File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

Death Penalty In India

We have come across various rise and fall of different dynasties through the passing centuries. The only one thing which is common between them was the use of death punishment as a means of serving justice. The death penalty was awarded only to the person who have committed most cruel kind of act and for that act death penalty is considered as a least punishment. The capital punishment is a punishment which was given all over the world and it is considered as a means which saves the justice.

Nowadays in India, both the country and the crime rates are increasing at the same time. The crime rates have to be controlled to keep the country at peace. Though there is lot of legislation in India to control and stop the crimes, but those punishments are not enough to stop the increasing crimes in India. The punishments which are awarded to the offenders must be sever to reduce the crime rates.

There are different kinds of punishments like capital punishment, life imprisonment, imprisonment etc., among them capital punishment is most severe form. But the death penalty was awarded only at the rarest of the rare cases. This paper focus on the death penalty or capital punishment. It also concentrates on the modes of capital punishment and also about the positive and negative impacts on the society. The constitution has also given powers to the Governor and president to suspend the death penalty. This article through light on the reason for death penalty and its impact on the society and on the wrongdoer.

Death Penalty In India

India has a large number of crimes and criminals. The punishments are given to the wrongdoer on the basics of their motive to do that offence. There are two main reason behind imposing those punishments, one is the wrongdoer must suffer for his mistake and the second one is that he must not repeat that mistake again in his lifetime. To punish the wrongdoer the legislature has imposed may rules and various kinds of punishments.

Among the different kinds of punishment death penalty is the highest degree of punishment given to the offenders. The capital punishment or death punishment has been defined as the execution of an offender who is sentenced to death after convicted by the court of law. The infliction of death by an authorized public authority as a punishment is capital punishment[1].

Capital punishment plays an important role in the Indian criminal justice system. The term capital punishment has been derived from the Latin word “capitalis” which means “regarding the head”. In many of the country's capital punishment is a long-established element of criminal justice. The offender sentenced to death by the court of law for the criminal offence committed by him is known as death penalty or capital punishment.

This capital punishment has been awarded only in the rarest of the rare cases or for the most grievous crimes against humanity. Death penalty differs from place to place and also differs from state to state and even from country to country.

The death penalty is executed in different modes or methods. There are nine methods of execution of death penalty. The following are them: hanging, shooting by firing squad, shooting, beheading, lethal injection, stoning, gas chamber, electrocution, and falling from an unknown height. Hanging is the most common method authorized by law and electrocution, gas chamber, and falling from a height is the least common methods.

In most of the cases death penalty is executed by hanging the offender. Under the Indian penal code section 53 deals with the kinds of punishment in which death penalty comes first. It states that the death penalty can be awarded for the 11 cases. They are waging war against the government of India, abetting munity, giving or fabricating false evidence whereby an innocent person suffers death, threatening any person to give false evidence resulting in conviction and death of an innocent person, murder, abetment of suicide of a minor or insane or intoxicated person, attempt to murder by life convicts if hurt is caused, kidnapping for ransom, rape causing death or resulting in persistent vegetative state of the victim, second or subsequent offences punishable under section 376, 376-A or 376-D[2] of Indian penal code and dacoity with murder. But the death penalty is awarded only for the rarest of the rare cases.

An offender committing a murder and other capital offences can be awarded the death sentence. But the decision to award death sentence must be based on cogent reasons and should not be given as a matter of rule. Elaborate reason must be recorded by the court for choosing death penalty over the sentence of life imprisonment. The Supreme Court is of the opinion that the death sentence should be awarded only in the rarest of the rare cases[3].

In Raghubir Singh v. state of Haryana[4], a treacherous murderer deserves sterner sentence, but ameliorative features have to be noticed since judicial temper has more components than indignation against murder. In Attorney general of India v. Lachma Devi[5], it was argued that the punishment of death was improper, unjust and unreasonable as it violated article 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian constitution. The Supreme Court discussed this problem in detail and ruled by a majority of 4:1 that death penalty is not unjust. On the contrary it is in the public interest. The rarest of rare doctrine has not been free from inconsistencies in its application and the courts are still grappling with the million-dollar question as to what case falls in this category.

The capital punishment should be retained to safeguard the society from the criminals. The main aim behind the execution of death penalty is to satisfy the society's feeling of hatred towards crimes. The security of the society lies in removing the criminals from the society and the mercy petitions should be rejected by the president and by the governor. There is no alternative punishment for the capital punishment but life imprisonment is considered as alternative but it has not effect.

The crime rate keeps on increasing. If one offender is punished with death penalty it sets as an example for other offenders. By giving lesser punishment the criminal will continue to do the same offence. Compared to the life imprisonment, death penalty is quick and painless. If death penalty is abolished it would embolden the criminal.

As a coin with two sides the death penalty also has a negative impact on the society. This penalty is an admission of the state's failure to achieve deterrence by threat of capital punishment. Criminal are also a human being and they can be reformed. Death penalty is barbaric and cruel. The rich rules the law and escapes from punishment, while the poor become its prey. Morally it is unjustifiable because it is a murder by the state.

The death penalty itself is an offence against the humanity. Nobody has a right to kill another person because God has given as this life. If the state executes death penalty, the state is considered to commit an offence of murder.

Arguably, capital punishment is here to stay in this country because the time is not ripe for its abolition. In view of terrorism prevailing in Jammu and Kashmir, Naxalite movement in Assam and Nagaland, and the various surreptitious divisive movements that spread this evil in India, it is argued that the death penalty should not be abolished. It would give encouragement to terrorism and separatist force in India if the death penalty is abolished.

The Supreme Court and the law commission[6] are also of the same opinion. Hence the death penalty plays an important role in criminal justice. It sets an example for the criminals not to commit offence. To reduce the crime rate in India death penalty is the only way.

End-Notes:
  1. Walker, the oxford companion of law (1980 Edn.) 184.
  2. Sec 376 – punishment for rape; sec 376-A – rape leading to death; sec 376-D – gang rape.
  3. Bachan Singh v. state of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC (Cri) 580.
  4. (1975) 3 SCC 37; 1974 SCC (Cri) 733.
  5. 1989 supp (1) SCC 264: 1989 SCC (Cri) 413.
  6. 35th report (1967) and 262nd report (2015) of law commission of India.

    Award Winning Article Is Written By: Aiswarya Lakshmi.J.S

    Awarded certificate of Excellence
    Authentication No: NV030811589483-3-1120

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers



Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


LawArticles

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...

Titile

The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of th...

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi

Titile

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Whether Caveat Application is legally pe...

Titile

Whether in a criminal proceeding a Caveat Application is legally permissible to be filed as pro...

The Factories Act,1948

Titile

There has been rise of large scale factory/ industry in India in the later half of nineteenth ce...

Constitution of India-Freedom of speech ...

Titile

Explain The Right To Freedom of Speech and Expression Under The Article 19 With The Help of Dec...

Copyright: An important element of Intel...

Titile

The Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has its own economic value when it puts into any market ...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online


File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly