Necessity of Anti-Begging Laws in India: A Legal Perspective

By Alabhya Sharma Views: 20608

Scale and Economic Impact of Begging in India

Begging remains a pervasive socio-economic challenge in India. As per the 2011 Census of India, approximately 4 lakh (400,000) individuals were officially recorded as beggars, though independent studies suggest the actual figure is significantly higher. The underground begging economy generates an estimated daily turnover exceeding ₹180 crore, amounting to over ₹65,700 crore annually. Notably, these earnings operate outside the formal economy, resulting in substantial revenue losses for the government due to non-payment of taxes. Of grave concern is the intergenerational perpetuation of poverty, where families rely on begging as a hereditary livelihood. This entrenched dependency undermines efforts to uplift marginalized communities through economic empowerment programs.

Protection of Vulnerable Populations, Especially Children

Anti-begging laws must prioritize safeguarding vulnerable groups from systemic exploitation. A 2018 report by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) revealed that a significant proportion of child beggars are victims of human trafficking and forced labor, depriving them of education, healthcare, and basic rights. Disturbingly, criminal syndicates employ tactics such as:

Physical mutilation
Sedation
Psychological coercion

to enhance the "profitability" of child beggars, as documented by UNICEF and human rights organizations. Such practices constitute egregious violations of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, mandating stringent legal intervention.

Organized Crime Nexus and Exploitation

Begging in urban centers is increasingly linked to transnational organized crime networks. UNICEF estimates 300,000 children are trapped in begging rackets, many kidnapped or deliberately disabled to elicit sympathy. Elderly and disabled individuals are similarly exploited, with criminal syndicates controlling their movements and appropriating earnings to fund:

Drug trafficking
Prostitution
Terrorism

This underscores the urgency of dismantling such networks under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, alongside targeted amendments to address modern exploitation tactics.

Socio-Economic and Civic Consequences

The proliferation of organized begging adversely impacts urban governance:

Degradation of public spaces, deterring tourism and investment.
Loss of civic order due to unregulated occupation of streets and transit hubs.
Psychological burden on citizens, fostering guilt and helplessness.

Tourists in cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and Kolkata frequently report harassment, tarnishing India's global image. Effective enforcement of anti-begging laws is thus critical to preserving public order and human dignity.

Rehabilitation: A Pillar of Sustainable Reform

Merely criminalizing begging without rehabilitation risks perpetuating cycles of poverty. Key initiatives must include:

Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY): Provides food security and financial aid (launched March 2020).
Uttar Pradesh Zero Poverty Programme (2025): Aims to eradicate extreme poverty through employment generation.
Skill India Mission: Vocational training integrated with anti-begging enforcement.
Expansion of state shelters offering medical care, counseling, and addiction treatment.

Rehabilitation must address trauma and mental health to ensure long-term reintegration.

Curbing Begging as a Lucrative Enterprise

To deter begging as an "easy income" source:

Public awareness campaigns promoting government welfare schemes.
Strict penalties for organizers under IPC Sections 363A (kidnapping for begging) and 374 (unlawful compulsory labor).
Cash-for-work programs (e.g., urban cleanup drives) to provide dignified alternatives.
Regulation of public donations through verified NGOs and digital platforms.

Collaborative Enforcement Framework

A multi-agency approach involving law enforcement, NGOs, and civil society is essential:

Police training to distinguish victims from perpetrators.
NGO partnerships for rehabilitation under the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA).
Data-driven monitoring to evaluate policy efficacy and identify gaps.

Conclusion
Anti-begging laws must strike a balance between deterrence and compassion. While dismantling criminal networks under stringent statutes like the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959, parallel investments in rehabilitation, education, and employment are vital to breaking systemic poverty. Public cooperation—diverting donations to credible initiatives like PM CARES or Childline India Foundation—will ensure resources reach deserving beneficiaries.

India's legal framework must evolve to address both the symptoms and roots of begging, fostering a society where dignity and opportunity prevail over exploitation.

References: