{"id":9605,"date":"2025-10-04T05:41:09","date_gmt":"2025-10-04T05:41:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/?p=9605"},"modified":"2025-10-04T05:44:05","modified_gmt":"2025-10-04T05:44:05","slug":"understanding-manufacture-under-central-excise-act-supreme-courts-landmark-definition-in-quippo-energy-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalserviceindia.com\/Legal-Articles\/understanding-manufacture-under-central-excise-act-supreme-courts-landmark-definition-in-quippo-energy-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding ‘Manufacture’ Under Central Excise Act: Supreme Court’s Landmark Definition in Quippo Energy Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/span>Introduction<\/span><\/h2>\n

The concept of ‘manufacture’ under Indian tax laws has been a subject of extensive judicial interpretation, particularly in the context of excise duty. The recent Supreme Court judgment in M\/s Quippo Energy Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad \u2013 II provides crucial clarity on what constitutes ‘manufacture’ under Section 2(f)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CEA). This landmark decision establishes important precedents for determining when product modifications amount to manufacturing, potentially affecting various industries involved in product assembly and modification.<\/p>

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n