{"id":29470,"date":"2026-08-06T13:19:47","date_gmt":"2026-08-06T13:19:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=29470"},"modified":"2026-08-06T13:30:29","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T13:30:29","slug":"section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 id=\"h-introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introduction\"><\/span>Introduction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 173(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), ostensibly codifies the mandatory duty of the police to register a First Information Report (FIR) upon receipt of information disclosing a cognisable offence. However, the introduction of subsections (3) to Section 173 creates a statutory dilemma that potentially undermines this very mandate and places the victim&#8217;s right to access the criminal justice system in jeopardy. Section 173(3) permits the officer in charge of a police station to conduct a preliminary inquiry \u201cto ascertain whether there exists a prima facie case for proceeding in the matter\u201d in cases where the offence is punishable for three years or more but less than seven years of imprisonment, with the prior permission of an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_86 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Introduction\" >Introduction<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Conflict_Between_Section_1731_and_Section_1733\" >Conflict Between Section 173(1) and Section 173(3)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Key_Issues_Highlighted\" >Key Issues Highlighted<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Overview_of_Section_173_BNSS\" >Overview of Section 173 BNSS<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Provisions_of_Section_173_and_Its_Scope\" >Provisions of Section 173 and Its Scope<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Section_173_Information_in_Cognisable_Cases\" >Section 173: Information in Cognisable Cases<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Key_Features_of_Section_173_of_the_BNSS\" >Key Features of Section 173 of the BNSS<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Statutory_Analysis_of_Section_173\" >Statutory Analysis of Section 173<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Preliminary_Enquiry_Under_Section_1733\" >Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#A_Critical_Analysis_of_Section_1733\" >A Critical Analysis of Section 173(3)<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#31_%E2%80%9CWithout_Prejudice_to_the_Provisions_Contained_in_Section_175%E2%80%9D\" >3.1. &#8220;Without Prejudice to the Provisions Contained in Section 175&#8221;<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Section_175_Police_Officers_Power_to_Investigate_Cognisable_Case\" >Section 175. Police Officer&#8217;s Power to Investigate Cognisable Case<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Structural_Paradox_Between_Sections_173_and_175\" >Structural Paradox Between Sections 173 and 175<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Chronological_Analysis_of_the_Statutory_Powers\" >Chronological Analysis of the Statutory Powers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Magisterial_Intervention_Under_Section_1753\" >Magisterial Intervention Under Section 175(3)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Statutory_Drafting_Flaw\" >Statutory Drafting Flaw<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Comparative_Analysis_of_Sections_1733_1751_and_1753\" >Comparative Analysis of Sections 173(3), 175(1) and 175(3)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Key_Observations\" >Key Observations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#32_%E2%80%9COn_Receipt_of_Information_Relating_to_the_Commission_of_Any_Cognisable_Offence%E2%80%9D\" >3.2. &#8220;On Receipt of Information Relating to the Commission of Any Cognisable Offence&#8221;<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Major_Procedural_Gaps_Under_Section_1733\" >Major Procedural Gaps Under Section 173(3)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Key_Takeaways\" >Key Takeaways<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#33_%E2%80%9CWhich_Is_Made_Punishable_for_Three_Years_or_More_but_Less_Than_Seven_Years%E2%80%9D\" >3.3. \u201cWhich Is Made Punishable for Three Years or More but Less Than Seven Years,\u201d<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Key_Constitutional_Concerns\" >Key Constitutional Concerns<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#34_%E2%80%9CThe_Officer_in_Charge_of_the_Police_Station_May%E2%80%9D\" >3.4. &#8220;The Officer in Charge of the Police Station May&#8221;<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Procedural_Gaps_Created_by_the_Word_%E2%80%9CMay%E2%80%9D\" >Procedural Gaps Created by the Word &#8220;May&#8221;<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#35_%E2%80%9CWith_the_Prior_Permission_from_an_Officer_Not_Below_the_Rank_of_Deputy_Superintendent_of_Police%E2%80%9D\" >3.5. &#8220;With the Prior Permission from an Officer Not Below the Rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police&#8221;<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Issues_with_the_Prior_Permission_Mechanism\" >Issues with the Prior Permission Mechanism<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Summary_of_Constitutional_Objections\" >Summary of Constitutional Objections<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#36_Considering_the_Nature_and_Gravity_of_the_Offence\" >3.6. Considering the Nature and Gravity of the Offence<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Consequence_of_the_Sequence_of_Clauses_Is_Material_in_the_Context_of_Interpretation_of_the_Section\" >Consequence of the Sequence of Clauses Is Material in the Context of Interpretation of the Section<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#37_i_Proceed_to_Conduct_Preliminary_Enquiry\" >3.7. (i) Proceed to Conduct Preliminary Enquiry<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-32\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#38_To_Ascertain_Whether_There_Exists_a_Prima_Facie_Case_for_Proceeding_in_the_Matter\" >3.8. To Ascertain Whether There Exists a Prima Facie Case for Proceeding in the Matter<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-33\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#39_Within_a_Period_of_Fourteen_Days\" >3.9. Within a Period of Fourteen Days<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-34\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#310_The_Interpretation_of_%E2%80%9COr%E2%80%9D\" >3.10. The Interpretation of &#8220;Or&#8221;<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-35\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#311_ii_Proceed_with_Investigation_When_There_Exists_a_Prima_Facie_Case\" >3.11. (ii) Proceed with Investigation When There Exists a Prima Facie Case<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-36\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Interpretation_of_the_Term_%E2%80%9COr%E2%80%9D\" >Interpretation of the Term &#8220;Or&#8221;<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-37\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Procedural_Infirmities_and_Ambiguities_in_Section_1733_of_BNSS\" >Procedural Infirmities and Ambiguities in Section 173(3) of BNSS<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-38\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#i_Absence_of_Timelines\" >i) Absence of Timelines<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-39\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#ii_Lack_of_Reasoned_Orders_Communication\" >ii) Lack of Reasoned Orders &amp; Communication<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-40\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#iii_Undefined_Procedure_Powers\" >iii) Undefined Procedure &amp; Powers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-41\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#iv_Ambiguity_on_Power_of_Arrest\" >iv) Ambiguity on Power of Arrest<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-42\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#v_Evidentiary_Value_of_Materials\" >v) Evidentiary Value of Materials<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-43\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#vi_Deficit_of_Conclusion_Accountability\" >vi) Deficit of Conclusion &amp; Accountability<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-44\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Summary_of_Key_Procedural_Gaps_Under_Section_1733_BNSS\" >Summary of Key Procedural Gaps Under Section 173(3) BNSS<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-45\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Key_Procedural_Deficiencies_in_Section_1733_BNSS\" >Key Procedural Deficiencies in Section 173(3) BNSS<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-46\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-conflict-between-section-173-1-and-section-173-3\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conflict_Between_Section_1731_and_Section_1733\"><\/span>Conflict Between Section 173(1) and Section 173(3)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article advances that this subsection is conceptually and operationally at odds with the legislative intent behind Section 173(1). By statutorily inserting a &#8216;preliminary inquiry&#8217; requirement, the legislature has, in effect, conferred a discretion upon the police that is <em>ex facie<\/em> unfettered, unguided, and subject to arbitrary exercise. The determination of a prima facie case at the inception, without registration of an FIR, amounts to a pre-emptive adjudication of the complaint, thereby defeating the very purpose of an investigation, which is to unearth evidence. By inserting an unnecessary preliminary inquiry and multi-layered administrative steps under Section 173, the legislature bypassed this established, fair process to construct an artificial barrier between the victim and their fundamental rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-issues-highlighted\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Issues_Highlighted\"><\/span>Key Issues Highlighted<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 173(1) mandates registration of an FIR for cognisable offences.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Section 173(3) introduces a preliminary inquiry before FIR registration in specified cases.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The preliminary inquiry requires prior approval from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The provision grants broad police discretion that may be exercised arbitrarily.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Determining a prima facie case before FIR registration risks prejudging the complaint.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The additional procedural requirements may impede a victim&#8217;s access to the criminal justice system.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-overview-of-section-173-bnss\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Overview_of_Section_173_BNSS\"><\/span>Overview of Section 173 BNSS<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Provision<\/th><th>Key Requirement<\/th><th>Potential Concern<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Section 173(1) BNSS<\/td><td>Mandatory registration of an FIR upon receipt of information disclosing a cognisable offence.<\/td><td>Ensures prompt access to criminal investigation.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 173(3) BNSS<\/td><td>Permits a preliminary inquiry with prior DSP approval for offences punishable with three years or more but less than seven years.<\/td><td>May delay FIR registration and create an additional procedural barrier.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-provisions-of-section-173-and-its-scope\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Provisions_of_Section_173_and_Its_Scope\"><\/span>Provisions of Section 173 and Its Scope<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Before evaluating the legislative implications and operationality of Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter \u2018BNSS\u2019), it is necessary to outline the relevant statutory text. The provision reads as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-section-173-information-in-cognisable-cases\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Section_173_Information_in_Cognisable_Cases\"><\/span>Section 173: Information in Cognisable Cases<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Section 173. Information in cognisable cases.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(1)<\/strong> All information relating to the commission of a cognisable offence, irrespective of the area where the offence is committed, may be given orally or by electronic communication to an officer in charge of a police station, and if given\u2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>(i)<\/strong> orally, it shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction and be read over to the informant; and every such information, whether given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(ii)<\/strong> by electronic communication, it shall be taken on record by him on being signed within three days by the person giving it,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the State Government may by rules prescribe in this behalf:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Provided that<\/strong> if the information is given by the woman against whom an offence under section 64, section 65, section 66, section 67, section 68, section 69, section 70, section 71, section 74, section 75, section 76, section 77, section 78, section 79 or section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, is alleged to have been committed or attempted, then such information shall be recorded by a woman police officer or any woman officer:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Provided further that\u2014<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>(a)<\/strong> in the event that the person against whom an offence under section 64, section 65, section 66, section 67, section 68, section 69, section 70, section 71, section 74, section 75, section 76, section 77, section 78, section 79 or section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is alleged to have been committed or attempted, is temporarily or permanently mentally or physically disabled, then such information shall be recorded by a police officer, at the residence of the person seeking to report such offence or at a convenient place of such person&#8217;s choice, in the presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(b)<\/strong> the recording of such information shall be videographed;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(c)<\/strong> The police officer shall get the statement of the person recorded by a magistrate under clause (a) of sub-section (6) of section 183 as soon as possible.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(2)<\/strong> A copy of the information as recorded under subsection (1) shall be given forthwith, free of cost, to the informant or the victim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(3)<\/strong> Without prejudice to the provisions contained in section 175, on receipt of information relating to the commission of any cognizable offence, which is made punishable for three years or more but less than seven years, the officer in charge of the police station may with the prior permission from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, considering the nature and gravity of the offence,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>(i)<\/strong> proceed to conduct a preliminary enquiry to ascertain whether there exists a <em>prima facie<\/em> case for proceeding in the matter within a period of fourteen days; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(ii)<\/strong> proceed with investigation when there exists a <em>prima facie<\/em> case.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(4)<\/strong> Any person aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the information referred to in sub-section (1) may send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned, who, if satisfied that such information discloses the commission of a cognisable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by this Sanhita, and such officer shall have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence, failing which such aggrieved person may make an application to the Magistrate.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-key-features-of-section-173-of-the-bnss\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Features_of_Section_173_of_the_BNSS\"><\/span>Key Features of Section 173 of the BNSS<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Sub-section<\/th><th>Key Provision<\/th><th>Purpose<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Section 173(1)<\/td><td>Recording of information relating to cognisable offences<\/td><td>Ensures mandatory recording of information and recognition of electronic complaints.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 173(2)<\/td><td>Free copy of recorded information<\/td><td>Protects the rights of the informant and victim.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 173(3)<\/td><td>Preliminary enquiry for offences punishable between three and seven years<\/td><td>Permits limited preliminary enquiry before registration of an FIR.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 173(4)<\/td><td>Remedy against refusal to register information<\/td><td>Provides administrative and judicial remedies.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-statutory-analysis-of-section-173\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Statutory_Analysis_of_Section_173\"><\/span>Statutory Analysis of Section 173<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An overall reconstruction of Section 173 of the BNSS reveals that the statute has adopted a qualified mandatory framework for recording information regarding cognisable offences and supplying a copy of that recorded information to the informant, a process that carries over the core rules of the former Section 154 of the CrPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, Section 173(3) categorises cognisable offences based on the quantum of punishment, thereby making specific offences subject to a preliminary enquiry by a police officer prior to the registration of an FIR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Further, Section 173(4) outlines the default remedy when such information is refused, establishing a two-tiered mechanism:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The first tier vests initial discretion in the executive.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The second tier culminates in judicial scrutiny through an application to the magistrate.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-preliminary-enquiry-under-section-173-3\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Preliminary_Enquiry_Under_Section_1733\"><\/span>Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The BNSS, 2023, by way of Section 173(3), has introduced the concept of a <strong>&#8216;preliminary enquiry&#8217;<\/strong> and prescribed its procedure for specific cognisable offences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The legislative wisdom behind incorporating this provision, along with its operational framework and inherent lacunae, is critically examined below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-a-critical-analysis-of-section-173-3\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Critical_Analysis_of_Section_1733\"><\/span>A Critical Analysis of Section 173(3)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-1-without-prejudice-to-the-provisions-contained-in-section-175\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"31_%E2%80%9CWithout_Prejudice_to_the_Provisions_Contained_in_Section_175%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>3.1. &#8220;Without Prejudice to the Provisions Contained in Section 175&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Statutorily, while there is no structural impediment explicitly visible within the text of Section 173 itself, a holistic evaluation of its interaction with Section 175 is required to uncover potential operational friction. Section 175 BNSS represents a major reconstruction of Section 156 of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). In adopting the old framework, the legislature added a new proviso clause to sub-section (1), retained sub-section (2) intact, and introduced stringent, restrictive criteria for the magistrate&#8217;s investigative orders under sub-section (3). Furthermore, subsection (4) was inserted to govern investigations against public servants acting in their official capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To critique the operational boundaries of the preliminary inquiry, only the provisions of Sections 175(1) and 175(3) are directly relevant and reproduced below:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-section-175-police-officer-s-power-to-investigate-cognisable-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Section_175_Police_Officers_Power_to_Investigate_Cognisable_Case\"><\/span>Section 175. Police Officer&#8217;s Power to Investigate Cognisable Case<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(1)<\/strong> Any officer in charge of a police station may, without the order of a magistrate, investigate any cognisable case which a court having jurisdiction over the local area within the limits of such station would have power to enquire into or try under the provisions of Chapter XIV:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Provided that,<\/strong> considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the Superintendent of Police may require the Deputy Superintendent of Police to investigate the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(2)<\/strong> xxx\u2026xxx\u2026xxx<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(3)<\/strong> Any Magistrate empowered under section 210 may, after considering the application supported by an affidavit made under sub-section (4) of section 173, and after making such inquiry as he thinks necessary and submission made in this regard by the police officer, order such an investigation as above-mentioned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>(4)<\/strong> xxx\u2026xxx\u2026xxx<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-structural-paradox-between-sections-173-and-175\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Structural_Paradox_Between_Sections_173_and_175\"><\/span>Structural Paradox Between Sections 173 and 175<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A structural paradox emerges when contrasting the powers of the police under these overlapping domains. Section 173(3) empowers an officer-in-charge to subject a specific category of cognisable offences (punishable by three to seven years of imprisonment) to a preliminary inquiry, subject to the prior permission of an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DySP). Concurrently, the new proviso to Section 175(1) empowers the Superintendent of Police (SP), considering the nature and gravity of an offence, to mandate a DySP to directly investigate a case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Because the comprehensive investigative powers under Section 175(1) naturally encompass all offences registerable under Section 173, this specific band of offences falls simultaneously under the discretion of two distinct statutory actors:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The officer-in-charge seeking permission for a preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Superintendent of Police directing a full investigation under Section 175(1).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-chronological-analysis-of-the-statutory-powers\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Chronological_Analysis_of_the_Statutory_Powers\"><\/span>Chronological Analysis of the Statutory Powers<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, a chronological analysis reveals that this apparent conflict is functionally impossible. The preliminary inquiry power under Section 173(3) operates exclusively as a residuary, pre-registration mechanism activated before an FIR is formally recorded. Conversely, the SP&#8217;s power under the proviso to Section 175(1) to delegate an investigation to a DySP can only be operationalised after a cognisable case has been registered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Because the SP&#8217;s power applies strictly to cases directly registered under Section 173(1) or cases where an FIR has been finalized after a preliminary inquiry, Section 175(1) can never cross paths with or impede the pre-FIR window of Section 173(3).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-magisterial-intervention-under-section-175-3\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Magisterial_Intervention_Under_Section_1753\"><\/span>Magisterial Intervention Under Section 175(3)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A similar chronological barrier isolates Section 173(3) from Magisterial intervention under Section 175(3). The legislature has intentionally restricted direct access to the magistrate by mandating a strict administrative ladder under Section 173(4). An aggrieved informant must exhaust executive remedies by approaching the police hierarchy before the magistrate&#8217;s jurisdiction can be invoked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Consequently, because the judicial remedy under Section 175(3) can only be activated after the administrative process under Section 173 has completely broken down, there is no jurisdictional occasion where the magistrate&#8217;s powers could intercept or conflict with the police officer&#8217;s active conduct of a preliminary inquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-statutory-drafting-flaw\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Statutory_Drafting_Flaw\"><\/span>Statutory Drafting Flaw<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ultimately, this temporal isolation reveals a profound flaw in the statutory drafting. Because Section 175(1) operates exclusively post-registration and Section 175(3) operates exclusively post-exhaustion, neither provision can ever operationally intersect with the pre-registration window of the preliminary inquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Consequently, the legislature&#8217;s inclusion of the opening clause in sub-section (3)\u2014&#8221;Without prejudice to the provisions contained in section 175&#8243;\u2014is stripped of all functional utility, rendering the phrase a mere statutory illusion designed to simulate a check and balance that does not exist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-comparative-analysis-of-sections-173-3-175-1-and-175-3\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Comparative_Analysis_of_Sections_1733_1751_and_1753\"><\/span>Comparative Analysis of Sections 173(3), 175(1) and 175(3)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Provision<\/th><th>Stage of Operation<\/th><th>Authority Exercising Power<\/th><th>Functional Role<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Section 173(3)<\/td><td>Before FIR registration<\/td><td>Officer-in-Charge with DySP approval<\/td><td>Preliminary inquiry before registration of FIR<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 175(1)<\/td><td>After FIR registration<\/td><td>Superintendent of Police<\/td><td>Directs DySP to investigate the registered case<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Section 175(3)<\/td><td>After administrative remedies are exhausted<\/td><td>Magistrate<\/td><td>Orders investigation upon satisfying statutory conditions<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-observations\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Observations\"><\/span>Key Observations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 173(3) operates only during the pre-FIR stage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Section 175(1) becomes applicable only after registration of a cognisable case.