"If we can teach people about wildlife, they will be touched. Share my wildlife
with me. Because humans want to save things that they love."― Steve Irwin
Wildlife protection laws are pieces of legislation enacted to safeguard wildlife
and its ecosystems against exploitation, habitat destruction, and other
detrimental activities. The protection of wild animal populations and their
habitats for future generations is made possible by these laws, which are
crucial for the conservation and sustainable use of wildlife resources. Human
activity has significantly impacted wildlife populations and their habitats,
making wildlife protection laws important.
The loss of biodiversity and the
extinction of many species are results of overexploitation, habitat degradation,
and climate change. By limiting human activity that could endanger wildlife
populations or their habitats, Wildlife Protection Laws seek to address these
One of the most prevalent types of wildlife protection laws are those
that govern hunting and fishing. In order to minimise depletion of natural
resources of wildlife populations, these laws set out norms and limitations on
hunting and fishing activities.
By limiting land use, construction, and other
activities that can affect the environment, habitat protection laws work to
conserve the habitats of wildlife species. Laws protecting endangered and
vulnerable species provide particular safeguards, such as limitations on trade,
hunting, and other activities that can jeopardise the species.
For the conservation and wise use of wildlife resources, wildlife protection
laws are essential overall. These laws contribute to the equitable distribution
of the benefits of wildlife resources and the protection of wild animal
populations and habitats for future generations.
The main legislation pertaining to wildlife conservation in Brazil is the
Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, or Law No. 5,197/1967. By limiting hunting
and fishing throughout the nation, the legislation creates measures for the
preservation and conservation of Brazilian biodiversity. The legislation forbids
the hunting, trapping, catching, transportation, and marketing of a number of
animal species and establishes guidelines for the management and conservation of
native animals. For those who break the law, it also specifies civil, criminal,
and administrative sanctions, including fines and jail time. Since it was passed
in 1967, the legislation has undergone several amendments; the most recent ones
were adopted in 2019.
The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 is the main piece of legislation in India
pertaining to wildlife conservation. The Act outlines penalties for hunting,
poaching, and dealing in wildlife and offers protection for wild animals and
plants. The Act specifies the legislative guidelines for the administration and
preservation of these places and governs the proclamation of national parks and
Moreover, the Act specifies rules for the management and
maintenance of animal habitats as well as the preservation of endangered
species. India also has additional state and federal laws and rules addressing
the preservation and protection of wildlife.
In order to conserve and safeguard wild creatures and their habitats, wildlife
protection laws are essential. Both Brazil and India have diverse wildlife
populations and intricate legislative systems for wildlife protection. The
Indian Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 and the Brazilian Wildlife Protection
Law, Law No. 5,197/1967, are two intricate legislative frameworks for wildlife
protection. Notwithstanding the fact that both laws seek to safeguard wildlife
resources, they differ in their specific provisions and methods for protecting
We may learn about the distinctive characteristics and methods of
wildlife conservation of these two legal systems by contrasting and comparing
them. In order to contribute to more effective wildlife conservation and
protection, this research paper will investigate prospects for enhancing the
Indian legal system. This research paper compares and contrasts the wildlife
protection laws of Brazil and India in order to better appreciate the Indian
legal system, as well as to contribute to the worldwide effort to preserve and
safeguard wildlife resources for future generations.
The Comparison Of Aspects
Scope Of Protection The Brazilian law
Art. 1st. Animals of any species, at any stage of their development and that
live naturally outside captivity, constituting the wild fauna, as well as their
nests, shelters and natural breeding grounds are State property, their use,
persecution, destruction, hunting being prohibited. or catch.
The Indian Law
An Act to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for
matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto with a view to
ensuring the ecological and environmental security of the country. (The long
While the Brazilian law provides protection to all Brazilian wildlife, the
Indian law extends protection to not only wild animals but also to plants and
birds. Thus it is more encompassing.
A wildlife protection law should have a wide scope for protection of not just
animals, but also plants and birds, because they are all interconnected
components of the ecosystem. The conservation and protection of these species
are crucial for the maintenance of healthy and balanced ecosystems, which in
turn support human well-being.
Plants are the foundation of most terrestrial ecosystems, providing habitat,
food, and oxygen for a vast array of species, including humans. Many animal
species, such as insects, birds, and mammals, rely on plants for food and
shelter. Therefore, the protection of plants is crucial for the conservation of
Similarly, birds play an important role in the ecosystem, such as pollination,
seed dispersal, and controlling insect populations. They are also indicators of
the health of ecosystems and can provide valuable information about the quality
of the environment. The loss of bird populations can have cascading effects on
other species and the ecosystem as a whole.
A wildlife protection law with a wide scope for protection of not just animals,
but also plants and birds, recognizes the interconnectedness of all species and
the importance of maintaining healthy and balanced ecosystems. Such a law can
provide legal protections for the conservation and management of these species
and their habitats, as well as for the sustainable use of natural resources.
Additionally, it can facilitate the conservation of genetic diversity, which is
essential for the adaptation and evolution of species in changing environmental
Hunting ClubsThe Brazilian law
Art. 11. Amateur hunting and flying shooting clubs or societies may be organized
separately or jointly with fishing clubs, and will only function validly after
obtaining legal personality, in the form of civil law and registration with the
federal public agency. competent.
The Indian Law
There is no Indian equivalent.
There is no Indian equivalent of the Brazilian law. This is bad as there may be
a number of advantages to supporting amateur hunting and fishing clubs that have
received licence from the government. These clubs may support conservation
efforts, help local economies, encourage social and cultural involvement, and
promote ethical and sustainable hunting and fishing activities. To maintain
sustainability and prevent detrimental effects on animal populations or their
habitats, it is crucial to make sure that all hunting and fishing operations are
strictly controlled and monitored. To guarantee that hunting and fishing clubs
are functioning ethically and are not facilitating unlawful hunting or
overfishing, the government should keep an eye on and enforce restrictions.
Introduction Of New Species The Brazilian law
Art. 4 No species may be introduced into the country without a favorable
official technical opinion and a license issued pursuant to the Law.
The Indian Law
There is no Indian equivalent.
There is no Indian equivalent of the Brazilian law. This is bad. Introducing new
species into a country without government permission can have harmful effects on
the existing ecosystem and native species. It can lead to competition for
resources and potential displacement of native species, leading to a decline in
biodiversity. The introduction of non-native species can also cause economic
damage to agriculture, fisheries, and other industries. Therefore, governments
have strict laws and regulations in place to control and manage the introduction
of new species. These laws aim to protect the existing ecosystems, native
species, and prevent any adverse effects on the economy and environment.
Wildlife Habitat ProtectionThe Brazilian law
There is no Brazilian equivalent.
The Indian Law
Chapter IV: Protected Areas
This chapter deals with the declaration of certain areas as "protected areas"
for the purpose of conservation and protection of wildlife. The chapter outlines
the powers of the Central Government, State Government, and Chief Wildlife
Wardens in declaring and managing such protected areas. It also mentions the
prohibition of hunting or damaging any wildlife or property within these
Chapter IVA: Central Zoo Authority And Recognition Of Zoos
This chapter deals with the establishment of the Central Zoo Authority (CZA) and
its functions. The CZA is responsible for the recognition of zoos in India and
for ensuring that they comply with prescribed norms and standards. The chapter
also outlines the guidelines for the establishment and maintenance of zoos, as
well as the powers of the CZA in regulating and managing zoos.
There is no Brazilian equivalent of the Indian law.
This is regrettable for the
When it comes to creating protected areas and zoos, laws that are specifically
designed to conserve wildlife habitat are required for a number of reasons.
In order to preserve biodiversity and natural resources, protected areas are
crucial. These are designated areas that are maintained with the intention of
preserving wildlife and their habitats. These areas are essential for the
survival of endangered and vulnerable species, as well as for the preservation
of natural processes and services that sustain human well-being. Protected areas
must be recognised, named, and administered efficiently, which necessitates laws
that create and control them.
Second, zoos are crucial for wildlife study, teaching, and conservation. If not
adequately maintained, zoos may potentially endanger the wellbeing of the
animals and their habitat. The laws make sure that zoos adhere to a set of
requirements for the care, conservation, and education of animals.
Finally, laws devoted to wildlife habitat protection are required to control
human activities that can endanger wildlife and their ecosystems. These includes
activities that may result in habitat degradation and fragmentation, including
as hunting, poaching, logging, and mining. Wildlife habitats may be better
protected and maintained by developing laws to govern these activities.
To build and administer protected areas and zoos, as well as to control human
activities that can endanger wildlife and their habitats, laws specifically
addressing wildlife habitat protection are required. In addition to protecting
endangered and vulnerable species, these laws are essential for maintaining the
natural systems and services that sustain human well-being.
Law To Protect Specific Animals
The Brazilian law
There is no Brazilian equivalent
The Indian Law
There is an entire chapter like that, which is the Chapter IVB: National
Tiger Conservation Authority.
Chapter IV B of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 in India deals with the
establishment of the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and its
functions. This chapter was added to the act in 2006 to specifically address the
conservation of tigers and their habitats in India.
Under Chapter IV B, the NTCA was established as a statutory body with the
mandate to ensure the conservation of tigers and their habitats in the country.
The NTCA is responsible for implementing the Project Tiger program, which was
launched in 1973 to protect and conserve Bengal tigers in their natural
The chapter outlines the functions of the NTCA, which include the following:
- Implementation of the Project Tiger program
- Declaration of areas as tiger reserves
- Approval of tiger conservation plans prepared by the state governments
- Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of tiger conservation plans
- Providing technical and financial assistance to the state governments
for tiger conservation
- Regulating tourism in tiger reserves to ensure minimal disturbance to
tigers and their habitats
- Conducting scientific research and monitoring of tiger populations and
Chapter IV B of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the establishment of the
NTCA have been crucial in the conservation of tigers in India, which has the
largest population of tigers in the world. The NTCA has played a significant
role in the recovery of tiger populations in the country through its
conservation efforts and management of tiger reserves.
Tigers are a particular focus of conservation efforts since they are an apex
predator and are essential to preserving the ecosystem's equilibrium. They are
also a significant cultural and national icon of India. However, tigers are
under a lot of pressure, including habitat degradation, poaching, and conflicts
with people and other animals. For that reason, the NTCA and Project Tiger work
to preserve and safeguard these majestic creatures for coming generations.
Unfortunately, as pointed above, Brazil does not have laws protecting specific
animals. This is especially bad when you consider the fact that an animal like
the jaguar, which like the tiger is a national animal, is itself an endangered
species. However, while there is a specific law to protect certain species like
the tiger in India, the same is absent in the Brazilian law.
There are several reasons why there should be laws to protect specific animals.
Firstly, some animals may be more vulnerable to threats than others due to
factors such as habitat loss, poaching, and climate change. Therefore, specific
laws can be designed to address the unique threats faced by these animals and
protect them from harm.
Secondly, some animals may be culturally or ecologically important, and their
loss could have severe consequences. For example, certain animals may be
important for the balance of the ecosystem, and their disappearance could have
cascading effects on other species and the environment as a whole.
Furthermore, specific laws can be used to regulate the activities that threaten
specific animals, such as hunting, fishing, and wildlife trade. Without such
laws, these activities could cause significant harm to animal populations, and
general laws may not be sufficient to address the specific threats.
General laws, while important, may not always be sufficient to protect specific
animals adequately. General laws tend to focus on broader principles and
guidelines and may not address the unique challenges faced by specific species.
Moreover, enforcement of general laws may be challenging, as they may not
provide the necessary tools to address specific issues.
For example, the Wildlife Protection Act in India, which is a general law, was
insufficient to protect the Bengal tiger population adequately. Therefore,
specific legislation was introduced to establish the National Tiger Conservation
Authority and regulate activities that threaten tigers specifically.
In conclusion, laws to protect specific animals are necessary to ensure the
conservation of vulnerable or ecologically significant species. While general
laws are essential, specific laws can be tailored to address the unique
challenges faced by specific species and provide better protection.
Conclusion And Suggestion
Upon taking into account the above comparisons, I can easily say that the
Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law - Law No. 5,197/1967 is not as well drafted as
The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. The Indian law has a far wider scope,
includes specific protection for a specie (tiger), and has laws to protect
wildlife habitats. Overall, if seen from objective lens, even if the Indian law
is lacking in some minor aspects, it is overall a better drafted law.
The Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 has a total of 66 sections, including
various schedules and amendments. The sections cover a range of topics related
to the protection and conservation of wildlife and their habitats, such as the
establishment of protected areas, the regulation of hunting and trade in
wildlife, and the prevention of wildlife-related crimes. The law also includes
provisions for the management of national parks, sanctuaries, and other
protected areas, as well as the recognition of the rights of indigenous and
The Brazilian Wildlife Protection Act, 1967 has a total of 29 articles (which
are similar to sections in other countries' laws) and 2 transitional provisions.
The articles cover a range of topics related to the protection and conservation
of wildlife and their habitats, such as the regulation of hunting and trade in
wildlife, the establishment of hunting seasons and protected areas, and
penalties for offenses related to wildlife.
However, the scope of the law is
more limited than the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, and it primarily focuses
on hunting regulations and the protection of game animals for hunting purposes,
rather than broader conservation objectives.
Brazil is home to some of the world's most diverse and unique wildlife,
including species such as jaguars, giant otters, and capybaras. However, the
Brazilian Wildlife Protection Law, 1967, which is the main law governing
wildlife conservation in the country, has limitations in terms of its scope and
The law primarily focuses on hunting regulations and the
protection of game animals for hunting purposes, rather than broader
conservation objectives. This limited scope has resulted in inadequate
protection of many species of plants, animals, and birds, and their habitats.
In contrast, the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 has a more comprehensive
approach towards wildlife conservation, which includes provisions for the
protection of wild animals, birds, and plants, as well as the establishment of
protected areas, the regulation of hunting and trade in wildlife, and the
prevention of wildlife-related crimes.
The Indian law also has provisions for
the management of national parks, sanctuaries, and other protected areas, and
recognizes the rights of indigenous and local communities. The effectiveness of
the Indian law can be seen in the recovery of species such as tigers and rhinos,
which were once threatened with extinction.
Therefore, Brazil could benefit from taking inspiration from the Indian Wildlife
Protection Act and drafting a better wildlife protection law with a wider scope
and more effective provisions. Such a law could help protect and conserve
Brazil's unique and diverse wildlife, and promote sustainable development
practices that balance conservation objectives with the needs of local
Please Drop Your Comments