Biological Male, Is It Merely A Notion?
The statement that "the biological male is a biological male, biological
female is a biological female" is a statement of fact, not a question of
notion. It is not a human construct, but rather God's construct. This is a
belief held by many individuals, particularly those who adhere to traditional
gender roles and religious beliefs.
In India, this belief has been deeply ingrained in the fabric of society for
centuries. However, as society evolves, beliefs and attitudes may also change.
This is where the role of the court becomes important.
It is the responsibility of the court to interpret the laws and ensure that they
are in line with the constitution and uphold the rights of all individuals,
regardless of their gender or sexual orientation. While it is true that the
opinion of the public is important, the court's decision should not be solely
based on public opinion. The court's decision should be based on constitutional
principles and the best interests of the child.
When it comes to adoption, it is important to recognize that every individual,
regardless of their sexual orientation, should have equal opportunities to adopt
a child as long as they meet the required criteria and can provide a safe and
stable home for the child. The well-being and best interests of the child should
be the priority when considering adoption.
The ability to provide a loving and stable home environment is far more
important than the sexual orientation of the parents. However, the acceptance of
society should not be the determining factor in whether or not a gay couple is
allowed to adopt a child. It is the responsibility of the court to ensure that
the rights of the child and the adoptive parents are protected.
While it is true that societal attitudes may take time to change, this should
not prevent the court from upholding the rights of all individuals. History has
shown that change is possible, even in deeply ingrained societal beliefs such as
Sati Pratha. It was the efforts of individuals like Raja Ram Mohan Roy who
created social awareness against this harmful practice and paved the way for
Similarly, the court's decision to uphold the rights of all individuals,
regardless of their sexual orientation, can create social awareness and pave the
way for change in societal attitudes. It is the responsibility of the court to
ensure that the law is not "teethless" and that all individuals are
protected under the constitution.
In conclusion, while beliefs about gender and sexuality may be deeply
ingrained in society, it is the responsibility of the court to ensure that the
rights of all individuals are protected. The court's decision should be based on
constitutional principles and the best interests of the child, rather than
public opinion or societal attitudes. With time and effort, societal attitudes
can change, and the court's decision can pave the way for progress and equality
for all individuals.
Law Article in India
You May Like
Legal Question & Answers