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Section 175(3) can be invoked only after the statutory administrative process has been exhausted.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The three provisions function sequentially rather than simultaneously.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The opening words &#8220;Without prejudice to the provisions contained in section 175&#8221; have no practical operational effect.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-2-on-receipt-of-information-relating-to-the-commission-of-any-cognisable-offence\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"32_%E2%80%9COn_Receipt_of_Information_Relating_to_the_Commission_of_Any_Cognisable_Offence%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>3.2. &#8220;On Receipt of Information Relating to the Commission of Any Cognisable Offence&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under Section 173(3), the power of a police officer to conduct a preliminary enquiry is statutorily activated by the receipt of information relating to the commission of a cognisable offence. This information may be received by the police station either orally or in writing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, a critical loophole arises when such information is received, particularly where the officer-in-charge intends to conduct a preliminary enquiry before the registration of an FIR. The statute fails to clarify how such information is to be handled at this stage: if given orally, must it be reduced to writing?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Further, when it is received orally or in writing, should it be recorded in any special book? Should a copy of such information be supplied to the informant or victim? Must the informant or victim be notified in writing that the officer-in-charge has decided to conduct a preliminary enquiry into the alleged offence?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The statute remains entirely silent on these specific procedural aspects, even though they play a vital role in securing the rights of the informant or victim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-major-procedural-gaps-under-section-173-3\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Major_Procedural_Gaps_Under_Section_1733\"><\/span>Major Procedural Gaps Under Section 173(3)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Issue<\/th><th>Statutory Position<\/th><th>Practical Concern<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Oral information<\/td><td>No express procedure<\/td><td>Uncertainty regarding reduction into writing<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Written information<\/td><td>No prescribed recording mechanism<\/td><td>Lack of transparency and accountability<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Special register<\/td><td>No statutory requirement<\/td><td>Difficulty in monitoring preliminary enquiries<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Copy to informant.<\/td><td>Not provided<\/td><td>The informant may remain unaware of official action.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Written intimation of preliminary inquiry<\/td><td>No statutory mandate<\/td><td>Weakens procedural fairness and victim rights<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-key-takeaways\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Takeaways\"><\/span>Key Takeaways<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 173(3) activates upon receipt of information relating to a cognisable offence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The BNSS does not prescribe the procedure for recording such information before FIR registration.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The law is silent regarding the maintenance of a separate register for preliminary enquiries.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No provision requires supplying a copy of the information to the informant or victim.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No statutory obligation exists to notify the informant that a preliminary inquiry has commenced.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>These procedural omissions may adversely affect transparency, accountability, and the rights of victims and informants.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-3-which-is-made-punishable-for-three-years-or-more-but-less-than-seven-years\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"33_%E2%80%9CWhich_Is_Made_Punishable_for_Three_Years_or_More_but_Less_Than_Seven_Years%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>3.3. \u201cWhich Is Made Punishable for Three Years or More but Less Than Seven Years,\u201d<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 173(3) confers the power to conduct a preliminary inquiry on the officer-in-charge of a police station for a specific category of cognisable offences, namely, those punishable by imprisonment ranging from three to seven years. While the criminal framework includes cognisable offences with punishments below three years and exceeding seven years, the legislature has selectively targeted this intermediate category for preliminary enquiries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Critically, this structure fails to establish any rational criteria or reasonable classification under Article 14 of the Constitution. Under this framework, low-level cognisable offences (punishable by under three years) bypass the inquiry phase and are registered immediately, whereas more serious offences (punishable by three to seven years) are subjected to pre-registration delays. This contradiction indicates an inverse relationship between the gravity of the crime and the applicable procedure, demonstrating a lack of an intelligible differentia, especially when a punishment-based classification is further qualified by the subjective parameter of the &#8220;nature and gravity&#8221; of the offence, leaving the rights of the victim open to arbitrary administrative discretion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 id=\"h-key-constitutional-concerns\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Constitutional_Concerns\"><\/span>Key Constitutional Concerns<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Section 173(3) applies only to offences punishable between three and seven years.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Less serious cognisable offences are registered immediately without preliminary inquiry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>More serious offences within the three-to-seven-year category face procedural delay.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The classification lacks an intelligible differentia under Article 14.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The subjective standard of &#8220;nature and gravity&#8221; increases administrative discretion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The victim&#8217;s right to prompt FIR registration becomes vulnerable to arbitrary decision-making.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Category of Cognisable Offence<\/th><th>Punishment<\/th><th>Procedure Under Section 173(3)<\/th><th>Issue Highlighted<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Low-level offences<\/td><td>Below 3 years<\/td><td>Immediate registration<\/td><td>No preliminary inquiry<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Intermediate offences<\/td><td>3\u20137 years<\/td><td>May undergo preliminary inquiry<\/td><td>Registration delayed<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Serious offences<\/td><td>Above 7 years<\/td><td>Outside this provision<\/td><td>Different statutory treatment<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-4-the-officer-in-charge-of-the-police-station-may\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"34_%E2%80%9CThe_Officer_in_Charge_of_the_Police_Station_May%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>3.4. &#8220;The Officer in Charge of the Police Station May&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While the power to conduct a preliminary enquiry under Section 173(3) of the BNSS is subject to the prior permission of a superior officer, the statutory framework completely fails to mandate a reasoned exercise of discretion by the officer-in-charge. Crucially, the provision remains entirely silent on whether the initiating officer must record reasons in writing before applying for permission to hold an enquiry. Furthermore, it fails to specify whether such recorded grounds must be forwarded to the sanctioning authority or communicated to the informant. By omitting a clear, mandatory internal procedure, the statute creates a profound procedural gap. This vacuum leaves the baseline rights of the informant unprotected and creates an environment ripe for the unchecked, unfair misuse of executive power at the threshold of the criminal justice process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Further, under Section 173(3), the legislature explicitly utilises the word &#8220;may&#8221; to confer wide discretion upon the officer-in-charge when determining whether to initiate a preliminary enquiry before registering specific mid-level offences (punishable by three to seven years of imprisonment). Although this discretion is ostensibly qualified by a statutory directive to consider the &#8220;nature and gravity&#8221; of the offence, the use of &#8220;may&#8221; effectively grants absolute choice to the station officer. In practice, it transforms an administrative assessment into a subjective gatekeeping mechanism. It gives the officer-in-charge total latitude to decide whether to register information immediately under Section 173(1) or to defer the creation of a formal record by forcing the complaint into a fourteen-day preliminary filter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 id=\"h-procedural-gaps-created-by-the-word-may\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Procedural_Gaps_Created_by_the_Word_%E2%80%9CMay%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>Procedural Gaps Created by the Word &#8220;May&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>No statutory requirement to record reasons before seeking permission.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No obligation to communicate reasons to the informant.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No requirement that written grounds accompany the request for approval.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The discretion granted by the word &#8220;may&#8221; creates a subjective gatekeeping process.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The complaint may be delayed by a fourteen-day preliminary inquiry instead of immediate FIR registration.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Statutory Aspect<\/th><th>Position Under Section 173(3)<\/th><th>Resulting Concern<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Recording of reasons<\/td><td>Not mandated<\/td><td>Lack of accountability<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Communication to informant<\/td><td>Not required<\/td><td>Reduced transparency<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Written request to superior officer<\/td><td>Not prescribed<\/td><td>No documentary basis for approval<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Officer&#8217;s discretion<\/td><td>Use of the word &#8220;may&#8221;<\/td><td>Potential arbitrary exercise of power<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-5-with-the-prior-permission-from-an-officer-not-below-the-rank-of-deputy-superintendent-of-police\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"35_%E2%80%9CWith_the_Prior_Permission_from_an_Officer_Not_Below_the_Rank_of_Deputy_Superintendent_of_Police%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>3.5. &#8220;With the Prior Permission from an Officer Not Below the Rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The requirement to obtain prior permission from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DySP) is structurally hollow, as the statute fails to establish any criteria governing how this permission should be granted or refused. While the &#8220;nature and gravity&#8221; of the offence serves as the statutory baseline for the officer-in-charge to seek an enquiry, the sanctioning authority is left with no objective material or formal record to evaluate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By impliedly permitting the officer-in-charge to seek permission without reducing the underlying basis to a written, reasoned request, the legislature allows the supervisory check to become a mere rubber-stamping exercise. When a DySP grants or denies permission without a structured evidentiary record, the exercise of authority becomes inherently arbitrary. Consequently, the literal text of Section 173(3) places arbitrary, unmonitored power in the hands of the police, ultimately conditioning a citizen&#8217;s fundamental right to lodge an FIR upon unrecorded and unreviewable administrative whims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 id=\"h-issues-with-the-prior-permission-mechanism\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Issues_with_the_Prior_Permission_Mechanism\"><\/span>Issues with the Prior Permission Mechanism<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>No statutory criteria for granting or refusing permission.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No requirement for a written and reasoned request by the officer-in-charge.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No objective material available for the DySP to evaluate.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The supervisory approval risks becoming a rubber-stamping exercise.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The citizen&#8217;s right to lodge an FIR becomes dependent on unrecorded administrative discretion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Requirement<\/th><th>Statutory Position<\/th><th>Constitutional Concern<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Prior permission of DySP<\/td><td>Mandatory<\/td><td>No governing standards<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Written reasons by officer-in-charge<\/td><td>Not required<\/td><td>Lack of transparency<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Objective record before DySP<\/td><td>Absent<\/td><td>Arbitrary approval process<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Judicial review of decision<\/td><td>Difficult due to absence of recorded reasons<\/td><td>Unchecked executive discretion<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4 id=\"h-summary-of-constitutional-objections\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Summary_of_Constitutional_Objections\"><\/span>Summary of Constitutional Objections<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The punishment-based classification under Section 173(3) is alleged to violate Article 14.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The use of the word &#8220;may&#8221; grants broad discretionary powers without adequate safeguards.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The statute does not require written reasons before initiating a preliminary enquiry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The DySP approval mechanism lacks objective standards and documentary safeguards.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The cumulative effect may permit arbitrary exercise of police discretion at the FIR registration stage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-6-considering-the-nature-and-gravity-of-the-offence\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"36_Considering_the_Nature_and_Gravity_of_the_Offence\"><\/span>3.6. Considering the Nature and Gravity of the Offence<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, the discretion to conduct a preliminary enquiry is qualified by the criteria of &#8220;considering the nature and gravity of such offence.&#8221; However, the evaluation of these factors is left to the subjective satisfaction of the police. Even though the statute requires prior permission from a deputy superintendent of police, the assessment still rests on police discretion. The legislature has conferred unguided discretion on police officers; therefore, the appreciation of \u201cnature and gravity\u201d may vary from officer to officer. What requires a preliminary enquiry for one officer might not for another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the basis of nature and gravity, the legislature has already classified offences into cognisable and non-cognisable, providing specific remedial measures. Section 173(3), however, introduces an impermissible mechanism of &#8216;re-classification&#8217; at the hands of an executive officer. By allowing a police officer to conduct a preliminary enquiry into a selected class of cognisable offences using his own perception, the provision effectively permits the executive to override, dilute, and reclassify categories established by the legislature. This second filter gives the police unchecked, unfair control, which directly violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and the doctrine of separation of powers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While Section 173(3) contemplates considering the &#8216;nature and gravity&#8217; of an offence, it provides no legislative guidance or statutory standard. In this statutory vacuum, a pertinent question arises: what degree of &#8216;nature&#8217; and what type of &#8216;gravity&#8217; is the officer expected to consider? In the absence of objective criteria, the test becomes inherently subjective and susceptible to arbitrary application, conferring uncanalised discretion upon the police officer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Such discretion is not contemplated by the principal object of Section 173(1), which mandates the registration of an FIR once information discloses a cognisable offence, irrespective of its nature or gravity. The statute does not classify cognisable offences for FIR registration. Therefore, introducing the concept of a preliminary enquiry based on the unguided criteria of &#8216;nature and gravity&#8217; is not only vague and unworkable, but also in derogation of the mandatory nature of Section 173(1). To permit an officer to refuse registration because an offence is not of &#8216;sufficient gravity&#8217; grants them judicial power to adjudicate at a pre-investigation stage, militating against the object of setting the criminal law in motion. Consequently, this test is manifestly arbitrary, void for vagueness, and ultra vires the scheme of the Code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-consequence-of-the-sequence-of-clauses-is-material-in-the-context-of-interpretation-of-the-section\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Consequence_of_the_Sequence_of_Clauses_Is_Material_in_the_Context_of_Interpretation_of_the_Section\"><\/span>Consequence of the Sequence of Clauses Is Material in the Context of Interpretation of the Section<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While conferring powers of preliminary enquiry, the legislature provided criteria and conditions with specific implications: \u201cthe officer in charge of the police station may, with the prior permission from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, consider the nature and gravity of the offence.\u201d The legislature provided the condition first\u2014\u201cwith the prior permission from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police\u201d\u2014and later provided the criteria\u2014\u201cconsidering the nature and gravity of the offence.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Further, the operational field of clauses (i) (i) and (ii) is qualified on the basis of the said criteria. Therefore, it appears that the condition becomes principal, and the criteria collateral. However, the vital issue of discretion in conducting a preliminary enquiry revolves around the criteria. Critically examining this sequence, it appears that following the said sequence, mechanical discretion operates in the field of pre-permission, while material discretion operates in post-permission. Had the legislature applied the \u2018criteria\u2019 first and the \u2018condition\u2019 later, it would have sufficed the intent of the legislature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This structural flaw highlights a departure from the Principle of Purposive Interpretation in the law-making process, which dictates that the grammatical syntax and structural sequence of a provision must actively serve, rather than frustrate, the primary legislative intent. By subordinating the substantive criteria to a prior procedural condition, the draftsman has inadvertently allowed a mechanical administrative step to overshadow the core material evaluation, resulting in a structural inversion that compromises the clarity of the statutory mandate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Legislative Component<\/th><th>Observation<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Condition<\/td><td>Prior permission from the Deputy Superintendent of Police<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Criteria<\/td><td>Considering the nature and gravity of the offence<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Issue Highlighted<\/td><td>Criteria becomes subordinate to procedural permission, creating structural inconsistency.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-7-i-proceed-to-conduct-preliminary-enquiry\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"37_i_Proceed_to_Conduct_Preliminary_Enquiry\"><\/span>3.7. (i) Proceed to Conduct Preliminary Enquiry<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sub-section (3) of Section 173 contains two clauses. Both clauses are preceded by the word \u201cmay\u201d, which confers discretion upon the officer-in-charge of the police station to conduct a preliminary enquiry, subject to the prior permission of the sanctioning authority. This discretion is qualified by a subjective condition and the underlying criteria, and thereafter, both clauses (i) and (ii) are appended to this statutory requirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Upon obtaining permission from the sanctioning authority, the officer-in-charge of a police station is vested with two statutory options, as specified under clauses (i) (i) and (ii). Clause (i) permits the officer to &#8220;proceed to conduct a preliminary enquiry&#8221; into the alleged offence. While conferring such power on the officer-in-charge of the police station, the provision is conspicuously silent on the procedural modalities for initiating and conducting this enquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The statute fails to prescribe:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Whether the informant must be intimated in writing about the initiation of a preliminary enquiry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The extent to which the officer may exercise powers conferred upon a police officer during the investigation of a cognisable offence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether entries pertaining to day-to-day proceedings are required to be recorded in the General Diary or any other register, and if so, the manner of such record-keeping.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The procedure for concluding the preliminary enquiry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether the outcome or decision of the enquiry must be communicated to the informant.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This statutory vacuum on fundamental procedural safeguards is likely to foster arbitrariness and undermine the informant\u2019s right to a fair and transparent process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-8-to-ascertain-whether-there-exists-a-prima-facie-case-for-proceeding-in-the-matter\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"38_To_Ascertain_Whether_There_Exists_a_Prima_Facie_Case_for_Proceeding_in_the_Matter\"><\/span>3.8. To Ascertain Whether There Exists a Prima Facie Case for Proceeding in the Matter<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The object of a preliminary enquiry under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023, must remain consistent with the principal object of Section 173 as a whole. Since the provision for a preliminary enquiry is introduced to subserve the purpose of the principal section, its object must not travel beyond or override the object of Section 173 as a whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The principal object of Section 173(1) is to set the criminal law in motion upon receipt of information disclosing a cognisable offence. In contrast, the preliminary enquiry contemplated under Section 173(3) is intended to ascertain whether a prima facie case exists &#8220;for proceeding in the matter.&#8221; This introduces an additional criterion not envisaged in the main provision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Thus, the statute creates an artificial classification between cognisable offences themselves, those where an FIR is registered forthwith upon disclosure of an offence, and those subjected to a preliminary enquiry to test for a prima facie case. Since this classification lacks a rational nexus with the object of Section 173, it appears to be unreasonable and potentially violates Article 14 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-9-within-a-period-of-fourteen-days\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"39_Within_a_Period_of_Fourteen_Days\"><\/span>3.9. Within a Period of Fourteen Days<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The said clause stipulates a timeline of fourteen days for conducting the preliminary enquiry. While the legislature has prescribed this period, it has failed to clarify the terminus a quo for its commencement. It is unclear whether the fourteen-day period is inclusive of the time spent applying for and obtaining permission from the sanctioning authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Procedural delays, whether intentional or otherwise, in seeking and granting such permission are foreseeable. The absence of statutory clarity on whether this delay period is to be included or excluded from the prescribed fourteen days creates ambiguity. This legislative omission directly impacts the rights of the informant or victim, as an extended and indefinite enquiry under the guise of &#8216;seeking permission&#8217; would defeat the very object of prescribing a time-bound enquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-10-the-interpretation-of-or\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"310_The_Interpretation_of_%E2%80%9COr%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>3.10. The Interpretation of &#8220;Or&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>[This implication is evaluated immediately following the analysis of the expressions in clause (ii).]