File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

Important Cases Of General Exceptions In IPC

General defenses in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provide individuals with legal justifications for their actions.General Defenses in IPC

Some important case laws related to general defenses in the IPC include:

  • Private Defense (Section 96-106 IPC):
    Case Law: Ratanlal vs. State of Punjab (1965): The court held that the right of private defense is a crucial right, and a person can use force proportionate to the threat faced.
  • Insanity (Section 84 IPC):
    Case Law: R v. Daniel M'Naghten (1843): While this case is not from India, it significantly influenced the legal understanding of insanity. The court established the M'Naghten Rules, which laid down criteria to determine insanity as a defense.
  • Mistake of Fact (Section 76 IPC):
    Case Law: Queen-Empress vs. Mirza (1900): The court held that if an accused acted under a genuine and bona fide mistake of fact, it could be a valid defense.
  • Consent (Section 87-93 IPC):
    Case Law: Deepak Gulati vs. State of Haryana (2013): The Supreme Court clarified the scope of consent as a defense, emphasizing that it should be voluntary and informed.
  • Infancy (Section 82-83 IPC):
    Case Law: Shaktivel vs. State (2007): The court clarified that the defense of infancy is available to a person under the age of seven, and between seven and twelve, there is a presumption that the child is incapable of committing an offense.
  • Necessity (Section 81 IPC):
    Case Law: State of Maharashtra vs. Mohd. Sajid Husain (1998): The court held that the defense of necessity is available when there is a reasonable apprehension of danger to life or limb.
  • Private Defense of Property (Section 97-106 IPC):
    Case Law: Munshi Ram vs. Delhi Administration (1968): The court emphasized the right of private defense of property, stating that it extends to the protection of one's movable property.
  • Right of Private Defense Against Deadly Assault (Section 100 IPC):
    Case Law: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhanudas Krishnaji (2009): The court held that the right of private defense against a deadly assault is available when there is an imminent threat of death or grievous bodily harm.
  • Mistake of Law (Section 76 IPC):
    Case Law: Hari Singh Gond vs. Emperor (1945): The court clarified that ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. However, if the accused genuinely believed in a certain legal right, it might be considered.
  • Unsoundness of Mind (Section 84 IPC):
    Case Law: Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar vs. State of Gujarat (1964): The court emphasized that the defense of unsoundness of mind is applicable if, at the time of the act, the accused was incapable of understanding the nature of the act.
It's important to note that legal interpretations can evolve, and new case laws may emerge over time. Legal professionals should refer to the latest judgments and legal developments for the most up-to-date information.

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers

Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi


How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Increased Age For Girls Marriage


It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...

Facade of Social Media


One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...


The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...


The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...

Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...


Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online

File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly