File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

Maratha Reservation- Supreme Court Judgment

In 1992, Reservation for the socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC) was introduced to end the historical injustices such as inequality, exploitation, discrimination faced by a vulnerable section of the society. India has already curb many of these issues to an extent but still, this is present, mainly in the remote areas of the country. Supreme Court set a cap in 1992 on the 50% reservation to SEBC and this ceiling can not be altered except in ‘Extraordinary circumstances’.

Introduction
Reservation was always a contentious and sentimental issue and raise many concerns of the people at times. The Supreme court in a recent judgement quashed the reservation for the Maratha community in education and public services.

On May 5, the Supreme court struck down the reservation for the Maratha’s which was given under the Maharashtra state reservation for socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC) and termed it as unconstitutional.

The apex court held that they didn’t find any extraordinary circumstances in this case which can give the reservation to the Maratha community and break the ceiling of 50% reservation set by the SC in the Indira Sawhney vs. union of India case.

Maharashtra government enacted a law in 2018 giving reservation to the Maratha community which is backed by all the political parties. Both the houses of the state legislature cleared the law on the same date.

Historical Background
Maratha’s are the politically active and dominant community of Maharashtra and comprise 1/3 population of the state. They are classified as warrior caste earlier and owns a large chunk of land. Since the inception of the Maharashtra, 11 chief ministers are from the Maratha community only and many government services are occupied by them.

Maharashtra legislature passed a bill in November 2018, proposing 16% reservation to the Maratha,s in government jobs and education. Bombay high court declares it as violative of 50% ceiling on the reservation.

Then Maharashtra government file an affidavit and demand to give reservation to the Marathas to alleviate them from poverty. Bombay HC starts hearing the petitions filed by the Maharashtra government and ratifies the constitutional validity of the Maratha reservation. High court also asks the government to bring down it to 12%-13% from 16%. Finally, after hearing for 10 consecutive days, the supreme court reserve the judgement and holds Maratha’s judgement as unconstitutional and abolish the law.

Supreme Court Judgement
A five-judge constitution bench on May 5, held that reservation for the Maratha community was unconstitutional as it exceeds the 50% ceiling limit. The unanimous judgement was delivered by the justices Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, L. Nageshwar Rao, Hemant Gupta and S.Ravindra Bhat.

The bench rejected the plea of Indra Sawhney vs. union of India verdict which had fixed the 50% cap on the reservation and stated that there are no extraordinary circumstances in the case that should grant an additional 16% reservation to the Maratha community.

The bench didn’t consider the interpretation of Article 342A of the constitution which was incorporated by the 102nd Amendment.

Article 342A stands for identification of communities in States as socially and educationally backward classes by the President, after consultation with the Governor of the state.
The bench further said that the Gaikwad report and Bombay high court decision are also not satisfying any extraordinary circumstances under which reservation will be given to the Marathas.

Questions Before The Court:
  • Tamilnadu also has 69% reservation since the 1990s so will the supreme court take action on that?
  • 10% reservation is also given to the economically backward classes(EWS) in addition to the 50% ceiling limit, So is the 103rd amendment subject to abrogation?
Reference:
  • https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/23618/23618_2019_35_1501_27992_Judgement_05-May-2021.pdf
  • https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/maratha-reservation-a-timeline-of-events/article34487593.ece
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maratha_(caste)
Written ByPrashant Jaiswal
Email: [email protected]

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers



Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


LawArticles

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...

Titile

The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of th...

Whether Caveat Application is legally pe...

Titile

Whether in a criminal proceeding a Caveat Application is legally permissible to be filed as pro...

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi

Titile

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Copyright: An important element of Intel...

Titile

The Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has its own economic value when it puts into any market ...

The Factories Act,1948

Titile

There has been rise of large scale factory/ industry in India in the later half of nineteenth ce...

Law of Writs In Indian Constitution

Titile

Origin of Writ In common law, Writ is a formal written order issued by a body with administrati...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online


File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly