The Golden Triangle of the Constitution of India is a term used to describe the
fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Indian
Constitution. These articles are considered the most important and
interdependent provisions of the Constitution and form the cornerstone of Indian
democracy.
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to equality before
the law and equal protection of the laws to all persons. It prohibits
discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.
This means that every person in India is entitled to equal protection of the law
and equal treatment under the law, regardless of their background or social
status.
Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees certain freedoms to all
citizens, such as the freedom of speech and expression, the freedom to assemble
peacefully, the freedom to form associations or unions, the freedom to move
freely throughout the territory of India, and the freedom to practice any
profession or carry on any trade, business or occupation.
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal
liberty to all persons. It ensures that no person shall be deprived of their
life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law.
These three articles together form the Golden Triangle of the Indian
Constitution, which is essential to protect the fundamental rights of citizens
and ensure that justice is served. The three articles are interdependent and
cannot be interpreted in isolation. For example, the right to equality under
Article 14 cannot be achieved without the freedom of speech and expression
guaranteed by Article 19. Similarly, the right to life and personal liberty
under Article 21 is dependent on the protection of equal rights and freedoms
under Article 14 and Article 19.
The Golden Triangle of the Constitution of India reflects the values and
principles of the Indian Constitution, and it plays a crucial role in protecting
the fundamental rights and freedoms of all individuals in India.
Meaning Of Golden Triangle In Indian Constitution
The Golden Triangle in the Indian Constitution refers to the interdependent and
interconnected nature of three fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution,
namely, Articles 14, 19, and 21. These three articles are considered the most
important provisions of the Constitution and form the basis of democracy in
India.
The Golden Triangle of the Indian Constitution signifies the interdependence and
interconnected nature of these three fundamental rights. They are mutually
reinforcing and provide a framework for protecting the basic rights and freedoms
of all individuals in India. For instance, the right to equality before the law
under Article 14 is necessary for ensuring the freedom of speech and expression
guaranteed by Article 19, and the right to life and personal liberty under
Article 21 is dependent on the protection of equal rights and freedoms under
Article 14 and Article 19.
Together, these three articles form the Golden Triangle of the Indian
Constitution. They are interdependent and cannot be interpreted in isolation.
For example, the right to equality under Article 14 cannot be achieved without
the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19. Similarly, the
right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 is dependent on the
protection of equal rights and freedoms under Article 14 and Article 19.
The Golden Triangle of the Indian Constitution is considered crucial for the
protection of fundamental rights and the maintenance of democracy in India. It
ensures that every citizen is treated equally before the law and is entitled to
basic freedoms and rights, such as the freedom of speech, assembly, and
movement, and the right to life and personal liberty.
The Golden Triangle of the Indian Constitution reflects the values and
principles of the Indian Constitution and plays a vital role in maintaining the
democratic and constitutional fabric of India. It ensures that all citizens are
treated equally and are entitled to basic freedoms and rights.
Fundamental Rights In Indian Constitution
The Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution are enshrined in Part III of
the Constitution, which guarantees a set of rights and freedoms to every citizen
of India. These rights are considered fundamental as they are essential for the
development of the individual and the nation as a whole.
The fundamental rights
in the Indian Constitution include the following:
- Right to Equality (Articles 14-18): This right ensures that every
individual is treated equally before the law and prohibits discrimination on
the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
- Right to Freedom (Articles 19-22): This right guarantees the freedom of
speech and expression, the right to assemble peaceably and without arms, the
right to form associations or unions, the right to move freely throughout
the territory of India, and the right to practice any profession or
occupation.
- Right against Exploitation (Articles 23-24): This right prohibits all
forms of forced labor, trafficking, and the exploitation of children.
- Right to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25-28): This right guarantees the
freedom of religion and the right to practice, profess, and propagate any
religion of one's choice.
- Cultural and Educational Rights (Articles 29-30): This right provides
protection to the cultural and educational interests of minorities and other
marginalized communities.
- Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21): This right guarantees
the right to life and personal liberty and protects an individual from
arbitrary arrest, detention, or torture.
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32): This right provides
citizens with the power to enforce their fundamental rights through the
courts of law.
These fundamental rights are essential for the protection and development of the
individual, and they also serve as a check against the potential misuse of power
by the state. The Indian Constitution guarantees these rights to every citizen,
and the government and the judiciary are responsible for ensuring that these
rights are upheld and protected.
Article-14: Constitution Of India
Article 14 of the Constitution of India is a fundamental right that guarantees
equality before the law and equal protection of the law to all individuals in
India. It prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex,
or place of birth.
- The article states that the State shall not deny to any person
equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the
territory of India. It further explains that equality before the law
means that every person, regardless of their social status, economic
condition, or political influence, is subject to the same laws as others
and is treated equally under the law.
- The principle of equal protection of the laws means that the State
cannot discriminate between persons who are similarly situated and must
treat them equally under the law. The State cannot make arbitrary or
discriminatory laws that violate the principle of equality.
- Article 14 also prohibits discrimination by private entities in
matters of employment, trade, and business. This means that private
individuals or organizations cannot discriminate against any person
based on their religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
- The right to equality is not absolute and can be restricted in
certain circumstances, such as in the interest of national security,
public order, morality, or health. However, such restrictions must be
reasonable and not arbitrary.
- Article 14 is a cornerstone of the Indian Constitution and is an
essential feature of India's democratic and secular character. It
ensures that all individuals are equal before the law and are entitled
to equal protection of the law. The article has been interpreted and
applied in numerous cases by the Indian judiciary to ensure that the
principle of equality is upheld and that discrimination is eradicated
from Indian society.
Article 14 of the Constitution of India is a crucial provision that ensures
equality before the law and equal protection of the law to all individuals in
India. It is a fundamental right that guarantees that every person is subject to
the same laws and is treated equally under the law, regardless of their social
status, economic condition, or political influence.
Article-14: Constitution Of India Landmark Judgement
There have been several landmark judgments in India that have interpreted
Article 14 of the Constitution and expanded its scope.
Some of these judgments
are:
- Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973):[i]
This judgment established the basic structure doctrine, which held
that certain fundamental principles of the Constitution, including
the right to equality, cannot be amended by the Parliament. This
ensured that the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution
are protected and cannot be diluted by the government.
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):[ii]
This judgment expanded the scope
of Article 14 and held that the right to travel abroad is an integral part of
the right to personal liberty. It also established the principle of natural
justice, which requires that any action taken by the government must be fair,
just and reasonable.
- Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992):[iii]
This judgment upheld the
reservation policy for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes but held that
the reservation policy cannot exceed 50% of the available seats. It also
established the principle of creamy layer, which excludes the economically and
socially advanced members of the backward classes from the benefits of
reservation.
- Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi (2009):[iv]
This judgment
decriminalized homosexuality and upheld the right to equality of the LGBT
community. It held that discrimination against individuals based on their sexual
orientation violates Article 14 and the right to life and personal liberty
guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution.
These judgments have helped to expand the scope of Article 14 and ensure that
the right to equality is upheld in all spheres of life. They have also
established the principle that the government must act fairly and justly in all
its actions and policies.
Article 19: Constitution Of India
Article 19 of the Constitution of India guarantees certain fundamental freedoms
to all citizens of India. These freedoms include the right to freedom of speech
and expression, the right to assemble peacefully and without arms, the right to
form associations or unions, the right to move freely throughout the territory
of India, the right to reside and settle in any part of the country, and the
right to practice any profession, occupation, trade, or business.
- The right to freedom of speech and expression includes the
right to express one's views, opinions, thoughts, and beliefs
through any medium such as speech, writing, or through
audio-visual means. However, this right is subject to reasonable
restrictions in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of
India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign
States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to
contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence.
- The right to assemble peacefully and without arms allows
citizens to gather together for peaceful protests,
demonstrations, and meetings without the use of weapons.
However, this right is also subject to reasonable restrictions
in the interest of public order and morality.
