under the Framework<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Fixes a maximum\/outer limit on probation (e.g., double the normal period)<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>Takes the rule out of Category One (Sukhbans Singh line)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Requires a further positive act\u2014fitness assessment, departmental examination, or similar\u2014as a precondition to confirmation<\/td><td>No<\/td><td>Takes the rule out of Category Three (Shamsher Singh \/ Satya Narayan Jhavar line)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Contains express affirmative &#8220;deemed confirmed&#8221; language tied to a defined window (e.g., eight weeks) for employer inaction<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>Places the rule squarely in Category Two (Dharam Singh \/ Om Prakash Maurya line)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-framework-observations\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Framework_Observations\"><\/span>Key Framework Observations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The rule fixes a maximum or outer limit on the probation period.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It does <strong>not<\/strong> require any further positive act, such as a fitness assessment or departmental examination, before confirmation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It expressly provides for <strong>deemed confirmation<\/strong> if the employer fails to act within the prescribed period.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Accordingly, the rule falls within <strong>Category Two<\/strong> of the <em>Satya Narayan Jhavar \/ Wasim Beg<\/em> framework.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-analysis-under-the-satya-narayan-jhavar-wasim-beg-framework\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Analysis_Under_the_Satya_Narayan_Jhavar_Wasim_Beg_Framework\"><\/span>Analysis Under the Satya Narayan Jhavar \/ Wasim Beg Framework<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this analysis, a rule of this kind cannot be equated with the <strong>Shamsher Singh Explanation<\/strong> (which converted an apparently mandatory maximum into a directory one by deeming extension, not confirmation, on employer inaction) nor with <strong>Rule 24 of the M.P. Judicial Service Rules<\/strong> in <em>Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em> (which conditioned confirmation on fitness and examination).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead, such a rule&#8217;s own default position on employer inaction operates in the employee&#8217;s favor\u2014the opposite structural choice from <em>Shamsher <\/em>Singh\u2014which is the decisive textual feature that placed a rule of this kind within the deemed-confirmation category in <strong>Debrup Hui<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-opinion-on-deemed-confirmation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Opinion_on_Deemed_Confirmation\"><\/span>Opinion on Deemed Confirmation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A reading of the authorities discussed above appears to indicate that a rule providing that an employee is deemed to have successfully completed probation where no order of confirmation, discharge, or reversion is issued within eight weeks of the expiry of the maximum permissible period of probation falls within the category of service rules recognized by the Supreme Court as giving rise to deemed confirmation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unlike the rules considered in <em>Shamsher Singh<\/em> and <em>Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em>, such a rule does not make confirmation contingent upon the satisfaction of any further requirement, such as an assessment of fitness, the passing of a departmental examination, or the issuance of a substantive confirmation order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead, it prescribes a maximum permissible period of probation, beyond which continuation on probation is not contemplated, and further provides that where no order of confirmation, discharge, or reversion is issued within eight weeks of the expiry of that maximum period, the officer shall be deemed to have successfully completed probation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Read in light of the principles laid down in <em>State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh<\/em>, <em>Om Prakash Maurya<\/em>, <em>Wasim Beg,<\/em> and <em>Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em>, such a rule corresponds to the category of rules under which deemed confirmation arises by operation of the governing provision itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision of the Delhi High Court in <em>Debrup Hui<\/em>, which interpreted a provision of this kind, also adopts this construction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-what-counts-as-deemed-confirmation-and-what-does-not\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Counts_as_Deemed_Confirmation_%E2%80%94_and_What_Does_Not\"><\/span>What Counts as Deemed Confirmation \u2014 and What Does Not<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The following table summarizes the principles governing deemed confirmation under service jurisprudence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Category<\/th><th>Whether It Constitutes Deemed Confirmation<\/th><th>Key Principle<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Category Two<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><td>A maximum probation period is prescribed, and no further condition is required before confirmation takes effect.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Category One<\/td><td>No<\/td><td>No outer limit for probation exists, allowing probation to continue indefinitely.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Category Three<\/td><td>No<\/td><td>Although a maximum period exists, confirmation depends upon an additional statutory requirement or express confirmation order.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-counts-as-deemed-confirmation-category-two\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Counts_as_Deemed_Confirmation_Category_Two\"><\/span>Counts as Deemed Confirmation (Category Two)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The rule fixes a definite maximum probation period (e.g., double the normal period) beyond which extension is not permitted.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The rule states, or is silent in a way that does not negate, that confirmation follows automatically if no confirming, discharge, or reversion order is issued within the stated grace period after that maximum expires.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No further act \u2014 examination, fitness certification, or discretionary assessment \u2014 is made a precondition to confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-does-not-count-as-deemed-confirmation-category-one\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Does_Not_Count_as_Deemed_Confirmation_Category_One\"><\/span>Does Not Count as Deemed Confirmation (Category One)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The rule permits extension of probation without ever fixing an outer\/maximum limit, so mere continuance in post past any particular date carries no inference of confirmation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-does-not-count-as-deemed-confirmation-category-three\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Does_Not_Count_as_Deemed_Confirmation_Category_Three\"><\/span>Does Not Count as Deemed Confirmation (Category Three)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The rule fixes a maximum period, but an explanation or proviso treats non-action by the employer as extending probation rather than confirming the employee (as in <em>Shamsher Singh<\/em>).