File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

Covid-19: More Ammunition For China Conspiracy Theory

The Biological Weapons Convention needs to be ARMED so that nations can be DISARMED of their Biological and Chemical weapons.

The Novel Coronavirus has sent the entire world in a tizzy. With lockdowns enforced and businesses and work coming to a halt, it is difficult to feel normal. Neighbours are becoming suspicious of one another, everyone is concerned about their neighbour's travel history. All classes are now untouchables. SOCIAL DISTANCING IS WEAKENING SOCIAL BONDS.
The deadly virus originated from Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province of China.

Although the earliest case was detected in November, 2019 according to media reports, Doctors who tried to raise the alarm were reprimanded. Authorities did not publicly concede there was human-to-human transmission until 21st January, 2020. Cases in China crossed 80,000. Evidence of widespread human-to-human transmission outside of China has been well established, making chances of containing the virus much harder.

U.S. President Donald Trump stirred up a controversy by referring to the Virus as ‘Wuhan Virus' and some referring to it as the Kung Flu or Chinese Virus. Zhao Lijian, a foreign ministry spokesman, on the other hand, suggested that the US army may have brought it into China. In India there are instances of people from North Eastern states being called out as ‘Corona Virus' in the National capital.

A Texas lawyer Larry Klayman has filed suit seeking $20-trillion dollars in damages against the People's Republic of China. Klayman's suit says the COVID-19 coronavirus was created by the Chinese government as a biological weapon and released by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where the coronavirus outbreak originated.

A question that is on the mind of everyone today is whether the Covid-19 is a weapon of Biological warfare created to wreak havoc that either leaked to the outside world or was deliberately released? There is no concrete evidence to establish such a deliberate action from China and there is nothing, apart from connecting distant dots to castigate the Chinese Government.

Let us now look into the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The Biological Weapons Convention, is a Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction.

The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), is a multilateral disarmament treaty banning the development, production and stockpiling of an entire category of weapons of mass destruction. It was opened for signature on 10 April 1972 and 109 States were signatories to it. The BWC came into force on 26 March 1975. Over the years, the number of States Parties has grown to 183, with Tanzania ratifying the same on 14th August, 2019.

Article I of the Convention provides that:
Article I
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain:
  1. microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes;
  2. weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.

Interestingly, though the purpose of the Convention as is evident from its Preamble was the disarmament and prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons and their elimination, the Convention failed to adopt effective measures also for the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical weapons.

This led to insertion of Article IX in the Convention which provides that:
Article IX
Each State Party to this Convention affirms the recognised objective of effective prohibition of chemical weapons and, to this end, undertakes to continue negotiations in good faith with a view to reaching early agreement on effective measures for the prohibition of their development, production and stockpiling and for their destruction, and on appropriate measures concerning equipment and means of delivery specifically designed for the production or use of chemical agents for weapons purposes.

While India became one of the signatories on 15th January, 1973, China acceded to the Convention in 1984.

India made a statement at the time of signature which was reiterated on ratification expressing the need for elimination of chemical weapons also. The statement is reproduced hereunder:
India has stood for the elimination of both chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons. However, in view of the situation that developed in regard to the discussions concerning biological and chemical weapons, it became possible to reach agreement at the present moment on a Convention on the elimination of biological and toxin weapons only. Negotiations would need to be continued for the elimination of chemical weapons also.

It has been recognised that, both in regard to the Convention on biological and toxin weapons and in respect of future negotiations concerning chemical weapons, the Geneva Protocol of 1925 should be safeguarded and the inseparable link between prohibition of biological and chemical weapons should be maintained. India's position on the Convention on biological and toxin weapons has been outlined in the statements of the representative of India before the Conference of the Committee on Disarmament (CCD) and the First Committee of the General Assembly.

The Government of India would like to reiterate in particular its understanding that the objective of the Convention is to eliminate biological and toxin weapons, thereby excluding completely the possibility of their use, and that the exemption in regard to biological agents or toxins, which would be permitted for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes would not, in any way, create a loophole in regard to the production or retention of biological and toxin weapons.