- The right to form associations or unions allows citizens to
come together and form groups for a common purpose, such as a
trade union, political party, or social organization. However,
this right is also subject to reasonable restrictions in the
interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, public order,
and morality.
- The right to move freely throughout the territory of India
allows citizens to travel within the country without any
restrictions, subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest
of public order, decency, and morality.
- The right to reside and settle in any part of the country
allows citizens to live and work in any part of India, subject
to reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order,
health, and morality.
Overall, Article 19 is an important safeguard for the fundamental freedoms of
citizens and is essential for upholding the principles of democracy and liberty.
Article-19: Constitution Of India Landmark Judgement
There have been several landmark judgments in India that have interpreted and
expanded the scope of Article 19 of the Constitution.
Some of these judgments
are:
- Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950):[v]
This judgment established the
principle that the right to freedom of speech and expression includes the right
to criticize the government and its policies, even if such criticism is
unpopular or inconvenient.
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):[vi]
This judgment expanded the scope
of the right to freedom of movement to include the right to travel abroad. It
also held that any restriction on this right must be reasonable and cannot be
arbitrary.
- Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
v. Cricket Association of Bengal (1995):[vii]
This judgment established the principle that the right to
freedom of speech and expression also includes the right to receive information
and ideas from any source, including the media.
- State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat (2005):[viii]
This
judgment held that the right to carry on any trade or business includes the
right to conduct slaughterhouses, subject to reasonable restrictions in the
interest of public health and hygiene.
- Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017):[ix]
This judgment upheld the right to
privacy as a fundamental right under Article 19 and Article 21 of the
Constitution. It held that any restriction on the right to privacy must be
reasonable and must serve a legitimate state interest.
These judgments have helped to expand the scope of Article 19 and ensure that
the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution are upheld in all
spheres of life. They have also established the principle that any restriction
on these freedoms must be reasonable and cannot be arbitrary.
Article 21: Constitution Of India
Article 21 is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution of India, which
guarantees the protection of the right to life and personal liberty of every
citizen of India. It is considered as one of the most significant and sacrosanct
provisions of the Constitution, as it ensures that every citizen has the right
to life with dignity.
- The Article states that no person shall be deprived
of his life or personal liberty except according to the
procedure established by law. This means that the State
can take away a person's life or personal liberty only
if it follows the due process of law.
- Article 21 has been interpreted by the judiciary in
various cases, and its scope has been expanded over the
years to include the right to livelihood, the right to
travel abroad, the right to privacy, the right to a
pollution-free environment, the right to a fair trial,
the right to legal aid, the right to health, and the
right to die with dignity.
- The fundamental right to life and personal liberty
under Article 21 is not only limited to the protection
of physical existence but also extends to mental,
social, and economic well-being. The judiciary has held
that the right to life and personal liberty under
Article 21 is a dynamic and evolving concept, and any
action by the government that violates these rights must
be fair, just, and reasonable.
- Article 21 is a cornerstone of the Indian
Constitution and ensures that every citizen of India has
the right to live with dignity and freedom. It is the
duty of the State to protect and uphold this fundamental
right and ensure that every citizen can exercise their
rights and freedoms without any fear or coercion.
Article-21: Constitution Of India Landmark Judgement
There have been several landmark judgments in India that have interpreted and
expanded the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution.
Some of these judgments
are:
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978):[x]
This judgment expanded the scope of
Article 21 and held that the right to life and personal liberty includes the
right to travel abroad. It established the principle of natural justice and held
that any action taken by the government must be fair, just, and reasonable.
- Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985):[xi]
In this case, the
Supreme Court held that the right to livelihood is a part of the right to life
and personal liberty under Article 21. The court observed that the right to
livelihood is a basic human right and deprivation of this right would affect the
right to life.
- State of Maharashtra v. Chandrabhan Tale (1983):[xii]
In this case, the
Supreme Court held that custodial violence and torture violated the right to
life and personal liberty under Article 21. The court observed that the
fundamental right to life and liberty cannot be restricted even if the person is
in police custody or under arrest.
- Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997):[xiii]
In this case, the Supreme Court
held that sexual harassment at the workplace violates the right to life and
personal liberty of women under Article 21. The court laid down guidelines to
prevent sexual harassment at the workplace, which are known as the Vishaka
guidelines.
- Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India (2018): [xiv]
In this case,
the Supreme Court recognized the right to die with dignity as a part of the
right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. The court legalized passive
euthanasia and laid down guidelines for it.
These landmark judgments have expanded the scope of Article 21 and ensured that
the right to life and personal liberty of every citizen is protected. The
judiciary has interpreted Article 21 in a way that guarantees not only physical
but also mental, social, and economic wellbeing.
Supreme Court Landmark Judgement: Golden Triangle
The Golden Triangle case is a landmark judgement delivered by the Supreme Court
of India on 30th March 1989 in the case of
Parmanand Katara v. Union of India
[xv].
The judgement dealt with the issue of emergency medical aid to victims of road
accidents and the duty of hospitals and doctors to provide such aid.
- In this judgement, the Supreme Court recognized the fundamental right to life
under Article 21 of the Constitution, which includes the right to emergency
medical aid. The court observed that the right to life includes the right to
live with human dignity, and any act or omission that impairs this right is a
violation of Article 21.
- The court further held that it is the duty
of every hospital and doctor to provide
emergency medical aid to the victims of road
accidents without waiting for procedural
formalities or the arrival of the police. The
court also observed that the duty of doctors and
hospitals to provide medical aid arises from
their professional commitment to society and
their ethical obligations.
- The judgement also established the concept of the "Golden Hour," which refers
to the critical hour after a traumatic injury, during which timely medical
intervention can make the difference between life and death. The court held that
every hospital and doctor must take necessary steps to ensure that victims of
road accidents receive emergency medical aid within the "Golden Hour."
- The Golden Triangle case has had a
significant impact on the provision of emergency
medical aid in India. It has helped to raise
awareness about the importance of timely medical
intervention in saving lives, and has led to the
development of various schemes and programs
aimed at improving emergency medical services in
the country.
Overall, the Golden Triangle case is a landmark judgement that has helped to
strengthen the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution and has
emphasized the importance of the duty of hospitals and doctors to provide
emergency medical aid to victims of road accidents.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Golden Triangle of the Constitution of India, consisting of
Articles 14, 19, and 21, represents the fundamental rights of citizens to
equality before law, freedom of speech and expression, and the right to life and
personal liberty, respectively. These three articles are interrelated and
provide the foundation for the protection of the basic rights and freedoms of
citizens in India.
The Supreme Court of India has played a significant role in interpreting and
expanding the scope of these fundamental rights through various landmark
judgements. The Golden Triangle case, in particular, has emphasized the
importance of the duty of hospitals and doctors to provide emergency medical aid
to victims of road accidents and has helped to strengthen the right to life
under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Golden Triangle case, in particular, has emphasized the importance of the
right to life and the duty of hospitals and doctors to provide emergency medical
aid to victims of road accidents within the critical "Golden Hour"
Overall, the Golden Triangle serves as a powerful reminder of the fundamental
principles of equality, freedom, and dignity that underlie the Indian democracy.
The Government and the Judiciary of India must continue to uphold and protect
these fundamental rights, thereby ensuring that the citizens of India can enjoy
their freedom and dignity without any hindrance.
References:
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/golden-triangle-indian-constitution/
- https://lawcorner.in/golden-triangle-of-indian-constitution/
- https://www.lawcolumn.in/the-rule-of-golden-triangle-of-the-indian-constitution-under-article-21/
End-Notes:
- (1973) 4 SCC 225
- 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621
- AIR 1993 SC 477
- 160 Delhi Law Times 277
- (AIR 1950 SC 124)
- 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621
- 1995 AIR 1236, 1995 SCC (2)161
- 8 SCC_534
- (2008) 6 SCC
- 1978 AIR 597
- 1985 SCC (3) 545
- 1983 SCR (3) 327
- (1997) 6 SCC 241
- (2018) 5 SCC
- (1989) 4 SCC 286
Please Drop Your Comments