"The Magna Carta was a legislative agreement enacted by King John I of England in 1215. It defined the king's rights as well as those of his subjects. Magna Carta is regarded as one of the most important historical documents since it declares that no one should be above the law.

The signing of Magna Carta was intended to limit the king's power. The fundamental motivation for the Magna Carta's creation was to remedy the injustices that King John had communicated to his subjects. The Magna Carta, which was signed in 1215, laid the foundation for the norms we know today in modern countries. People at the time proclaimed that the king's and nobles' rights must be reduced, and this was the first step toward what we now call democracy".

"There are limits to what the state may do according to Magna Carta rights while also setting boundaries to encourage equality between the state and the individual. The Magna Carta is considered by many historians to be the first example of a charter restricting the power of the monarch. While it only covered a limited fraction of the English populace, it did say that the king's barons had rights that they may use to sue the monarch for.

The English Bill of Rights, which was part of the Glorious Revolution of 1688, set restrictions on the power of the monarchy. While the United States Constitution of 1787 established a government limited by the terms of the written document, the people elected legislators and an executive to serve on their behalf. Additionally, there were checks and balances in place to ensure that each branch of government had a limited amount of power, as stated previously."

The rights established by Magna Carta found their way to the forefront of the French Revolution in 1789, when "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" became a symbol of democratic freedom that was later incorporated into conventions and other international institutions.

"These papers, which asserted individual liberties, were forerunners to many of today's human rights declarations, including the Magna Carta (1215), English Bill of Rights (1689), French Declaration of Human Rights (1789), and United States Constitution and Bill of Rights (1791)."

"However, many of these agreements excluded women, people of colour, and members of certain social, religious, economic, and political groups when they were first translated into legislation. However, oppressed people all across the world have used the concepts expressed in these writings to promote revolutions that claim the right to self-determination." .

There are significant historical precedents for current international human rights legislation and the UN's foundation. Examples from the 19th century include efforts to end the slave trade and reduce the devastation caused by conflict. "Countries formed the International Labor Organization (ILO) in 1919 to monitor treaties guaranteeing workers' rights, including health and safety. After World War I, the League of Nations became concerned about the safety of various ethnic minorities.

Even Nevertheless, the triumphant European allies' international organisation for peace and collaboration failed to meet its objectives. The League failed because the United States declined to join and because the League failed to stop Japan's invasion of China and Manchuria (1931) and Italy's invasion of Ethiopia (1935)" .

With the outbreak of World War II, it eventually died (1939). In today's world, Magna Carta's primary objective is to imprint the rules in people's brains so that they learn to follow and put them into action. It is an inherent feature of international accords that Magna Carta rights have been seized from countries at the national level, where they have become an integral part of national constitutions and laws. 800 years after they were declared, several of these rights are still in existence and are contained in the constitutions of various countries, especially those in the Western Balkans.

This shows that they were effective. For example, in accordance with the Magna Carta's guarantee of equal treatment for all people before the law and the ban against discrimination, these rights are incorporated into Macedonia's constitution. Otherwise, they are simply words on paper.

The Magna Carta is regarded as the first successful attempt by citizens under the authority to limit the powers of a ruling authority. The agreement, which was signed in the presence of witnesses by King John of England, granted the English people more independence in later years. The Magna Carta papers charted the route for human rights development and gave parliament the power to make choices. When drafting the American constitution, the founding fathers looked to the Magna Carta for inspiration.

This paper includes a brief history of the Magna Carta's origins and motivations for development, as well as its impact on the United States and the United Kingdom, and whether or not it achieved its objectives.

Concept of Magna Carta and Bill of Rights

Magna Carta was the first legal instrument to expressly state that the monarch and his administration were subject to the same rules as the rest of the population. It was issued in the middle of the month of June in the year 1215. It was an attempt to limit the abuse of power by the king by creating law as a distinct authority."

It is expected that Parliament and the people of the UK will mark the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta's signing in 2015. (1215). Printed at Runnymede, a little Berkshire town between Windsor and Staines on the Thames, in 1215, it was originally published in London. Charters issued by lords across society, including the king, provided rights and liberties to people and organizations. To prove their authenticity, these documents included wax seals on top of the written accounts of someone is activities.

A political crisis and an uprising of England's notable men led to the creation of Magna Carta, despite its conventional shape at the time. Magna Carta is noteworthy because it is a statement of law that applies to both kings and subjects. When it was signed in 1215, the Magna Carta was the first written document to formalize England as a society with its own set of laws distinct from the king's.

The Bill of Rights, which comprises the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution, is sometimes referred to as the Bill of Rights A collection of constraints on the federal government's authority aiming at protecting inherent rights to liberty and property, such as freedom of religion, free speech and a free press, as well as the right to keep and bear arms.

Due process demands an indictment by a grand jury for all capital and infamous crimes, as well as an expedited trial before an impartial jury drawn from residents of the state or judicial district where the crime was committed, and federal criminal proceedings are prohibited from using double jeopardy." . In addition, the Bill of Rights reserves to the people any rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution, as well as any authority not explicitly granted to the central government, or to the states.

Difference between Magna Carta and Bill of Rights

Despite the fact that the American Revolution produced a completely new country, the new country's legal code was built on extremely old customs. The laws enshrined in the United States Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights, are based on England's very old and very important legal writings. The Magna Carta (1215) and the English Bill of Rights (1688) served as significant turning points in the evolution of our Bill of Rights (which we will learn about later).

The Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights will be used in this project to help you understand how our country's founding documents were influenced by English common law dating back to the Middle Ages. However, the English Bill of Rights ensured that the monarchy in England did not have too much accumulated authority, and so gave greater power to the Parliament, whereas the Magna Carta was designed to operate as a peace contract between unhappy nobility and King John The Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights serve distinct purposes, yet there are unexpected parallels between both, despite the fact that the former was later supplanted by the latter. Using a side-by-by-by comparison and contrast approach, this article will look at how Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights compare and contrast. As a result of widespread outcry, both papers were drafted." .

To put it another way, the rebellion against King John had grown weary of his oppressive rule and felt that the English government had trampled on their essential liberties and freedoms. These liberties were granted to all free men of the realm for the benefit of themselves and their heirs through the Magna Carta, which read: To all free men of the realm we have also granted the liberties set forth below for the benefit of us both as individuals and as a family for future generations (1215, King John)

In contrast to the Bill of Rights, the Magna Carta did not call for the abolition of the monarchy in its entirety. The Bill of Rights was developed by a society that had recently suffered the Glorious Revolution, nearly 500 years after the Magna Carta, and attempted to put an end to the crown's intervention in the law ("English Bill of Rights of 1689," 2018). ("English Bill of Rights of 1689," 2018). Most of the two pieces of literature came out of dissatisfaction with the monarchy in England at the time, and both of them were attempts to usurp the king's power by restricting the monarch's authority.

The Impact Of Magna Carta On Bill Of Rights, 1689 (UK)

"Following the overthrow of King James II, William III and Mary II of England promulgated the English Bill of Rights in 1689. As a result of the act, Parliament gained ultimate power over the monarchy and detailed constitutional and civil rights for the people. The English Bill of Rights is frequently cited as being a crucial piece of legislation in the establishment of the country's constitutional monarchy in Great Britain."

As a result, many historians believe it had a hand in creating the United States Bill of Rights. As a result, many rights that were later included in the First Amendment are included in this document, which was originally called the English Bill of Rights of 1689. the speech and debate provision in the United States Constitution applies only to members of Congress Whereas the First Amendment sought to dismantle all national religions and the Constitution prohibited requiring individuals to confirm religious convictions in test oaths, the English Bill of Rights sided with Protestants and forbade "Papists" from holding positions of royal authority or sitting in Parliament. In 1689, Parliament passed the English Bill of Rights, which, like Magna Carta, established regulations limiting the monarch's power and safeguarding the people's individual rights.

The Bill was a turning point in British political history since it limited the monarch's authority while establishing Parliament's rights. As a result of this, people had rights such as petitioning the monarch, being exempt from torture, and not being punished without a trial. These were all precursors to our current Human Rights Act's protections against severe punishments. In these times, news travels slowly, yet over in America, people embrace the notion of having individual rights. The fledgling American colonies decide to make their own rules based on some of the principles in the Magna Carta".

The Impact Of Magna Carta On Bill Of Rights, 1791 (USA)

Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the US constitution, were ratified on December 15th, 1791 by the newly formed USA, guaranteeing the basic human rights to its inhabitants. The First Amendment safeguards the freedoms of religion, expression, and the press, as well as the freedoms of peaceful assembly and petition.

Others guarantee rights such as the right to establish a "well-regulated militia," to own and use weapons, to be treated fairly when accused of crimes, to be protected from arbitrary search and seizure, to avoid self-incrimination, and to have a quick and impartial jury trial with lawyer representation. Constitutional Amendments 1-10 (Bill Of Rights) entered into effect on December 15, 1791 and restricted federal government authority and safeguarded rights for all Americans (including inhabitants and tourists) in American territory.

The Bill of Rights safeguards freedom of speech, religion, the right to bear arms, the right to petition, and the right to bear weapons. Unreasonable search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment, and forced self-incrimination are also forbidden. For example, the Bill of Rights prevent Congress from making any law regarding the establishment of religion or from depriving anybody of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law."

In the event of a capital charge or notorious crime, a grand jury indictment is required. This ensures a speedy public trial with an unbiased jury in the district where the crime happened. It also prohibits federal criminal prosecutions from using double jeopardy as an argument.

"Many earlier initiatives to enhance basic rights in England and America informed and inspired the Bill of Rights, including the Magna Carta (1215) and the English Bill of Rights (1689). George Mason penned the Virginia Declaration of Rights, on which the amendments to the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights were based."

Relevancy of Magna Carta on Contemporary World

"As Head of History, I am frequently asked this topic in many versions. What good is it to learn about an event that occurred approximately 800 years ago? The Magna Carta, which was signed in June 1215, 799 years ago, between the barons of Medieval England and King John, provides some basis for the question. 'Magna Carta' is Latin for Great Charter, and this great charter continues to have enormous significance for us today because it is directly related to so many aspects of our life, including human rights and the establishment of the Human Rights Act in 1988" . "The Magna Carta was essentially a contract between England's barons and King John, consisting of a number of written pledges between the king and his subjects.

Historians consider it significant because it was one of the first attempts by the barons to prevent a monarch, in this case John, from abusing his power and causing the people of England to suffer as a result. This is particularly pertinent for us today since it was one of the first times laws were pledged to be fair to all people, not just the wealthy and powerful. With the recent developments in Syria and Ukraine, this attempt to limit the power of the powerful elite appears to be as pertinent now as it was at Runnymede all those years ago"

The Magna Carta comprised 63 articles separated into sections, the most famous of which stated that everyone, regardless of income or background, should have access to the courts. "No one will be imprisoned or punished without first going through the proper legal system; indeed.

Article 39 of the Magna Carta famously states:
No freeman shall be taken, imprisoned, exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him, nor will we send upon him except upon the lawful judgement of his peers or the law of the land.

This was revolutionary because, prior to this, the impoverished of the time were unlikely to have access to the courts and were sometimes punished unfairly" . The argument over Guantanamo Bay and the detention of suspected terrorists without charge or trial can be considered as a direct result of the difficulties raised by the Magna Carta. "Accepting that the law did not apply solely to the wealthy and powerful was a watershed point in history.

The route to Universal Human Rights continued from the Magna Carta's first steps with the first Bill of Rights in history, which Britain passed in 1689 and guaranteed the civil and political rights of ALL men, not just lords and barons. It granted, among other things, freedom from royal prerogative taxation, the right to petition the king, the right to freely elect members of parliament without intervention, and the right to free expression" . The Bill of Rights was based on a strong heritage of civil rights in Britain, to the point where many analysts feel a formal, written constitution was never thought required.

The Bill of Rights would also have a significant impact on the formation of the United States Constitution in 1797, as well as some of the key principles underpinning the French Revolution. As a result, the Magna Carta's mark can be seen plainly not just on the 1689 Bill of Rights, but also on the American Constitution, which is possibly the most famous political document of all time.

A more complex world brought problems unimaginable in the mediaeval period, but when the holocaust and the horrors of World War II prompted members of the United Nations to adopt the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Eleanor Roosevelt, one of its key thinkers, referred to it as the "international Magna Carta" for humanity, demonstrating that its ideas originated in the historic document of 1215. Perhaps even more significant was the fact that the Magna Carta was cited with authority in one of the most important documents of the time, and that the concepts behind it were easily understood by all.

The Magna Carta had become a type of beacon for battling injustice and a lack of rights, and it is this that makes it so important today, whether we're talking about terrorism, dictatorships, or a lack of basic rights in Kenya, Syria, or Zimbabwe. "Universally acknowledged as the first proclamation that the subjects of the king had legal rights and that the monarch could be bound by the law, the Magna Carta became the first document to establish a tradition of civil rights in Britain that still exists today,' writes Terry Kirby in the Guardian.

Furthermore, Dr. James Sweeney of Durham University's Human Rights Centre contends that the lengthy history of human rights refutes UK Eurosceptics' arguments that it is a culture imposed by Europe and the EU. "It is a misconception that human rights are foreign to the United Kingdom. Despite its tumultuous history of slavery and colonialism, the United Kingdom has a long tradition of considering civil liberties' ."

The passage of the Human Rights Act by the Houses of Parliament in 1998 marked the completion of a lengthy journey that began almost 800 years earlier in 1215 at Runnymede, when the barons reached an agreement that would reverberate throughout British history. As with the Great Reform Act of 1832, it is the principle and ideas that the Magna Carta established in British history, as well as the impact they have had over the last 800 years that make it so significant to us all.

The Magna Carta's lasting significance stems from the more broad phrases in which each generation can see its own protection, rather than its specific depiction of the feudal relationship between lord and subject.

The Magna Carta, which was also a forerunner of Parliament, the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the United States Bill of Rights, contains wording that inspired the right to petition and habeas corpus, as well as the concept of due process. Magna Carta had a significant impact on the United States Constitution as well as the constitutions of individual states.

However, what eighteenth-century Americans thought Magna Carta meant affected its significance. Magna Carta was largely regarded as the people's reaffirmation of rights against an oppressive ruler, a legacy that reflected American scepticism of centralized political power.

Most state constitutions included declarations of rights to guarantee individual citizens a list of protections and immunities from the state authority, in part because of this history. Because of this political conviction, the United States enacted the Bill of Rights.

Several guarantees were incorporated into state declarations of rights and the United States Bill of Rights, which were regarded at the time of their ratification to descend from Magna Carta-protected rights. Freedom from illegal searches and seizures, a right to a quick trial, the right to a jury trial in both criminal and civil cases, and protection from the loss of life, liberty, or property without due process of law are just a few of them.

Conclusion
Magna Carta was a peace pact agreed to by King John of England in June 1215. It was forced upon a defeated king by his rebellious, often equally inebriated barons. Its goal was to rein in John's rash rule, as well as to define and safeguard the privileges of the politically strong, particularly the feudal lords who brought him to heel and the English church. Magna Carta, on the other hand, applied to more than just these groups, setting precedents that have lasted for centuries, first in England, then in America, and finally across the globe.

The text of Magna Carta is preserved in four contemporary English manuscripts and articulates recognisable and now essential themes. Among them are the following: government is limited by law and held accountable in its offices to the general public, agreement is required for taxation, and individuals shall not be deprived of their liberty or property without due process, including peer judgement.

These principles were expanded upon in later English interpretations, as well as the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, and have since formed a cornerstone of modern constitutional philosophy. The global legacy of Magna Carta persists and promises to endure in the face of the new difficulties brought by the twenty-first century.

To summarize, the Claim of Right is entitled to be read alongside Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights as a formal declaration of the notion of lawful limited monarchy, as well as the fundamental rights to due process and judicial protection against arbitrary executive action. We can rightfully demand respect for these other, clearer manifestations of the Common Law history, as passionate as the statements of adoration for Magna Carta have been.

Bibliography/ References:

• https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1110845.pdf (last visited Sep 26, 2021)
• The Ancient Magna Carta and the Modern Rule of Law: 1215 to 2015 Papers.ssrn.com,
• https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2891896 (last visited Sep 26, 2021
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290649059_The_Legacy_Of_Magna_Carta_And_The_Rule_Of_Law_In_The_Republic_Of_Macedonia (last visited Sep 26, 2021)
• How Did Magna Carta Influence the U.S. Constitution? History, https://www.history.com/news/magna-carta-influence-us-constitution-bill-of-rights (last visited Sep 26, 2021)
• Magna Carta v. Bill of Rights | DocsTeach Docsteach.org, https://www.docsteach.org/activities/printactivity/magna-carta-v-bill-of-rights (last visited Sep 26, 2021)