Also, any assistance which might be furnished under the terms of the Convention would be of medical or humanitarian nature and in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations. India's support of the Convention on biological and toxin weapons is based on these main considerations. It is India's earnest hope that the Convention will be adhered to by all States, including all the major Powers, at a very early date.

The Geneva Protocol of 1925 referred to above in India's statement, is a Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare.

The statement released by China while accession is as under:
  1. The basic spirit of the Convention on the Prohibition of Biological Weapons conforms to China's consistent position and is conducive to the efforts of the world's peace-loving countries and peoples in fighting against aggression and maintaining world peace. China once was one of the victims of biological (bacteriological) weapons. China has not produced or possessed such weapons and will never do so in future. However, the Chinese Government considers that the Convention has its defects. For instance, it fails to provide in explicit terms for the prohibition of the use of biological weapons and the concrete and effective measures for supervision and verification; it lacks forceful measures of sanctions in the procedure of complaint against instances of violation of the Convention. It is the hope of the Chinese Government that these defects maybe made up or corrected at an appropriate time.
  2. It is also the hope of the Chinese Government that a convention on complete prohibition and thorough destruction of chemical weapons will soon be concluded.
Analysing the Statement of China, the declaration is: China once was one of the victims of biological (bacteriological) weapons. China has not produced or possessed such weapons and will never do so in future.

Apparently, China has restricted it's statement to not producing in future such weapons, which read with the previous portion of the statement would mean biological (bacteriological) weapons. In this view of the matter, it appears that the accession of China is qualified and restricted. The biological weapons that China undertakes to never produce or possess in future are limited to bacteriological category.

Now, the term bacteriological relates to bacteriology or bacteria. Bacteriology is in turn the scientific study of bacteria. It is well known that Virus is not Bacteria. Besides difference in size, a Virus, unlike a Bacteria, cannot live without a host. In fact, some viruses attack bacteria. Even the Geneva Protocol of 1925 deals with Bacteriological methods of warfare. China also recognises that the Convention does not have much teeth to take effective measures for violations as is evident from the latter part of the statement. So, China, by developing or releasing the Covid-19 Virus is neither violating the BWC nor the Geneva Protocol.

With this situation, it would make sense to employ the Strict Liability Doctrine with the modification devised by the Supreme Court of India. The Strict Liability Doctrine as propounded in the English case of Rylands Vs. Fletcher, lays down that a person brings, or accumulates, on his land anything which, if it should escape, may cause damage to his neighbour, he does so at his peril. If it does escape, and cause damage, he is responsible, however careful he may have been, and whatever precautions he may have taken to prevent the damage. The Doctrine is, however, subject to various exceptions, one being Act of God.

However, the doctrine was modified by the Supreme Court of India and christened as Doctrine of Absolute Liability which provides that an enterprise which is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity and harm is caused to anyone due to such activity, is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all who have suffered harm and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which apply to the strict liability rule.

In such a scenario, if China was attempting to develop the Virus at it's Wuhan Institute of Virology and it was accidently leaked to the outside world or deliberately released, the Indian Doctrine of Absolute Liability would apply and can be successfully employed by Klayman in his suit.

Surely, China's hand in creating or proliferating a deadly virus would make a perfect plot for a sci-fi thriller. But we are too far from making any such assumption. The above analysis only creates a few more dots to help amateur fiction writers complete the map.

But what the pandemic has certainly done is to bring the BWC to fore. There is an urgent need to strengthen the Convention and plug the loopholes existing in the Convention. The UN must take urgent steps to address these issues. Even while giving a clean chit to China, there is a need to ensure that there is a complete disarmament of all Biological and Chemical weapons, even if defensive.

Photo Credit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_warfare 

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers



Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


LawArticles

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...

Titile

The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of th...

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi

Titile

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Whether Caveat Application is legally pe...

Titile

Whether in a criminal proceeding a Caveat Application is legally permissible to be filed as pro...

The Factories Act,1948

Titile

There has been rise of large scale factory/ industry in India in the later half of nineteenth ce...

Constitution of India-Freedom of speech ...

Titile

Explain The Right To Freedom of Speech and Expression Under The Article 19 With The Help of Dec...

Copyright: An important element of Intel...

Titile

The Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has its own economic value when it puts into any market ...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online


File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly