Trademark disputes often arise when businesses clash over the usage of similar or identical marks that could potentially confuse consumers or dilute the distinctiveness of a brand. In this anal...

The supplementary injury report indicates that no radiological bone injury was observed in the skull. A fracture of the left ulna was noted. The ulna is not a vital part of the body. There was ...

Finland is a country known for its strong commitment to human rights, both domestically and internationally. The country's human rights record is characterized by a robust legal framework, effe...

The question of whether human rights are universally applicable or subject to cultural interpretation has been a topic of significant debate. On other hand, proponents of cultural relativism ar...

The forensic science system struggles with a multitude of challenges, arising from limited resources, shortage of forensic laboratories and forensic experts, ever increasing number of registere...

The law is constantly evolving, shaped by the interplay of legal principles, societal values, and judicial interpretations. This essay will examine the key drivers of this evolution, including ...

The Doctrine of Basic Structure evolved through series of verdicts in India, one such case was of Shankari Prasad Vs. Union of India. This case was result of the ongoing struggles between the j...

As the wise Josiah Charles Stamp once said, "It is easy to dodge our responsibilities, but we cannot dodge the consequences of dodging our responsibilities." Businesses need to be car...

Plaintiff's Claim: The plaintiff initiated a lawsuit claiming that the defendant infringed on their proprietary rights associated with the trademark "CONSOLETTE." Injunction Request...

In a recent ruling by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, the interpretation of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding the display of old company names came under scrutiny in a case wher...