Free legal Advice - lawyers Forum

Legal service India => Criminal laws => Topic started by: vijaychauhan on September 17, 2017, 10:12:35 PM

Title: Section 354 S.P. review - pending charge sheet. PLEASE HELP!! THANKS!
Post by: vijaychauhan on September 17, 2017, 10:12:35 PM
We had a pending court case against our neighbors in SDO Sadar court regarding Cr. P.C 133, as they had forcibly closed off common passageway. However, one day they resorted to violence and viciously beat us up including our 70 years old fragile and sick mother. As a result, we called police and filed an FIR with true facts. However, opposite party filed a false counter FIR the same day, after about 4 hours, using false allegations of their 4 month pregnant wife. My mother’s incision wound and injury was acknowledged and given by town’s government medical college and hospital, while opposite party despite making serious false allegation of vicious beating on her pregnant belly was examined by the government’s medical college and NOT A SINGLE abnormality or injury was found by them (as she was not even touched) and she was not even admitted in government hospital, because everything she wrote in her counter FIR were blatant lies. Both parties are on bail currently.

IPC Sections imposed on opposite party based on our true FIR were :


323   Voluntarily causing hurt   1 Year or Fine or Both   Non-Cognizable   Bailable   The person to whom the hurt is caused

341   Wrongfully restraining any person   Simple Imprisonment for 1 Month or Fine or Both   Cognizable   Bailable   The person restrained

504   Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace   2 Years or Fine or Both   Non-Cognizable   Bailable   The person insulted

506   (1)   Criminal intimidation
(2)   If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, Etc.   (1)   2 Years or Fine or Both
(2)   7 Years or Fine or Both   Non-Cognizable
Non-Cognizable   Bailable
Bailable   The person intimidated

379   Theft   Whoever commits theft shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.   Cognizable   Non-Bailable   The owner of the property stolen

34               

IPC Sections imposed on us based on opposite party’s false counter FIR , with the help of bribing concerned officers were:

323   Voluntarily causing hurt   1 Year or Fine or Both   Non-Cognizable   Bailable   The person to whom the hurt is caused

341   Wrongfully restraining any person   Simple Imprisonment for 1 Month or Fine or Both   Cognizable   Bailable   The person restrained

504   Insult intended to provoke breach of the peace   2 Years or Fine or Both   Non-Cognizable   Bailable   The person insulted

506   (3)   Criminal intimidation
(4)   If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, Etc.   (3)   2 Years or Fine or Both
(4)   7 Years or Fine or Both   Non-Cognizable
Non-Cognizable   Bailable
Bailable   The person intimidated

354   Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty   1 to 5 years + Fine   Cognizable   Non-Bailable   NOT COMPUNDABLE ??


34               



Dy. S. P Review = He made all sections against us and opposite parties to be TRUE.


S. P. Review = Based on Dy. S.P. review report and independent witnesses, he dropped sections 354 and 506 from us, while section 506 from opposite parties and had instructed Investigation officer to submit incident diary to court and report progress to S.P. office.

So, per S.P. review report, following sections are to be considered true against us: 323 / 341 / 504 / 34

While following sections are to be considered true against opposite parties:  323 / 341 / 504 / 379 / 34



However, opposite party is saying that I.O is his close friend from college days, and even I.O himself had threatened us that he would ignore S.P. review during charge sheet and all sections would remain true against us ( including heinous section 354 and 506, from false and heinous allegation ) as per Dy.S.P review report ???

Please answer the following questions:

(1) Does Investigation Officer have power to reinstate sections dropped by S.P. review against us while framing charge sheet ?  Can he simply ignore S.P. review ?

(2) Will the court honor and accept S.P. review report and accept those 2 false and heinous charges dropped against us , while section 379 being held true against opposite parties, as spelled out in S.P. review ?

(3) Is there fabricated and false case against us, ripe for quashing by High Court – each one of their claim in their concocted story is false – even the government medical college hospital had denied that she ( 4 month old pregnant ) was ever admitted to hospital – she had come there but all tests, including ultrasound, was ABSOLUTELY normal ?

(4) What should we demand from government medical college about her visit and diagnostic tests via R.T.I as we are hearing that on some hospital register it is also mentioned that there was NO mark of external injury on that pregnant woman ?

Thank you so much !!!