A Comparison Of The Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law: Law No. 5,197/1967 With The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972
"If we can teach people about wildlife, they will be touched. Share my wildlife
with me. Because humans want to save things that they love."― Steve Irwin
Wildlife protection laws are pieces of legislation enacted to safeguard wildlife and its ecosystems against exploitation, habitat destruction, and other detrimental activities. The protection of wild animal populations and their habitats for future generations is made possible by these laws, which are crucial for the conservation and sustainable use of wildlife resources. Human activity has significantly impacted wildlife populations and their habitats, making wildlife protection laws important.
The loss of biodiversity and the extinction of many species are results of overexploitation, habitat degradation, and climate change. By limiting human activity that could endanger wildlife populations or their habitats, Wildlife Protection Laws seek to address these risks.
One of the most prevalent types of wildlife protection laws are those that govern hunting and fishing. In order to minimise depletion of natural resources of wildlife populations, these laws set out norms and limitations on hunting and fishing activities.
By limiting land use, construction, and other activities that can affect the environment, habitat protection laws work to conserve the habitats of wildlife species. Laws protecting endangered and vulnerable species provide particular safeguards, such as limitations on trade, hunting, and other activities that can jeopardise the species.
For the conservation and wise use of wildlife resources, wildlife protection laws are essential overall. These laws contribute to the equitable distribution of the benefits of wildlife resources and the protection of wild animal populations and habitats for future generations.
The main legislation pertaining to wildlife conservation in Brazil is the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, or Law No. 5,197/1967. By limiting hunting and fishing throughout the nation, the legislation creates measures for the preservation and conservation of Brazilian biodiversity. The legislation forbids the hunting, trapping, catching, transportation, and marketing of a number of animal species and establishes guidelines for the management and conservation of native animals. For those who break the law, it also specifies civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including fines and jail time. Since it was passed in 1967, the legislation has undergone several amendments; the most recent ones were adopted in 2019.
The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 is the main piece of legislation in India pertaining to wildlife conservation. The Act outlines penalties for hunting, poaching, and dealing in wildlife and offers protection for wild animals and plants. The Act specifies the legislative guidelines for the administration and preservation of these places and governs the proclamation of national parks and animal sanctuaries.
Moreover, the Act specifies rules for the management and maintenance of animal habitats as well as the preservation of endangered species. India also has additional state and federal laws and rules addressing the preservation and protection of wildlife.
In order to conserve and safeguard wild creatures and their habitats, wildlife protection laws are essential. Both Brazil and India have diverse wildlife populations and intricate legislative systems for wildlife protection. The Indian Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 and the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, Law No. 5,197/1967, are two intricate legislative frameworks for wildlife protection. Notwithstanding the fact that both laws seek to safeguard wildlife resources, they differ in their specific provisions and methods for protecting wildlife.
We may learn about the distinctive characteristics and methods of wildlife conservation of these two legal systems by contrasting and comparing them. In order to contribute to more effective wildlife conservation and protection, this research paper will investigate prospects for enhancing the Indian legal system. This research paper compares and contrasts the wildlife protection laws of Brazil and India in order to better appreciate the Indian legal system, as well as to contribute to the worldwide effort to preserve and safeguard wildlife resources for future generations.
Chapter IV: Protected Areas This chapter deals with the declaration of certain areas as "protected areas" for the purpose of conservation and protection of wildlife. The chapter outlines the powers of the Central Government, State Government, and Chief Wildlife Wardens in declaring and managing such protected areas. It also mentions the prohibition of hunting or damaging any wildlife or property within these protected areas.
Comparison
There is no Brazilian equivalent of the Indian law.
This is regrettable for the following reasons:
When it comes to creating protected areas and zoos, laws that are specifically designed to conserve wildlife habitat are required for a number of reasons.
In order to preserve biodiversity and natural resources, protected areas are crucial. These are designated areas that are maintained with the intention of preserving wildlife and their habitats. These areas are essential for the survival of endangered and vulnerable species, as well as for the preservation of natural processes and services that sustain human well-being. Protected areas must be recognised, named, and administered efficiently, which necessitates laws that create and control them.
