File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

SC acquitted few men convicted of arson, violence in 1984 anti-Sikh riots case

After the extermination of our then Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards, there broke out a pogrom which directed the attention of the nation towards the response of some people against the Sikhs as a response to the same. There was a public outcry over Mrs. Gandhi’s death which led to these killings of more than thousands of people belonging to the Sikh religion. The estimation by the independent sources was that the numbers of deaths were at about 8,000–17,000. The government estimates projected that about 2,800 Sikhs were killed in Delhi[1].
 The trial court on August 27 1996 convicted more than 85 people who were then awarded a five-year jail term for rioting, burning the houses and violation of curfew during the riots. The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of 70 of these offenders and repudiated their appeals. 15 of these convicts filed appeal in the apex court of the nation on Tuesday, 30th April 2019. The Supreme Court allowed these appeals and thus acquitted these 15 persons and stifled their five-year jail terms. Those who were acquitted had been earlier convicted for fuelling riots in East Delhi's Trilok Puri area.
 The bench comprising of Honourable CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta as well as Justice Sanjiv Khanna allowed these appeals basing their decision on the fact that the convictions of these persons lacked evidence. There was no evidence against these people and even eyewitnesses did not identify them directly, the apex court said annexing this acquittal. Those acquitted on Tuesday by the Supreme Court of India include Ganshenan, Ved Prakash, Tara Chand, Surendra Singh (Kalyan Puri), Habib, Ram Shiromani, Brahm Singh, Subbar Singh and Surendra Murti.[2]
 Reversing the concurrent judgements by the Trial court as well as the Delhi High Court after nearly 35 years of the alleged involvement of these people acquitted, the Supreme Court took to heed the arguments of the Counsel for the convicts, Advocate R Basant and Advocate V Raghunath who told the bench that these people were randomly picked up by the police for violating the curfew imposed after the rioting and there was no evidence to link them to rioting or arson.
 [1] Source :
 [2] Source :

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers

Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...


The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of th...

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi


How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Whether Caveat Application is legally pe...


Whether in a criminal proceeding a Caveat Application is legally permissible to be filed as pro...

The Factories Act,1948


There has been rise of large scale factory/ industry in India in the later half of nineteenth ce...

Constitution of India-Freedom of speech ...


Explain The Right To Freedom of Speech and Expression Under The Article 19 With The Help of Dec...

Copyright: An important element of Intel...


The Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has its own economic value when it puts into any market ...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online

File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly