{"id":34500,"date":"2026-10-21T07:51:14","date_gmt":"2026-10-21T07:51:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=34500"},"modified":"2026-10-21T08:05:22","modified_gmt":"2026-10-21T08:05:22","slug":"amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/","title":{"rendered":"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 id=\"h-can-a-plaint-be-amended-after-trial-has-begun-supreme-court-explains-order-vi-rule-17-cpc\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun_Supreme_Court_Explains_Order_VI_Rule_17_CPC\"><\/span>Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun? Supreme Court Explains Order VI Rule 17 CPC<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court has clarified that a plaint amendment sought after the commencement of trial cannot be rejected merely because it is belated. The applicant must satisfy the due-diligence requirement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, while questions such as limitation and maintainability may be left open for trial where they depend on disputed facts.<\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_89 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #0c0c0c;color:#0c0c0c\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun_Supreme_Court_Explains_Order_VI_Rule_17_CPC\" >Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun? Supreme Court Explains Order VI Rule 17 CPC<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-2' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#What_Does_Order_VI_Rule_17_CPC_Say_About_Amendment_of_Pleadings\" >What Does Order VI Rule 17 CPC Say About Amendment of Pleadings?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Why_the_2002_Amendment_Matters\" >Why the 2002 Amendment Matters<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#The_Case_Before_the_Supreme_Court\" >The Case Before the Supreme Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Why_the_Respondents_Opposed_the_Amendment\" >Why the Respondents Opposed the Amendment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Supreme_Court_on_Due_Diligence_Why_the_Amendment_Was_Allowed\" >Supreme Court on Due Diligence: Why the Amendment Was Allowed<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Significance_of_the_Due-Diligence_Ruling\" >Significance of the Due-Diligence Ruling<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Does_an_Amendment_That_Expands_the_Dispute_Change_the_Nature_of_the_Suit\" >Does an Amendment That Expands the Dispute Change the Nature of the Suit?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#The_Test_for_Changing_the_Nature_and_Character_of_a_Suit\" >The Test for Changing the Nature and Character of a Suit<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun_If_the_Amended_Claim_May_Be_Time-Barred\" >Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun If the Amended Claim May Be Time-Barred?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Judgments_Relied_on_for_Limitation_and_Amendment_of_Pleadings\" >Judgments Relied on for Limitation and Amendment of Pleadings<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Difference_Between_Allowing_an_Amendment_and_Deciding_Limitation\" >Difference Between Allowing an Amendment and Deciding Limitation<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#The_Courts_Approach_to_Prejudice_and_Multiplicity_of_Proceedings\" >The Court&#8217;s Approach to Prejudice and Multiplicity of Proceedings<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#How_the_Decision_Relates_to_Earlier_Supreme_Court_Judgments\" >How the Decision Relates to Earlier Supreme Court Judgments<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#AK_Gupta_Sons_Ltd_v_Damodar_Valley_Corporation\" >A.K. Gupta &amp; Sons Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Rajesh_Kumar_Aggarwal_v_KK_Modi\" >Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal v. K.K. Modi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Abdul_Rehman_v_Mohd_Ruldu\" >Abdul Rehman v. Mohd. Ruldu<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Basavaraj_v_Indira\" >Basavaraj v. Indira<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#What_Is_the_Practical_Effect_of_the_Judgment\" >What Is the Practical Effect of the Judgment?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#For_a_Party_Seeking_Amendment\" >For a Party Seeking Amendment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#For_the_Opposing_Party\" >For the Opposing Party<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#For_Courts\" >For Courts<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#What_the_Supreme_Court_Ultimately_Directed\" >What the Supreme Court Ultimately Directed<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Legal_Issues_Left_Open_for_the_Trial_Court\" >Legal Issues Left Open for the Trial Court<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Summary_of_the_Supreme_Courts_Directions\" >Summary of the Supreme Court&#8217;s Directions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Conclusion_The_Law_on_Amendment_of_Plaint_After_Commencement_of_Trial\" >Conclusion: The Law on Amendment of Plaint After Commencement of Trial<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Need_Legal_Advice_on_Amendment_of_Plaint_or_a_Pending_Court_Case\" >Need Legal Advice on Amendment of Plaint or a Pending Court Case?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Consult_Adv_Tarun_Choudhury\" >Consult Adv. Tarun Choudhury<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Frequently_Asked_Questions_FAQs\" >Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#1_Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun_Under_Order_VI_Rule_17_CPC\" >1. Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#2_What_Is_the_Due_Diligence_Requirement_for_Amendment_of_Plaint_After_Commencement_of_Trial\" >2. What Is the Due Diligence Requirement for Amendment of Plaint After Commencement of Trial?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-32\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#3_Can_a_Court_Reject_an_Amendment_of_Plaint_Because_the_Proposed_Claim_May_Be_Barred_by_Limitation\" >3. Can a Court Reject an Amendment of Plaint Because the Proposed Claim May Be Barred by Limitation?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-33\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#4_Does_Amendment_of_Plaint_After_Trial_Has_Begun_Change_the_Nature_and_Character_of_the_Suit\" >4. Does Amendment of Plaint After Trial Has Begun Change the Nature and Character of the Suit?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-34\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#5_What_Should_I_Do_If_My_Amendment_Application_Is_Rejected_by_the_Trial_Court\" >5. What Should I Do If My Amendment Application Is Rejected by the Trial Court?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-35\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#Key_Takeaways_Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun\" >Key Takeaways: Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Can a plaint be amended after trial has begun? The answer depends on the circumstances of the case, the nature of the proposed amendment and, most importantly, whether the party seeking the amendment can explain why the relevant matter could not have been raised earlier despite exercising due diligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court examined these principles in <em>Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others<\/em>, 2026 INSC 1112, decided on 12 October 2026. A Bench comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan allowed an amendment application that had been rejected by the trial court and the Orissa High Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision offers useful guidance on how courts should approach amendments sought after the trial has commenced. It also draws an important distinction: permission to amend a plaint does not amount to a finding that the amended claim is legally sustainable or that the relief sought must ultimately be granted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-what-does-order-vi-rule-17-cpc-say-about-amendment-of-pleadings\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Does_Order_VI_Rule_17_CPC_Say_About_Amendment_of_Pleadings\"><\/span>What Does Order VI Rule 17 CPC Say About Amendment of Pleadings?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, empowers courts to allow either party to amend its pleadings at any stage of the proceedings, on such terms as may be just. The underlying purpose is to ensure that the real questions in controversy between the parties can be properly determined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The provision, however, contains an important restriction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the proviso to Order VI Rule 17, once the trial has commenced, the court cannot allow an amendment unless it is satisfied that, despite exercising due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The provision therefore requires courts to consider two related questions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Is the proposed amendment necessary to determine the real controversy between the parties?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If the trial has commenced, has the applicant established that the matter could not have been raised earlier despite due diligence?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first question concerns the usefulness and relevance of the amendment. The second imposes a statutory condition that must be satisfied once the trial has begun.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court must consider both. A proposed amendment may be relevant to the dispute, but relevance alone does not excuse an unexplained failure to raise the matter earlier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-why-the-2002-amendment-matters\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_the_2002_Amendment_Matters\"><\/span>Why the 2002 Amendment Matters<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The proviso to Order VI Rule 17 was introduced through the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002, which came into effect on 1 July 2002. It was intended to prevent parties from repeatedly changing their pleadings at advanced stages of litigation without a satisfactory explanation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The provision does not impose an absolute prohibition on amendments after the commencement of trial. Instead, it requires the applicant to meet a more demanding standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In practical terms, delay is an important consideration, but the decisive question is whether the statutory requirement of due diligence has been satisfied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-the-case-before-the-supreme-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Case_Before_the_Supreme_Court\"><\/span>The Case Before the Supreme Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dispute arose from a property suit instituted by Rabindranath Sahoo, who sought a declaration of his right, title and interest over the suit property, recovery of possession and rectification of registered sale deeds, among other reliefs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The suit, registered as C.S. No. 86 of 2009, concerned property covered by Hal Plot Nos. 3370\/4045 and 3371\/4050. The litigation involved competing claims and successive transfers of portions of the property.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">During the proceedings, the plaintiff sought to introduce additional pleadings concerning a compromise decree passed in T.S. No. 105 of 1998. According to the plaintiff, that decree affected a portion of the very property whose title and possession were already in dispute in the pending suit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff maintained that he had not been a party to the earlier proceedings and had not known about the compromise decree. He stated that he obtained certified copies of the plaint and final decree on 22 June 2020 and discovered the relevant details through those documents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff also relied on the fact that the written statements filed by the contesting defendants had not disclosed the source of title of the relevant vendors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The proposed amendment sought to bring these facts before the court and include consequential relief concerning the compromise decree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The trial court rejected the application on 21 September 2022. The Orissa High Court declined to interfere with that decision on 10 April 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff&#8217;s legal heirs then approached the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-why-the-respondents-opposed-the-amendment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_the_Respondents_Opposed_the_Amendment\"><\/span>Why the Respondents Opposed the Amendment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The respondents argued that the suit had already been pending for years and that the plaintiff had made repeated attempts to amend the pleadings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They contended that the latest application was filed after a substantial delay and would enlarge the scope of the proceedings. They also argued that allowing the amendment at such a late stage would undermine the purpose of the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reliance was placed on <em>Basavaraj v. Indira<\/em>, 2024 INSC 151, in support of the objection to permitting the amendment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court therefore had to consider whether the delay justified rejecting the application or whether the explanation offered by the appellants