In a world marked by the clash of tradition and modernity, the use of
firecrackers during festive celebrations stands as a symbol of this ongoing
struggle. For generations, the brilliant bursts of light and ear-piercing cracks
of firecrackers have been an integral part of various cultural celebrations,
adding an element of spectacle, joy, and auspiciousness. However, as we become
increasingly aware of the detrimental impact of these pyrotechnics on our
environment and public health, particularly in densely populated urban centers,
the age-old practice faces a pivotal moment of adaptation or extinction.
In recent years, the debate over firecracker bans has ignited across many
countries, bringing to the forefront questions about cultural preservation,
health and safety, and environmental sustainability. One of the most prominent
instances of this discourse can be observed in India, where the annual Diwali
festival, known as the Festival of Lights, has traditionally involved an
extravagant display of fireworks. The celebration, rooted in mythology and
tradition, has faced growing opposition from environmentalists, medical
professionals, and concerned citizens who point to the devastating consequences
of air pollution, noise pollution, and health hazards caused by the rampant use
As the argument rages on, it raises complex questions about the intersection of
cultural heritage, individual rights, and collective responsibility. This
article explores the multifaceted aspects of the firecracker ban controversy,
from the reasons behind the bans to their impact on cultural traditions and the
broader implications for public health and the environment. By examining this
evolving landscape, we aim to shed light on the delicate balance between the
past and the future, between cherished customs and the pressing need for a more
Origins of this tradition
Historical practices surrounding the use of firecrackers during Diwali reveal a
rich tapestry of tradition and cultural significance deeply rooted in India's
ancient history. The origins of this practice can be traced back centuries,
reflecting the profound connections between mythology, spirituality, and the
communal celebrations of the festival.
One of the most enduring legends associated with Diwali revolves around Shri
Ram, the seventh avatar of Lord Vishnu, as chronicled in the epic Ramayana.
After 14 years of exile and a triumphant battle against the demon king Ravana,
Lord Rama, his wife Sita, and loyal brother Lakshman returned to Ayodhya. The
jubilant people of Ayodhya, eager to celebrate this divine homecoming, lit oil
lamps and illuminated the city. Additionally, they set off firecrackers to fill
the night sky with brilliant bursts of light and sound. This gesture was not
only a means of expressing their joy but also symbolized the victory of light
over darkness, virtue over evil, and the restoration of dharma (righteousness).
Another compelling narrative linked to Diwali revolves around Lord Krishna's
triumph over Narakasur, a demon king who terrorized the world. According to
mythology, Lord Krishna vanquished Narakasur, bringing an end to his tyranny. To
mark this victory, people celebrated with great fervor, bursting firecrackers
and making merry to express their relief and happiness.
These historical practices underscore the deep spiritual and mythological
underpinnings of firecrackers during Diwali. Firecrackers have long been seen as
a means of celebrating the triumph of good over evil, the return of divine
beings to their abode, and the dispelling of darkness and ignorance from one's
life. Over the centuries, this tradition has evolved, with firecrackers becoming
an integral part of Diwali celebrations, symbolizing hope, joy, and the communal
bond that ties people together during this auspicious festival.
Traditions and customs as sources of law
In India, traditions and customs hold a pivotal place as sources of law,
particularly in the realm of personal and family matters. The country's rich
cultural tapestry is woven with diverse customs and traditions that have been
handed down through generations. These customary practices often have a profound
impact on personal laws governing issues such as marriage, inheritance, and
religious rituals. For instance, the Hindu personal laws, influenced by ancient
customs and practices, are deeply rooted in Hindu traditions and guide matters
related to marriage, divorce, and succession.
Similarly, Muslim personal laws
are derived from Islamic traditions and customs, governing various aspects of
family and personal life within the Muslim community. India's recognition of
these customary laws acknowledges the cultural diversity and pluralism of the
nation, allowing individuals to adhere to their respective traditions in these
However, there can be instances where traditions and customs clash with
established legal norms or public policy in India. For example, certain
traditional practices like child marriage, dowry, and sati have been banned and
criminalized due to their inherent harm or infringement upon individual rights.
These practices, although rooted in long-standing customs, are considered
against the principles of gender equality and human rights, and they are
prohibited by law.
In such cases, the Indian legal system takes precedence over
traditional customs to uphold the principles of justice, equality, and the
welfare of its citizens. This demonstrates the delicate balance between honoring
cultural traditions and the imperative to protect individual rights and public
welfare within India's evolving legal framework.
Essentials for a tradition or custom to become a law
For a custom to become legally recognized and enforceable, it typically needs to
meet several essential criteria. These criteria may vary depending on the legal
system and jurisdiction, but generally, the following elements are considered
Law vs Traditions:
- Consistency and Antiquity: The custom should have been consistently followed over a significant period, demonstrating its antiquity and continuity. Courts and legal authorities are more likely to recognize customs that have been observed for a long time without substantial deviation.
- Reasonable Certainty: The custom should be well-defined and understood within the community where it is practiced. It should provide clear guidelines on how it operates and what is expected of individuals or parties involved.
- Against public policy: A custom should not be contrary to public policy, established laws, or morality. It should not cause harm, infringe upon individual rights, or promote illegal activities. Customary practices that are in conflict with fundamental legal principles will not be recognized.
- Reasonable Acceptance: The custom should be accepted by a significant portion of the community or the group it pertains to. Widespread acceptance within the relevant community is a crucial factor in its recognition.
- Continuous Usage: The custom should have been in continuous use and should not have been abandoned or substantially altered over time. Customs that have lapsed or evolved significantly may not meet the criteria for recognition.
- Consistency with Statute Law: Customs should not conflict with statutory law. In cases of conflict, statutory law generally takes precedence. Customary practices that are inconsistent with legal statutes may not be recognized or enforced.
- Absence of Arbitrariness: The custom should not be arbitrary or capricious. It should have a rational basis and serve a legitimate purpose within the context of the community or group in which it is practiced.
In India, there have been instances where certain traditions or customary
practices were banned or regulated by law due to their harmful or discriminatory
nature, despite their deep-rooted cultural significance. These legal
interventions aim to uphold constitutional principles, protect individual
rights, and promote social justice
Here are a few examples:
- Child Marriage: Child marriage, a deeply entrenched tradition in
some parts of India, was banned and made illegal through the Child Marriage
Restraint Act, 1929 (also known as the Sarda Act). This law set the legal age for marriage at
18 for males and 14 for females, effectively prohibiting marriages involving
minors. The ban was implemented to protect the rights and well-being of
children, particularly young girls who were disproportionately affected by child
- Dowry Prohibition: The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, was enacted
to address the social evil of dowry, a longstanding custom in many Indian
communities. The law prohibits the giving, receiving, and demanding of dowry
in connection with marriage. Dowry-related harassment and violence against
brides were rampant, leading to the introduction of this law to safeguard
the rights and dignity of women.
- Sati Pratha: The practice of sati, where widows were expected to
self-immolate on their husband's funeral pyre, was banned in the early 19th
century by the British colonial authorities through the Bengal Sati Regulation
Act of 1829. Subsequent legislation, such as the Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987,
further strengthened the prohibition against sati and the glorification of this
- Triple Talaq: The practice of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-bidat) in Muslim
personal law, which allowed a husband to divorce his wife by uttering "talaq"
three times in quick succession, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme
Court of India in 2017 ( Shayara Bano vs Union of India (2017) 9 SCC 1). The
court held that it violated the fundamental rights of Muslim women and could no
longer be legally practiced.
In all these cases, the Indian legal system intervened to curtail harmful
practices that were inconsistent with the principles of gender equality, human
rights, and public policy. While these bans were met with resistance from some
quarters who argued for the preservation of traditions, they were aimed at
ensuring the welfare and protection of vulnerable individuals and communities.
This demonstrates the complex relationship between law and deeply rooted
traditions in India, where the legal system seeks to strike a balance between
cultural heritage and the principles of justice and equality.
Fundamental rights vs law and traditions
The ban on firecrackers during festivals like Diwali has raised debates and
legal challenges regarding its potential infringement on fundamental rights
guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. While the ban is primarily motivated by
concerns related to environmental protection and public health, they intersect
with various fundamental rights
- Right to Freedom of Religion (Article 25): One of the
fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution is the right to freedom of
religion. Article 25 guarantees the right to practice, profess, and
propagate one's religion freely. Some argue that firecrackers hold
religious and cultural significance during festivals like Diwali, and a ban on their use could be seen as impinging on this
right. However, Indian courts have generally held that this right is not
absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of public
order, health, and morality. Courts have recognized that the right to religious
freedom should be balanced with the broader welfare of society.
- Right to Life and Personal Liberty (Article 21): Article 21
of the Indian Constitution enshrines the right to life and personal
liberty. Air pollution resulting from firecrackers can have severe
health consequences, potentially infringing on the right to a healthy
life and personal liberty. Courts have acknowledged the importance of
safeguarding public health and have upheld restrictions on activities
that pose a threat to life and well-being.
- Right to Equality (Article 14): The right to equality under
Article 14 ensures that all individuals are equal before the law. Some
argue that a firecracker ban unfairly targets specific cultural
practices, which could be perceived as discriminatory. However, the
government and courts often justify such bans as necessary to achieve a
legitimate public interest, such as environmental protection and public
health, thereby satisfying the "reasonable classification" test.
- Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression (Article 19(1)(a)):
The ban on firecrackers can also be seen as a restriction on the right
to freedom of speech and expression. Firecrackers are often used as a
form of expression and celebration during festivals. However, Indian
courts have held that reasonable restrictions on this right can be
imposed to protect public health and order, which includes controlling
noise and air pollution.
The Indian legal system recognizes that fundamental rights are not absolute and
can be subject to reasonable restrictions. Courts have often upheld firecracker
bans during specific periods, such as Diwali, when environmental and health
concerns are particularly acute. The balancing act between individual rights and
the greater public welfare is a complex challenge that the Indian legal system
navigates when addressing issues like firecracker bans. Courts typically assess
whether the restrictions are reasonable, proportionate, and necessary to achieve
a legitimate public interest.
The ban on firecrackers during Diwali highlights a complex legal dynamic where
traditions encounter regulatory measures. While firecrackers are deeply
ingrained in Diwali celebrations, the law recognizes the importance of public
interest, particularly concerning environmental and public health concerns.
legal framework acknowledges that fundamental rights, including the freedom to
practice one's religion, can be subject to reasonable restrictions in the
interest of public order, health, and the environment. As a result, firecracker
bans are implemented as a means of balancing individual customs with broader
societal and ecological responsibilities.
- http://law.uok.edu.in/Files/5ce6c765-c013-446c-b6ac-b9de496f8751/Custom/Uni-5.pdf (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/customs-source-law/amp/ (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- (1942) 1 MLJ 564
- https://www.srdlawnotes.com/2017/01/constituents-of-valid-custom.html (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- https://www.gktoday.in/topic/custom-in-jurisprudence/ (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- https://www.loc.gov/law/help/customary-law/india.php (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- https://www.outlookindia.com/newswire/story/customary-law-prevails-over-statutory-law-sc/480438 (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- 2018 S.C.C. OnLine S.C. 1690
- (2014) 7 S.C.C. 547
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/remembering-sabarimala-verdict-conflict-customs-law-prevail/#_ftnref8 (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- Appeal (civil) 12395 of 1996
- https://www.india-seminar.com/2000/492/492%20b.%20j.%20krishnan.htm (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- https://www.indiatimes.com/explainers/news/happy-diwali-how-people-celebrate-the-festival-553298.html (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/the-history-of-firecrackers-offers-clues-to-silence-them/cid/1840270 (Visited on June 8, 2023)
- Arjun Gopal v. Union of India, (2019) 13 SCC 523