Starting from the days of traditional thoughts, India has never accepted the
expression of love, in its entirety although our society believes that love
knows no boundaries and it has the ability to reform any situation but still it
hasn’t believed its expression.  The orthodox attitude, and blind following of
the customs prevailing in our fraternity/ league, the older generation has never
looked beyond the spectrum and always lived with the belief of love with no
expression.
However, the society being dynamic, the new generation with its modernised mind
set welcomed this expression of love whether in public or private with its
reasonable fencing which will govern the people and gladly accepted its validity
and thus going in contradiction to the older generation which looked at this
expression with a raised eyebrow. Â It is quite unfortunate to bring up the fact
before the world that if love constitutes the basic and integral part of human
mechanism, then why does the question of restrictions come for the expression of
the same.
Expression of love through the means of kissing each other is quite common in
western culture but still it is regarded as a prohibited act in the domain of
public sphere, not considering the fact that there exist a full chapter in Kama
Sutra (Hindu Text on erotic love) describing the art of kissing consisting 30
varieties. Temples of greater value such as Khajuraho and Konark Temple which
contributes immensely to Indian heritage has shown various erotic sculptures
expressing love and affection, therefore time immemorial Indian heritages have
shown the expression of love and with all its unrestricted boundaries and
measures. However, the society has taken this acts of human as a scene of
obscenity in public which needs to be regulated by the man-made law of the land.
Indian substantive criminal jurisprudence doesn’t much define the scope and
extent of public display of affection in India however maximum suits in respect
of obscenity are filed under sec-294 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It is
widely considered that this section is nothing but a mere bait for moral police
to feed on it. This section whoever to the annoyance of others, a) does any
obscene act in public place, or b) sings, recites or utters any obscene songs,
ballad, or word, in or near any public place, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months,
or with fine, or with both. However, the second part of the legislation is
interpretable and understandable but the first part is too wide, ambiguous and
unclear.
The precise definition of obscene is nowhere mentioned in the IPC however this
specific term is extremely dynamic and continues to change its character with
the passage of time and prominently differs from person to person and place to
place, therefore no person in this world can accurately point out the fact that
this act is obscene or not.
The Supreme Court in this regard, has bought a recent development named as
Community Standard prevalent in the United States of America to India wherein
the degree of obscenity will depend on the various communities and its attitude
towards the expression of love, so if an act which is considered acceptable in
one geographical arena may not be acceptable to another arena.
Determining the legality of kissing and other sort of affection in a public
place, that is whether an individual has the right to show these type of
affection in an Indian society or not. By the virtue of the heart and soul of
Indian Constitution that is the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Part III
clearly states the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). The
Apex Court in its various judicial pronouncements have strengthened the above
fact and clearly stated that consensual kissing between individuals whether in
public or in private cannot be filed before the Court of Law for its validity.
Though Article 19 which gives freedom of speech & expression, takes into
consideration the expression of love in its purview has reasonable restrictions
just like any other fundamental right but the restrictions are to made in
interest of general public. India, where the general public consist of 60
percent of youth population, what kind and up to what extent of restriction can
be imposed on the society in this regard. Â India on the other hand is competing
with the world in economic and social forum where cultural forum is acting as a
drawback due to such thought process, controlling perception.
Therefore, what is obscene for one person may or may not be obscene for
another. An individual expressing his love towards the other person by kissing
or hugging is a matter of private concern and no other person should decide upon
its nature and classify it as obscene or not obscene. Rules need to be same
irrespective of the act done in metropolitan area or rural area.
Restrictions though acceptable up to a certain extent but a clarity needs to be
drawn upon to protect individuals from unwanted harassments and unreasonable
question from the society. Absolute arbitrary restrictions in regard to these
acts cannot be and shouldn’t be allowed. Social values as well as social needs
to cope up with the change in the society otherwise there will be a conflict of
interest which might to lead anarchy. Such acts which are criminalised under the
Indian legal system has been blatantly misused by the police authorities and
throws some harsh consequences on the individuals needs which to curbed with
immediate effect by the State so as to protect the citizens from unreasonable
false proceedings.
Therefore, the need of the hour is to demarcate what actually is obscenity under
the Indian Legal system and under section 294 of the IPC, 1860. A Proper
governance in this regard is of utmost importance to reduce as many as false
cases pending before the Hon’ble courts of India. In today’s world where live in
relationship and consensual homosexual relationship is accepted, public display
of affection cannot be considered as a criminal activity under the criminal
jurisprudence of India.
India from its very inception had a conservative approach towards everything
including love making but this conservative mind set needs to be moulded with
the needs of the western culture and its domain and although if a restriction
needs to be implemented, it should be of reasonable and should be in nexus with
the mind set our country wants to achieve in future years.
So to conclude, the question (to kiss or not to kiss) should not be of utmost
concern to the society and the individuals infinite quest for privacy and
fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression should be preserved and
respected by the society in its totality. With regards to the recent
development, the public display of affection is a natural way of life, a genuine
kiss or a hug between individuals should not be a source of conflict.
Â
Written By: Debmallya Sinha and Ritodeep Bhattacharyya
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
Please Drop Your Comments