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The rule conditions confirmation on a further positive act\u2014such as passing a departmental examination, obtaining a fitness assessment, or the issuance of a specific confirmatory order\u2014regardless of how much time has elapsed (as in <em>Satya Narayan Jhavar<\/em> and the Karnataka Rules considered in <em>Khazia Mohammed Muzammil<\/em>).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The rule contains express negative language stating that delay in issuing an order does not entitle the probationer to be deemed confirmed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-63-copyright-act-supreme-court-rules-copyright-infringement-is-a-cognizable-and-non-bailable-offence\/\">Section 63 Copyright Act: Supreme Court Rules Copyright Infringement Is a Cognizable and Non-Bailable Offence<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/probation-of-offenders-act-1958-india\/\">Probation of Offenders Act, 1958: A Second Chance in Criminal Justice System<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/medical-negligence-consumer-protection-act-india-ima-vp-shantha-analysis\/\">Dance of Death before the Deity of Delusion: Medical Negligence and the CPA<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/indo-american-trade-deal-all-is-well-that-ends-well\/\">Indo-American Trade Deal: All Is Well That Ends Well<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/romeo-juliet-clause-pocso-consensual-relationships\/\">The Romeo\u2013Juliet Exception: Decriminalization of Consensual Adolescent Relationships.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Legal Issue Whether under a service rule that (i) fixes a maximum permissible period of probation and (ii) provides that if no order of confirmation, discharge, or reversion is issued within eight weeks of the expiry of that maximum period, the employee is deemed to have successfully completed probation\u2014such a rule falls within the line<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":369,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4864],"class_list":["post-28529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-administrative","tag-administrative-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.1 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Deemed confirmation during probation is explained with Supreme Court rulings by Satya Narayan Jhavar, Wasim Beg, and Debrup Hui (2025).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Deemed confirmation during probation is explained with Supreme Court rulings by Satya Narayan Jhavar, Wasim Beg, and Debrup Hui (2025).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-27T07:50:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-27T07:58:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mukesh Dosad\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mukesh Dosad\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mukesh Dosad\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/495bae9ea9c146211310be14cc6260e1\"},\"headline\":\"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-27T07:50:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-27T07:58:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3683,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Administrative law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Administrative Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/\",\"name\":\"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-27T07:50:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-27T07:58:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"Deemed confirmation during probation is explained with Supreme Court rulings by Satya Narayan Jhavar, Wasim Beg, and Debrup Hui (2025).\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Administrative Law > When Does a Probationer Become Deemed Confirmed? Supreme Court's Three-Category Test Explained\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/495bae9ea9c146211310be14cc6260e1\",\"name\":\"Mukesh Dosad\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9670cbcf7c8f04a7cc3d95e59b4ba55?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9670cbcf7c8f04a7cc3d95e59b4ba55?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9670cbcf7c8f04a7cc3d95e59b4ba55?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"Mukesh Dosad\"},\"description\":\"Mukesh is a dual-degree student of BBA LLB (Hons.) and BA Psychology (Hons.), passionate about law, human behavior, and societal change. His writings aim to simplify complex issues with clarity and insight. He is open to contributions, collaborations, and academic dialogue.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/mukeshdosad\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Deemed confirmation during probation is explained with Supreme Court rulings by Satya Narayan Jhavar, Wasim Beg, and Debrup Hui (2025).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained","og_description":"Deemed confirmation during probation is explained with Supreme Court rulings by Satya Narayan Jhavar, Wasim Beg, and Debrup Hui (2025).","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-07-27T07:50:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-27T07:58:13+00:00","author":"Mukesh Dosad","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mukesh Dosad","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Mukesh Dosad","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/495bae9ea9c146211310be14cc6260e1"},"headline":"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained","datePublished":"2026-07-27T07:50:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-27T07:58:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/"},"wordCount":3683,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"keywords":["Administrative law"],"articleSection":["Administrative Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/","name":"Deemed Confirmation During Probation: Supreme Court Principles, Satya Narayan Jhavar Test &amp; Debrup Hui (2025) Explained - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-07-27T07:50:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-27T07:58:13+00:00","description":"Deemed confirmation during probation is explained with Supreme Court rulings by Satya Narayan Jhavar, Wasim Beg, and Debrup Hui (2025).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/deemed-confirmation-during-probation-supreme-court-service-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Administrative Law > When Does a Probationer Become Deemed Confirmed? Supreme Court's Three-Category Test Explained"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/495bae9ea9c146211310be14cc6260e1","name":"Mukesh Dosad","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9670cbcf7c8f04a7cc3d95e59b4ba55?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9670cbcf7c8f04a7cc3d95e59b4ba55?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9670cbcf7c8f04a7cc3d95e59b4ba55?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"Mukesh Dosad"},"description":"Mukesh is a dual-degree student of BBA LLB (Hons.) and BA Psychology (Hons.), passionate about law, human behavior, and societal change. His writings aim to simplify complex issues with clarity and insight. He is open to contributions, collaborations, and academic dialogue.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/mukeshdosad\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/369"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28529"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28529\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28575,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28529\/revisions\/28575"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}