If you've come up with a creative approach to accomplishing anything or the
latest innovative desirable outcome, you're entitled to a patent, which grants
you a unique privilege to use your innovation. Obtaining a patent requires the
disclosure of detailed particulars concerning innovation in a patent filing.
A utility patent is a unique right issued for an innovation that enables the
registered proprietor to prohibit everyone else from commercial applications
utilizing patented innovation without his permission for a set number of years.
Petty patents, innovation patents, minor patents, as well as small patents are
all terms used to describe these types of patent applications.
However, just a few nations worldwide provide utility patents; they include
China, Brazil, Japan, Italy, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States of
America. India is not one of these nations.
The United States Patent & Trademarks Department (USPTO) would grant utility
patents to all of the innovators in this category.
The intellectual property office will issue a patent for innovation based on the
invention's integrity and regardless or not the innovation has previously been
The creator is granted a utility patent, which grants him or her the exclusive
authority to forbid everyone else from creating, trying to sell, or engaging in
several other economic operations without his / her permission.
Obtaining a utility patent would safeguard the invention's entire framework as
well as its numerous purposes. Because of this, then there will be no
unauthorized or cloned rendition of the innovation, despite when it appears to
When a new or better invention, technique, or equipment is created, a utility
patent is issued to protect it. People and businesses cannot make, use, or sell
the idea without permission if they have a utility patent (often called a
"patent for innovation
"). Generally, people use the term "patent" to relate to
utility patents, being the most common type of patent.
The exclusive economic rights that utility patents grant innovators to produce
and apply cutting-edge technologies make them extremely significant. Utility
patents, on the other hand, are extremely challenging to get. As a result, they
can be expensive in terms of time and money-consuming to produce, and their
intricacy can also end up making it tough to comprehend.
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) issues utility patents, which are valid
for up to Twenty yrs. The patent owner, on the other hand, may be required to
pay service costs over this span of time.
Use the USPTO's patent searching facility if you wish to see if your idea has
previously been patented. It is up to the creator to prevent people from
actually making, exploiting, or distributing their innovation when a utility
patent is awarded.
There are 3 essential requirements to get a utility Patent:
You have to be new. It means you have to be the first and it should be
original. But it also means if you publish something more than a year before
you apply, you can't get a patent. There's limited time for applying for a
It means, it has to be useful. Useful means to the public. It
Could there be a proxy for brilliance. There's more to
it, there are more criteria, and it is complex gradually.
It means, were you first? Is it New? Is it a new invention? Are you the Creator?
Basically, it is being the first and being new. The general idea is, you can't
get a patent if you have already disclosed the invention if you have already
shared it with the public if you have already used it. Therefore, an invention
cannot be patented if its already public information.
Not patentable if one of the following happened before the applicant filed for
the patent protection:
- Known to public/ used in product
- Described in publication / online
- Described in a patent application
There is a 1 year grace period from the first public disclosure. If you don't
file within that 1 year, you'll lose all rights to obtain a patent. And nobody
else can also patent. Because it becomes a public domain. That one year stops
when you file your patent application. The provisional patent stops the clock on
this one year. The grace period of one year applies in the USA and it applies in
most other countries throughout Europe, Japan, Korea, China, Australia, New
Zealand, India, etc.
There are few countries that provide a shorter grace period. They want to
encourage you to be quick to file in their Country. It is generally preferable
to file a patent application within 3 months of disclosure.
Novelty is important because governments want publication. That's the deal they
made years ago when patents were created. It says if you publish your invention
in the public to see, for the competitors to see, they will give protection for
20 years. That's the limited Monopoly of a patent in trade for publication.
On the whole, the purpose of Novelty requirements is to prevent prior art from
It is even easier but deadlier too.
The utility is, why it is useful?
It's not the only kind of patent, but it's the most useful kind of patent. It's
the most money that you can make from having a patent. It's the best protection
of a patent, and it's a patent that requires usefulness.
Most state utility:
Stated utility need not be the only useful application
- Most state some way in which product or process is useful in
- Burden is generally on PTO to show that innovation is not useful.
- But if you don't state a utility that is grounds for immediate dismissal
of your patents.
- Drugs often patented for one use and used for other.
E.g., You may get a patent on a drug, a chemical formulation, that helps to cure
a rare form of cancer, but they start to grow hair on their head. So, it turns
out that this drug can help cure rare cancer and baldness. Therefore, you still
have a Monopoly on that chemical formulation. You got that drug patented. It
doesn't matter that the application you're using it for is not at all the one
you applied for in the patent.
All you have to do to get a patent is state some useful application. If there
are other applications are present is great. So, you can't extrapolate processes
as well as you can produce. But a product, which is a chemical formulation or
specific device, if you get a patent on that can easily be used in another
The best way to show utility is sales. A product with commercial sales is
clearly useful. If sales grow fast, evidence (but not proof) of utility, the
government can still say you have committed fraud.' 'It's better to file
applications and then start commercial sales. You still get to show that utility
via sales because it will probably take 3 yrs. to get your application. Most
importantly, it must be useful to society.
Therefore, Utility is only required for utility patents. Because they're granted
as a matter of public policy for useful arts. You must clearly state why it's
useful and also useful to the public, not useful to a researcher in the lab.
Hence, benefit publicly and not personally.
Hardest of the three elements of patenting.
The product filed for patenting must be non - obvious to someone skilled in
related fields. Now, the obviousness factor is viewed from the perspective of an
industry expert. Now, the general rule in addition to being non - obviousness,
is it has to represent some significant advance over the prior state of the art.
Obviousness is viewed from the perspective of Industry experts, and not from
Demonstrating of Non-Obviousness:
- Most of the effort in the patent application goes here. Because this is the
hardest thing to show.
- Detailed analysis of the business process or engineering applications.
- An extensive survey of prior art (existing invention).
Utility Patents In India
Indian enterprises and start-ups wishing to obtain utility patent cover must
submit their applications to one of the nations listed above because India does
not provide such status. India, like the rest of the world, needs utility patent
rights due to the various advantages.' 'Because they don't have the money to
undertake testing and examinations or to incur costly patent charges, SMBs gain
from utility-patent protections because they lacked the resources.
Well over 48,000,000 small & medium enterprises (SMEs) operate in India and
engage vast numbers of people, according to one assessment. Small and
medium-sized enterprises that don't have the resources to defend their
innovations may benefit from utility patent protection.
It has been found that utility patents are an efficient way to safeguard ideas
from MSMEs. The govt's 'Made in India' strategy is encouraging MSMEs to build
their businesses, and this might help them do so even more.
With this sort of patent, preparing and prosecuting the petition before such a
patent office is by far the most significant aspect, which necessitates
Neither 2 tier patent mechanism exists in India currently. A large portion of
the Country's gross domestic product comes from small and medium-sized
businesses. The country's financial system relies heavily on the nation's
unorganized sector, which has demonstrated significant advances in effectiveness
over the period.
Many innovation-based initiatives are also carried out by the unorganized
sector, although they do not always roll out R&D for it and operate within
restrictions. Most of these innovations are cumulative, which indicates that the
new technology is a modification or enhancement to pre-existing technology.
There is no originality in their creations. Because of these factors, it is
tough for them to obtain patent rights for their innovations, and their
creations are unable to match with those of large corporations. As a result, no
one can see what they've created. However, India's current patent laws appear to
exclusively benefit the nation's official sector, rather than the nation's
unorganized sector. A lack of access to patent protection in the informal
economy continues to hamper its ability to innovate effectively.
So, it is vital to develop a 2 tier patent system and to recognize how
inventions in the unorganized sector differ from those in the mainstream. As the
author explains in "The Shadow Economy: Invention, Ip Rights & Regulatory
Concerns," the unorganized sector consists of "firms as well as businessmen
who've had rudimentary technology as well as minimal resources. In the
unorganized sector, rip-offs and alterations to existing technology predominate
over the creation of new ones.