met the statutory test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-supreme-court-on-due-diligence-why-the-amendment-was-allowed\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Supreme_Court_on_Due_Diligence_Why_the_Amendment_Was_Allowed\"><\/span>Supreme Court on Due Diligence: Why the Amendment Was Allowed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court accepted that the amendment application had been filed after the commencement of trial. The proviso to Order VI Rule 17 was therefore applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The central issue was whether the appellants had explained why the matters sought to be introduced could not have been raised earlier despite due diligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court examined the circumstances surrounding the discovery of the compromise decree. It noted that the proposed amendment was not based on an entirely unrelated transaction. Rather, it concerned a decree that allegedly affected a portion of the same property already involved in the pending title and possession dispute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also considered the appellants&#8217; assertion that the original plaintiff had not been a party to the earlier proceedings and that the source of title of the relevant vendors had not been disclosed in the written statements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The date on which certified copies were obtained\u201422 June 2020\u2014was relevant to assessing the explanation for the delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court did not treat these circumstances as conclusively establishing every factual assertion made by the appellants. Instead, it considered whether the explanation was sufficient to satisfy the due-diligence requirement at the amendment stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In paragraphs 13.1 and 13.2 of the judgment, the Court concluded that the explanation could not, in the circumstances, be dismissed as mere omission, inadvertence or negligence. The subsequent discovery of the compromise proceedings, the plaintiff&#8217;s asserted non-party status and the absence of disclosure regarding the source of title provided a sufficient basis for accepting the plea of due diligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The statutory requirement was therefore satisfied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-significance-of-the-due-diligence-ruling\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Significance_of_the_Due-Diligence_Ruling\"><\/span>Significance of the Due-Diligence Ruling<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significance of the ruling is that the court must examine the explanation for the delay in its factual context. The mere fact that an amendment is sought after trial has begun does not, by itself, answer whether the proviso has been satisfied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is not a general exemption for late amendments. The applicant must still demonstrate why the matter could not reasonably have been raised before the trial commenced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-does-an-amendment-that-expands-the-dispute-change-the-nature-of-the-suit\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Does_an_Amendment_That_Expands_the_Dispute_Change_the_Nature_of_the_Suit\"><\/span>Does an Amendment That Expands the Dispute Change the Nature of the Suit?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another important question was whether the proposed amendment fundamentally altered the nature and character of the original suit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court held that it did not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The original suit concerned the plaintiff&#8217;s claim to title and possession over the disputed property. The proposed amendment introduced facts relating to a compromise decree that allegedly affected a portion of that same property.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court acknowledged that the amendment could enlarge the factual and legal questions requiring adjudication. However, it explained that an enlargement of the issues does not automatically mean that the nature and character of the suit have changed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-the-test-for-changing-the-nature-and-character-of-a-suit\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Test_for_Changing_the_Nature_and_Character_of_a_Suit\"><\/span>The Test for Changing the Nature and Character of a Suit<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The relevant question is whether the amendment introduces a distinct and independent controversy with no meaningful connection to the original cause of action, or whether it adds facts and consequential reliefs that are directly connected to the dispute already before the court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In paragraph 14.1, the Court focused on the connection between the proposed amendment and the existing controversy. Since the amendment concerned the same property and could directly affect the claims to title and possession, the Court found a sufficient nexus with the original suit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This distinction is important. An amendment can introduce additional questions for the court to decide without necessarily converting the original suit into a fundamentally different proceeding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision does not mean that a court must permit every amendment that concerns the same property. The nature of the original claim, the relationship between the proposed pleadings and the existing dispute, and the prejudice to the other side remain relevant considerations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-can-a-plaint-be-amended-after-trial-has-begun-if-the-amended-claim-may-be-time-barred\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun_If_the_Amended_Claim_May_Be_Time-Barred\"><\/span>Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun If the Amended Claim May Be Time-Barred?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Limitation was another significant issue in the appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As a general principle, courts may consider whether an amendment would introduce a claim that is clearly barred by limitation. A proposed amendment may be refused where it would unfairly deprive the opposite party of an accrued defence or otherwise cause injustice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the position is different where limitation depends on disputed facts that have not yet been determined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In Haramani Sahoo, the date and circumstances in which the original plaintiff learned of the compromise decree were relevant to the limitation question. The appellants relied on the certified copies obtained on 22 June 2020, while the respondents opposed the amendment on grounds that included delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court considered it inappropriate to finally decide limitation while determining whether the plaint should be amended.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-judgments-relied-on-for-limitation-and-amendment-of-pleadings\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judgments_Relied_on_for_Limitation_and_Amendment_of_Pleadings\"><\/span>Judgments Relied on for Limitation and Amendment of Pleadings<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court relied on established principles reflected in the following decisions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Ragu Thilak D. John v. S. Rayappan, (2001) 2 SCC 472;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sampath Kumar v. Ayyakannu, (2002) 7 SCC 559; and<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Pankaja v. Yellappa, (2004) 6 SCC 415.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These authorities recognise that an arguable question of limitation need not invariably result in the rejection of an amendment at the threshold. Depending on the facts, the amendment may be allowed while the limitation issue is left for determination in the suit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court accordingly preserved the respondents&#8217; right to raise limitation before the trial court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-difference-between-allowing-an-amendment-and-deciding-limitation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Difference_Between_Allowing_an_Amendment_and_Deciding_Limitation\"><\/span>Difference Between Allowing an Amendment and Deciding Limitation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Allowing an amendment is not the same as holding that the amended claim is within limitation. The amendment permits the relevant pleadings to be brought before the court; the legal effect of those pleadings remains to be decided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-the-court-s-approach-to-prejudice-and-multiplicity-of-proceedings\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Courts_Approach_to_Prejudice_and_Multiplicity_of_Proceedings\"><\/span>The Court&#8217;s Approach to Prejudice and Multiplicity of Proceedings<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An amendment application must also be examined from the perspective of fairness to the opposing party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Courts generally consider whether the proposed change is necessary for an effective determination of the dispute, whether it is bona fide, whether it would cause prejudice that cannot adequately be compensated, and whether refusing it could result in injustice or further litigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These considerations form part of the broader principles discussed in <em>Revajeetu Builders &amp; Developers v. Narayanaswamy &amp; Sons<\/em>, (2009) 10 SCC 84, and <em>Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Sanjeev Builders Private Limited<\/em>, (2022) 16 SCC 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Haramani Sahoo<\/em>, the proposed amendment related directly to the title and possession dispute already before the trial court. Refusing to bring the issue into the existing proceedings could have left the parties to pursue further litigation concerning the same property.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the same time, the Supreme Court did not overlook the delay or the inconvenience that the amendment might cause the respondents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rather than treating either consideration as automatically decisive, the Court allowed the amendment subject to costs and preserved the respondents&#8217; opportunity to file additional written statements and raise their legal objections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This approach sought to balance effective adjudication with procedural fairness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-how-the-decision-relates-to-earlier-supreme-court-judgments\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_the_Decision_Relates_to_Earlier_Supreme_Court_Judgments\"><\/span>How the Decision Relates to Earlier Supreme Court Judgments<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling in <em>Haramani Sahoo<\/em> should be understood alongside the established law on amendment of pleadings. It applies existing principles to the particular circumstances before the Court rather than removing the restrictions imposed by Order VI Rule 17 CPC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-a-k-gupta-amp-sons-ltd-v-damodar-valley-corporation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"AK_Gupta_Sons_Ltd_v_Damodar_Valley_Corporation\"><\/span>A.K. Gupta &amp; Sons Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>A.K. Gupta &amp; Sons Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation<\/em>, AIR 1967 SC 96, the Supreme Court explained the principles governing amendments and the distinction between a permissible elaboration of an existing case and an amendment that introduces a fundamentally new claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision remains relevant when assessing whether a proposed amendment is connected to the original controversy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-rajesh-kumar-aggarwal-v-k-k-modi\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Rajesh_Kumar_Aggarwal_v_KK_Modi\"><\/span>Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal v. K.K. Modi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal v. K.K. Modi<\/em>, (2006) 4 SCC 385, the Supreme Court emphasised that amendments should be considered with a view to determining the real questions in controversy between the parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That principle supports an approach focused on effective adjudication rather than technical objections alone, subject to the statutory restrictions applicable to the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-abdul-rehman-v-mohd-ruldu\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Abdul_Rehman_v_Mohd_Ruldu\"><\/span>Abdul Rehman v. Mohd. Ruldu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In <em>Abdul Rehman v. Mohd. Ruldu<\/em>, (2012) 11 SCC 341, the Supreme Court considered the principles governing amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17. The decision forms part of the established framework within which courts assess the relevance and permissibility of proposed amendments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-basavaraj-v-indira\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Basavaraj_v_Indira\"><\/span>Basavaraj v. Indira<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The respondents relied on <em>Basavaraj v. Indira<\/em>, 2024 INSC 151, to oppose the amendment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court did not overrule that decision. Instead, it distinguished the case before it by examining the particular explanation offered for the delay and the circumstances surrounding the later discovery of the compromise decree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That distinction matters. <em>Haramani Sahoo<\/em> should not be read as holding that an assertion of late discovery will always satisfy the due-diligence requirement. The court must assess the explanation against the facts of each case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-what-is-the-practical-effect-of-the-judgment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Is_the_Practical_Effect_of_the_Judgment\"><\/span>What Is the Practical Effect of the Judgment?