Online Copyright Registration in India

Protect your creative work
Books, Songs, film, websites, Software, painting, fashion Design etc
Call now: 09891244487

Ask Our legal Experts, on issues related to Divorce

File Mutual Consent divorce right away

Call at ph no: 9650499965
Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

To Appeal before CIC - Central Information Commission
For Filing and Hearing contact: Choudhury's law Office
Ph no: 8851046564

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - advcaroltripathi

Pages: [1]
Lawyers in India / Supreme Court proceedings to be broadcast Live
« on: October 23, 2017, 11:03:07 PM »
Supreme Court proceedings to be broadcast for first time

Proceedings in the Supreme Court are being filmed and broadcast for the first time in the history of the State.

Television cameras will be allowed in court to film two judgments being handed down.

Chief Justice Frank Clarke described this as an attempt to demystify the courts process.

The proceedings will be broadcast on rte News Now, and on TV and radio bulletins during the day.

Although cameras have been allowed into the Supreme court on a handful of occasions, the courts have never before given permission for legal proceedings to be recorded and broadcast.

It follows a lengthy discussion process between rte, the Courts Service and the judiciary.

The court will hand down two judgments in two unrelated cases - a challenge to an extradition request and an appeal against a refusal to award compensation under the scheme for people who spent time in residential institutions.

Mr Justice Clarke has described this as a "baby step" which may lead to wider filming of the courts in the future, although he has said filming of criminal trials or sentences is still a long way off.

The words "landmark" and "unprecedented" are often overused in court reporting. But this is a very significant moment for rte News and for the courts in Ireland, as proceedings in the Supreme Court will be filmed and broadcast for the first time in the history of the State.

Cameras have been allowed into the Supreme Court and other courts on only a handful of occasions in the past.

When the Court of Appeal was established in October 2014, cameras were allowed to record a short speech by the then Chief Justice, Susan Denham, assigning cases to the new court.

In 2003, cameras were also permitted to record pictures of the Central Criminal Court sitting outside Dublin.

Former Chief Justice Liam Hamilton also allowed rte in to record the appointment of new Supreme Court judges but no sound could be broadcast.

This will be the first time that the court is allowing the legal proceedings themselves to be filmed and to be broadcast.

A satellite van during work to set up the court cameras

Roof-top cabling at the court building
Chief Justice Mr Justice Frank Clarke has said he hopes filming cases will give the public the opportunity to understand as much as possible about what goes on in court and to demystify the process.

He has described this as a "baby step" which may lead to wider filming of the court in the future.

rte's Head of News and Current Affairs Jon Williams welcomed the decision and said he hoped the public would be able to see the way justice is delivered in a more open and transparent manner than at present.

The court is due to deliver two judgments.

The first concerns a man who is wanted in the US on 51 counts of mortgage fraud.

He objected to his extradition in the High Court on grounds including the treatment by the US of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and its sanctioning of acts of torture such as water-boarding.

In the Appeal Court, he challenged his extradition on the basis that some of the offences were alleged to have happened when he was in Ireland and he claimed he should be tried here and should not be extradited.

His case was rejected by both courts.

The second judgment - H and the Residential Institutions Review Committee and the Residential Institutions Redress Board - concerns a man who was in an institution as a very young child due to a suspected medical condition.

He was then transferred to a second institution where he suffered "significant abuse" including being sedated and at one stage being swung "like a pendulum" through a window, by his feet.

The man sought compensation but because the second institution was a private one and not covered by the Redress scheme, he was refused compensation for the abuse he suffered there.

The High Court found in his favour and said this decision should be reviewed.

The Appeal Court overturned that ruling "without any enthusiasm" and now the Supreme Court will rule on the matter.

These judgments will be handed down in court by the Chief Justice and transmitted on rte News

Traditionally Supreme Court judgments are not read out in full - the Chief Justice usually outlines the court's decision and may read part of the court's conclusions. The other judges usually indicate if they agree or dissent. So the proceedings are likely to be quite brief.

The idea of televising the courts has been discussed for many years. Many legal professionals are enthusiastic, to a degree, about having some limited televising of proceedings.

Some, however, think it could influence how cases are fought and even what decisions are reached.

rte has had discussions on and off since 2012 with the previous Chief Justice Ms Justice Susan Denham, who was eager to bring transparency to court decisions and was in favour of allowing the cameras in.

But it wasn't possible before her time in charge came to an end.

When Mr Justice Frank Clarke took over, he adopted a mantra of "you can't complain if you don't explain" and decided to press ahead with the idea very quickly.

So the broadcast of these proceedings has been put together at very short notice.

This will be a learning curve for everyone involved. However, if successful, it's hoped it could lead to the televising of further judgments from the Supreme Court and possibly arguments from that courts.

It's also hoped that eventually hearings from the Court of Appeal could be televised and perhaps even certain proceedings in the High Court or the Criminal Courts.

Although the Chief Justice has said that is a long way off yet.

Pages: [1]

File a Consumer Complaint
Property verification
Call: 9873628941

Lawyers in India - Listed city wise Mumbai
lawyers in London
lawyers in Birmingham
lawyers in Toronto
lawyers in Sydney

lawyers in Milan

Delhi - New Delhi
lawyers in New York
los Angeles
lawyers in Dhaka
lawyers in Dubai

Copyright Registration
Ph no: 9891244487

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi
-Ph no: 9650499965

Home | Bare Acts | Law Forms | Supreme Court Judgments | Legal Advice | Lawyers | Submit article | Sitemap | Contact Us

legal Service is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2018
Get Free legal Advice here from top notch lawyers in India