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-11-ii-proceed-with-investigation-when-there-exists-a-prima-facie-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"311_ii_Proceed_with_Investigation_When_There_Exists_a_Prima_Facie_Case\"><\/span>3.11. (ii) Proceed with Investigation When There Exists a Prima Facie Case<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is clause (ii) of Section 173(3). In clause (ii), the legislature has used the expression &#8220;proceed with investigation&#8221;. Under the broader context of Section 173, the term &#8220;investigation&#8221; logically occurs only after the registration of an FIR. However, while detailing the procedural aspects of Section 173(3) of the BNSS, the legislature has omitted any express provision regarding the contingencies of FIR registration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Clause (i) provides for the ascertainment of a prima facie case, while clause (ii) confers the power upon the officer in charge of the police station to proceed with the investigation. Yet, between these two contingencies, no explicit provision exists for the registration of the offence. Crucially, Section 173(3) remains entirely silent on the procedure and the interim handling of information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The statute fails to specify the timeline within which an FIR must be registered once a preliminary enquiry is completed within the mandatory fourteen-day window and a prima facie case is established. This silence facilitates congenital administrative delays, occasional pauses, and the hazardous practice of keeping proceedings in abeyance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-interpretation-of-the-term-or\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Interpretation_of_the_Term_%E2%80%9COr%E2%80%9D\"><\/span>Interpretation of the Term &#8220;Or&#8221;<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Significantly, clauses (i) (i) and (ii) are connected by the disjunctive conjunction \u201cor\u201d at the end of the clause. This structural arrangement indicates that these clauses represent alternative remedies available to the officer-in-charge. Consequently, the officer may employ either option to the exclusion of the other, provided prior permission is obtained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If clause (ii) is construed literally within this framework, it operates with two distinct implications:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>An investigation can be initiated only with the prior permission of the sanctioning authority.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An investigation can proceed by directly bypassing the preliminary enquiry under the clause, provided a \u201cprima facie case\u201d already exists.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This drafting framework raises a critical question of law: under what circumstances, upon receiving information of a cognisable offence and obtaining the requisite permission, would a \u201cprima facie case\u201d exist without conducting the preliminary enquiry contemplated in the clause? The statute provides no guidance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, for interpretative purposes, even if one attempts to make the provision meaningful by substituting the conjunctive \u201cand\u201d for the disjunctive \u201cor\u201d at the end of the clause, or alternatively, by restructuring the clause (i) to commence immediately after the word \u201cmay\u201d used in sub-section (3), even then, neither a coherent legislative objective nor a substantive statutory purpose is manifested by such a modified structure. Ultimately, the current use of \u201cor\u201d renders the provision internally inconsistent, creating insurmountable complications for both literal and purposive interpretations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-procedural-infirmities-and-ambiguities-in-section-173-3-of-bnss\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Procedural_Infirmities_and_Ambiguities_in_Section_1733_of_BNSS\"><\/span>Procedural Infirmities and Ambiguities in Section 173(3) of BNSS<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 173(3) BNSS introduces the statutory concept of a &#8220;preliminary enquiry&#8221; for specified categories of cognisable offences, punishable for three years or more but less than seven years of imprisonment. This provision permits an officer-in-charge to conduct an enquiry prior to the formal registration of a First Information Report (FIR).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the legislature has failed to define &#8220;preliminary enquiry&#8221; within the statute. Consequently, the scope, procedure, and legal boundaries of this mechanism remain entirely ambiguous. The provision exhibits critical statutory silences:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-i-absence-of-timelines\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"i_Absence_of_Timelines\"><\/span>i) Absence of Timelines<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The provision prescribes no timeframe for the officer-in-charge to seek the mandatory prior permission from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police. Similarly, no statutory window is stipulated for the superior officer to grant or reject such a request. This regulatory vacuum effectively grants unbridled discretion to police authorities, potentially defeating the rule of prompt FIR registration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-ii-lack-of-reasoned-orders-amp-communication\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"ii_Lack_of_Reasoned_Orders_Communication\"><\/span>ii) Lack of Reasoned Orders &amp; Communication<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The statute does not mandate the recording of reasons for invoking powers under Section 173(3). Furthermore, there is no requirement to communicate these reasons or the progress of the enquiry to the informant. This absence demonstrates a clear lack of transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-iii-undefined-procedure-amp-powers\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"iii_Undefined_Procedure_Powers\"><\/span>iii) Undefined Procedure &amp; Powers<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The BNSS fails to prescribe the exact manner in which a preliminary enquiry must be conducted. It remains silent on which investigative powers under the Sanhita may be lawfully exercised during this pre-FIR stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-iv-ambiguity-on-power-of-arrest\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"iv_Ambiguity_on_Power_of_Arrest\"><\/span>iv) Ambiguity on Power of Arrest<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is textually unclear whether a police officer is empowered to effectuate an arrest of a suspect during the pendency of such a preliminary enquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-v-evidentiary-value-of-materials\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"v_Evidentiary_Value_of_Materials\"><\/span>v) Evidentiary Value of Materials<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The procedure for collecting material and recording statements remains unguided. Crucially, the eventual evidentiary value of any data or statements collected during this informal stage is left undefined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-vi-deficit-of-conclusion-amp-accountability\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"vi_Deficit_of_Conclusion_Accountability\"><\/span>vi) Deficit of Conclusion &amp; Accountability<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The statute provides no guidance on how the enquiry is to be formally concluded. It does not mandate recording these enquiries in the station General Diary, nor does it require informing the informant if a prima facie case is made out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-summary-of-key-procedural-gaps-under-section-173-3-bnss\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Summary_of_Key_Procedural_Gaps_Under_Section_1733_BNSS\"><\/span>Summary of Key Procedural Gaps Under Section 173(3) BNSS<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Issue<\/th><th>Statutory Deficiency<\/th><th>Potential Consequence<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Absence of Timelines<\/td><td>No prescribed time limits for seeking or granting approval.<\/td><td>Delay in FIR registration and excessive police discretion.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lack of Reasoned Orders &amp; Communication<\/td><td>No obligation to record or communicate reasons.<\/td><td>Reduced transparency and accountability.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Undefined Procedure &amp; Powers<\/td><td>No prescribed procedure for conducting the enquiry.<\/td><td>Uncertainty regarding permissible investigative actions.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Ambiguity on Power of Arrest<\/td><td>No express provision regarding arrest during preliminary enquiry.<\/td><td>Conflicting interpretations and legal uncertainty.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Evidentiary Value of Materials<\/td><td>No guidance regarding collection or evidentiary status of materials.<\/td><td>Uncertainty during subsequent criminal proceedings.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Deficit of Conclusion &amp; Accountability<\/td><td>No statutory procedure for concluding the enquiry or informing the informant.<\/td><td>Lack of procedural safeguards and accountability.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-key-procedural-deficiencies-in-section-173-3-bnss\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Procedural_Deficiencies_in_Section_1733_BNSS\"><\/span>Key Procedural Deficiencies in Section 173(3) BNSS<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Absence of statutory timelines for obtaining prior approval.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No requirement for reasoned orders or communication with the informant.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Failure to prescribe the procedure governing preliminary enquiries.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Uncertainty regarding the police power to arrest during the enquiry.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No statutory guidance on the evidentiary value of materials collected.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Absence of provisions governing the conclusion of the enquiry and accountability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-conclusion\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By conferring unguided and unfettered discretion upon the police under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, the legislature directly jeopardises the fundamental statutory right of a citizen to mandate the registration of an FIR under Section 173(1). Furthermore, the absolute legislative silence on fundamental procedural aspects leaves this newly carved-out power highly susceptible to arbitrary exercise, failing the tests of certainty, non-arbitrariness, and procedural fairness enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Ultimately, time will determine whether the unguided statutory discretion conferred upon the police, coupled with this lack of procedural certainty, will strengthen the criminal justice system by filtering out frivolous complaints or weaken it by jeopardising the core constitutional rights guaranteed to victims under Articles 14 and 21.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Written By: Shri. Kiran S. Pawar, Advocate<\/strong>, Islampur Bar Association (Maharashtra) 415409.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/differences-between-police-investigation-and-police-enquiry\/\">Differences Between Police Investigation and Police Enquiry<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/fir-registration-crpc-section-154-vs-bnss-section-173-key-differences\/\">Difference Between FIR Registration Provisions Under Section 154 CrPC &amp; Section 173 BNSS: A Comprehensive Analysis<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/when-can-police-refuse-to-register-an-fir-bnss-2023\/\">When Can Police Refuse to Register an FIR? &#8211; BNSS, 2023<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/fir-vs-complaint-matrimonial-disputes-bnss-bns85-dv-act\/\">FIR vs Complaint in Matrimonial Disputes: Legal Difference Under BNSS, BNS 85\/86 &amp; DV Act Explained<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/supreme-court-orders-cbi-probe-into-suspicious-death-of-dalit-woman-in-madhya-pradesh\/\">Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe Into Suspicious Death Of Dalit Woman In Madhya Pradesh<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction Section 173(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), ostensibly codifies the mandatory duty of the police to register a First Information Report (FIR) upon receipt of information disclosing a cognisable offence. However, the introduction of subsections (3) to Section 173 creates a statutory dilemma that potentially undermines this very mandate and places<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1737,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[4798],"class_list":["post-29470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-criminal-law","tag-criminal-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.2 (Yoast SEO v28.2) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Section 173 BNSS analysis: Can police delay FIR through preliminary inquiry? Explore constitutional issues under Articles 14 and 21.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Section 173 BNSS analysis: Can police delay FIR through preliminary inquiry? Explore constitutional issues under Articles 14 and 21.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-06T13:19:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-06T13:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"kiranpawaradv\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"kiranpawaradv\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"23 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"kiranpawaradv\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9cb5910ca45183d0fce2ca9ac9f7b30a\"},\"headline\":\"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-06T13:19:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-06T13:30:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5781,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"criminal law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Criminal Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/\",\"name\":\"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-06T13:19:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-06T13:30:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"Section 173 BNSS analysis: Can police delay FIR through preliminary inquiry? Explore constitutional issues under Articles 14 and 21.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Criminal Law > Can Police Delay FIR Under Section 173 BNSS? Constitutional Analysis of Preliminary Inquiry Before Registration\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9cb5910ca45183d0fce2ca9ac9f7b30a\",\"name\":\"kiranpawaradv\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e222bffcf83ba3be51da37c7618c7b12?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e222bffcf83ba3be51da37c7618c7b12?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e222bffcf83ba3be51da37c7618c7b12?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"kiranpawaradv\"},\"description\":\"Advocate\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/kiranpawaradv\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Section 173 BNSS analysis: Can police delay FIR through preliminary inquiry? Explore constitutional issues under Articles 14 and 21.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS","og_description":"Section 173 BNSS analysis: Can police delay FIR through preliminary inquiry? Explore constitutional issues under Articles 14 and 21.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-08-06T13:19:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-06T13:30:29+00:00","author":"kiranpawaradv","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"kiranpawaradv","Est. reading time":"23 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/"},"author":{"name":"kiranpawaradv","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/9cb5910ca45183d0fce2ca9ac9f7b30a"},"headline":"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS","datePublished":"2026-08-06T13:19:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-06T13:30:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/"},"wordCount":5781,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"keywords":["criminal law"],"articleSection":["Criminal Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/","name":"A Critical Analysis of Provisions of Preliminary Enquiry Under Section 173(3) of BNSS - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-08-06T13:19:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-06T13:30:29+00:00","description":"Section 173 BNSS analysis: Can police delay FIR through preliminary inquiry? Explore constitutional issues under Articles 14 and 21.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/section-173-bnss-preliminary-inquiry-before-fir-analysis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Criminal Law > Can Police Delay FIR Under Section 173 BNSS? Constitutional Analysis of Preliminary Inquiry Before Registration"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/9cb5910ca45183d0fce2ca9ac9f7b30a","name":"kiranpawaradv","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e222bffcf83ba3be51da37c7618c7b12?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e222bffcf83ba3be51da37c7618c7b12?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e222bffcf83ba3be51da37c7618c7b12?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"kiranpawaradv"},"description":"Advocate","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/kiranpawaradv\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1737"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29470"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29470\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29501,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29470\/revisions\/29501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}