Once, a women activist jokingly said, to a judge in Ahmedabad. "Sexual
harassment is like god, its everywhere."
It has been a decade of the famous Vishakha Judgement.
Bhanwari Devi a Saathin of a development program run by the state
government of Rajasthan, fighting against child and multiple marriages in
villages, tried to stop child marriage of Ramkaran Gujjar's infant
daughter who was less than one year old. The marriage took place
nevertheless, and Bhanwari earned the ire of the Gujjar family. Gujjar
family got infuriated by her interference, and on September 1992 five men
including Ramkaran Gujjar, gang raped Bhanwari. Unable to get justice,
women groups had filled a petition in the supreme court of India, under
the name of, 'Vishakha', asking the court to give certain directions
regarding the sexual harassment that women face at the workplace. The
result is the Supreme Court judgment, which came on the 13th august 1997,
and gave the Vishakha guidelines.
This was the case, which bought sexual harassment at workplace into public
glare. The petitioners wanted assistance in suitable methods for
realization of the true concept of “gender equality”; and to prevent
sexual harassment of working women in all workplaces through judicial
process and to fill the vacuum in existing legislation. The Supreme Court
held that, “each incidence of sexual harassment of women at workplace
results in violation of the fundamental rights,” “gender equality” and the
"right to life and liberty." It was a clear violation of the articles 1,
15 and 21of the constitution. Gender equality includes protection from
sexual harassment and right to work with dignity, which is universally,
recognized Human Right. From the viewpoint of the Supreme Court it took
this case quite seriously as it understood the gravity of the situation.
The Supreme Court took assistance from the then solicitor general of India
to formulate certain guidelines and norms to help working women against
sexual harassment. These guidelines were formulated since the then civil
and penal laws in India did not adequately provide for specific protection
of women from sexual harassment in workplace and that enactment of such
legislation would take considerable time.
Today its 10 years of the Supreme Court having given these guidelines but
has there been an implementation to these? One of the major drawbacks
being, that such laws and guidelines find their places only in law books
and few journals. The common masses don’t get to know about such
judgments. The NCW study shows that 60% of working woman is still not
aware of this. In number of cases it was found that the women who made
complaints had to meet with an enquiry about their own conduct and no
enquiry was made against the person against whom the complaint was made.
Lodging complaints often results in isolation of the women, both by
employer and by the colleagues. It results in increase and sometimes more
violent harassment. In a sexual harassment case the response of the
employer institution is of great resistance. The institution gangs up
against the women who complaints and then shield the person against whom
the complaint has been reported. There is always a hesitation to initiate
action against him. Worst of all, the victim is usually pressured to take
the complaint back, through threat. Witnesses also tend to show their back
since they are threatened to remain quite. In a 2005 case, Indian Air
Force pilot Anjali Gupta was court martial for misconduct after she
accused three superiors of sexually harassing her. A year later 3 trainees
were also sacked when they leveled similar charges.
The case of Phaneesh Murthy clearly tells about the immunity to
regulations. Phaneesh Murthy, US based head of sales, communication and
product service at Infosys, India’s leading InfoTech Company, resigned in
July after an American women employee in Freemont, California, registered
a lawsuit against him and the company, alleging sexual harassment and
wrongful termination. It should be the duty of the employer to see that
nothing like this happens in the workplace. It was observed that sexual
harassment is not just confined to various offices but it is quite present
in educational institutions. Sexual harassment has been reported many a
times in universities across India. A respected faculty member in the Urdu
department in one of the collages of Delhi University harassed one of his
female students. The poor girl did not find any help. A female teacher in
the department stood to give her justice as nobody came up for any help.
She forced the university administration to start an enquiry. But three
years on, the enquiry committee has yet to come up with the conclusion.
It proves about that there is very little seriousness of not only the
Vishakha guidelines but also the presence of complaint committee. The
spirit of guidelines lies in its clause on prevention, but in most cases a
complaint committee is set up only once a case has been reported. In a
survey commissioned by for the national commission for women reveals poor
compliance. Of the 799 organizations surveyed, (including government
departments), only 664 had set up complaint committees as required under
the guidelines required. Of these, 61 committees were headed by men, not
women as the guidelines required; and over 400 of the committees did not
have NGO or third-party participation. As for NGOs, only 9 out of the 22
surveyed had set up the complaint committees; and only 7 out of the 14
news agencies surveyed had set up the committees. Even where these
committees existed, it seems that not all of them had women fifty percent
of the total membership, as stipulated.
It is a reality that many women across India face, but few have the
courage to speak against it. However Alka Pandey (name changed) is an
exception. An executive with leading audit firm KPMG, was forced to resign
from her post when she spoke up against sexual harassment she was facing
at the hands of one of her colleagues. However, not the one to be cowed by
the repressive measure, she is now taking on the ones who victimized her.
Alka said it took great courage to speak about it, but the problem was she
was unable to explain the situation to the senior management that
comprised mostly men. While the law is very clear on sexual harassment at
work place, implementation and action are still a far cry.
It can be said that the battle his half won. A recent CII survey suggests
that popular private companies like Infosys Technologies, TATA Consultancy
Services, Coco-Cola, Walchand Capital and Technologies have already put
place a policy of prevention of sexual harassment. Even the government has
swung itself in action with the ‘the sexual harassment at the workplace
(prevention and Redressal) Bill.’ But the present bill is also not
perfect. Justice J.S. Verma, who penned the Vishakha judgment also,
“severely criticized” the bill for its vague and loose definitions. It
would need to go for a round of suggestions as in the present form it
would not give women the confidence to speak it out. Besides this, the new
draft fails to reflect any of the many constructive suggestions put
forward by women's groups. In a letter dated April 3, 2003, sent to the
joint secretary of the NCW, a coalition of these women's groups’ states
that they were shocked by the new draft as the changes suggested were not
incorporated. The most important point is that the preventive aspect is
not highlighted in the bill, as it was in the Vishakha judgment, since all
workplaces must take responsibility for generating awareness about sexual
harassment and making the workplaces must take responsibility for
generating awareness about sexual harassment and making the workplaces
safe for women.
WPC (women power connect) has listed a number of changes to the draft.
1) Clarify whether an establishment that has violated a provision of this
Bill can be forced to pay monetary damages to the said party.
2) Assigning personal liability to someone who victimizes a sexual
harassment complainant for having brought a complaint.
3) Including in the Bill sex-based discrimination so that it becomes
gender- neutral. The current Bill only protects women against harassment
by men... “As women can also sexually harass men, and same-sex harassment
is also possible... it would be better to make the legislation
gender-neutral,” says WPC President Ranjana Kumari. The groups also said
there is a need to include sex-based discrimination that is not sexual in
nature under the ambit of the Bill.
Even if we forget about the flaws of the bill, the delay in its
implementation only shows the seriousness of the government towards it.
The guidelines were laid in 1997 and in 10 years no law could be
formulated and the draft bill so prepared is not also acceptable. Moral
education is very important and it starts from home.
If a person is morally sane then such a problem might not arise. Stricter
law is necessary as well as its awareness. As said above the laws find its
place in limited resources. Laws need to be told at national level so
women are aware of there right. Mere warning to the accused won’t solve
the matter and the employee should think for once about the women who
faced it rather about its own reputation.
Bhanwari Devi’s case bought sexual harassment into public glare in 1992;
Vishakha guidelines in 1997 created norms before a law could be made
against sexual harassment and now we have to wait for the final
implementation of the sexual harassment of women at workplace bill. Ten
years on, awareness has increased but without and hard-core method to
completely end it. Despite the noble intention of the supreme court in
issuing the above mentioned guidelines, fact remains that they are
observed in breach of all the talk of the making the workplace free of
sexual violence, is still a mirage. What people, whether men or woman;
people inside the parliament or outside; should think about is a statement
by Justice Arjit Pasayat:
“While a murder destroys the physical frame of the
victim, a rapist degrades and defiles the soul of a helpless women”
The author can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org /
Print This Article
Laws on Sexual Harassment
The Eve Teasing Malaise: under Section
298 A and Section 298 B of the Indian Penal Code, a man
who is found guilty of making a female the target of
Rape Laws In India-Appropriate or not:
Rape is a stigma which exists in the society from a long
time. The dictionary meaning of word rape....
Crime Against Women & its Impact on Them:
Over 32000 murders, 19,000 rapes, 7500 dowry deaths and
36500 molestation cases are the violent crimes reported in
India in 2006 against women......
Law on Sexual Harassment
The Court has emphasized that the guidelines and norms
being laid down by it had to be duly observed
Impact of Sexual Harassment on Women
Survey of the Gender Study Group shows that most women
felt disgusted, insulted and scared by ......
Sexual Harassment At Workplace-An
According to the Protection of Human Right Act, 1993
"human rights" means