Since January 18, 2023, India's top wrestlers named Phogat, Bajrang Punia, Ravi
Dahila, and several other wrestlers are protesting against the president Brij
Bhushan Sharan Singh and the wrestling body at the Jantar Mantar in New Delhi.
Brij Bhushan Sharan president of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) and a
BJP Lok Sabha MP from Uttar Pradesh alleged the wrestlers that Brij Bhushan
Singh had sexually harassed them for years Also, they pointed out that there is
an atmosphere of fear and intimidation at national camps and some national
coaches also work on his behalf.
Against Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, the BJP MP
who oversees wrestling in India, wrestlers have been protesting at Jantar Mantar
in New Delhi. The allegations were investigated by a government committee
chaired by boxer M. C. Mary Kom. But, According to a report that appeared on May
4 in The Indian Express, 16 out of India's 30 national sports federations lack
an internal complaints committee (ICC), which is made mandatory by the
Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) Act 2013.
The Law Against Sexual Harassment Of Women In The Workplace
The PoSH Act is also known as the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace
(Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, which was passed in 2013. But
before 2013 the instance of discrimination against women is first time
illustrated in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan.
In its landmark
decision Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
("Vishaka Judgement"), the Honourable
Supreme Court of India recognized workplace sexual harassment for the first time
in India. The Union of India was given orders by the Supreme Court to pass an
adequate law to handle workplace sexual harassment. The POSH Act and the POSH
Rules were passed 16 years after the Vishaka Judgement.
In the above-said case, A social worker named Bhanwari Devi a Dalit woman
employed with a rural development program of the Rajasthan government was
gang-raped in because she was trying to stop child marriage. Unfortunately, this
case was dismissed due to a lack of proof for supporting the crime.
this incident gained support from several NGOs and social activists, reinforcing
the need for specific legislation for workplace sexual harassment of women in
light of gender equality immediately after that, this writ petition was filed
under Article 32 by many social activists and NGOs because Articles 14, 15, and
21 of the Constitution had been violated. The Supreme Court for the first time
acknowledged clear legal shortcomings and recognized workplace sexual harassment
as a violation of human rights.
The Vishaka Guidelines introduced the term "sexual harassment" and gave
Institutions three major duties: prohibition, prevention, and redress.
The Supreme Court instructed them to form a complaints committee to investigate
claims of sexual harassment of women at work. The rules are now enforceable by
The Vishaka Guidelines, created by the Supreme Court in a 1997 judgment, were
broadened by the 2013 statute and given legal effect.
The Act defines sexual harassment as any inappropriate behavior (directly or
indirectly), such as:
- Physical advances and contact
- Request or demand for sexual favors
- Making remarks with a sexual agenda
- Showing adult content
Any other inappropriate sexual behavior, whether it be physical, verbal, or
nonverbal. The Act offers a procedure for preventing, outlawing, and resolving
claims of sexual harassment in the workplace.
Additionally, the PoSH Act lists five situations that qualify as sexual
Obligations of the employer:
- The implied or explicit threat about the complainant's current or future work
- Implied or explicit promise of special treatment in her employment.
- The implied or explicit threat of unfavorable treatment;
- Interfering with the complainant's job or generating a hostile or unpleasant
- Humiliating the complainant in a way that might endanger her health or safety
POSH Act and Redressal Forum:
- To give women a secure working environment.
- Showcase the legal repercussions of sexual harassment.
- Create workshops and awareness programs.
- If the complainant decides to bring a criminal case against the respondent,
One of the important features of the POSH Act is to direct the setting up of a
grievance redressal forum in every office.
The procedure of filling a complaint:
- Internal Complaint Committee
The POSH Act requires an employer to set up an 'Internal Complain Committee' ("ICC")
at each office or branch, of an organization employing 10 or more employees, to
hear and redress grievances about sexual harassment. Failure to constitute the
ICC has led to the imposition of a fine under the POSH Act.
Constitution of the Internal Complaint Committee:
- Presiding Officer must be a woman employed at a senior level in the
workplace from amongst the employees
- A minimum of two people chosen from the employees.
- One external representative from an NGO, group, or individual who is
knowledgeable about sexual harassment issues.
- Each office or branch with ten or more workers must have an Internal
Complaints Committee (ICC), which must be established by every office.
- The term of the IC Members shall not exceed 3 years.
- A minimum of 3 Members of the ICC including the Presiding Officer are to be
present for conducting the inquiry.
- Local Complaint Committee
The Act also allows the District Officer to establish a Local Complaints
Committee (LCC) when the complaint is against the employer or when less than 10
employees are working there. The LC is especially important when domestic
employees are the targets of sexual harassment or when the complainant is the
employer himself or a third party who is not an employee.
- Committed to the cause of women.
- One of the members must be nominated amongst the women working in a block,
Taluka, tehsil, ward, or municipality in the district.
- Two NGO members, out of which, at least one shall be a woman to be nominated
from an NGO or an association committed to the Cause of women or a person
familiar with issues of sexual harassment against women.
- Chairperson must be an eminent woman in the field of social work.
As per Section2(a) of the POSH Act a complaint may be filled by the aggrieved
woman or in case of mental incapacity, physical incapacity, or death of the
aggrieved woman complaint may be filled by - Her relative, friend colleague,
legal heir, a special educator, a psychiatrist, any other person who know about
the incident but with her written consent, in case of death than with the
written permission of her legal heir.
In essence, for the ICC to take action, the aggrieved victim does not need to
file a complaint. She "may" do so, and if she is unable, any ICC member "must"
provide her with "all reasonable assistance" in filing a formal complaint, under
According to the Act, the complaint must be filed "within three months from the
date of the incident or within three months of the date of the latest event in
the case of several instances. The ICC may, however, extend the deadline if "it
is satisfied that the circumstances were such that prevented the woman from
filing a complaint within the said period."
Before taking action on a complaint, the IC may, at the request of the aggrieved
women may, attempt to resolve the dispute between the parties through
conciliation by reaching an amicable solution. Despite this, conciliation should
not be based on a monetary settlement.
Timeline Of The Inquiry Process
Punishment and Compensation
- The Inquiry must be finished within a total of 90 days after the complaint is
- Within 10 days of the investigation, the investigation report must be published.
- Within 60 days of receiving the Inquiry report, the Employer must consider the
- Within 90 days following the date of the committee's recommendations, an appeal
against the decision may be filed.
According to the POSH Act, an employer can punish an employee for engaging in
sexual harassment in the following ways:
Under the Posh act, the compensation to be paid will be decided depending on:
- The penalty specified by the organization's service rules;
- In the absence of service rules, disciplinary action, such as a written apology,
warning, reprimand, censure, withholding of a promotion or pay raise or
increments, terminating the respondent's employment, requiring him to attend
counseling or perform community service; and
- Deducting the compensation Payable to the victimized woman from the respondent's
- The aggrieved employee's mental trauma, pain, suffering, and emotional distress;
- The loss of career opportunities as a result of the sexual harassment incident.
- The victim's medical costs for physical and mental treatment; the income and
status of the alleged perpetrator; and
- The viability of such payment in one lump sum or installments.
Protection Against A False Complaint Of Sexual Harassment
The POSH Act includes provisions for action against "false or malicious"
complainants to prevent abuse of the safeguards intended by the legislation.
False or malicious complaints and false evidence are punished under Section 14
of the Act. In this situation, the ICC "may recommend" to the employer that it
take action against the woman or the person who filed the complaint "under the
provisions of the service rules."
However, the Act makes it clear that failure to "substantiate the complaint or
provide adequate proof" is not sufficient grounds for action.
Please Drop Your Comments