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision offers guidance to both litigants and courts dealing with amendment applications filed after the commencement of trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-for-a-party-seeking-amendment\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"For_a_Party_Seeking_Amendment\"><\/span>For a Party Seeking Amendment<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a party seeking amendment, the judgment highlights the importance of explaining the delay with specific facts and supporting material. If the application relies on the later discovery of a document or transaction, the applicant should explain when and how that discovery occurred, why the matter could not reasonably have been raised earlier, and how the proposed amendment relates to the existing dispute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-for-the-opposing-party\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"For_the_Opposing_Party\"><\/span>For the Opposing Party<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the opposing party, the judgment does not remove the right to challenge an amendment. Objections based on due diligence, limitation, prejudice, maintainability and the nature of the proposed claim remain available, depending on the circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-for-courts\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"For_Courts\"><\/span>For Courts<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For courts, the decision reinforces the need to distinguish between the procedural question of whether an amendment should be permitted and the substantive question of whether the amended claim can succeed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The fact that a party has been permitted to amend its pleadings does not prevent the opposite party from contesting the amended case on all legally available grounds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-what-the-supreme-court-ultimately-directed\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_the_Supreme_Court_Ultimately_Directed\"><\/span>What the Supreme Court Ultimately Directed<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court set aside the trial court&#8217;s order dated 21 September 2022 and the Orissa High Court&#8217;s order dated 10 April 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It allowed the amendment application subject to the following conditions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The appellants were directed to pay costs of \u20b925,000 to the contesting respondents within two weeks.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The consequential amendments to the plaint were to be carried out within four weeks thereafter.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The respondents were permitted to file additional written statements within the period fixed by the trial court.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-legal-issues-left-open-for-the-trial-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Legal_Issues_Left_Open_for_the_Trial_Court\"><\/span>Legal Issues Left Open for the Trial Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Crucially, the Court left open all questions relating to limitation, maintainability, the applicability of Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC, the validity and binding nature of the compromise decree, title, possession and the merits of the parties&#8217; respective claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Those issues remain for consideration by the trial court in accordance with law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court&#8217;s order therefore allowed the pleadings to be amended without deciding whether the appellants would ultimately succeed on the amended case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-summary-of-the-supreme-court-s-directions\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Summary_of_the_Supreme_Courts_Directions\"><\/span>Summary of the Supreme Court&#8217;s Directions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Issue<\/th><th>Direction or Clarification<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Orders challenged<\/td><td>The trial court&#8217;s order dated 21 September 2022 and the Orissa High Court&#8217;s order dated 10 April 2023 were set aside.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Costs<\/td><td>The appellants were directed to pay \u20b925,000 to the contesting respondents within two weeks.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Amendment of plaint<\/td><td>The consequential amendments were to be carried out within four weeks thereafter.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Additional written statements<\/td><td>The respondents were permitted to file additional written statements within the period fixed by the trial court.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Substantive legal issues<\/td><td>Questions concerning limitation, maintainability, the compromise decree, title, possession and the merits of the claims remained open for consideration by the trial court.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Effect of the decision<\/td><td>Permission to amend the pleadings did not determine whether the appellants would ultimately succeed on the amended case.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-conclusion-the-law-on-amendment-of-plaint-after-commencement-of-trial\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion_The_Law_on_Amendment_of_Plaint_After_Commencement_of_Trial\"><\/span>Conclusion: The Law on Amendment of Plaint After Commencement of Trial<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So, can a plaint be amended after trial has begun? Yes, but only if the statutory requirements are met and the court finds the amendment appropriate in the circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, the applicant must satisfy the court that, despite due diligence, the matter could not have been raised before the commencement of trial. The proposed amendment must also be assessed in light of its connection to the existing dispute, the potential prejudice to the opposing party and the need for effective adjudication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others, the Supreme Court found that the later discovery of a compromise decree affecting the same property provided a sufficient explanation for the proposed amendment. It also held that expanding the factual and legal issues did not, on the facts of the case, fundamentally change the nature and character of the suit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling does not dispense with the due-diligence requirement, nor does it guarantee that an amended claim will survive objections based on limitation or maintainability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Its central lesson is more measured: a late amendment must be examined on its facts, and procedural permission should not be confused with a final decision on the rights of the parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-need-legal-advice-on-amendment-of-plaint-or-a-pending-court-case\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Need_Legal_Advice_on_Amendment_of_Plaint_or_a_Pending_Court_Case\"><\/span>Need Legal Advice on Amendment of Plaint or a Pending Court Case?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A procedural decision today can have a lasting impact on your case. If you are dealing with an amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, a property dispute, a limitation issue, or a civil case that has already reached the trial stage, understanding your legal options is essential before taking the next step.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whether you want to seek an amendment to your pleadings, oppose an amendment application, or understand how a Supreme Court judgment may apply to your circumstances, obtaining advice tailored to the facts of your case can help you make a more informed decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-consult-adv-tarun-choudhury\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Consult_Adv_Tarun_Choudhury\"><\/span>Consult Adv. Tarun Choudhury<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Supreme Court Advocate | 25+ Years of Legal Experience<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Get in touch to discuss your legal concerns, understand the applicable law, and explore the options available in your case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Call:<\/strong> <a href=\"tel:9650499965\">9650499965<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>WhatsApp:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/wa.me\/918851978611\">8851978611<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Email:<\/strong> <a href=\"mailto:admin@legalserviceindia.com\">admin@legalserviceindia.com<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Don&#8217;t leave important legal questions unanswered. Contact Adv. Tarun Choudhury to discuss your matter and understand your next steps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Every case depends on its specific facts and applicable law. A consultation can help you understand your legal position; no particular outcome can be guaranteed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-frequently-asked-questions-faqs\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Frequently_Asked_Questions_FAQs\"><\/span>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-1-can-a-plaint-be-amended-after-trial-has-begun-under-order-vi-rule-17-cpc\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"1_Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun_Under_Order_VI_Rule_17_CPC\"><\/span>1. Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes. A plaint can be amended after the commencement of trial under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), provided the statutory requirements are satisfied. The applicant must demonstrate that, despite exercising due diligence, the matter could not have been raised before the trial commenced. In Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others (2026 INSC 1112), the Supreme Court permitted an amendment based on the circumstances of the case while leaving questions such as limitation and maintainability open for the trial court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-2-what-is-the-due-diligence-requirement-for-amendment-of-plaint-after-commencement-of-trial\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_What_Is_the_Due_Diligence_Requirement_for_Amendment_of_Plaint_After_Commencement_of_Trial\"><\/span>2. What Is the Due Diligence Requirement for Amendment of Plaint After Commencement of Trial?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC requires the court to be satisfied that the applicant could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial despite exercising due diligence. The applicant should explain when the relevant facts or documents came to light, why they could not reasonably have been discovered earlier, and why the proposed amendment is necessary. Mere delay or a general assertion of later discovery may not be sufficient; the court assesses the explanation in the context of the particular case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-3-can-a-court-reject-an-amendment-of-plaint-because-the-proposed-claim-may-be-barred-by-limitation\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"3_Can_a_Court_Reject_an_Amendment_of_Plaint_Because_the_Proposed_Claim_May_Be_Barred_by_Limitation\"><\/span>3. Can a Court Reject an Amendment of Plaint Because the Proposed Claim May Be Barred by Limitation?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Not in every case. Where the limitation issue depends on disputed facts or requires further evidence, the court may allow the amendment while leaving the limitation question open for determination during trial. In Haramani Sahoo v. Lalita Nayak, the Supreme Court did not finally decide limitation when allowing the amendment. The opposing party retained the right to raise the limitation objection before the trial court. Allowing an amendment does not automatically mean that the amended claim is within limitation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-4-does-amendment-of-plaint-after-trial-has-begun-change-the-nature-and-character-of-the-suit\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"4_Does_Amendment_of_Plaint_After_Trial_Has_Begun_Change_the_Nature_and_Character_of_the_Suit\"><\/span>4. Does Amendment of Plaint After Trial Has Begun Change the Nature and Character of the Suit?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Not necessarily. An amendment may introduce additional facts, issues or reliefs without fundamentally changing the nature and character of the original suit. The court examines whether the proposed amendment has a direct connection with the existing dispute or introduces an entirely different controversy. In Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others, the Supreme Court found that the proposed amendment concerning a compromise decree had a sufficient connection with the existing property dispute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-5-what-should-i-do-if-my-amendment-application-is-rejected-by-the-trial-court\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"5_What_Should_I_Do_If_My_Amendment_Application_Is_Rejected_by_the_Trial_Court\"><\/span>5. What Should I Do If My Amendment Application Is Rejected by the Trial Court?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If an application to amend a plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is rejected, the appropriate legal remedy depends on the facts, the stage of the proceedings and the nature of the order. A lawyer can examine the order, the proposed amendment, the reasons for the delay and the available procedural remedies. The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Haramani Sahoo v. Lalita Nayak illustrates the importance of establishing due diligence and showing how the proposed amendment relates to the existing dispute. It does not mean that every rejected amendment application will succeed on challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-key-takeaways-can-a-plaint-be-amended-after-trial-has-begun\" class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Takeaways_Can_a_Plaint_Be_Amended_After_Trial_Has_Begun\"><\/span>Key Takeaways: Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Amendment of plaint after commencement of trial is possible:<\/strong> Under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), a court may permit an amendment after trial has begun if the statutory requirements are satisfied.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Due diligence is mandatory:<\/strong> The applicant must satisfy the court that, despite exercising due diligence, the matter could not have been raised before the commencement of trial.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Supreme Court clarifies the law:<\/strong> In Haramani Sahoo and Others v. Lalita Nayak and Others (2026 INSC 1112), decided on 12 October 2026, the Supreme Court allowed an amendment concerning a compromise decree connected to an existing property dispute.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Later discovery of relevant facts may justify amendment:<\/strong> The Court considered the plaintiff&#8217;s asserted lack of knowledge of the earlier compromise proceedings, his non-party status and the subsequent discovery of relevant documents when assessing due diligence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Expansion of issues does not automatically change the nature of the suit:<\/strong> An amendment may introduce additional facts or legal questions without fundamentally altering the original suit, particularly where the proposed amendment is directly connected to the existing dispute.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Limitation can remain open for trial:<\/strong> Allowing an amendment does not establish that the amended claim is within limitation. Where appropriate, the court may leave the limitation question for determination during the proceedings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Maintainability and substantive rights remain undecided:<\/strong> Permission to amend does not determine the validity or binding effect of the compromise decree, title, possession or the ultimate merits of the amended claim.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The opposing party retains the right to object:<\/strong> The respondents may raise legally available objections, including limitation and maintainability, before the trial court.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The amendment was allowed subject to costs:<\/strong> The Supreme Court directed payment of \u20b925,000 in costs, required consequential amendments within the prescribed period and permitted the respondents to file additional written statements.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The judgment does not remove the due-diligence requirement:<\/strong> Haramani Sahoo applies the existing legal framework to the particular facts of the case. It does not mean that every delayed amendment or claim of later discovery must be allowed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-yoast-seo-related-links yoast-seo-related-links\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/doctrine-of-basic-structure-judicial-shield-of-the-indian-constitution\/\">Doctrine of Basic Structure: Judicial Shield of the Indian Constitution<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/rejection-of-plaint-under-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-grounds-procedure-supreme-court-judgments\/\">Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Grounds, Procedure &amp; Supreme Court Judgments<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/order-vii-rule-11-cpc-explained-grounds-for-rejection-of-plaint-supreme-court-judgments-complete-legal-guide\/\">Order VII Rule 11 CPC Explained: Grounds for Rejection of Plaint, Supreme Court Judgments &amp; Complete Legal Guide<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/kesavananda-bharati-v-state-of-kerala-1973-the-basic-structure-landmark\/\">Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) \u2013 The Basic Structure Landmark<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/copyright-infringement-suit-india-complete-guide\/\">Complete Guide to Drafting a Copyright Infringement Suit in India: Procedure, Evidence, Interim Relief &amp; Court Process<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Has Begun? Supreme Court Explains Order VI Rule 17 CPC The Supreme Court has clarified that a plaint amendment sought after the commencement of trial cannot be rejected merely because it is belated. The applicant must satisfy the due-diligence requirement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, while questions<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":34501,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"two_page_speed":[],"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[1008,24,28],"class_list":["post-34500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-civil-law","tag-civil-law","tag-just-in","tag-top-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.6 (Yoast SEO v28.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling - Legal Service India - Articles<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Can a plaint be amended after the trial begins? The Supreme Court explains due diligence, Order VI Rule 17 CPC and limitation objections.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can a plaint be amended after the trial begins? The Supreme Court explains due diligence, Order VI Rule 17 CPC and limitation objections.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Service India - Articles\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-21T07:51:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-21T08:05:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Adv.Tarun Choudhury\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@legalserviceind\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Adv.Tarun Choudhury\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Adv.Tarun Choudhury\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a84c6ba34b5399b3c5224117c6406abe\"},\"headline\":\"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-21T07:51:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-21T08:05:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4097,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Civil Law\",\"Just In\",\"Top News\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Civil Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/\",\"name\":\"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling - Legal Service India - Articles\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-21T07:51:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-21T08:05:22+00:00\",\"description\":\"Can a plaint be amended after the trial begins? The Supreme Court explains due diligence, Order VI Rule 17 CPC and limitation objections.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"Amendment Of Plaint After Trial Begins\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Civil Law > Amendment of Plaint After Trial Begins: Supreme Court Explains Due Diligence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India - Law Articles\",\"description\":\"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Legal Service India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/logo-circle-1.png\",\"width\":105,\"height\":95,\"caption\":\"Legal Service India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/legalservicesind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legalserviceind\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a84c6ba34b5399b3c5224117c6406abe\",\"name\":\"Adv.Tarun Choudhury\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/50\\\/1764427557-bpfull.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/50\\\/1764427557-bpfull.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/avatars\\\/50\\\/1764427557-bpfull.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Adv.Tarun Choudhury\"},\"description\":\"Adv. Tarun Choudhury is a seasoned Supreme Court practitioner with over 24 years of rich legal experience, known for his strategic insight and unwavering dedication to justice. He has successfully handled a wide spectrum of high-stakes matters across constitutional, criminal, and civil law, earning a reputation for excellence and integrity at the highest court of the land.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalserviceindia.com\\\/Legal-Articles\\\/author\\\/adv-tchoudhury\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling - Legal Service India - Articles","description":"Can a plaint be amended after the trial begins? The Supreme Court explains due diligence, Order VI Rule 17 CPC and limitation objections.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling","og_description":"Can a plaint be amended after the trial begins? The Supreme Court explains due diligence, Order VI Rule 17 CPC and limitation objections.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/","og_site_name":"Legal Service India - Articles","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","article_published_time":"2026-10-21T07:51:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-21T08:05:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Adv.Tarun Choudhury","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legalserviceind","twitter_site":"@legalserviceind","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Adv.Tarun Choudhury","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/"},"author":{"name":"Adv.Tarun Choudhury","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/a84c6ba34b5399b3c5224117c6406abe"},"headline":"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling","datePublished":"2026-10-21T07:51:14+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-21T08:05:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/"},"wordCount":4097,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp","keywords":["Civil Law","Just In","Top News"],"articleSection":["Civil Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/","name":"Can a Plaint Be Amended After Trial Begins? Supreme Court Ruling - Legal Service India - Articles","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp","datePublished":"2026-10-21T07:51:14+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-21T08:05:22+00:00","description":"Can a plaint be amended after the trial begins? The Supreme Court explains due diligence, Order VI Rule 17 CPC and limitation objections.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"Amendment Of Plaint After Trial Begins"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Civil Law > Amendment of Plaint After Trial Begins: Supreme Court Explains Due Diligence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","name":"Legal Service India - Law Articles","description":"Legal Service India - Law Article Directory is the oldest in India since 2000, with thousands of article written by lawyers, law Students and Scholars on all branches of law","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#organization","name":"Legal Service India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/logo-circle-1.png","width":105,"height":95,"caption":"Legal Service India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/legalservicesind","https:\/\/x.com\/legalserviceind","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LegalServiceIndia-lsi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/#\/schema\/person\/a84c6ba34b5399b3c5224117c6406abe","name":"Adv.Tarun Choudhury","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/50\/1764427557-bpfull.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/50\/1764427557-bpfull.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/avatars\/50\/1764427557-bpfull.jpg","caption":"Adv.Tarun Choudhury"},"description":"Adv. Tarun Choudhury is a seasoned Supreme Court practitioner with over 24 years of rich legal experience, known for his strategic insight and unwavering dedication to justice. He has successfully handled a wide spectrum of high-stakes matters across constitutional, criminal, and civil law, earning a reputation for excellence and integrity at the highest court of the land.","url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/author\/adv-tchoudhury\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/amendment-plaint-after-trial-begins.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34500"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34500\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34502,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34500\/revisions\/34502"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}