Second, zoos are crucial for wildlife study, teaching, and conservation. If not adequately maintained, zoos may potentially endanger the wellbeing of the animals and their habitat. The laws make sure that zoos adhere to a set of requirements for the care, conservation, and education of animals.
Finally, laws devoted to wildlife habitat protection are required to control human activities that can endanger wildlife and their ecosystems. These includes activities that may result in habitat degradation and fragmentation, including as hunting, poaching, logging, and mining. Wildlife habitats may be better protected and maintained by developing laws to govern these activities.
To build and administer protected areas and zoos, as well as to control human activities that can endanger wildlife and their habitats, laws specifically addressing wildlife habitat protection are required. In addition to protecting endangered and vulnerable species, these laws are essential for maintaining the natural systems and services that sustain human well-being.
Law To Protect Specific Animals
The Brazilian law
There is no Brazilian equivalent
The Indian Law
There is an entire chapter like that, which is the Chapter IVB: National Tiger Conservation Authority..
Comparison
Chapter IV B of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 in India deals with the establishment of the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and its functions. This chapter was added to the act in 2006 to specifically address the conservation of tigers and their habitats in India.
Under Chapter IV B, the NTCA was established as a statutory body with the mandate to ensure the conservation of tigers and their habitats in the country. The NTCA is responsible for implementing the Project Tiger program, which was launched in 1973 to protect and conserve Bengal tigers in their natural habitats.
The chapter outlines the functions of the NTCA, which include the following:
Tigers are a particular focus of conservation efforts since they are an apex predator and are essential to preserving the ecosystem's equilibrium. They are also a significant cultural and national icon of India. However, tigers are under a lot of pressure, including habitat degradation, poaching, and conflicts with people and other animals. For that reason, the NTCA and Project Tiger work to preserve and safeguard these majestic creatures for coming generations.
Unfortunately, as pointed above, Brazil does not have laws protecting specific animals. This is especially bad when you consider the fact that an animal like the jaguar, which like the tiger is a national animal, is itself an endangered species. However, while there is a specific law to protect certain species like the tiger in India, the same is absent in the Brazilian law.
There are several reasons why there should be laws to protect specific animals. Firstly, some animals may be more vulnerable to threats than others due to factors such as habitat loss, poaching, and climate change. Therefore, specific laws can be designed to address the unique threats faced by these animals and protect them from harm.
Secondly, some animals may be culturally or ecologically important, and their loss could have severe consequences. For example, certain animals may be important for the balance of the ecosystem, and their disappearance could have cascading effects on other species and the environment as a whole.
Furthermore, specific laws can be used to regulate the activities that threaten specific animals, such as hunting, fishing, and wildlife trade. Without such laws, these activities could cause significant harm to animal populations, and general laws may not be sufficient to address the specific threats.
General laws, while important, may not always be sufficient to protect specific animals adequately. General laws tend to focus on broader principles and guidelines and may not address the unique challenges faced by specific species. Moreover, enforcement of general laws may be challenging, as they may not provide the necessary tools to address specific issues.
For example, the Wildlife Protection Act in India, which is a general law, was insufficient to protect the Bengal tiger population adequately. Therefore, specific legislation was introduced to establish the National Tiger Conservation Authority and regulate activities that threaten tigers specifically.
In conclusion, laws to protect specific animals are necessary to ensure the conservation of vulnerable or ecologically significant species. While general laws are essential, specific laws can be tailored to address the unique challenges faced by specific species and provide better protection.
Conclusion And Suggestion
Upon taking into account the above comparisons, I can easily say that the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law - Law No. 5,197/1967 is not as well drafted as The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. The Indian law has a far wider scope, includes specific protection for a specie (tiger), and has laws to protect wildlife habitats. Overall, if seen from objective lens, even if the Indian law is lacking in some minor aspects, it is overall a better drafted law.
The Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 has a total of 66 sections, including various schedules and amendments. The sections cover a range of topics related to the protection and conservation of wildlife and their habitats, such as the establishment of protected areas, the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, and the prevention of wildlife-related crimes. The law also includes provisions for the management of national parks, sanctuaries, and other protected areas, as well as the recognition of the rights of indigenous and local communities.
The Brazilian Wildlife Protection Act, 1967 has a total of 29 articles (which are similar to sections in other countries' laws) and 2 transitional provisions. The articles cover a range of topics related to the protection and conservation of wildlife and their habitats, such as the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, the establishment of hunting seasons and protected areas, and penalties for offenses related to wildlife.
However, the scope of the law is more limited than the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, and it primarily focuses on hunting regulations and the protection of game animals for hunting purposes, rather than broader conservation objectives.
Brazil is home to some of the world's most diverse and unique wildlife, including species such as jaguars, giant otters, and capybaras. However, the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, 1967, which is the main law governing wildlife conservation in the country, has limitations in terms of its scope and effectiveness.
The law primarily focuses on hunting regulations and the protection of game animals for hunting purposes, rather than broader conservation objectives. This limited scope has resulted in inadequate protection of many species of plants, animals, and birds, and their habitats.
In contrast, the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 has a more comprehensive approach towards wildlife conservation, which includes provisions for the protection of wild animals, birds, and plants, as well as the establishment of protected areas, the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, and the prevention of wildlife-related crimes.
The Indian law also has provisions for the management of national parks, sanctuaries, and other protected areas, and recognizes the rights of indigenous and local communities. The effectiveness of the Indian law can be seen in the recovery of species such as tigers and rhinos, which were once threatened with extinction.
Therefore, Brazil could benefit from taking inspiration from the Indian Wildlife Protection Act and drafting a better wildlife protection law with a wider scope and more effective provisions. Such a law could help protect and conserve Brazil's unique and diverse wildlife, and promote sustainable development practices that balance conservation objectives with the needs of local communities.
Bibliography
Wildlife protection laws are pieces of legislation enacted to safeguard wildlife and its ecosystems against exploitation, habitat destruction, and other detrimental activities. The protection of wild animal populations and their habitats for future generations is made possible by these laws, which are crucial for the conservation and sustainable use of wildlife resources. Human activity has significantly impacted wildlife populations and their habitats, making wildlife protection laws important.
The loss of biodiversity and the extinction of many species are results of overexploitation, habitat degradation, and climate change. By limiting human activity that could endanger wildlife populations or their habitats, Wildlife Protection Laws seek to address these risks.
One of the most prevalent types of wildlife protection laws are those that govern hunting and fishing. In order to minimise depletion of natural resources of wildlife populations, these laws set out norms and limitations on hunting and fishing activities.
By limiting land use, construction, and other activities that can affect the environment, habitat protection laws work to conserve the habitats of wildlife species. Laws protecting endangered and vulnerable species provide particular safeguards, such as limitations on trade, hunting, and other activities that can jeopardise the species.
For the conservation and wise use of wildlife resources, wildlife protection laws are essential overall. These laws contribute to the equitable distribution of the benefits of wildlife resources and the protection of wild animal populations and habitats for future generations.
The main legislation pertaining to wildlife conservation in Brazil is the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, or Law No. 5,197/1967. By limiting hunting and fishing throughout the nation, the legislation creates measures for the preservation and conservation of Brazilian biodiversity. The legislation forbids the hunting, trapping, catching, transportation, and marketing of a number of animal species and establishes guidelines for the management and conservation of native animals. For those who break the law, it also specifies civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including fines and jail time. Since it was passed in 1967, the legislation has undergone several amendments; the most recent ones were adopted in 2019.
The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 is the main piece of legislation in India pertaining to wildlife conservation. The Act outlines penalties for hunting, poaching, and dealing in wildlife and offers protection for wild animals and plants. The Act specifies the legislative guidelines for the administration and preservation of these places and governs the proclamation of national parks and animal sanctuaries.
Moreover, the Act specifies rules for the management and maintenance of animal habitats as well as the preservation of endangered species. India also has additional state and federal laws and rules addressing the preservation and protection of wildlife.
In order to conserve and safeguard wild creatures and their habitats, wildlife protection laws are essential. Both Brazil and India have diverse wildlife populations and intricate legislative systems for wildlife protection. The Indian Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 and the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, Law No. 5,197/1967, are two intricate legislative frameworks for wildlife protection. Notwithstanding the fact that both laws seek to safeguard wildlife resources, they differ in their specific provisions and methods for protecting wildlife.
We may learn about the distinctive characteristics and methods of wildlife conservation of these two legal systems by contrasting and comparing them. In order to contribute to more effective wildlife conservation and protection, this research paper will investigate prospects for enhancing the Indian legal system. This research paper compares and contrasts the wildlife protection laws of Brazil and India in order to better appreciate the Indian legal system, as well as to contribute to the worldwide effort to preserve and safeguard wildlife resources for future generations.
The Comparison Of Aspects
Scope Of Protection
The Brazilian law
Art. 1st. Animals of any species, at any stage of their development and that live naturally outside captivity, constituting the wild fauna, as well as their nests, shelters and natural breeding grounds are State property, their use, persecution, destruction, hunting being prohibited. or catch.
The Indian Law
An Act to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto with a view to ensuring the ecological and environmental security of the country. (The long title part)
Comparison
While the Brazilian law provides protection to all Brazilian wildlife, the Indian law extends protection to not only wild animals but also to plants and birds. Thus it is more encompassing.
A wildlife protection law should have a wide scope for protection of not just animals, but also plants and birds, because they are all interconnected components of the ecosystem. The conservation and protection of these species are crucial for the maintenance of healthy and balanced ecosystems, which in turn support human well-being.
Plants are the foundation of most terrestrial ecosystems, providing habitat, food, and oxygen for a vast array of species, including humans. Many animal species, such as insects, birds, and mammals, rely on plants for food and shelter. Therefore, the protection of plants is crucial for the conservation of entire ecosystems.
Similarly, birds play an important role in the ecosystem, such as pollination, seed dispersal, and controlling insect populations. They are also indicators of the health of ecosystems and can provide valuable information about the quality of the environment. The loss of bird populations can have cascading effects on other species and the ecosystem as a whole.
A wildlife protection law with a wide scope for protection of not just animals, but also plants and birds, recognizes the interconnectedness of all species and the importance of maintaining healthy and balanced ecosystems. Such a law can provide legal protections for the conservation and management of these species and their habitats, as well as for the sustainable use of natural resources. Additionally, it can facilitate the conservation of genetic diversity, which is essential for the adaptation and evolution of species in changing environmental conditions.
Hunting Clubs
The Brazilian law
Art. 11. Amateur hunting and flying shooting clubs or societies may be organized separately or jointly with fishing clubs, and will only function validly after obtaining legal personality, in the form of civil law and registration with the federal public agency. competent.
The Indian Law
There is no Indian equivalent.
Comparison
There is no Indian equivalent of the Brazilian law. This is bad as there may be a number of advantages to supporting amateur hunting and fishing clubs that have received licence from the government. These clubs may support conservation efforts, help local economies, encourage social and cultural involvement, and promote ethical and sustainable hunting and fishing activities. To maintain sustainability and prevent detrimental effects on animal populations or their habitats, it is crucial to make sure that all hunting and fishing operations are strictly controlled and monitored. To guarantee that hunting and fishing clubs are functioning ethically and are not facilitating unlawful hunting or overfishing, the government should keep an eye on and enforce restrictions.
Introduction Of New Species
The Brazilian law
Art. 4 No species may be introduced into the country without a favorable official technical opinion and a license issued pursuant to the Law.
The Indian Law
There is no Indian equivalent.
Comparison
There is no Indian equivalent of the Brazilian law. This is bad. Introducing new species into a country without government permission can have harmful effects on the existing ecosystem and native species. It can lead to competition for resources and potential displacement of native species, leading to a decline in biodiversity. The introduction of non-native species can also cause economic damage to agriculture, fisheries, and other industries. Therefore, governments have strict laws and regulations in place to control and manage the introduction of new species. These laws aim to protect the existing ecosystems, native species, and prevent any adverse effects on the economy and environment.
Wildlife Habitat Protection
The Brazilian law
There is no Brazilian equivalent.
The Indian Law
Chapter IV: Protected Areas This chapter deals with the declaration of certain areas as "protected areas" for the purpose of conservation and protection of wildlife. The chapter outlines the powers of the Central Government, State Government, and Chief Wildlife Wardens in declaring and managing such protected areas. It also mentions the prohibition of hunting or damaging any wildlife or property within these protected areas.
Chapter IVA: Central Zoo Authority And Recognition Of Zoos
This chapter deals with the establishment of the Central Zoo Authority (CZA) and its functions. The CZA is responsible for the recognition of zoos in India and for ensuring that they comply with prescribed norms and standards. The chapter also outlines the guidelines for the establishment and maintenance of zoos, as well as the powers of the CZA in regulating and managing zoos.Comparison
There is no Brazilian equivalent of the Indian law.
This is regrettable for the following reasons:
When it comes to creating protected areas and zoos, laws that are specifically designed to conserve wildlife habitat are required for a number of reasons.
In order to preserve biodiversity and natural resources, protected areas are crucial. These are designated areas that are maintained with the intention of preserving wildlife and their habitats. These areas are essential for the survival of endangered and vulnerable species, as well as for the preservation of natural processes and services that sustain human well-being. Protected areas must be recognised, named, and administered efficiently, which necessitates laws that create and control them.
Second, zoos are crucial for wildlife study, teaching, and conservation. If not adequately maintained, zoos may potentially endanger the wellbeing of the animals and their habitat. The laws make sure that zoos adhere to a set of requirements for the care, conservation, and education of animals.
Finally, laws devoted to wildlife habitat protection are required to control human activities that can endanger wildlife and their ecosystems. These includes activities that may result in habitat degradation and fragmentation, including as hunting, poaching, logging, and mining. Wildlife habitats may be better protected and maintained by developing laws to govern these activities.
To build and administer protected areas and zoos, as well as to control human activities that can endanger wildlife and their habitats, laws specifically addressing wildlife habitat protection are required. In addition to protecting endangered and vulnerable species, these laws are essential for maintaining the natural systems and services that sustain human well-being.
Law To Protect Specific Animals
The Brazilian law
There is no Brazilian equivalent
The Indian Law
There is an entire chapter like that, which is the Chapter IVB: National Tiger Conservation Authority..
Comparison
Chapter IV B of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 in India deals with the establishment of the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and its functions. This chapter was added to the act in 2006 to specifically address the conservation of tigers and their habitats in India.
Under Chapter IV B, the NTCA was established as a statutory body with the mandate to ensure the conservation of tigers and their habitats in the country. The NTCA is responsible for implementing the Project Tiger program, which was launched in 1973 to protect and conserve Bengal tigers in their natural habitats.
The chapter outlines the functions of the NTCA, which include the following:
- Implementation of the Project Tiger program
- Declaration of areas as tiger reserves
- Approval of tiger conservation plans prepared by the state governments
- Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of tiger conservation plans
- Providing technical and financial assistance to the state governments for tiger conservation
- Regulating tourism in tiger reserves to ensure minimal disturbance to tigers and their habitats
- Conducting scientific research and monitoring of tiger populations and their habitats
Tigers are a particular focus of conservation efforts since they are an apex predator and are essential to preserving the ecosystem's equilibrium. They are also a significant cultural and national icon of India. However, tigers are under a lot of pressure, including habitat degradation, poaching, and conflicts with people and other animals. For that reason, the NTCA and Project Tiger work to preserve and safeguard these majestic creatures for coming generations.
Unfortunately, as pointed above, Brazil does not have laws protecting specific animals. This is especially bad when you consider the fact that an animal like the jaguar, which like the tiger is a national animal, is itself an endangered species. However, while there is a specific law to protect certain species like the tiger in India, the same is absent in the Brazilian law.
There are several reasons why there should be laws to protect specific animals. Firstly, some animals may be more vulnerable to threats than others due to factors such as habitat loss, poaching, and climate change. Therefore, specific laws can be designed to address the unique threats faced by these animals and protect them from harm.
Secondly, some animals may be culturally or ecologically important, and their loss could have severe consequences. For example, certain animals may be important for the balance of the ecosystem, and their disappearance could have cascading effects on other species and the environment as a whole.
Furthermore, specific laws can be used to regulate the activities that threaten specific animals, such as hunting, fishing, and wildlife trade. Without such laws, these activities could cause significant harm to animal populations, and general laws may not be sufficient to address the specific threats.
General laws, while important, may not always be sufficient to protect specific animals adequately. General laws tend to focus on broader principles and guidelines and may not address the unique challenges faced by specific species. Moreover, enforcement of general laws may be challenging, as they may not provide the necessary tools to address specific issues.
For example, the Wildlife Protection Act in India, which is a general law, was insufficient to protect the Bengal tiger population adequately. Therefore, specific legislation was introduced to establish the National Tiger Conservation Authority and regulate activities that threaten tigers specifically.
In conclusion, laws to protect specific animals are necessary to ensure the conservation of vulnerable or ecologically significant species. While general laws are essential, specific laws can be tailored to address the unique challenges faced by specific species and provide better protection.
Conclusion And Suggestion
Upon taking into account the above comparisons, I can easily say that the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law - Law No. 5,197/1967 is not as well drafted as The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. The Indian law has a far wider scope, includes specific protection for a specie (tiger), and has laws to protect wildlife habitats. Overall, if seen from objective lens, even if the Indian law is lacking in some minor aspects, it is overall a better drafted law.
The Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 has a total of 66 sections, including various schedules and amendments. The sections cover a range of topics related to the protection and conservation of wildlife and their habitats, such as the establishment of protected areas, the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, and the prevention of wildlife-related crimes. The law also includes provisions for the management of national parks, sanctuaries, and other protected areas, as well as the recognition of the rights of indigenous and local communities.
The Brazilian Wildlife Protection Act, 1967 has a total of 29 articles (which are similar to sections in other countries' laws) and 2 transitional provisions. The articles cover a range of topics related to the protection and conservation of wildlife and their habitats, such as the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, the establishment of hunting seasons and protected areas, and penalties for offenses related to wildlife.
However, the scope of the law is more limited than the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, and it primarily focuses on hunting regulations and the protection of game animals for hunting purposes, rather than broader conservation objectives.
Brazil is home to some of the world's most diverse and unique wildlife, including species such as jaguars, giant otters, and capybaras. However, the Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, 1967, which is the main law governing wildlife conservation in the country, has limitations in terms of its scope and effectiveness.
The law primarily focuses on hunting regulations and the protection of game animals for hunting purposes, rather than broader conservation objectives. This limited scope has resulted in inadequate protection of many species of plants, animals, and birds, and their habitats.
In contrast, the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 has a more comprehensive approach towards wildlife conservation, which includes provisions for the protection of wild animals, birds, and plants, as well as the establishment of protected areas, the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, and the prevention of wildlife-related crimes.
The Indian law also has provisions for the management of national parks, sanctuaries, and other protected areas, and recognizes the rights of indigenous and local communities. The effectiveness of the Indian law can be seen in the recovery of species such as tigers and rhinos, which were once threatened with extinction.
Therefore, Brazil could benefit from taking inspiration from the Indian Wildlife Protection Act and drafting a better wildlife protection law with a wider scope and more effective provisions. Such a law could help protect and conserve Brazil's unique and diverse wildlife, and promote sustainable development practices that balance conservation objectives with the needs of local communities.
Bibliography
- https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/country/india
- https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/country/brazil
- http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L5197compilado.htm
- https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1972-53_0.pdf
Law Article in India
Legal Question & Answers
Lawyers in India - Search By City
LawArticles
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
Increased Age For Girls Marriage
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
Facade of Social Media
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
Please Drop Your Comments