{"id":32204,"date":"2026-09-17T07:35:45","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T07:35:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=32204"},"modified":"2026-09-17T07:43:25","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T07:43:25","slug":"advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/","title":{"rendered":"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 id=\"h-the-advocate-s-duty-of-candour-active-concealment-and-the-section-151-recall-jurisdiction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Advocates_Duty_of_Candour_Active_Concealment_and_the_Section_151_Recall_Jurisdiction\"><\/span>The Advocate&#8217;s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment, and the Section 151 Recall Jurisdiction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-a-case-study-on-shiv-shankar-singh-v-committee-of-management-nehru-vidyapeeth-inter-college-and-another-2026-ahc-178254\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Case_Study_on_Shiv_Shankar_Singh_v_Committee_of_Management_Nehru_Vidyapeeth_Inter_College_and_Another_2026_AHC_178254\"><\/span>A Case Study on Shiv Shankar Singh v. Committee of Management, Nehru Vidyapeeth Inter College and Another, 2026:AHC:178254<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Date of Judgment:<\/strong> 24-08-2026<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#The_Advocates_Duty_of_Candour_Active_Concealment_and_the_Section_151_Recall_Jurisdiction\" >The Advocate&#8217;s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment, and the Section 151 Recall Jurisdiction<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#A_Case_Study_on_Shiv_Shankar_Singh_v_Committee_of_Management_Nehru_Vidyapeeth_Inter_College_and_Another_2026_AHC_178254\" >A Case Study on Shiv Shankar Singh v. Committee of Management, Nehru Vidyapeeth Inter College and Another, 2026:AHC:178254<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#I_Prefatory_Note\" >I. Prefatory Note<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#II_The_Facts_in_Brief\" >II. The Facts, in Brief<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#III_Two_Advocates_Two_Outcomes\" >III. Two Advocates, Two Outcomes<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#RC_Dwivedi_%E2%80%94_Procedural_Lapse_Not_Concealment\" >R.C. Dwivedi \u2014 Procedural Lapse, Not Concealment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#SC_Dwivedi_%E2%80%94_Active_Concealment\" >S.C. Dwivedi \u2014 Active Concealment<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#IV_The_Courts_Central_Holding\" >IV. The Court&#8217;s Central Holding<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#Suppressio_Veri_Expressio_Falsi\" >Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#V_The_Doctrinal_Foundation_Candour_as_the_Price_of_the_Courts_Door\" >V. The Doctrinal Foundation: Candour as the Price of the Court&#8217;s Door<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#The_Clean_Hands_Doctrine\" >The Clean Hands Doctrine<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#Courts_as_Instruments_of_Fraud\" >Courts as Instruments of Fraud<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#VI_The_Vakalatnama_and_the_Limits_of_Representation\" >VI. The Vakalatnama and the Limits of Representation<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#A_Live_Development_Worth_Watching_Not_Yet_Citable\" >A Live Development Worth Watching, Not Yet Citable<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#VII_Orders_and_Directions\" >VII. Orders and Directions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#VIII_Citation_Table\" >VIII. Citation Table<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#IX_Practitioner_Checklist\" >IX. Practitioner Checklist<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#X_Concluding_Observations\" >X. Concluding Observations<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-i-prefatory-note\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"I_Prefatory_Note\"><\/span>I. Prefatory Note<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This note takes up a judgment of the Allahabad High Court delivered on 24 August 2026 by Justice Siddharth Nandan, reported as <em>Shiv Shankar Singh v. Committee of Management, Nehru Vidyapeeth Inter College and another<\/em> in CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No.106 of 2026 (2026:AHC:178254). The Court was called upon to unravel a tangle of a disputed vakalatnama, a forensic signature comparison, and a writ petition that had proceeded on an assertion later shown to be false \u2014 and, in doing so, drew a sharp and citable line between an advocate&#8217;s inadvertent error and an advocate&#8217;s active concealment of fact. The distinction, and the costs and directions that followed it, deserve a place in the standing literature on advocates&#8217; duty of candour to the court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-ii-the-facts-in-brief\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"II_The_Facts_in_Brief\"><\/span>II. The Facts, in Brief<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By order dated 5 May 2026, a learned Single Judge disposed of a writ petition (Writ-C No. 17384 of 2026) concerning the Committee of Management of Nehru Vidyapeeth Intermediate College, Reotipur, Ghazipur, by directing the District Inspector of Schools to hold fresh elections within two months. The order proceeded on the basis of an electoral list said to date from 2009, both sides having represented to the Court that the 2009 election was undisputed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Shiv Shankar Singh, arrayed as respondent no. 6, filed a review application asserting that he had never executed a vakalatnama in favour of the advocate on record, Sri R.C. Dwivedi, and had never authorised the caveat filed on his behalf. Advocate R.C. Dwivedi&#8217;s response was that Singh, together with his nephew Bhola Yadav, had attended his office, handed over a signed vakalatnama, and paid a fee of Rs. 2,500; Bhola Yadav supported this account on affidavit, though Singh himself did not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court referred the disputed signatures for forensic examination. The Forensic Science Laboratory&#8217;s report, dated 27 July 2026, found that neither the signature on the vakalatnama nor the admitted signatures filed in two other proceedings matched Singh&#8217;s sample signatures or his bank specimen signatures. No party objected to the report, and it attained finality \u2014 yet, holding that the applicant had nonetheless failed to establish forgery on the facts before it, the Court declined to set aside the vakalatnama on that ground alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court&#8217;s principal concern, however, lay elsewhere: with the assertion \u2014 made to the Court and acted upon in the order of 5 May 2026 \u2014 that the 2009 election was undisputed. Records showed that the Joint Director of Education had, by order dated 16 April 2016, held the 2009 election doubtful and directed fresh elections; that the then District Inspector of Schools, Smt. Malti Rai, had by letter dated 23 July 2016 expressly denied having conducted any such election; and that a writ petition challenging the 2016 order had been dismissed as infructuous by consent, leaving that finding final. Sri S.C. Dwivedi, who had represented the petitioner throughout, could not, the Court held, plead ignorance of material that had been within his knowledge over a period of years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-iii-two-advocates-two-outcomes\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"III_Two_Advocates_Two_Outcomes\"><\/span>III. Two Advocates, Two Outcomes<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgment is instructive precisely because it does not treat every lapse by counsel alike. Two advocates appear in the narrative, and the Court reaches two different conclusions about them \u2014 a distinction of real practical value for practitioners assessing their own exposure in analogous situations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-r-c-dwivedi-procedural-lapse-not-concealment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"RC_Dwivedi_%E2%80%94_Procedural_Lapse_Not_Concealment\"><\/span>R.C. Dwivedi \u2014 Procedural Lapse, Not Concealment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As to the advocate who filed the caveat on a vakalatnama later found not to match the client&#8217;s admitted signatures, the Court held that he had merely acted on instructions conveyed through the client&#8217;s nephew, that the documents casting doubt on the 2009 election had never come into his hands, and that his conduct amounted to neither active concealment nor an expression of falsehood. His unconditional apology for the procedural lapse in verifying the vakalatnama in his own office was accepted, and no adverse order was passed against him personally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-s-c-dwivedi-active-concealment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"SC_Dwivedi_%E2%80%94_Active_Concealment\"><\/span>S.C. Dwivedi \u2014 Active Concealment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As to the advocate who had represented the writ petitioner over a period of years and asserted the 2009 election to be undisputed, the Court reached a starkly different conclusion, holding him and his client equally responsible for a representation the underlying record could not sustain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-iv-the-court-s-central-holding\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"IV_The_Courts_Central_Holding\"><\/span>IV. The Court&#8217;s Central Holding<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgment&#8217;s most citable passages are its articulation of the line between an innocent misstatement and a deliberate one \u2014 a distinction that has practical bite because only the latter attracts consequences going to costs and to the Court&#8217;s inherent power of recall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere is a distinction between active concealment and mere inadvertence or wrong interpretation of the factual or the legal position. Once the petitioner has approached this Court, he is expected to disclose all relevant facts and material which may constitute a bundle of fact giving rise to a cause of action.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2014 Siddharth Nandan, J.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe active concealment of fact means a truth is sought to be hidden on purpose to mislead the court; but however statement in ignorance means you share false information by mistake because you do not know the real truth.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2014 Siddharth Nandan, J.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Applying that distinction to the facts \u2014 and to Sri S.C. Dwivedi&#8217;s years-long engagement with the litigation, which placed the 2016 record squarely within his knowledge \u2014 the Court held:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c&#8230;this Court has no hesitation in holding that there was an active concealment of fact on the part of Shri S.C. Dwivedi, Advocate and his client, which lead to the interference with the administration of justice.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2014 Siddharth Nandan, J.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-suppressio-veri-expressio-falsi\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Suppressio_Veri_Expressio_Falsi\"><\/span>Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The maxim \u2014 that the suppression of a truth is, in its legal consequence, equivalent to the expression of a falsehood \u2014 does the doctrinal work of collapsing the distinction litigants often try to draw between an active lie and a convenient silence. Where a fact is within counsel&#8217;s knowledge and its omission changes the complexion of the relief sought, the omission is treated as if it were an affirmative misrepresentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-v-the-doctrinal-foundation-candour-as-the-price-of-the-court-s-door\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"V_The_Doctrinal_Foundation_Candour_as_the_Price_of_the_Courts_Door\"><\/span>V. The Doctrinal Foundation: Candour as the Price of the Court&#8217;s Door<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Nehru Vidyapeeth holding does not stand alone; it sits within a well-settled and continuously reaffirmed line of Supreme Court authority on the duty of full and frank disclosure owed by a litigant \u2014 and, through the litigant, by counsel \u2014 to a court whose equitable or extraordinary jurisdiction is invoked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-the-clean-hands-doctrine\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Clean_Hands_Doctrine\"><\/span>The Clean Hands Doctrine<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>K.D. Sharma v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.<\/em>, (2008) 12 SCC 481, the Supreme Court held that a party invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of a court under Article 32 or Article 226 \u201cis supposed to be truthful, frank and open\u201d and \u201ccannot be allowed to play \u2018hide and seek\u2019 or to \u2018pick and choose\u2019 the facts he likes to disclose.\u201d This is, in substance, the same proposition the Allahabad High Court applied to counsel in Nehru Vidyapeeth, and it supplies the missing doctrinal citation the source draft&#8217;s treatment of the point needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Dalip Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh<\/em>, (2010) 2 SCC 114, the Court opened its judgment with the observation that Indian society had \u201cfor many centuries\u201d cherished truth (satya) as a foundational value of litigation, before lamenting a \u201cprogressive decline\u201d in the candour of the new generation of litigants \u2014 a passage frequently invoked, as it might usefully be here, wherever a court is asked to recall relief obtained on an incomplete factual canvas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-courts-as-instruments-of-fraud\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Courts_as_Instruments_of_Fraud\"><\/span>Courts as Instruments of Fraud<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Bhagwan Singh v. State of U.P.<\/em> (2024 INSC 708), decided on 20 September 2024, the Supreme Court ordered a CBI investigation into a scheme by which proceedings had been filed in a litigant&#8217;s name without his knowledge, holding in terms directly applicable to the concealment found in Nehru Vidyapeeth that \u201cno Court can allow itself to be used as an instrument of fraud, and no Court can allow its eyes to be closed to the fact that it is being used as an instrument of fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-vi-the-vakalatnama-and-the-limits-of-representation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"VI_The_Vakalatnama_and_the_Limits_of_Representation\"><\/span>VI. The Vakalatnama and the Limits of Representation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgment&#8217;s second doctrinal strand concerns the vakalatnama itself as the jurisdictional foundation of an advocate&#8217;s appearance \u2014 a point on which the Allahabad High Court was emphatic, notwithstanding its ultimate finding that forgery had not been established on the facts before it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe recognition of appearance of an Advocate by the Court is premised entirely upon the existence of a valid and subsisting Vakalatnama. The filing of a Vakalatnama without the knowledge or consent of the party purportedly represented, constitutes a misrepresentation to the Court.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2014 Siddharth Nandan, J.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This proposition is well anchored in Supreme Court authority on unauthorised vakalatnamas. In <em>Narain Pandey v. Pannalal Pandey<\/em>, (2013) 11 SCC 435, the Court upheld disciplinary sanction against an advocate found to have filed vakalatnamas without authority and pursued fictitious compromises on their strength, holding that the punishment for such conduct must be commensurate with its gravity \u2014 a standard the Nehru Vidyapeeth Court implicitly applied in accepting R.C. Dwivedi&#8217;s apology for a lesser, procedural default while withholding any such indulgence from S.C. Dwivedi&#8217;s active concealment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The broader proposition that an advocate&#8217;s duty runs first to the court, and only through the court to the client, traces to <em>Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar<\/em>, (1976) 2 SCC 291, where Krishna Iyer, J. described the central function of the legal profession as the promotion of the administration of justice \u2014 language the Nehru Vidyapeeth Court echoes closely in its own observations on the advocate as \u201can officer of the Court\u201d bearing a \u201cdual responsibility\u201d higher than the merely professional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And in <em>J.S. Jadhav v. Mustafa Haji Mohamed Yusuf<\/em>, (1993) 2 SCC 562, the Court affirmed that punishment for professional misconduct must track its degree and gravity \u2014 the same calibrated approach visible in Nehru Vidyapeeth&#8217;s differential treatment of its two advocates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-a-live-development-worth-watching-not-yet-citable\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Live_Development_Worth_Watching_Not_Yet_Citable\"><\/span>A Live Development Worth Watching, Not Yet Citable<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In its place, and purely for situational awareness rather than as authority, it is worth noting that the Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered a detailed inquiry in August 2026 into an allegedly forged vakalatnama used to attempt the withdrawal of a first appeal \u2014 the appellant and the advocate whose name had been substituted onto the record both having disowned the document. That matter remains at the inquiry stage and has not, as of this writing, produced a reportable ratio; it is flagged here as a fact pattern to track, not as an authority to cite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-vii-orders-and-directions\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"VII_Orders_and_Directions\"><\/span>VII. Orders and Directions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Acting in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Court:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Recalled its order dated 5 May 2026 directing fresh elections on the 2009 electoral list, holding that the order had proceeded on a false premise created by suppression, and directed the writ petition be placed before the appropriate bench for adjudication afresh on the merits.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Imposed exemplary costs of Rs. 50,000 each on the writ petitioner (Awadhesh Rai) and on the review applicant (Shiv Shankar Singh), payable to the High Court Legal Services Committee within one month, failing which the Registrar General was directed to initiate contempt proceedings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Declined to refer either advocate to the Bar Council or to invoke criminal contempt jurisdiction, holding that such jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly \u2014 while nonetheless leaving on record findings capable of grounding disciplinary scrutiny should similar conduct recur.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Directed that a copy of the order be placed before the Chief Justice on the administrative side, to consider amending Chapter XXII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 \u2014 which presently permits a caveat to be lodged on a mere application, without a supporting affidavit \u2014 so as to require an affidavit of the applicant along with every caveat application.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The costs order and the procedural-reform recommendation are, in combination, the judgment&#8217;s most exportable features for practitioners: they show a court treating suppression not merely as a ground for costs against the parties who benefited from it, but as a systemic gap (an affidavit-free caveat procedure) inviting institutional correction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-viii-citation-table\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"VIII_Citation_Table\"><\/span>VIII. Citation Table<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Case<\/th><th>Citation<\/th><th>Legal Proposition \/ Relevance<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Bar Council of Maharashtra v. M.V. Dabholkar<\/em><\/td><td>(1976) 2 SCC 291<\/td><td>Observed Advocate as an officer of the Court<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>J.S. Jadhav v. Mustafa Haji Mohamed Yusuf<\/em><\/td><td>(1993) 2 SCC 562<\/td><td>Punishment must be commensurate with the gravity of professional misconduct.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Narain Pandey v. Pannalal Pandey<\/em><\/td><td>(2013) 11 SCC 435<\/td><td>Confirmed on multiple independent sources. Suspension for filing unauthorised vakalatnamas and fictitious compromises.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>K.D. Sharma v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.<\/em><\/td><td>(2008) 12 SCC 481<\/td><td>A litigant \u201ccannot be allowed to play hide and seek\u201d with material facts \u2014 directly on point and stronger than the citation it replaces.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Dalip Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh<\/em><\/td><td>(2010) 2 SCC 114<\/td><td>Opens with the \u201csatya\u201d passage on the decline of candour among litigants \u2014 apt rhetorical anchor for the concealment holding.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Bhagwan Singh v. State of U.P.<\/em><\/td><td>2024 INSC 708; (2025) 6 SCC 416<\/td><td>The proposition (courts must not be used as instruments of fraud) is correctly attributed.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-ix-practitioner-checklist\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"IX_Practitioner_Checklist\"><\/span>IX. Practitioner Checklist<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For counsel assessing their own exposure, or advising a client, on facts resembling those in Nehru Vidyapeeth:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Treat any representation to the court about the undisputed or admitted status of a fact as a personal certification \u2014 verify it against the client&#8217;s file and against any adverse orders or findings you are aware of, however old, before repeating it to the bench.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where you have represented a client over an extended period, assume the court will impute to you knowledge of every material order or finding generated in that period, whether or not it was placed before you afresh in the present proceeding.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Verify every vakalatnama personally, or through a clerk under your direct supervision, before filing \u2014 and document that verification. A procedural lapse in verification, promptly and unconditionally acknowledged, was treated very differently here from an active misstatement of fact.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Where a caveat is to be lodged under a rule that does not presently require a supporting affidavit, consider filing one voluntarily; the Court&#8217;s own recommendation signals that the affidavit-free procedure may not survive in its present form.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If facts come to light after an order has been obtained that cast doubt on a representation made to the court, disclose them proactively and seek a review or recall rather than allowing the point to surface through an adversary \u2014 the costs order here fell on the party who benefited from the concealment, not merely on the one who discovered it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Do not treat a favourable forensic report on one issue (here, the failure to establish forgery of the vakalatnama) as disposing of a separate and independent concealment inquiry (here, the falsity of the \u2018undisputed election\u2019 assertion) \u2014 the Court kept the two strands analytically distinct throughout.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-x-concluding-observations\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"X_Concluding_Observations\"><\/span>X. Concluding Observations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nehru Vidyapeeth is a useful addition to the jurisprudence on advocates&#8217; candour precisely because it resists an easy, one-size-fits-all severity. The Court had before it two advocates whose conduct might, at first glance, have appeared to sit on the same spectrum of irregularity; it separated them with care, sanctioning the one whose years of engagement placed contrary material squarely within his knowledge, and absolving the one whose procedural lapse was promptly owned. For a bar increasingly alert to the reach of Section 151 recall jurisdiction and to costs orders of this kind, the judgement&#8217;s real instruction lies less in its result than in its method: the active\/inadvertent distinction, applied fact by fact, advocate by advocate, rather than assumed from the outcome backward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Written By: Inder Chand Jain<\/strong><br>Ph no: 8279945021, Email: inderjain2007@rediffmail.com<br>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-disclose-adverse-binding-precedents-india\/\">Advocate\u2019s Duty To Disclose Adverse Binding Precedents To The Court In India: Supreme Court, Ethics &amp; Article 141 Explained<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/how-to-change-advocate-in-civil-cases-criminal-cases-and-advocates-before-high-court-what-you-need-to-know\/\">How To Change Advocate In Civil Cases, Criminal Cases, And Advocates Before High Court: What You Need To Know<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/nri-divorce-in-india-complete-legal-guide-to-serving-divorce-notice-court-summons-to-wife-in-india\/\">NRI Divorce in India: Complete Legal Guide to Serving Divorce Notice &amp; Court Summons to Wife in India<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/order-18-rule-17-cpc-recall-of-witness-supreme-court\/\">Order 18 Rule 17 CPC: Supreme Court Explains When a Witness Can Be Recalled &amp; When Recall Is Not Permissible<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/new-vistas-in-ied-attacks-emerging-tactics-technologies-and-threat-horizons\/\">New Vistas in IED Attacks: Emerging Tactics, Technologies, and Threat Horizons<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Advocate&#8217;s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment, and the Section 151 Recall Jurisdiction A Case Study on Shiv Shankar Singh v. Committee of Management, Nehru Vidyapeeth Inter College and Another, 2026:AHC:178254 Date of Judgment: 24-08-2026 I. Prefatory Note This note takes up a judgment of the Allahabad High Court delivered on 24 August 2026 by<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":73,"featured_media":32487,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[1008],"class_list":["post-32204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-civil-law","tag-civil-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.4 (Yoast SEO v28.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court on advocate\u2019s duty of candour, active concealment, vakalatnama and Section 151 CPC recall jurisdiction.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court on advocate\u2019s duty of candour, active concealment, vakalatnama and Section 151 CPC recall jurisdiction.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-17T07:35:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-17T07:43:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Inder Jain\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Inder Jain\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Inder Jain\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ad1e46eba703bd5bc7788cc8bb7cca20\"},\"headline\":\"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-17T07:35:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-17T07:43:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2653,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Civil Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Civil Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/\",\"name\":\"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-17T07:35:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-17T07:43:25+00:00\",\"description\":\"Allahabad High Court on advocate\u2019s duty of candour, active concealment, vakalatnama and Section 151 CPC recall jurisdiction.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"advocate\u2019s duty of candour\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Civil Law > When an Advocate\u2019s Mistake Becomes Active Concealment: Allahabad High Court\u2019s Section 151 Recall Ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/ad1e46eba703bd5bc7788cc8bb7cca20\",\"name\":\"Inder Jain\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/13e802d35a283dba679d3529a0380965?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"url\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/13e802d35a283dba679d3529a0380965?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"contentUrl\":\"\\\/\\\/www.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/13e802d35a283dba679d3529a0380965?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm\",\"caption\":\"Inder Jain\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/inderjain\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Allahabad High Court on advocate\u2019s duty of candour, active concealment, vakalatnama and Section 151 CPC recall jurisdiction.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall","og_description":"Allahabad High Court on advocate\u2019s duty of candour, active concealment, vakalatnama and Section 151 CPC recall jurisdiction.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-09-17T07:35:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-17T07:43:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Inder Jain","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Inder Jain","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/"},"author":{"name":"Inder Jain","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/ad1e46eba703bd5bc7788cc8bb7cca20"},"headline":"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall","datePublished":"2026-09-17T07:35:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-17T07:43:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/"},"wordCount":2653,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp","keywords":["Civil Law"],"articleSection":["Civil Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/","name":"Suppressio Veri, Expressio Falsi: Advocate\u2019s Duty of Candour, Active Concealment &amp; Section 151 Recall - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp","datePublished":"2026-09-17T07:35:45+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-17T07:43:25+00:00","description":"Allahabad High Court on advocate\u2019s duty of candour, active concealment, vakalatnama and Section 151 CPC recall jurisdiction.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"advocate\u2019s duty of candour"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Civil Law > When an Advocate\u2019s Mistake Becomes Active Concealment: Allahabad High Court\u2019s Section 151 Recall Ruling"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/ad1e46eba703bd5bc7788cc8bb7cca20","name":"Inder Jain","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13e802d35a283dba679d3529a0380965?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","url":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13e802d35a283dba679d3529a0380965?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","contentUrl":"\/\/www.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13e802d35a283dba679d3529a0380965?s=96&#038;r=g&#038;d=mm","caption":"Inder Jain"},"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/inderjain\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/advocates-duty-candour-active-concealment-vakalatnama-section-151-recall.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/73"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32204"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32490,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32204\/revisions\/32490"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32487"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}