Media as the watchdog plays a very important role in every democracy so in
the world’s largest democracy its role becomes largely important. In the history
of India, media has been recognized as influential, patriotic and trust worthy
in the socio, economic and political climate of the nation. But with the growth
of TRP and paid news environment in recent years, the trust over the media has
taken a drastic hit, and, because of this the biggest victim here turns out to
be the Indian Democracy. This outreach of crony-capitalism in the media is
destroying the profession and ethics of journalism. The foul practice of taking
money or taking favors from the corporate houses, government, political parties
or big organization, in order to show favorable news about them, is becoming a
very common practice in journalism. As a result, the truth is not shown due to
which people suffers and at last the democracy loses. The media has been
receiving private treaties involving share transfers between media companies and
non-media companies in lieu of advertisement space and favorable coverage
disguised as ‘news’. This is referred as the ‘paid news syndrome’.
India is the biggest market for the 4th pillar of democracy with over 82,237
registered newspapers, being circulated across different regions, and almost 700
television news channel, running all over India, and these numbers are
increasing day by day. For social media platforms also namely Facebook, Twitter,
YouTube and Whatsapp India provides for their largest user base because of its
lenient and restriction free cyber laws. Despite this large user base and
circulations the media in India covers news to a larger extent of Entertainment,
Politics or corporate advertisement only rather than to educate and show truth
to the people.
Legislations For Media
Media has the enormous power of influencing the society at large and due to this
influencing power they play a huge role in making and unmaking of the
government, therefore it wouldn’t completely wrong in saying that the media is
very important in modern society. So because of this ability of influencing the
society, the media is regulated and controlled by various laws. In people’s
rule, the media faces less restriction and enjoys more support as compared to
other forms of government. In fact under military rule or authoritarianism, the
media is not free at all.
In India the laws regarding media are like constitution, i.e., they are rigid
and flexible at the same time. Article 19 (1)(a) of the constitution is the
biggest support for the media because this provision guarantees freedom of
expression, but at the same time Article 19(2) provides for certain reasonable
restrictions. Besides, there are various other laws and rules that regulate the
functioning of media.
Due to the media’s impact on the society that can either be positive or
negative, the media laws have long history, starting right from the British era,
to curb the negative effect of media on the integrity of the nation.
Some of
these laws are:
1. Press Regulation 1799
This regulation made mandatory for the newspapers to print the names and
addresses of printers, editors and publishers as well.
2. Gagging act 1857
This Act made it mandatory for licensing of running a printing press and
empowered the Government to prohibit the publication or circulation of any
newspaper or any printed material. This gave the Government power to ban the
publications news which had a tendency to cause criticism of the Government.
3. Vernacular Press Act, 1878
This act gave the British government the power to curb the newspaper which is
printed in Indian languages. This also played an important role in British
strategy to destroy Indian languages.
4. Indian Press Act 1910
This act makes it mandatory for the owners of presses were required to tender a
security deposits, which can be forfeited if they printed any objectionable
matter. It also give the police force an extensive power to conduct search and
seize any objectionable material.
After independence the media were given freedom but with certain reasonable
restrictions, and these were Integrity of India, Security of the State,
Friendly Relations with neighboring Countries, Public order, Decency or
morality, Contempt of Court and Contempt of Legislature, Defamation, and
Incitement to an offence[1]. Therefore various legislations were introduced for
this such as:
1. Contempt Of Court Act
This was introduced in order to maintain honor and dignity of the Judges and
their Judgments. This is one of the restrictions of freedom of expression which
are mentioned in Article 19(2) of the constitution.
2. Young Person's (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956
This act was introduced in order to prohibit the publication of any literature
which glorifies crime, violence and genocide in order to protect the minds of
young readers.
3. Cable television regulation act, 1995:
This act provides for mandatory registration of all operators of cable
television network, and also, it makes it compulsory to transmit at least two
Doordarshan Channels through the cable service. In fact, this act along with
cable rules makes it very clear that transmission of communal polarization is an
offence[2].
4. Press Council of India act 1965
It is a statutory body to govern and regulate the function of mainly print and
televised media. Its preamble states that this institution was established “For
protecting the freedom of the press and maintaining and improving the standards
of both newspapers and news agenciesâ€. Its main job is to monitor the conduct of
the media; it’s basically the watchdog of watchdog. The press council also
provides the “norms of journalist conduct[3]†which is the guidelines for the
principled and ethical journalism.
The paid or sponsored news by the corporate, political parties or big
organizations easily deviates the media from the real objective and aim of news
to the propaganda of these sponsors. The media, instead of being an eye opener
and mirror to the society, becomes a puppet in the hands of few powerful. Hence
the media instead of working for the people, by the people, and of the people
starts working for the sponsors, by the sponsors, and of the sponsor, as a
result the democratic spirit of the nation gets hurt.
