{"id":33082,"date":"2026-09-28T04:49:23","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T04:49:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=33082"},"modified":"2026-09-28T06:14:47","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T06:14:47","slug":"the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/","title":{"rendered":"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 id=\"h-doctrine-of-common-employment-meaning-origin-conditions-criticism-and-present-position\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Doctrine_of_Common_Employment_Meaning_Origin_Conditions_Criticism_and_Present_Position\"><\/span>Doctrine of Common Employment: Meaning, Origin, Conditions, Criticism and Present Position<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-introduction\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introduction\"><\/span>Introduction<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Doctrine of Common Employment, also known as the Fellow-Servant Rule, was an old exception to the general principle of vicarious liability. Under the ordinary rule, an employer is liable for the wrongful act or negligence of an employee when it is committed in the course of employment.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Doctrine_of_Common_Employment_Meaning_Origin_Conditions_Criticism_and_Present_Position\" >Doctrine of Common Employment: Meaning, Origin, Conditions, Criticism and Present Position<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Introduction\" >Introduction<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Origin\" >Origin<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Why_It_Existed_Historical_Justifications\" >Why It Existed: Historical Justifications<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Essential_Conditions\" >Essential Conditions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Important_Limitations\" >Important Limitations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Criticism_of_the_Doctrine_of_Common_Employment\" >Criticism of the Doctrine of Common Employment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Abolition_Restriction_of_the_Doctrine\" >Abolition \/ Restriction of the Doctrine<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#England\" >England<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#India\" >India<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Present_Position\" >Present Position<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Quick_Comparison\" >Quick Comparison<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, under the traditional doctrine of common employment, an employer was not liable for an injury caused to one employee by the negligence of another employee if both were engaged in the same or common employment. In other words, an employee was generally expected to bear the risk of negligence committed by a fellow employee working in the same undertaking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctrine was developed in nineteenth-century English law but was later criticised as unfair to employees. Its scope was gradually restricted by courts and legislation, and it was eventually abolished in England. In India, the Employers&#8217; Liability Act, 1938, significantly restricted its operation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-origin\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Origin\"><\/span>Origin<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rule began with the English case <em>Priestley v. Fowler (1837)<\/em>. A butcher\u2019s servant was injured when an overloaded van broke down. The court refused to hold the employer liable. Later cases (including American and English decisions) developed the idea that a worker accepted the ordinary risk of fellow-workers\u2019 negligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-why-it-existed-historical-justifications\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_It_Existed_Historical_Justifications\"><\/span>Why It Existed: Historical Justifications<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Workers were said to assume the risk of working with others.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Employees were thought to know the workplace better than outsiders.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It limited employers\u2019 liability for every accident between workers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These reasons later came to be seen as unfair: ordinary workers had little real control over who was hired or how the workplace was run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-essential-conditions\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Essential_Conditions\"><\/span>Essential Conditions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the defence to apply, two things had to be shown:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Both the injured person and the negligent person were employees of the same employer.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>They were engaged in a common employment (the same undertaking) at the time of the accident.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-important-limitations\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Important_Limitations\"><\/span>Important Limitations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even while the doctrine existed, it could not protect an employer from his own negligence. An employer still had personal duties to provide:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>competent staff,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>proper equipment and machinery,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>a safe system of work, and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>effective supervision.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This was firmly stated by the House of Lords in <em>Wilson &amp; Clyde Coal Co. Ltd. v. English (1937)<\/em>. If the real cause of injury was the employer\u2019s failure in these duties, the defence of common employment did not apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-criticism-of-the-doctrine-of-common-employment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Criticism_of_the_Doctrine_of_Common_Employment\"><\/span>Criticism of the Doctrine of Common Employment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Doctrine of Common Employment was widely criticised for being harsh and unfair to employees. It was based on the assumption that a worker accepted the risk of negligence by fellow employees, but in reality, an employee usually had little or no control over the selection, training, supervision or conduct of co-workers. The doctrine also placed the burden of workplace accidents on the injured employee, even though the employer was generally in a better position to prevent such accidents through proper supervision, safety measures and working systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Further, the distinction between the employer\u2019s own negligence and the negligence of a fellow employee often created difficulties in obtaining compensation. With the growth of industrial employment and greater recognition of workers\u2019 rights, the doctrine came to be regarded as outdated and inconsistent with the modern principle that employers should take reasonable care to provide a safe working environment. These criticisms ultimately led to its restriction and abolition in various jurisdictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-abolition-restriction-of-the-doctrine\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Abolition_Restriction_of_the_Doctrine\"><\/span>Abolition \/ Restriction of the Doctrine<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctrine of common employment was gradually considered harsh and unfair to employees because it prevented an injured worker from holding the employer liable for the negligence of a fellow employee. As a result, its operation was restricted and, in some jurisdictions, completely abolished.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-england\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"England\"><\/span>England<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctrine was completely abolished by the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act, 1948. An employee could therefore no longer be denied a claim against the employer merely because the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-india\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"India\"><\/span>India<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctrine was substantially restricted by the Employers\u2019 Liability Act, 1938. The Act did not abolish the doctrine in every situation, but it prevented an employer from relying on it in several important circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 3 bars the defence of common employment in specified cases, including injuries resulting from the failure to maintain safe ways, works, machinery or plant, negligence of a person entrusted with superintendence, and negligence of a person whose orders or directions the injured employee was bound to follow, among other situations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 3-A prevents an employer from using a contractual term or agreement to exclude or limit liability for personal injuries caused in circumstances covered by the Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Privy Council in <em>Governor-General in Council v. Constance Zena Wells (1949)<\/em> clarified that the Employers\u2019 Liability Act, 1938, restricted the doctrine rather than completely abolishing it in all cases. Thus, the defence could still operate in situations not covered by the statutory exceptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-present-position\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Present_Position\"><\/span>Present Position<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The doctrine is now mainly of historical interest. Modern Indian law (through the 1938 Act and later labour and social-security legislation) has greatly reduced its practical importance. An employer cannot escape responsibility for failing to provide a safe workplace merely by pointing to the negligence of a fellow employee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-quick-comparison\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Quick_Comparison\"><\/span>Quick Comparison<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Vicarious Liability<\/th><th>Common Employment (Traditional)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Employer liable for employee\u2019s tort in course of employment<\/td><td>Defence that prevented liability when one employee injured another<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>General rule<\/td><td>Exception to that rule<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Still fundamental in modern law<\/td><td>Abolished in England; heavily restricted in India<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, the doctrine once allowed employers to avoid liability for injuries caused by one worker to another. Courts and legislatures gradually limited and then largely removed it because it was unfair to workers and inconsistent with the employer\u2019s own duty to provide a safe system of work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-conclusion\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Doctrine of Common Employment was once an important exception to vicarious liability, allowing an employer to escape responsibility when one employee was injured by the negligence of another engaged in the same work. Originating in nineteenth-century English cases such as <em>Priestley v. Fowler<\/em>, it rested on the idea that workers accepted the ordinary risks created by their fellow servants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Over time this reasoning was recognised as unfair and unrealistic, especially because ordinary employees had little control over workplace conditions or the conduct of their colleagues. English law abolished the defence completely in 1948, while India substantially restricted it through the Employers\u2019 Liability Act, 1938. The lasting lesson of the doctrine is that an employer\u2019s own duty to provide competent staff, proper equipment and a safe system of work remains distinct from the negligence of any individual employee, and modern law rightly places the primary responsibility for workplace safety on the employer rather than on the injured worker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/discharge-of-torts\/\">Discharge of Torts<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/death-penalty-in-india-constitutional-validity-human-rights-debate-rarest-of-rare-doctrine\/\">Death Penalty in India: Constitutional Validity, Human Rights Debate &amp; Rarest of Rare Doctrine<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/uk-police-solving-600000-fewer-crimes-than-a-decade-ago-a-deepening-crisis-in-criminal-justice\/\">UK Police Solving 600,000 Fewer Crimes Than a Decade Ago: A Deepening Crisis in Criminal Justice<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/privy-purse-supreme-court-judgment-mizo-chiefs-claim-rejected\/\">Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges Of Princely Rulers Not Enforceable Legal Rights\u2014Mizo Chiefs&#8217; Claim Rejected<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/can-company-terminate-employee-pending-498a-domestic-violence-case-india\/\">Can a company terminate an employee for a pending 498A or domestic violence case in India?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Doctrine of Common Employment: Meaning, Origin, Conditions, Criticism and Present Position Introduction The Doctrine of Common Employment, also known as the Fellow-Servant Rule, was an old exception to the general principle of vicarious liability. Under the ordinary rule, an employer is liable for the wrongful act or negligence of an employee when it is committed<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":33106,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[99],"tags":[3552],"class_list":["post-33082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-torts-law","tag-torts-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.4 (Yoast SEO v28.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Learn the doctrine of common employment, its meaning, origin, conditions, criticism, abolition in England and restricted application in India.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Learn the doctrine of common employment, its meaning, origin, conditions, criticism, abolition in England and restricted application in India.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-28T04:49:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-28T06:14:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Md. Imran Wahab\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Md. Imran Wahab\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Md. Imran Wahab\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/23f17916b2032842e5ccd9cb51dfc156\"},\"headline\":\"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-28T04:49:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-28T06:14:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1179,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Torts Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Torts Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-28T04:49:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-28T06:14:47+00:00\",\"description\":\"Learn the doctrine of common employment, its meaning, origin, conditions, criticism, abolition in England and restricted application in India.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"Doctrine of Common Employment\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Torts Law > Doctrine of Common Employment in India: Meaning, History, Conditions & Present Position\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/23f17916b2032842e5ccd9cb51dfc156\",\"name\":\"Md. Imran Wahab\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/49\\\/1777837060-bpfull.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/49\\\/1777837060-bpfull.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/49\\\/1777837060-bpfull.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Md. Imran Wahab\"},\"description\":\"Md. Imran Wahab, a distinguished 2004-batch Indian Police Service officer, has dedicated over 32 years to public service, holding various senior managerial positions within the West Bengal Police force. His career has spanned diverse roles across different districts, including Kolkata Police, serving as DCP, 5th Battalion, Kolkata Armed Police and DCP (Port Division), for approximately 4 years. He served in Barrackpore Police Commissionerate, holding the positions of DCP (Special Branch) and DCP (Traffic) for over 4 years. He was posted in the districts of Dakshin Dinajpur and Nadia as Additional SP. At the sub-divisional level, he has worked as SDPOs of Gangarampur, Raghunathpur and Kalna sub-divisions of West Bengal. His tenure as Special IG and subsequently as IGP of Correctional Services, West Bengal, for over 4 years, saw him deeply engaged in improving the prison and correctional system. He visited numerous correctional homes across West Bengal, interacting with inmates, both male and female, including children residing with their incarcerated mothers. His outreach extended to correctional homes in Assam, Bihar, and Tripura. This hands-on approach provided him with invaluable insights into the workings of prisons and the complexities of the prisoner psyche. Beyond his operational roles, Md. Imran Wahab possesses a strong academic background, holding B.Sc., M.A., L.L.B., and M.B.A. degrees. He has also completed Post Graduate Diplomas in Human Rights, Project Management, Corporate Management, Computer Application, Public Administration, Medical Law, Disaster Management, Fire Safety &amp; Hazards Management and Psychology. He has attended Indian government sponsored specialized training in police and management matters in SVPNPA, Hyderabad, IIM, Ahmedabad and Singapore. He is the author of the books 'Police Investigation &amp; Allied Matters' and 'Alternative Dispute Resolution: Evolving Trends and Innovations' demonstrating his commitment to knowledge sharing within the law enforcement field. As an observer for the Election Commission of India, he has gained firsthand experience in conducting assembly elections and bye-elections in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Assam, Bihar, and Tripura (twice). This exposure has given him a deep understanding of election management and the Election Commission's operations. He has also served as Chairman and as a member of various recruitment boards for the selection of police personnel in Kolkata Police and West Bengal Police. Md. Imran Wahab's interests extend beyond law enforcement to include law, politics, international affairs, prison management, and business management. He has authored over 1000 articles on these diverse topics, reflecting his intellectual curiosity and desire to contribute to public discourse. He is also a research scholar in law and has contributed articles to the Indian Police Journal, National Crime Record Bureau Journal, SVP National Police Academy Journal, and International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research etc. Currently, he serves as IGP, Provisioning, West Bengal.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/md-imranwahab\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Learn the doctrine of common employment, its meaning, origin, conditions, criticism, abolition in England and restricted application in India.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability","og_description":"Learn the doctrine of common employment, its meaning, origin, conditions, criticism, abolition in England and restricted application in India.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-09-28T04:49:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-28T06:14:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Md. Imran Wahab","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Md. Imran Wahab","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/"},"author":{"name":"Md. Imran Wahab","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/23f17916b2032842e5ccd9cb51dfc156"},"headline":"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability","datePublished":"2026-09-28T04:49:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-28T06:14:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/"},"wordCount":1179,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp","keywords":["Torts Law"],"articleSection":["Torts Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/","name":"The Doctrine of Common Employment: From Fellow-Servant Rule to Modern Employer Liability - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp","datePublished":"2026-09-28T04:49:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-28T06:14:47+00:00","description":"Learn the doctrine of common employment, its meaning, origin, conditions, criticism, abolition in England and restricted application in India.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"Doctrine of Common Employment"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-doctrine-of-common-employment-from-fellow-servant-rule-to-modern-employer-liability\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Torts Law > Doctrine of Common Employment in India: Meaning, History, Conditions & Present Position"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/23f17916b2032842e5ccd9cb51dfc156","name":"Md. Imran Wahab","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/49\/1777837060-bpfull.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/49\/1777837060-bpfull.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/49\/1777837060-bpfull.jpg","caption":"Md. Imran Wahab"},"description":"Md. Imran Wahab, a distinguished 2004-batch Indian Police Service officer, has dedicated over 32 years to public service, holding various senior managerial positions within the West Bengal Police force. His career has spanned diverse roles across different districts, including Kolkata Police, serving as DCP, 5th Battalion, Kolkata Armed Police and DCP (Port Division), for approximately 4 years. He served in Barrackpore Police Commissionerate, holding the positions of DCP (Special Branch) and DCP (Traffic) for over 4 years. He was posted in the districts of Dakshin Dinajpur and Nadia as Additional SP. At the sub-divisional level, he has worked as SDPOs of Gangarampur, Raghunathpur and Kalna sub-divisions of West Bengal. His tenure as Special IG and subsequently as IGP of Correctional Services, West Bengal, for over 4 years, saw him deeply engaged in improving the prison and correctional system. He visited numerous correctional homes across West Bengal, interacting with inmates, both male and female, including children residing with their incarcerated mothers. His outreach extended to correctional homes in Assam, Bihar, and Tripura. This hands-on approach provided him with invaluable insights into the workings of prisons and the complexities of the prisoner psyche. Beyond his operational roles, Md. Imran Wahab possesses a strong academic background, holding B.Sc., M.A., L.L.B., and M.B.A. degrees. He has also completed Post Graduate Diplomas in Human Rights, Project Management, Corporate Management, Computer Application, Public Administration, Medical Law, Disaster Management, Fire Safety &amp; Hazards Management and Psychology. He has attended Indian government sponsored specialized training in police and management matters in SVPNPA, Hyderabad, IIM, Ahmedabad and Singapore. He is the author of the books 'Police Investigation &amp; Allied Matters' and 'Alternative Dispute Resolution: Evolving Trends and Innovations' demonstrating his commitment to knowledge sharing within the law enforcement field. As an observer for the Election Commission of India, he has gained firsthand experience in conducting assembly elections and bye-elections in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Assam, Bihar, and Tripura (twice). This exposure has given him a deep understanding of election management and the Election Commission's operations. He has also served as Chairman and as a member of various recruitment boards for the selection of police personnel in Kolkata Police and West Bengal Police. Md. Imran Wahab's interests extend beyond law enforcement to include law, politics, international affairs, prison management, and business management. He has authored over 1000 articles on these diverse topics, reflecting his intellectual curiosity and desire to contribute to public discourse. He is also a research scholar in law and has contributed articles to the Indian Police Journal, National Crime Record Bureau Journal, SVP National Police Academy Journal, and International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research etc. Currently, he serves as IGP, Provisioning, West Bengal.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/md-imranwahab\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/doctrine-of-common-employment-india.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33082"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33082\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33107,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33082\/revisions\/33107"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}