Reformative homes are establishments created to offer assistance for
rehabilitation and reintegration to those who have engaged in criminal activity.
These houses' main goal is to help criminals modify their conduct and become
law-abiding citizens by providing them with assistance, direction, and
resources. It is crucial to remember that the delivery of rehabilitation
services must adhere to the fundamentals of human rights.
This means that during the rehabilitation process, the people's human rights
should be preserved and safeguarded. This paper is attempted to understand the
purpose of the reformatory homes with the drawback of this homes. It further
focus on the problems that why reformation is still not achieved and also
content some international legislation supporting prison reform and alternative
step of reformatory homes.
A correctional facility is a place where people who have committed relatively
minor crimes and are seen to be reformable are detained. The reformative
philosophy of punishment is something that India still adheres to and supports.
The reformative strategy is all-encompassing and concentrates on changing the
person on many levels. This strategy was developed to help people learn to atone
for crimes they have done, and it serves as a tool for self-realization.
Reformative homes, which are often referred to as correctional facilities or
juvenile detention facilities, are places where people who have been found
guilty of a crime are sent to carry out their sentences. These facilities' main
objectives are the rehabilitation and reformation of the people under their
care, as well as the societal reintegration of such people. These facilities are
often structured in a way that encourages personal growth, with the idea being
to provide an environment that encourages the development of values and
attitudes that are conducive to positive behaviour.
Human rights in light of reformation:
"A sentence of imprisonment constitutes only a deprivation of the basic right to
liberty. It does not entail the restriction of other human rights, with the
exception of those which are naturally restricted by the very fact of being in
prison. Prison reform is necessary to ensure that this principle is respected,
the human rights of prisoners protected and their prospects for social
reintegration increased, in compliance with relevant international standards and
Regarding the human rights of those living in reformative homes, there have been
various concerns expressed. Overcrowding, a lack of access to healthcare and
education, staff mistreatment, and solitary confinement are a some of the issues
raised by these worries. In addition to these general issues, there is also a
need for reformative homes to create secure environments that are free from
abuse and foster positive development of its inhabitants.
Purpose of Reformatory Homes:
"The premise from which Bentham started was that no two people are the same, no
two crimes are the same, and it is the duty of the law to accommodate such
variables before inflicting pain, in the name of the state, for the protection
of itself and other citizen members of that state." It is based on that penal
system should reform the criminal not simply punish him it is to make them
valuable to society.
Basically 3 purpose is there for the availability of Reformatory Homes:
- Social Rehabilitation
Sometimes in prison also there is a fold of correctional homes. For example:
Jail bhajiya house, Jail Bakery, Jail Furniture homes, Making Curry (giving to
prisoners on payments), Vocational training etc. By this they will feel they are
Reformatory houses with a human rights component are part of the current system.
It provides criminals with hope that they will be able to re-join society and
their loved ones, including family, friends, and kids, in a secure manner. A
change in attitude is also brought about by it, and this attitude shift results
Drawback of Reformative Homes:
The circumstances in reformative homes, according to several human rights
organisations, violate people's constitutional rights to be free from torture
and other cruel, inhumane, or humiliating treatment or punishment. In addition,
they contend that the dearth of healthcare and education provided in these
facilities makes it challenging for former inmates to properly reintegrate into
Some have argued for a change away from traditional punitive approaches to
correction in favour of a more rehabilitative and restorative justice paradigm
in order to address these problems. Instead, then merely penalising the
offender, this strategy would concentrate on resolving the root reasons of
criminal conduct, such as poverty, mental health conditions, and addiction.
Mainly drawbacks are:
- General allegation is on cruelty hand of managements.
- Sexual Exploitation.
- Lack of Counselling.
- Money Consideration.
There is absolutely no solid legislation for this. Adoption of some strict
restrictions is required.
"The Supreme Court has listed nine significant issues that require immediate
attention in order to achieve reformation in its landmark ruling in
Ramamurthy v. State of Karnataka:
- Rampant Overcrowding:
With an occupancy ratio 14% higher than the jails' capacity, India's prisons
are overcrowded. The separation of major minor offenders and criminals has
proven to be challenging in many institutions because of the extreme
congestion, which can have a negative effect on minor offenders. Due to
their ongoing interactions with serious criminals, they might develop into
- Torture and Neglect:
The convicts, including those who are awaiting trial, are subjected to the
worst forms of torture, compelled to perform arduous tasks that are against
the law without receiving any payment. The number of people killed while in
custody as a result of torture and other cruel treatment of inmates has been
steadily rising. Prisoners who are women are more likely to be abused.
- Delay in Trials:
Statistics show that 67% of those incarcerated in Indian jails are awaiting
trial. Under trials refers to those who are being held in custody during a
trial, investigation, or inquiry but have not yet been found guilty of a
crime by a court of law.
- Poor hygiene and health:
The conditions for prisoners in India are extremely unsanitary, there are
inadequate medical facilities, and there is always a possibility of abuse
and torture. Due to a lack of hygienic facilities, female detainees suffer
more in these jails. It could occur throughout their pregnancy or because of
- Severe staff crunch:
"While 33% of the aggregate prerequisite of jail authorities still lies
vacant, right around 36% of opening for regulating officers is yet
unfulfilled. The ratio between the prison staff and the prison population is
approximately 1:7. It means only one prison officer is available for 7
prisoners, while in the UK, 2 prison officers are available for every 3
prisoners. Without adequate prison staff, overcrowding in the prisons
prompts widespread savagery and other criminal exercises inside the
- Communication Problem:
Without any communication with anyone from the outside world, including
their family and relatives, the convicts are left to live in isolation. They
are still in the dark concerning the whereabouts and welfare of their
- A lack of nourishment and inadequate attire:
There is barely enough food and clothing offered in the prisons to get by.
For the convicts, it is insufficient and inadequate, which has a negative
impact on their health.
- Psychological effect:
Prisons become shocking wrecks with subpar living circumstances due to a
lack of inspection and careless use of oversight tools. The mental state of
the prisoner is impacted by this flaw in the criminal justice system. It has
negative psychological impacts on the prisoner, including as sadness,
claustrophobia, anxiety and panic attacks, stress, and more, making the
prisoner more susceptible to criminal tendencies than previously. The inmate
departs from prison more damaged than better.
- Control of outdoor jails:
Due to the current overcrowded situation in the jails, staff shortages, and
other factors, managing open-air prisons becomes increasingly challenging.
- Inequalities in laws and the administration of justice:
It is clear that there are differences in how the legislation is applied and
implemented. The remission laws that each state has in place vary widely.
The severity of the punishment varies depending on the length.
- Transparency issues:
The lack of openness in the Indian court system is another problem. The
Right to Information (RTI) Act is evidently completely outside the purview
of the judicial system. As a result, important concerns like the nature of
accountability and equity are not properly understood in the way the
- The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
In 1948, the United Nations General Assembly launched a movement with the
adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It lays down the
rules for how justice will be administered. Several significant clauses that
have been incorporated into the draught include the following:
- No one should be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.
- Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
- No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
- Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed
innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he
has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
- The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) remains the
core international treaty on the protection of the rights of prisoners. India
ratified the Covenant in 1979 and is bound to incorporate its provisions into
domestic law and state practice.
- The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESR)
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESR)
states that prisoners have a right to the highest attainable standard of
physical and mental health." In addition to their civil and political
rights, inmates are also entitled to the so-called second-generation economic
and social human rights outlined in the ICESR.
- Declaration on Protection from Torture, 1975
The UN General Assembly by consensus adopted a declaration on the protection of
torture. This declaration acts in tandem with the human rights principles of an
individual and protects that person from any kind of torture, or inhuman and
- General UN directives
The UN standard Minimum Rule also made it mandatory to provide separate
residence for young and child prisoners from the adult prisoners. Subsequent UN
directives have been the Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners (United
Nations 1990)" "for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of
Detention or Imprisonment (United Nations 1988) 
- Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
The UN Assembly adopted, a document called Convention against Torture and other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment wherein the responsibility
is shouldered on the state to take steps for effective judicial, legislative and
administrative methods. Further, it clearly lays down the rules for
interrogation and certain other instructions have been enumerated. Though this
is a concrete piece of legislation but unfortunately India has yet not ratified
to it. 
The following are some legal options open to those residing in reformative
- Habeas Corpus:
A writ of habeas corpus is a legal requirement that a detention institution
produce a person who is being detained in custody and provide documentation
to support their continued imprisonment.
A court may order a person to be released from detention in return for money
or some other kind of security.
Under the supervision of a parole board or other authorities, parole is a
type of conditional release that enables someone to serve the remaining time
of their sentence outside of custody. This is commonly suggested by
individuals who support human rights since parole allows a person to return
to society on a short basis, which helps him restore his position and
It is a different option from prison. A defendant is released back into
society under the terms of probation, much like a sentence that has been
suspended, but they are not given the same freedoms as other citizens. For
first-time offenders or criminals with little risk, courts typically grant
It is up to the sentencing judge to determine whether to actually allow
probation, even if statutes specify when it is possible. A probationer is
subject to a set of rules that regulate their behaviour, and the court has
the authority to revoke or modify their probation if they break one of those
rules. While enforcing probationary restrictions, courts are quite vigilant.
Some schools think that repeat offenders use this to commit additional
crimes, but authorities cannot waste time on such ideas; they must instead come
up with a remedy.
Furthermore, others have pushed for more community-based alternatives to
reformative homes, such as community service or counselling, which might offer
the same advantages as detention centres but with fewer restrictions on
Legal experts must closely monitor the conditions in these facilities and work
to ensure that the rights of people held in detention are protected in order to
ensure that reformative homes adhere to the standards outlined in national and
international laws and are capable of achieving their goal of rehabilitation and
In closing, reformative homes play a significant part in the criminal justice
system, although questions have been made concerning the human rights of those
who reside in these facilities. Respecting the human rights of those under their
care and working to establish more community-based alternatives are crucial if
these institutions are to be successful in achieving their objective of
rehabilitation and reintegration.
- United Nation (Office on drugs and crime), https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/justice-and-prison-reform/prison-reform-and-alternatives-to-imprisonment.html
(last visited on Feb. 22 2023).
- A. Draper, An Introduction to Jeremy Bentham's theory of punishment, 5
JBS, 1-17 (2002).
- Basant Rath, Why We Need to Talk About the Condition of India's Prisons
(The Wire, 26 July, 2017).
- Ramamurthy v. State of Karnataka, (1997) S.C.C. (Cri) 386.
- Art 1, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, (1948).
- Ibid, Art 3
- Ibid, Art 9
- Ibid, Art 11
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, vol. 999, p. 171,
Treaty Series, United Nations (1966).
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, vol.
993, p. 3, Treaty Series, UN General Assembly, United Nations, (1966).
- The Declaration on Protection from Torture, 1975, Art 2 and 3.
- U.N. General Assembly, Res 45/111 (14th December 1990).
- U.N. General Assembly, Res 43/ 173 (10th December 1984).
- U.N. General Assembly, Convention against Torture and other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Res 39/46 (1984).
Award Winning Article Is Written By: Ms.Shivangi.R.Pandey
Authentication No: MR308028555791-21-0323