The advances in the unorganized sector are built on accumulated learning, and
research has shown that groups instead of individuals are the driving force
behind these new ideas." India's government launched the National Innovation
Foundation in 2000 as a way to stimulate and support indigenous creativity. The
purpose of this was to create an organization that would assist grassroots
creation & growth, particularly for individuals and the general public, to
thrive in the area of research and advancement.
In addition to providing financial support, this basis also serves as a source
of inspiration for new initiatives in the community. Although this platform
encourages new ideas, it is not doing much to safeguard them. As a result, a
secondary mechanism is required to make patents more readily available to the
Requirement for Utility patent in India
An innovation, according to the Patents Act of 1970, is any fresh material or
technique that has distinctiveness, creative breakthrough, and can be used in
industry. S. 2 (1) (ac) of the Patents Act, 1970, expressly defines "compatible
of industrial uses" as what is created and applied in industry.' As a result, it
is analogous to the European Patent Convention's "susceptibility to industrial
In the case of Indian Vacuum brake Co., Ltd. v. E.S. Luard
Calcutta High Court ruled in this instance that the phrase "utility" is being
used in a specific manner within patent law and that is not meant to be taken in
a broad context. Therefore, a patent cannot be granted only on the basis of its
was characterized as an innovation greater than that of the existing
understanding of the field about the precise thing in Young and Neilson v.
Rosenthal and Co. (1884).
In the case of Cipla Ltd. v. F. Hoffmann
- La Roche Ltd. & Anr. (2015). The
terms of "invention" as well as "capable of industrial application" under the
Act stipulated that innovation should have commercial utility or embodiment.
Although an innovation might not yet be ready for market, it can still be
intellectual it might have some economic potential. Because the direct body
element formed has an economic perspective, rather than a commodity, this is the
center of concern.
Benefits of Utility Patent in India
Day after day, big number of new start-up firms are registering in India. These
start-ups often offer routine solutions in an unconventional manner. These
methods might well be novel, but they don't meet the patentability requirements.
The utility model notion may be the most applicable intellectual property right
in these instances.
It's disappointing that Indian enterprises and start-ups with unique conceptual
frameworks are unable to pursue patent immunity owing to the absence of the
utility model regime in India. As a result, these organizations are frequently
confronted with a surge in competitiveness, unfair trade practices, economic
decline, etc. as a result.
Some start-ups from India want to function in nations that have more extensive
intellectual property (IP) rights. In a growing nation like India, the Small &
Medium Enterprises (SMEs), as well as MSMEs, have a vital role. Small and
medium-sized enterprises might gain from utility model ownership because they
typically lack the finances to undertake testing & experiments as well as afford
costly patent costs.
Utility Model Patent In China
Chinese patent laws are not distinctive because utility model patent
applications are granted in many nations. In contrast, the utility model patent
in China has drawn far more emphasis & prompted serious concerns because of its
widespread adoption in the country.
Nearly all utility model patent rights registered in China this year were issued
by Local candidates, with moreover 1.6 million proposals submitted in 2017. In
2017, utility model patents accumulated over 3.5 million. For the first time, a
non-official information resource has estimated the number of first-instance
patent infringement lawsuit cases depending on utility model patents in China in
2016. This proves that utility model patents are now being used in the
What do Utility patents in China govern?
A utility model patent can be secured for a material thing, but not as a
technique or a concoction of matter since it pertains to the geometry or design
of the commodity or the conjunction of that structure & aspect. In addition, the
new technological approach must be useful. Electronic circuits are not
patentable as a standalone item, but as a component of another item, they may be
eligible for registration.
What innovations will not be covered in China?
There are many different types of approaches as well as procedures, however, the
most common are those that do not have a clear structure or configuration, those
that were modified by substituting a different material or changing the
production methodology, and those that still have a two-dimensional design
concept without tackling a technical glitch.
Notable exceptions to the
patentability rule include computer programs, innovations that violate state
rules or ethical norms, innovations that are harmful to the public good, new
advances, mental activity regulations & procedures, diagnostic or therapeutic
processes, living creature or plant variants, and chemical compounds created
through nuclear fusion.
Requirements for Registration
To register a utility model patent rights as well as an innovation patent
application for an innovation simultaneously at the same time, both should be
issued on the very same day, and that each should include an acknowledgment of
both of these applications' existence. It is mandatory for the candidate to give
up the utility model patent after the innovation patent has been issued since
the candidate could only hold one patent for a similar idea in China at any
There is a 10-year limit on the utility model patent's period of protection. It
is possible for the utility model patent to act as a kind of protection for the
financial preferences of the claimant, while the lengthier 20-year innovation
patent is proceeding. Nevertheless, there is indeed a hurdle for individuals who
apply for PCTs. To secure patent protection in China depending on a PCT patent
filing, a claimant should select perhaps an innovation or utility model patent
application when entering the national sector, but never both, at the moment of
national phase entrance.
Invention patents, utility model patents, & design patents are all forms of
patents in China. As in the United States, a novel technological approach to an
item, method, or enhancement that such can be protected by an invention patent
in China. This is not the case with a Chinese utility model patent, which only
protects novel technological solutions related to the design or composition of a
While patents that have a Ten yr. duration isn't significantly evaluated, they
do undergo a statutory inspection that typically spans between 1 - 1.5 yrs. If
you are looking for anything with a Twenty year term like a patent for an
innovation, you will need a thorough examination that could require from 3 - 5
yrs. for completion.
If a claimant wants to take the opportunity of the quick issuing of the utility
model patent, he/she should register for both utility model applications as well
as a patent filing. In contrast, most international candidates fail to take
advantage of this approach. In 2008, 99.3 percent (223,945) of utility model
petitions were issued by China candidates, as per SIPO figures. About 1,641
utility model submissions were submitted by outside candidates (0.7 percent ).
And there is no new here. Just 0.3% of utility model applications were submitted
by non -Chinese parties from 1985, with the Locals submitting 99.7 percent of
all such requests. One factor for this may be those international candidates,
especially many from nations that no utility model prevails, are unaware of
understanding Chinese utility models.
Grounds for consideration of the Patent
As a general rule, utility model patents are often less costly & awarded more
rapidly than inventive patents, often between six to twelve months of
- In certain cases, the device getting patented is of a sort which doesn't
need longer over what the ten-year duration of rights granted by a utility
- For this reason, the utility model patent gives a foundation for taking
action towards breaches much sooner than is the scenario with an inventive
patent. Violators may act swiftly to replicate the technology, and therefore
the utility model patent forms a framework for taking action over defaulters
- Evidence dependant type of Jurisprudence is the norm in China. In order
to prove that a privilege getting stated is invalid, this involves the use
of records. When it comes to a claim to a utility model patent, it might yet
require a great amount of time & exertion to gather reasonable grounds to
believe that the invention is invalid.
- This patent violation case of Chint v. Schneider in 2007 was extensively
publicized since it featured the biggest patent penalties compensation given by
a Chinese court to an infringing Chinese corporation against a non - Chinese
infringing organization. According to a China utility model patent, this issue
never was reported publicly during the period.
Utility Patents In The U.S
'Original as well as valuable processes, machines, manufacturing, or
compositions of material can be granted patents for up to 20 years, according to
the deposit of management charges. Utilities, also known as "patents for
innovation," account for the vast majority (90%) of all USPTO patent papers
granted in recent times.'
'Utility patent is defined as the innovation for which a patent can be sought
under Title 35, Part II, Chapter 10, sub. sec 101 of the U.S. Law. Anyone who
comes up with a unique, as well as beneficial procedure, machine or
manufacturing method, can apply for a patent, as long as they meet the terms &
criteria of this Ordinance.'
'For approximately Twenty yrs., the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) issues
utility patents. There are certain exceptions for up to 5 yrs. which are
available for drugs, medical devices, etc. It is possible that the patent owner
will be required to spend management costs during that timeframe.' 'A utility
patent gives innovators the power to block everyone else from making, utilizing,
or trading such inventions after they have been granted a patent.'
To begin the process of securing a utility patent, most people turn to the
services of a patent attorney/agent. They can help inventors navigate the
intricacies of utility patent applications. The second stage is to hire a patent
design illustrator. It's possible to create a file system once all the
components have been collected together. Registration fees could vary from 1000
dollars to 10,000 dollars, based on the intricacy of the innovation.
Provisional & non-provisional utility patent filings can be submitted. The
second is a relatively prevalent use case for this technique. The provisional
patent filing leveled the playing field for American and international patent
seekers alike. Non - USA candidates might extend the 20-year patent validity by
one year by initially issuing an appeal in their native land and afterward
issuing their U.S. petition w/o provisional patent petition. For an additional
year, they might acquire a royalty on their innovation by declaring primacy in
their own nation. In the USA, provisional patent applications provide candidates
having similar benefits by extending the patent "pending" period by one year.
Article 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) definition of "new" states that creation should not
have been previously acknowledged or utilized within that nation or registered
or published in any source. If the innovation has already been registered or is
shared with the public, the creator cannot be granted a patent. 1 yr. is the
typical wait time between the moment of creation and filing for a patent in most
countries. It is possible for the holding period to begin rolling as quickly as
the innovation is made public to others despite the guarantee of secrecy.
Utility Patents Regulations In Other Countries
One of several nations that granted an Innovations Patent (Utility Model
Coverage) security for approximately eight yrs. was Australia. The Innovation
Patent has a minimal barrier criterion for ingenuity and can basically give
significant security for innovations that might alternatively not fulfill the
greater creativity standards.' 'The Innovation Patent System provides security
for nearly all types of subject material that may be protected there under the
Australian Standard Patent System.
Yet, the Federal Government has lately declared tearing off from the creative
(utility model) patenting structure. The Government of Australia is of the
belief that most of the small & medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that engage the
present innovation patent structure would not gain benefit from this, and
consequently, the system levies large expenses on 3rd parties and the greater
European Union Legislation
Unlike patents, utility model protections in Europe do not have a universal
treaty that allows them to be protected in other jurisdictions. Albania,
Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic Denmark, Estonia, Finland France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, as well as Spain
are among countries where this can be acquired.
The United Kingdom does not presently have a utility model regime in place.
According to the German Regime, a utility model is an IPR. German utility models
are only enforced in Germany, and not outside of the European Union. The German
Patent & Trademark Office registers utility models. Nominations for these
patents can be made explicitly or taken from existing German, European, or PCT
Ten years of insurance are provided under the German utility model, which may be
filed between six-ten weeks of application. To make use of both quick narrow
security (utility models) and greater lengthy security (patents), a firm or
person could in Germany apply for a patent as well as a utility model for the
given particular subject.
"A device that pertains to the shape or structure of a product" that is
"industrially relevant" is protected by the Japanese Utility Model Act (JUMA).
The lifespan of a Japanese utility model is ten yrs.
Utility Patents In International Conventions
According to the Paris Convention, utility models are classified as Intellectual
Property rights internationally. In terms of meaning & classification,
meanwhile, the Convention remains mute and only states that utility models are
afforded the universal norms of general agreement as well as entitlement to
Consequently, A.1(2) specifies that: - The prevention of industrial property
includes patents, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, service marks,
generic versions, and indicators of sources/origination.
WTO signatory nations are permitted to develop or refuse tier-2 safety systems
as they deem appropriate under the TRIPS Agreement, which defines basic criteria
for all of the primary IPR regimes. Although the TRIPS Agreement does not
specifically include utility model coverage, it is possible that the Paris
Convention rules (particularly A.1(2)) are applicable to all WTO nations by
regard to A.2(1) of the TRIPS Agreement. However, this will not necessitate WTO
delegates or Convention member nations to implement utility model rules.
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is yet another key treaty that facilitates
patent portfolio in more than around jurisdiction. The pact promotes patentees
to seek relief over a wider territorial area by making the system easier and
cheaper. National patent offices can accept a unified petition rather than
submitting multiple applications in every country in which security is sought.
This allows them to indicate all the nations where security is also requested.
To perform a prior art investigation, the statement of claim is sent to 1 among
9 International Search Authorities (ISAs). Then it will be left towards the
patent offices of the specified jurisdictions to grant the patent.
The PCT facilitates worldwide patent protection for utility models here too,
making it easier for inventors to secure global recognition. "application" is
defined in Article 2 of the PCT as an application for the safeguard of a
creation; sources to an "application" would then be regarded as descriptions to
applications for patents for creations, innovators' credentials, utility
accreditations, utility models, patents or credentials of addition, inventors'
certificates of addition, and utility certificates of addition.
As a result, worldwide patent claims can be made for both conventional as well
as tier - 2 patents.
An important benefit of patent law is the shielding of utility models, which may
be particularly useful in growing nations like India. A utility model could
become a valuable asset on its own or in conjunction with a patent application.
An estimated 48 million small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operate in
India, generating work for crores of citizens.
Due to the inability to secure their creations, such SMEs are falling far beyond
their larger counterparts when it comes to economic development. Utility patents
can help close this gap. Utility model rights will thus be favorable to India's
India is lagging adrift when it comes to plugging the gaps in its innovation
pipeline. Many utility model patents appear to have a positive impact on
start-ups and small businesses. India would be able to bridge the distance
between patentable & non-patentable ideas if it adopts this complete paradigm.
Utility models may be able to address the deficiencies of the Indian patent
laws, given that they would be implemented inside a regulatory framework that is
beneficial to our own financial system & industrial sector. There must be no
attempt to undermine the patent system by using the utility model. When it comes
to development & economic growth, it must be a goal to encourage the spread of
ideas and imagination throughout the nation.
Because there is a large range of businesses with innovative skills but no
technological or legal assistance to seek IPR or that do not meet the global
patent standards, they are unable to safeguard their designs and incur
significant damages. As a consequence, the level of rivalry among similar
businesses declines, which in turn hurts customers.
- Interns, I. (2017, May 27). Utility Patents & Its Position in India.
Intepat. Retrieved from
- Utility Patents. Vakil Search. (n.d.). Retrieved from
- Kenton, W. (2021, March 31). Utility Patent. Investopedia. Retrieved from
- Singal, T. (2021, June 13). Understanding the utility requirement of a
patent. iPleaders. Retrieved from
- SS Rana & Co. (2018, February 15). India: Does the Establishment of Utility
Model make sense? Lexology. Retrieved from
- Kumar, A. (2021, October 2). Does the establishment of a utility model
make sense: Indian scenario. iPleaders. Retrieved from
- Mohapatra, A. (2021, May 19). The concept of utility model patent. iPleaders.
- Sen, P. (n.d.). Utility model and its need for protection in India. Legal
Service India. Retrieved from
- Sharma, G., & Kumar, H. (2018). Exploring the Possibilities of Utility
Models Patent Regime for Grassroots Innovations in India. Journal of
Intellectual Property Rights, 23, 119-130. Retrieved from http://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/7C7521B6-2021-457A-8672-EC67F2D7A192.pdf.
- Beijing Sanyo Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. (2019, May 20). Utility
model patent strategy in China. World Trademark Review. Retrieved from
- Chinese utility model patents. Lehman, Lee & Xu. (n.d.). Retrieved from
- Patents, Rules, and Regulations. (2010, January 22). Chinese Utility
Models: A Closer Look. Nutter. Retrieved from https://www.nutter.com/ip-law-bulletin/chinese-utility-models-a-closer-look.
- Kenton, W. (2021, March 31). Utility Patent. Investopedia. Retrieved from
- Utility Patents. Justia. (2021, October). Retrieved from
- Suthersanen, U. (2006, February). Utility Models and Innovation in
Developing Countries. UNCTAD. Retrieved from
- 92 Ind Cal 1008
- Cipla Ltd. vs F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. & Anr. on 27 November 2015
- https://wCornell Law School, Legal Information Institute. "35 U.S. Code
Sec. 101 - Inventions patentable, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/101?_ga=2.104702848.1286584459.1519416782-59586957.1519416782ww.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/data/patdesc.htm
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. "2701 Patent Term [R-10.2019]."
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. "Maintain your patent", https://www.uspto.gov/patents/maintain