Generally, a duty is an obligation and a right is an entitlement. They may exist
as a moral or a legal matter. For example, morally, a person may have a duty not
to hurt another's feelings. However, case law and statutes provide the legal
framework or parameters defining when harmful communications constitute
defamation and the procedures governing obtaining redress.
Rights may also exist on a moral or legal matter. For example, an employee has a
moral right to be treated with appreciation and respect by an employer.
Employment and discrimination laws provide the legal framework defining an
employee's rights to freedom from being disadvantaged by an employer's
discriminatory intent based on certain grounds, such as age, sex, handicap, or
religion. A moral right cannot be the basis for seeking relief through the legal
system. There must be a law creating a right before that right can be enforced
through the legal system.
Meaning of right:
Right in the ordinary sense of the term means a number of
things, but it is generally taken to mean the standard of permitted action
within a certain sphere. As a legal term, it means the standard of permitted
action by law. Such permitted action of a person is known as his legal right.
legal right must be distinguished from a moral or natural right. A legal right
is an interest recognized and protected by a rule of legal justice, an interest
the violation of which would be a legal wrong, done to him whose interest it is,
and respect for which is a legal duty. Moral or natural right means an interest
recognized and protected by a rule of natural justice, an interest the violation
of which would be a moral wrong, and respect for which is a moral duty'.
Definition of Right:
Austin: About the definition and the analysis of the legal rights there is a
great deal of difference of opinion among the jurists. According to Austin,
right is a faculty which resides in a determinate party or parties by virtue of
a given law and which avails against a party or parties (or answers to a duty
lying on a party or parties) other than the party or parties in whom it
resides. According to him, a person can be said to have a right only when
another or others are bound or obliged by law to do something or forbear in
regard to him. It means that a right has always a corresponding duty. This
definition, as it appears on is very face, is imperfect because in this
definition there is no place for imperfect rights
Holland: Holland defines legal right as the capacity residing in one man of
controlling, with the assent and assistance of the state the actions of others'.
It is clear that Holland follows the work given by Austin.
Salmond defines right from a different angle. He says, A right is an
interest recognized and protected by a rule of right'. It is an interest respect
for which is a duty, and disregard of which is a wrong.
The main elements in
this definition are two:
- First, a rule of right means a rule of law, or, in other words,
that which is judicially enforceable. Thus, according to Salmond, a right must be
- Second, a right is an interest. The element of Interest is essential to
constitute a right. So far as Salmond's first element is concerned, it is a
corollary to his definition of law.
Supreme Court of India also interprets the definition of right in case of State
of Rajasthan v. Union of India
, AIR (1977) SC 1361 as:
In the strict sense,
legal rights are correlatives of legal duties and are defined as interests whom
the law protects by imposing corresponding duties on others. But in a generic
sense, the word right' is used to mean immunity from the legal power of
another, immunity is an exemption from the power of another in the same way as
liberty is an exemption from the right of another, Immunity, in short, is no
Rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution
The Constitution of India has guaranteed certain rights to the citizens of India
which are known as Fundamental Right which is considered to be the most
important rights. If these rights get violated then the person has the right to
move to the Supreme Court of India or The High Court for enforcing rights.
Following rights are guaranteed by the Court:
- Right to Equality (Article 14
- Right to freedom (Article 19)
- Right against Exploitation (Article 23 and 24)
- Right to Freedom of Religion (Article 25)
- Right to Life (Article 21)
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32)
Theories of Rights
The Will Theory:
This theory says that the purpose of law is to grant the
individual the means of self-expression or self-assertion. Therefore, right
emerges from the human will. Holmes In his definition of right puts the same
view more clearly. He defines legal right as nothing but a permission to
exercise certain natural powers and upon certain conditions to obtain
protection, restitution, or compensation by the aid of public force'. Hegel,
Kant, Hume and others say that by right is meant the power of self-expression or
Will-Theory criticized: Duguit is vehemently opposed to the will theory.
According to him, the basis of law is the objective fact of social solidarity
and not the subjective will. The idea of will is anti-social. The will theory
has been criticized on other grounds also. Those who greatly emphasis the
element of will confuse the fact with abstract ideas, that is, they do not make
the distinction between what is
and what ought to be.
The Interest Theory:
The profounder of this theory is Ihering-a great German
jurist. He defines legal right as a legally protected interest'. According to
him, the basis of right is interest' and not will'. His definition of law is
in terms of purpose'. Law always has a purpose. In case of rights the purpose
of law is to protect certain interests and not the wills or the assertions of
The Elements of a Legal Right:
There are four elements or characteristics of a
- The subject: Subject means the person in whom the right is vested, or
the holder of the right. There can be no right without a subject
- The act of forbearance: Right relates to some act or forbearance. It
obliges a person to act or forbear in favour of the person who is entitled
to the right.
- The object of right or the res concerned: it is the thing in respect of which
the right exists or is exercised.
- The person bound or the person of incidence: It means the person upon
who falls the correlative duty.
In addition to these four elements, Salmond has given a fifth element also, that
. He says that every legal right has a title, that is to say, certain
facts or events by reason of which the right has become vested in its owner'.
this way, according to him, every right involves a three-fold relation, in which
its holder stands:
- It is a right against some person or persons.
- It is a right to some act or omission such person or persons.
- It is a right over or to something to which that act or omission
Wider sense of legal right: In its wider sense it includes other legally
recognized interests without considering whether they have a corresponding legal
duty or not. Salmond has pointed out that the term right-duty
was often used
to indicate relationships which were not in reality the same. It causes
confusion in legal argument. He said that the term legal right in its generic
sense means any advantage or benefit which is in any manner conferred upon a
person by a rule of law. Right in this sense, there are four distinct kinds:
Each of these has its correlative, namely
- No rights.
- Subjections (or Liabilities).
This analysis of Salmond was carried further by Hohfeld. He analyzed it with
greater accuracy. This has been again developed by many other jurists.
Claim and duty:
Salmond has used the word right' at the place of claim.
Therefore, the word claim' has been used here. Claim indicates what one can
force another to do, or to refrain from doing. The person who can so force is
said to have a claim and the person who can be made to act or forbear is said to
have a duty.
Liberty and no claim:
Liberty means that what one can do for himself without
being prevented by the law, or, in other words, he is free of the possibility
of legal interference by others'. It is that sphere of a person's activity
within which the law leaves him alone.
Privilege, Absolute and Qualified:Privilege
has been mentioned in a brakcet
along with liberty
. In some respects it is akin to liberty
, but in other
respects it differs. Liberty includes those acts which are generally lawful for
all. Privilege means those acts which are generally unlawful.
Power and liability:
Power is generally defined as an ability on the part of a
person to produce a change in a given relation by doing or not doing a given
act. The makings of will or alienating property are examples of such ability.
Power is of two kinds:
Public power is that which is vested in a person as an agent of the state, as
the judicial or executive power of the officers.
Private power is that power which is vested in a person as citizen for his own
Liability gives the sense of being affected by an act of a person who has
power' to do it. In other words, the person whose rights can be altered by the
exercise of power
is said to be under liability
Immunity and disability:
Immunity is defined as a freedom on the part of one
person against having a given legal relation altered by a given act or omission
on the part of another person. It is opposite of liability. So it is also said
that it is an exemption from having a given legal relation changed by another.
Claim= No Claim.
Duty= Liberty or privilege.
The correlative of immunity is disability. Disability means the absence of
Immunity is the Opposite of liability; disability is the opposite of power.
Rights and Duties:
Rights and duties are the very important elements of law. The
administration of justice, in most part, consists of the enforcement of rights
and the fulfillment of duties. Rights and duties are correlated to each other in
such a way that one cannot be conceived of without the other. In other words,
the existence of the one depends on the existence of the other as there can be
no child without a father and no father without a child. A right is always
against someone upon whom the correlative duty is imposed. In the same way a
duty is always towards someone in whom the correlative right vests.
The duties which are always correlated with a right are called
Austin, who supported, says that there are four kinds of absolute duties:
- Duties not regarding persons
- Duties owed to persons indefinitely.
- Self-regarding duties.
- Duties owed to the sovereign.
Classification of DutiesPositive duty:
A positive duty implies some act on the part of the person on
whom it is imposed. If a person owes money to another, the former is under a
duty to pay the money to the latter. This is a positive duty.
Negative duty: A negative duty implies forbearance on the part of the person on
whom it is imposed. For example, if a person owns lands, others are under a duty
not to make any interference with that person's use of the land. This is a
Primary and Secondary duties:
A primary duty is that duty which exists per
se and independent of any other duty. The duty not to cause hurt to any person
is a primary duty. A secondary duty is that duty whose purpose is only to
enforce some other duty. If a person causes injury to another, the former is
under a duty to pay damages to the latter. This is a secondary duty. The duty
not to cause injury is the primary duty. When a breach of this duty has been
committed, the secondary duty to pay damages arises.
Duties enriched under Indian Constitution
of the constitution of India guarantees certain duties to every
citizen of India. Article 51-A of the Indian constitution states that it shall
be the duty of every citizen of India
To respect the provisions of Constitution and respect the National Flag and
- To safeguard the sovereignty and integrity of India
- To follow the noble ideals of national struggle
- To defend the country and contribute to national service when called
- To preserve the national heritage of the country;
- To promote and maintain the harmony of brotherhood amongst people of India.
- To protect the dignity of women
- To protect the natural habitat and including forests, lakes, rivers, and
- To protect public property and to avoid violence;
- To contribute to the development of the nation in all spheres.
Classification of Rights:
Antecedent and remedial rights:They are known by other names
also, such as primary and secondary rights, principal and
accessory rights. Pollock calls them as substantive and
adjective rights. When a right exists independent of any other right and
for its own sake it is an antecedent right. When another right is joined to
it then so joined right is called a remedial right
Perfect and Imperfect rights: A perfect right means a right which has
a correlative duty that can be legally enforced. Generally, when law
recognizes a right, it prescribes a remedy also and when the right is
violated, it enforces it. An imperfect right' is that right which,
although, recognized by law, is not enforceable, such as the claims barred
Positive and negative rights: A positive right is that right which has a
correlative positive duty. In case of positive right the person having the
right can compel the person upon whom the correlative duty is imposed to do
some positive act. The scope of a negative right is only that the person
having the right shall not be harmed.
Rights in rem and rights in Personam: Generally most of the rights in personam,
are positive right and rights in rem are mostly negative rights.
Proprietary and personal rights: Proprietary right means a person's
right in relation to his own property. Personal rights are rights-relating
to status and that arising out of contract. Mainly two points of distinction
between proprietary and personal rights are put forward.
First that proprietary right is valuable; personal rights are not valuable.
Second, that proprietary rights are transferable, personal rights are not
Vested and contingent rights:A right is a vested right when all the
facts happening or not happening of which it is necessary to create or vest
the right, have happened or not happened If only some of such facts have
occurred then the right is a contingent right. It would become vested when
all the facts have occurred. A vested right creates an immediate interest.
It is transferable and heritable. A contingent right does not create an
immediate interest, and it can be defeated when the required facts have not
Legal and equitable rights: The rights recognized and enforced by the
common law courts were known as legal rights and the rights recognized and
enforced by the chancery courts were known as equitable rights.
However in India there is no such division of rights as legal
- Monika, What Are Rights And Duties. 13 April 2019, https://blog.ipleaders.in/the-concept-of-rights-and-duties/.
- Rights and Duties,https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-editorials/rights-and-duties.
- Prof. Narender Kumar, Constitutional Law Of India, (Allahabad Law
Agency, Haryana 8th Edn., 2011).
- Dr. B.N. Tripathi, Jurisprudence Legal theory (Allahabad Law Agency,
Haryana, 7th Edn. 2010).
Please Drop Your Comments