Equity is a fundamental and timeless feature of Indian law. It is composed of judicial doctrines, maxims, and guiding ideas that improve statute law by overcoming the limitations and strictness of strict legal standards. Over time, the concept of equity has undergone significant transformations in India due to the influence of various legal systems such as English common law, Hindu law, Islamic law, and indigenous customs. Injunctions, constructive trust, and specific performance are frequent equitable remedies in India. Equity is also essential for protecting individual rights and reducing the harshness of common law regulations. It strives to achieve a just balance on the judicial system by taking into account the specifics of each case.

Historical Background
Here is a quick rundown of how it developed:

1. Colonial Inflection (17th Century): The concept of equity originated in India during the British colonial era. Equitable principles were introduced by British courts in India to supplement the nation's pre-existing legal framework.
2. Equity Codification (19th Century): As Indian law developed, English law was progressively incorporated. However, equity was not codified in India. Conversely, Indian courts looked to English equity for guidance.
3. Indian Trusts Act (1882): The Indian Trusts Act, which was passed in 1882, formalized the use of equitable principles. This Act codified trust law in many of its forms, which is a fundamental component of equity. Indian courts continued to use and modify equitable notions throughout the 20th century, drawing on both English equity and their own growing body of case law.
4. Constitutional Influence: In 1950, following India's independence in 1947, the Indian Constitution was ratified. Fairness, equality, and justice are all principles upheld by the Constitution and are in line with equitable principles.
5. The Persistent Role of Equity: Even in modern Indian law, equity has a significant role. In situations where the strict application of the law may not be sufficient, Indian courts have recognized equity as a means of accommodating and providing remedies.

Principles of Equity
The following theories and remedies, among others, might be utilized to comprehend Indian legal equity principles:

• Rather than merely awarding damages, a court may utilize specific performance as an equitable remedy to force a party to fulfill a specific contractual obligation. When contracts are engaged in the sale of rare or real estate, it is typically utilized.
• Indian courts have the power to issue injunctions to prevent someone from acting in a way that would endanger another person. While mandatory injunctions stop a party from behaving in a certain way, mandatory injunctions force a party to take action.
• The notion of trusts and related ideas, such the trustees' fiduciary duty, are essential to justice in Indian law.
• These fair principles also apply to inaction and delay. If a party acquiesces to a certain circumstance or delays in pursuing their rights in an unreasonable manner, the court may fail to give equitable remedy.
• A party is prohibited by estoppel from withholding information or rights due to prior deeds or remarks made by that party. It is used to prevent unfairness and preserve uniformity in legal relationships.
• A court may order one party to reimburse another if that party wrongfully profited at that other's expense. The unfair enrichment principle refers to this.

Hindu Law
To understand Indian legal equity concepts, one may apply various theories and remedies such as the following: Specifically, a court may use particular performance as an equitable remedy to compel a party to perform a contractual commitment, instead of only awarding damages. It is usually used in negotiations involving the sale of real estate or rare items.

Indian courts has the authority to grant injunctions to stop an individual from acting in a way that could put another person in danger. Mandatory injunctions compel a party to act, as opposed to only stopping them from acting in a particular manner.

In Indian law, the concept of trusts and associated concepts, such the fiduciary obligation of trustees, are fundamental to justice.

Muslim Law
In Mohammedan law, the notions of equity are also easily discernible. Abu Hanifa, the founder of the Hanafi Sect of Sunnis, explained the concept that the rule of law based on analogy could be abandoned at the judge's discretion based on a liberal interpretation or judicial preference to satisfy the needs of a particular case. In Mohammedan law, these are called "Istihsan" or "Juristic Equity". About the Law of Mohammed. The main Works on Mussalman Law's chapter on the Qazi's duties (Adab) makes it abundantly evident that the English equity rules and equitable considerations that are widely accepted in the Courts of Chancery are not alien to the Mussalman System and are often referred to as English equity.

The East India Company Courts were required by Regulation of 1827 to conduct themselves in a way that upheld justice, equity, and good conscience because there was no explicit law or practice in place. Clause 36 of the Supreme Court Charter of 1823 expressly defined the Supreme Court of Bombay as a Court of Equity, granting it equitable jurisdiction equal to that of the Court of Chancery. Almost all subsequent Acts explicitly stated the principles of "justice," "equity," and "good conscience" for the guidance of judges.

Significance of Equity Under Indian Law
Equity considerations apply when applying the law precisely can have unfair consequences. They serve as a corrective measure where statutory law is insufficient to guarantee the preservation of justice and fairness. Indian courts frequently award particular performance or injunctions based on equity. Courts have the power to dictate to parties what needs to be done or what they must not do in contracts pertaining to the sale of real estate, rare objects, or to avoid harm. The Indian concept of trusts is based on equity principles, which govern trustees' fiduciary duties and guarantee that they act in the best interests of the beneficiaries.

Conclusion
In India, equity developed through a variety of statutes that gained popularity as a result of multiple acts that were approved over time. The legality of equality has become more significant in recent years. Some legislation in contemporary India are based on the equity principle. Equity was given greater weight than the common law system. Over time, its importance increased and it was incorporated into the Indian legal system.

References:

• https://www.lawteacher.net/...law.../equity-law/equity-common-law-appliance-in-india
• https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/equity
• https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/equity-law/history-of-equity-law.php
• Equity Trust, Mortgage & Specific Relief Act by Aqil Ahmad

Award Winning Article Is Written By: Ms.Kimika Bhardwaj

Authentication No: AP409715747381-6-0424