{"id":34337,"date":"2026-10-16T11:55:07","date_gmt":"2026-10-16T11:55:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=34337"},"modified":"2026-10-16T12:15:40","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T12:15:40","slug":"calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 id=\"h-love-jihad-not-defined-under-any-law-calcutta-high-court-refuses-relief-to-man-accused-of-concealing-religion-to-marry\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%98Love_Jihad_Not_Defined_Under_Any_Law_Calcutta_High_Court_Refuses_Relief_to_Man_Accused_of_Concealing_Religion_to_Marry\"><\/span>\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not Defined Under Any Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses Relief to Man Accused of Concealing Religion to Marry<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Calcutta High Court has declined to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of concealing his religious identity and marital status before entering into a relationship with a woman. The Court observed that the expression \u201clove jihad\u201d is not defined as a distinct offence under any central legislation and that the label had no bearing on its assessment of the allegations in the case.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#%E2%80%98Love_Jihad_Not_Defined_Under_Any_Law_Calcutta_High_Court_Refuses_Relief_to_Man_Accused_of_Concealing_Religion_to_Marry\" >\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not Defined Under Any Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses Relief to Man Accused of Concealing Religion to Marry<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Case_Details\" >Case Details<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Background_Allegations_of_Concealing_Religious_Identity_and_Marital_Status\" >Background: Allegations of Concealing Religious Identity and Marital Status<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Calcutta_High_Court_on_%E2%80%98Love_Jihad_No_Distinct_Offence_Defined_by_Central_Law\" >Calcutta High Court on \u2018Love Jihad\u2019: No Distinct Offence Defined by Central Law<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Does_Concealing_Religion_Automatically_Amount_to_Cheating\" >Does Concealing Religion Automatically Amount to Cheating?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Why_the_Court_Refused_to_Quash_the_Proceedings_Under_Section_482_CrPC\" >Why the Court Refused to Quash the Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Allegations_Against_Family_Members_and_the_Injury_Report\" >Allegations Against Family Members and the Injury Report<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Departmental_Inquiry_Does_Not_Automatically_End_Criminal_Proceedings\" >Departmental Inquiry Does Not Automatically End Criminal Proceedings<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#What_the_Judgment_Does%E2%80%94and_Does_Not%E2%80%94Establish\" >What the Judgment Does\u2014and Does Not\u2014Establish<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Final_Order\" >Final Order<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Frequently_Asked_Questions\" >Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#1_Did_the_Calcutta_High_Court_recognise_%E2%80%9Clove_jihad%E2%80%9D_as_a_criminal_offence\" >1. Did the Calcutta High Court recognise \u201clove jihad\u201d as a criminal offence?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#2_Does_concealing_religious_identity_automatically_amount_to_cheating\" >2. Does concealing religious identity automatically amount to cheating?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#3_Why_did_the_High_Court_refuse_to_quash_the_criminal_case\" >3. Why did the High Court refuse to quash the criminal case?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#4_Does_dismissal_of_a_quashing_petition_mean_the_accused_are_guilty\" >4. Does dismissal of a quashing petition mean the accused are guilty?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#5_Can_a_departmental_inquiry_determine_the_outcome_of_a_criminal_case\" >5. Can a departmental inquiry determine the outcome of a criminal case?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Need_Legal_Advice_Consult_an_Experienced_Supreme_Court_Advocate\" >Need Legal Advice? Consult an Experienced Supreme Court Advocate<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Adv_Tarun_Choudhury\" >Adv. Tarun Choudhury<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#%E2%9A%96%EF%B8%8F_Why_Seek_Legal_Guidance\" >\u2696\ufe0f Why Seek Legal Guidance?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Speak_to_an_Advocate_About_Your_Legal_Concerns\" >Speak to an Advocate About Your Legal Concerns<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Key_Takeaways_Calcutta_High_Courts_Ruling_on_%E2%80%98Love_Jihad\" >Key Takeaways: Calcutta High Court\u2019s Ruling on \u2018Love Jihad\u2019<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#Why_This_Judgment_Matters\" >Why This Judgment Matters<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Md. Rafikul Islam &amp; Others v. State of West Bengal &amp; Another<\/em>, the Court examined whether the allegations and materials collected during the investigation justified quashing the criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court concluded that the allegations, read with the case diary and charge sheet, disclosed matters requiring consideration at trial. It declined to accept the petitioners\u2019 factual defences as grounds for terminating the proceedings at the preliminary stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Importantly, the refusal to quash the case is not a finding of guilt. The allegations remain subject to proof in accordance with law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-case-details\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Case_Details\"><\/span>Case Details<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Particulars<\/th><th>Details<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><th>Case Title<\/th><td><em>Md. Rafikul Islam &amp; Others v. State of West Bengal &amp; Another<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Court<\/th><td>Calcutta High Court<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Judge<\/th><td>Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Case Number<\/th><td>C.R.R. No. 3501 of 2022<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Connected Applications<\/th><td>CRAN 3 of 2023 and CRAN 4 of 2023<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision Date<\/th><td>October 15, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Police Case<\/th><td>Nimta Police Station Case No. 885\/2021<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Principal Provision Considered<\/th><td>Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-background-allegations-of-concealing-religious-identity-and-marital-status\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Background_Allegations_of_Concealing_Religious_Identity_and_Marital_Status\"><\/span>Background: Allegations of Concealing Religious Identity and Marital Status<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The complainant alleged that the principal accused introduced himself as \u201cRajib Sarkar\u201d, represented himself as an unmarried Hindu man, and concealed his actual religious identity and existing marriage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the complaint, the parties entered into a relationship and participated in a temple ceremony in Digha in May 2021. The complainant further alleged that they subsequently lived together in Bardhaman.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The complaint also contained allegations of sexual assault, confinement, threats and physical assault involving the principal accused and members of his family. The prosecution relied on the materials collected during the investigation, including the injury report concerning the alleged assault at a family residence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following an application under Section 156(3) CrPC, Nimta Police Station Case No. 885\/2021 was registered. The investigation resulted in a charge sheet invoking, among other provisions, Sections 416, 419, 420, 498A, 323, 120B, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The accused approached the High Court seeking to have the criminal proceedings quashed. Their arguments included challenges to the complainant\u2019s account, the nature of the relationship, the validity of the alleged marriage and the significance of departmental proceedings concerning one of the petitioners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court had to determine whether those submissions justified terminating the prosecution without a trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-calcutta-high-court-on-love-jihad-no-distinct-offence-defined-by-central-law\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Calcutta_High_Court_on_%E2%80%98Love_Jihad_No_Distinct_Offence_Defined_by_Central_Law\"><\/span>Calcutta High Court on \u2018Love Jihad\u2019: No Distinct Offence Defined by Central Law<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the significant aspects of the decision was the Court\u2019s treatment of the expression \u201clove jihad\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judgment extract states that there is \u201cno single central legislation or Act\u201d defining or recognising \u201clove jihad\u201d as a distinct legal offence. The Court also found that the characterisation had no bearing on its assessment of the alleged deception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The distinction matters. A politically or socially charged expression does not, by itself, establish the ingredients of a criminal offence. Criminal liability must arise from the applicable statute and the facts alleged, rather than from the label attached to a relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court\u2019s approach was therefore to examine the alleged concealment of identity and marital status, the allegations of assault and intimidation, and the material collected during the investigation. It did not treat the expression \u201clove jihad\u201d as a substitute for the legal analysis required under the relevant provisions of the IPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also found no material establishing an attempt at religious conversion in the circumstances described in the judgment extract. The case was assessed on the allegations and offences actually before the Court, not on an assumed conversion-related motive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-does-concealing-religion-automatically-amount-to-cheating\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Does_Concealing_Religion_Automatically_Amount_to_Cheating\"><\/span>Does Concealing Religion Automatically Amount to Cheating?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. Concealment of religious identity does not automatically establish cheating or cheating by personation. Whether a criminal offence is made out depends on the applicable statutory ingredients and the evidence in the particular case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sections 416 and 419 IPC concern cheating by personation, while Section 420 addresses cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property. The prosecution must establish the elements required by the particular offence; the mere existence of a relationship or a misrepresentation does not automatically prove every element of these provisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The question before the High Court, however, was not whether the accused had already been proved guilty. It was whether the allegations and investigative materials justified quashing the prosecution before trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petitioners disputed the complainant\u2019s version and relied on their own factual explanations. The Court considered those defences unsuitable for final determination in a Section 482 proceeding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The issue of consent also required careful consideration. Section 90 IPC addresses circumstances in which consent is not valid consent for the purposes of the Code, including where it is given under a misconception of fact in circumstances covered by the provision. Whether the alleged concealment had the legal effect asserted by the prosecution would depend on the facts and evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court did not hold that every concealment of religion vitiates consent or constitutes a criminal offence. It declined to resolve the disputed factual questions at the quashing stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-why-the-court-refused-to-quash-the-proceedings-under-section-482-crpc\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_the_Court_Refused_to_Quash_the_Proceedings_Under_Section_482_CrPC\"><\/span>Why the Court Refused to Quash the Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Section 482 CrPC preserves the High Court\u2019s inherent power to prevent abuse of the process of a court and to secure the ends of justice. The power is important, but it is not intended to replace a criminal trial whenever the accused disputes the prosecution\u2019s version.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In applying this principle, the Court considered the Supreme Court\u2019s guidance in Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 315, on the limited scope of judicial interference with criminal investigations and proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also considered Rajiv Thapar v. Madan Lal Kapoor, (2013) 3 SCC 330, which addresses the circumstances in which defence material may justify quashing criminal proceedings. Defence material must meet a stringent standard; disputed factual claims cannot simply be accepted as conclusive at the preliminary stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The central question was whether the prosecution materials, taken at face value, disclosed a basis for continuing the case. The Court concluded that the allegations and materials could not be rejected on the grounds advanced by the petitioners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-allegations-against-family-members-and-the-injury-report\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Allegations_Against_Family_Members_and_the_Injury_Report\"><\/span>Allegations Against Family Members and the Injury Report<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The proceedings also involved allegations against other petitioners concerning an assault at a residence in Murshidabad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court considered these allegations alongside the injury report. It did not regard the allegations as inherently improbable or so plainly insufficient that the proceedings against the concerned petitioners should be terminated at the threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significance of this assessment was limited to the quashing application. Whether the allegations are ultimately established remains a matter for the criminal court after considering the evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-departmental-inquiry-does-not-automatically-end-criminal-proceedings\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Departmental_Inquiry_Does_Not_Automatically_End_Criminal_Proceedings\"><\/span>Departmental Inquiry Does Not Automatically End Criminal Proceedings<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petitioners also relied on the outcome of departmental proceedings concerning one of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The High Court did not treat the departmental inquiry as conclusive of the criminal allegations. Departmental proceedings and criminal prosecutions serve different purposes and operate under different standards of proof. An outcome in one does not automatically determine the other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court considered whether the departmental findings demonstrated that the criminal prosecution was an abuse of process. It concluded that they did not provide a sufficient basis to quash the proceedings in their entirety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also considered the argument concerning Section 498A IPC and the alleged marriage. Even if the applicability of that provision required further examination, a challenge to one charge would not, by itself, justify terminating the entire prosecution where other allegations could independently warrant a trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-what-the-judgment-does-and-does-not-establish\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_the_Judgment_Does%E2%80%94and_Does_Not%E2%80%94Establish\"><\/span>What the Judgment Does\u2014and Does Not\u2014Establish<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision draws an important distinction between a descriptive label and a legally defined offence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court did not recognise \u201clove jihad\u201d as a separate offence. Nor did it hold that concealment of religious identity automatically amounts to cheating, invalidates consent or establishes criminal liability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instead, it assessed whether the allegations concerning identity, marital status, assault and intimidation, together with the investigative materials, justified allowing the prosecution to proceed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling also reinforces the limits of Section 482 CrPC. A High Court may intervene where the legal requirements for quashing are met, but it ordinarily does not resolve contested questions of credibility and fact that require evidence at trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-final-order\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Final_Order\"><\/span>Final Order<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Calcutta High Court dismissed C.R.R. No. 3501 of 2022 and disposed of the connected applications identified in the judgment. The interim order was vacated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The practical effect is that the criminal proceedings were not terminated at the quashing stage. The dismissal does not amount to a conviction, and the allegations must still be determined through the applicable criminal process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-frequently-asked-questions\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Frequently_Asked_Questions\"><\/span>Frequently Asked Questions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-1-did-the-calcutta-high-court-recognise-love-jihad-as-a-criminal-offence\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"1_Did_the_Calcutta_High_Court_recognise_%E2%80%9Clove_jihad%E2%80%9D_as_a_criminal_offence\"><\/span>1. Did the Calcutta High Court recognise \u201clove jihad\u201d as a criminal offence?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The judgment extract states that no central legislation defines or recognises \u201clove jihad\u201d as a distinct offence. The Court assessed the allegations under the applicable criminal provisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-2-does-concealing-religious-identity-automatically-amount-to-cheating\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_Does_concealing_religious_identity_automatically_amount_to_cheating\"><\/span>2. Does concealing religious identity automatically amount to cheating?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. Whether cheating or cheating by personation is made out depends on the statutory ingredients and the facts of the case. Concealment of religion alone does not automatically establish criminal liability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-why-did-the-high-court-refuse-to-quash-the-criminal-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_Why_did_the_High_Court_refuse_to_quash_the_criminal_case\"><\/span>3. Why did the High Court refuse to quash the criminal case?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court found that the allegations and investigative materials disclosed issues that could not appropriately be resolved in a Section 482 CrPC proceeding. The petitioners\u2019 factual defences required consideration through the criminal process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-4-does-dismissal-of-a-quashing-petition-mean-the-accused-are-guilty\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"4_Does_dismissal_of_a_quashing_petition_mean_the_accused_are_guilty\"><\/span>4. Does dismissal of a quashing petition mean the accused are guilty?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. It means the proceedings have not been terminated at that stage. The prosecution must still establish the relevant charges in accordance with law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-5-can-a-departmental-inquiry-determine-the-outcome-of-a-criminal-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"5_Can_a_departmental_inquiry_determine_the_outcome_of_a_criminal_case\"><\/span>5. Can a departmental inquiry determine the outcome of a criminal case?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Not automatically. Departmental proceedings and criminal prosecutions have different purposes and standards of proof. The result of a departmental inquiry does not, by itself, require a criminal prosecution to be quashed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-conclusion\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Calcutta High Court\u2019s decision is significant for its distinction between the expression \u201clove jihad\u201d and offences recognised by criminal law. A label cannot replace statutory ingredients, and a disputed allegation is not a finding of guilt. The Court refused to quash the proceedings because the allegations and materials required further judicial examination, leaving the merits to be determined through the criminal process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-need-legal-advice-consult-an-experienced-supreme-court-advocate\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Need_Legal_Advice_Consult_an_Experienced_Supreme_Court_Advocate\"><\/span>Need Legal Advice? Consult an Experienced Supreme Court Advocate<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Facing a criminal law issue, matrimonial dispute, false criminal allegations, or a complex legal challenge? Understanding your legal rights and acting at the right time can make a meaningful difference to your case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Get professional legal guidance tailored to your circumstances. Discuss your concerns, understand the legal remedies available, and take an informed next step with an experienced advocate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-adv-tarun-choudhury\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Adv_Tarun_Choudhury\"><\/span>Adv. Tarun Choudhury<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Supreme Court Advocate | 25+ Years of Legal Experience<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-why-seek-legal-guidance\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%9A%96%EF%B8%8F_Why_Seek_Legal_Guidance\"><\/span>\u2696\ufe0f Why Seek Legal Guidance?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Understand your legal rights and available remedies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Get clarity on the legal options relevant to your situation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Discuss the appropriate next steps for your case.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Make informed decisions with professional legal guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-speak-to-an-advocate-about-your-legal-concerns\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Speak_to_an_Advocate_About_Your_Legal_Concerns\"><\/span>Speak to an Advocate About Your Legal Concerns<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\ud83d\udcde <strong>Call for a Consultation:<\/strong> 9650499965<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\ud83d\udcac <strong>WhatsApp for an Enquiry:<\/strong> 8851978611<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2709\ufe0f <strong>Email:<\/strong> admin@legalserviceindia.com<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Don&#8217;t let legal uncertainty prevent you from understanding your options. Reach out to discuss your situation and explore the appropriate legal course of action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Legal advice depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Contacting an advocate does not guarantee a particular outcome.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-key-takeaways-calcutta-high-court-s-ruling-on-love-jihad\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Takeaways_Calcutta_High_Courts_Ruling_on_%E2%80%98Love_Jihad\"><\/span>Key Takeaways: Calcutta High Court\u2019s Ruling on \u2018Love Jihad\u2019<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 is not a separately defined offence under central law:<\/strong> The Calcutta High Court observed that no central legislation defines or recognises \u201clove jihad\u201d as a distinct criminal offence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Concealing religious identity does not automatically establish cheating:<\/strong> Criminal liability depends on the ingredients of the specific offence and the evidence available in the case.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The Court refused to quash the criminal proceedings:<\/strong> In Md. Rafikul Islam &amp; Others v. State of West Bengal &amp; Another, the Court declined to terminate the prosecution at the preliminary stage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Refusal to quash does not mean conviction:<\/strong> The decision does not establish the accused\u2019s guilt. The allegations remain subject to determination through the criminal process.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Section 482 CrPC provides limited but important powers:<\/strong> The High Court may quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, but it does not ordinarily resolve disputed questions of fact at this stage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Allegations must be assessed under applicable criminal law:<\/strong> A politically or socially charged label cannot replace the statutory requirements of offences such as cheating, cheating by personation or criminal intimidation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Defence arguments may require a trial:<\/strong> Where the allegations and investigative materials disclose issues requiring judicial examination, disputed factual claims may not justify quashing the proceedings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Departmental proceedings do not automatically determine criminal liability:<\/strong> Departmental inquiries and criminal prosecutions serve different purposes and operate under different standards of proof.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-why-this-judgment-matters\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_This_Judgment_Matters\"><\/span>Why This Judgment Matters<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling highlights an important distinction between a public label and a legally recognised criminal offence. The Calcutta High Court\u2019s approach underscores that criminal proceedings must be assessed on the allegations, evidence and applicable statutory provisions\u2014not merely on the terminology used to describe a relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Legal significance:<\/strong> The decision concerns whether criminal proceedings should continue, not whether the accused are guilty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/civil-criminal-departmental-proceedings-simultaneously-india\/\">Can Civil, Criminal and Departmental Proceedings Run Simultaneously? Supreme Court Law Explained<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/corporate-fraud-and-misuse-of-companies-judicial-approach-under-indian-law\/\">Corporate Fraud and Misuse of Companies: Judicial Approach under Indian Law<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/the-unruly-litigant-in-robes-government-as-indias-largest-litigation-generator\/\">The Unruly Litigant In Robes: Government As India&#8217;s Largest Litigation Generator<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/quash-business-dispute-fir-section-528-bnss\/\">Business Dispute Turned Into a Criminal FIR? How to Quash It (Section 528 BNSS)<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/government-contracts-and-criminal-liability-analysis-of-karnataka-high-courts-landmark-ruling-on-contractual-disputes\/\">Government Contracts and Criminal Liability: Analysis of Karnataka High Court&#8217;s Landmark Ruling on Contractual Disputes<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not Defined Under Any Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses Relief to Man Accused of Concealing Religion to Marry The Calcutta High Court has declined to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of concealing his religious identity and marital status before entering into a relationship with a woman. The Court observed that the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":34338,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[7218,5160,28],"class_list":["post-34337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-family-law","tag-family-law","tag-picks","tag-top-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.6 (Yoast SEO v28.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court says \u2018love jihad\u2019 is not a separate offence under central law but refuses to quash the criminal case against the accused.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court says \u2018love jihad\u2019 is not a separate offence under central law but refuses to quash the criminal case against the accused.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-16T11:55:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-16T12:15:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal Service India\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal Service India\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc6363c10971984eb3d36331118826bd\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-16T11:55:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-16T12:15:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2300,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Family Law\",\"Picks\",\"Top News\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Family Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-16T11:55:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-16T12:15:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court says \u2018love jihad\u2019 is not a separate offence under central law but refuses to quash the criminal case against the accused.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"Calcutta High Court Love Jihad Judgment\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Family Law > Calcutta High Court on \u2018Love Jihad\u2019: No Separate Offence Under Central Law, Criminal Case to Continue\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc6363c10971984eb3d36331118826bd\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/1\\\/1787464557-bpfull.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/1\\\/1787464557-bpfull.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/1\\\/1787464557-bpfull.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"description\":\"A legal Expert, in the field of Intellectual property and Civil Laws\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/raaya\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Calcutta High Court says \u2018love jihad\u2019 is not a separate offence under central law but refuses to quash the criminal case against the accused.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case","og_description":"Calcutta High Court says \u2018love jihad\u2019 is not a separate offence under central law but refuses to quash the criminal case against the accused.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-10-16T11:55:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-16T12:15:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Legal Service India","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal Service India","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/"},"author":{"name":"Legal Service India","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/cc6363c10971984eb3d36331118826bd"},"headline":"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case","datePublished":"2026-10-16T11:55:07+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-16T12:15:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/"},"wordCount":2300,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp","keywords":["Family Law","Picks","Top News"],"articleSection":["Family Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/","name":"\u2018Love Jihad\u2019 Not a Crime Under Central Law: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Case - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-16T11:55:07+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-16T12:15:40+00:00","description":"Calcutta High Court says \u2018love jihad\u2019 is not a separate offence under central law but refuses to quash the criminal case against the accused.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"Calcutta High Court Love Jihad Judgment"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/calcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Family Law > Calcutta High Court on \u2018Love Jihad\u2019: No Separate Offence Under Central Law, Criminal Case to Continue"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/cc6363c10971984eb3d36331118826bd","name":"Legal Service India","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/1\/1787464557-bpfull.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/1\/1787464557-bpfull.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/1\/1787464557-bpfull.jpg","caption":"Legal Service India"},"description":"A legal Expert, in the field of Intellectual property and Civil Laws","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/raaya\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/alcutta-high-court-love-jihad-judgment.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34337","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34337"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34346,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34337\/revisions\/34346"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}