Hence, before acting as a fourth pillar of democracy, media has been subjected
to many limitations for various nationally important reasons to curb the misuse
of freedom of Speech and expression. The following has both positive and
negative impact. The optimistic approach of the following legislation is for
security of the nation as its republic(the instance where the Supreme Court ban
the broadcasting of live in-action of the police and military force during 26/11
was necessary so to avoid any leakage of information to the terrorist). The
negative impact of the following is that it prevents the transparency. The news
that are published are synthesized and contemplated according to the rules and
regulation.
Shocking Scandals of ‘Paid News’
Andhra Pradesh is always on the top line in the paid news scenario. The size of
the market for paid news is very big; it is somewhere between Rs 300 cr to Rs
1,000 cr. Politicians who stood for elections during the 2009 Lok Sabha
elections in Andhra Pradesh paid for favourable news coverage about themselves.
It is really unfortunate that journalists forget their dignity for petty gains.
The Election Commission disqualified UP MLA Umlesh Yadav for filling an
incorrect statement of election expenditure and for paying two local Hindi
newspapers for sponsoring ‘paid news’ before polling. She was the first
political victim of the paid news phenomenon.
The controversial telephonic tapes between corporate lobbyist Nira Radia with
journalist Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi resulted in a controversy for running
scripted interviews with politicians and lobbying for A Raja the then Telecom
Minister for his role in 2G Scam.
The former Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan was involved in the paid news
controversy. While contesting for Bhokar Assembly constituency in Nanded
district, he had paid money to various Hindi and Marathi newspapers to get
publicity and news praising him. He spent huge amount of money on
advertisements, which was not accounted properly in his election expenditure
account.
· One of the biggest expose of this so called holy fourth pillar of
democracy was the sting operation conducted by the cobrapost in video operation
136 which took place in 2 parts. In these sting the cobrapost showed that how
the number of media houses, whether televised, newspaper or on social media; are
willing to promote and show the reports which could easily lead to communal
polarization and result in gaining electoral gains for some. With the undercover
reporter, cobrapost did an sting operation on media houses like India TV, Dainik
Jagran, Sab TV, Daily News Analysis, Amar Ujala, UNI, Samachar Plus, Punjab
Kesari, Swatantra Bharat, Scoop-Whoop, Rediff, Sadhna Prime News and many
others; these media houses have huge audience, circulation and subscribers and
are easily able to influence the opinion of the viewers, but these media houses
are misusing their ability to change the viewer’s opinion in order to campaign
and set the agenda of the political and communal groups, to help in increasing
their electoral votes, in consideration of money. This expose of the cobrapost
has shown the true greedy and irresponsible face of media whether mainstream,
regional or national, big ones or small ones, old ones or newer ones. All of
these media houses agreed to set the campaign trail in return for unaccounted
cash.
This sting operation has found that most of the media houses has a vicious nexus
with the political parties specially the regional ones, or they are favored by
politicians, hence they become the voice of their masters. This is a clear cut
example of crony journalism. For instance, “ABN Andhra Jyothy, a prominent
Telugu TV news channel is patronized by TDP leader Chandrababu Naidu, in fact
the newpaper chief also claims that their newspaper Andhra Jyothy holds so much
sway that they could even influence the outcome of the Karnataka elections.â€[4]
· Another case of paid media or media fixing came out when a leaked
video of off record chat between Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal and well known
Journalist Punya Prasoon Vajpayee. The clip shows that at the end of the
interview Mr. Kejriwal is asking the journalist to play some part of the
interview while airing it, which in his opinion will influence the voters, and
the Mr. Punya Prasoon agrees by saying that this will be revolutionary and will
catch lot off reactions. When this interview was aired Mr. Kejriwal’s statement
of comparing his resignation as CM to the ultimate sacrifice of Bhagat Singh was
played repeatedly.
Conclusion
Paid news is lowering ethical standards of journalism. Corruption in Indian
media will eventually devour Indian journalism. Many believe that paid news has
taken deep roots. Today, more and more people are losing respect for the media.
They are subscribing to multiple newspapers and switch of TV channels because
they do not trust media.
All these show that the ethics and principles on which the journalism stands is
no longer being followed by the journalist. the journalist are not even
following the guiding rules of journalism set by the press council of India,
well that’s what the above mentioned cases says as loudly and clearly as
possible. In the hide of Freedom of expression the watchdogs of democracy are
having a nexus with the political parties, corporate and big organizations for
their own petty gains. The greedy media is killing the people and the democracy,
not at the rate of authoritarianism but killing the same.
End-Notes
[1]Constitution of India, 1950, art 19(2).
[2] Rule 6, Cables Television Network Rules (1994).
[3]Norms of Journalistic Conduct, Press Council of India.
[4]“Operation 136: Part-II†(Cobrapost, 25 may 2018) < https://www.cobrapost.com/blog/Press-Release-Operation-136-Part-II/1063>accessed
27 September 2018.
Please Drop Your Comments