Unravelling the Silent Epidemic: DNA Innovation in Missing Persons Identification

The Persistent Crisis of the Missing

A pervasive “silent epidemic” of disappearances constitutes a profound global crisis, starkly exemplified in the U.S. by the tragic disappearance of Ashley Loring HeavyRunner, which highlights the urgent plight of thousands of missing Indigenous women.

Annually, thousands are reported missing, yet an alarming number of these cases remain tragically unresolved, often due to significant limitations in forensic capabilities and the crucial absence of a comprehensive national database.

A similarly devastating crisis grips India, where tens of thousands of tribal women, Dalits, and other marginalized individuals vanish each year, frequently without a trace. This situation is further exacerbated by fractured inter-state coordination, woefully insufficient forensic resources, and the critical absence of a centralized national DNA database.

Individual tragedies like Pragya Kumari and Shraddha Walkar, alongside the alarming scale of over 90,000 annual missing persons reports – including high-profile cases like Najeeb Ahmed – powerfully exemplify this devastating reality.

Evidently, both nations are in urgent need of comprehensive systemic reforms and integrated technological solutions, most notably the establishment of robust national DNA databases, as such measures are essential to effectively combat this pervasive silent epidemic of disappearances, ultimately bringing much-needed resolution and closure to countless grieving families.

Technological Breakthroughs in DNA Identification

Recent advancements in rapid DNA sequencing and genetic genealogy have revolutionized forensic identification, allowing the extraction of thousands of genetic markers from degraded remains – a significant leap from previous methods that yielded only dozens.

This capability enables identification through distant familial lines by comparing markers across open-source genealogy databases, a “paradigm shift” according to former FBI geneticist Bruce Budowle.

Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), leveraging these advancements, has been instrumental in solving hundreds of high-profile cases, including the Golden State Killer investigation and 77 directly involving unidentified remains, with significant contributions from companies like Parabon NanoLabs and Othram.

While such advanced applications of FIGG are still emerging in India, due to limited high-throughput sequencing in central laboratories and the absence of open-access genealogical databases, there is growing recognition among experts and policymakers of the need to upgrade forensic capabilities for long-pending unidentified remains cases.

With appropriate safeguards and ethical frameworks, these tools hold significant potential to enhance India’s capacity to resolve missing persons cases, particularly in conflict-affected regions or those impacted by displacement and trafficking.

Challenges and Equity in Forensic Genetic Genealogy

Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) presents a powerful tool for solving cold cases and identifying missing persons, yet its full potential is severely limited by the absence of a unified national DNA database. Existing systems like CODIS are primarily confined to criminal samples, and other databases such as NamUs do not incorporate DNA profiles for general identification. This creates a significant gap, as FIGG often relies on voluntary datasets like GEDmatch, which predominantly consist of individuals of European descent, thereby curtailing their utility for identifying individuals from diverse and underrepresented communities.

This fragmentation and lack of comprehensive data disproportionately impact Indigenous and minority communities. Challenges stem from their underrepresentation in existing databases, cultural resistance to sampling, and complex jurisdictional hurdles, particularly on tribal lands. Indigenous communities face additional, intricate impediments, including concurrent legal jurisdictions and deeply held cultural or spiritual injunctions against DNA testing or the disturbance of ancestral remains.

For these scientific advancements to equitably benefit everyone, fundamental systemic changes are necessary. Profound ethical considerations arise concerning the collection, storage, and utilization of genetic data from Indigenous populations, highlighting the critical need for culturally appropriate guidelines and explicit tribal consent. Moving forward, inclusive, culturally sensitive policies must be developed, and public trust, especially among marginalized groups, must be actively rebuilt to ensure equitable access to and benefits from these technologies.

Indigenous-Led Solutions and Ethical Innovations

Indigenous scholars and scientists are increasingly leading the way in developing culturally respectful approaches to forensic identification.

A key initiative involves Ph.D. student Haley Omeasoo, who is collaborating with anthropologist Meradeth Snow to establish a tribally controlled DNA database for the Blackfeet Tribe. Crucially, this database is owned and managed by the tribe itself, ensuring community control over sensitive genetic information.

To address ethical concerns surrounding ancestral remains, Dr. Snow has also pioneered a non-destructive DNA extraction method. This innovative technique employs a non-toxic chemical solution to release genetic material without damaging the bone. Such an approach not only aligns with cultural sensitivities but also significantly enhances the effectiveness of identification efforts.

A powerful demonstration of this progress occurred in 2023. Human remains, discovered on the Yakama Nation Reservation in 2008, were successfully identified using advanced sequencing techniques developed by Othram. The remains were confirmed to belong to Daisy Mae Tallman, a Native American woman who had disappeared in 1987. After decades of uncertainty, her remains were finally returned to her family, providing them with long-awaited closure.

Case Studies of Resolution and Closure

A striking illustration of this potential comes from Snow, who utilized advanced DNA analysis to identify the closest living relative of an ancient Native American man whose remains had been in storage for years. The subsequent return of these remains to his descendants underscored not only the scientific prowess of modern forensic tools but also their profound capacity for fostering cultural reconciliation and respect.

Similar advancements are gradually emerging in India. While still limited to notable instances, such as the identification of disaster victims or long-missing individuals through mitochondrial DNA and bone analysis, Indian forensic teams are increasingly recognizing the necessity of combining scientific precision with cultural and familial sensitivity. For example, in high-profile tragedies like the 2004 tsunami and the 2022 Morbi bridge collapse, DNA testing proved vital in repatriating remains to grieving families. However, the widespread, routine application of such technology in missing persons investigations – particularly for marginalized communities – remains an area needing significant development.

Collectively, these examples from the U.S. and India highlight a growing push towards a justice-centered forensic approach, one that thoughtfully integrates both the scientific and human dimensions of missing persons cases. For affected families, the return of remains transcends mere closure; it represents the profound restoration of identity, dignity, and ancestral connection.

Discussion and Future Implications

New DNA technologies are revolutionizing the identification of missing persons within forensic science. Advanced tools like next-generation sequencing (NGS), rapid DNA profiling, and forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) significantly boost the accuracy and speed of identifications.

Crucially, they also alter the traditional power dynamics of law enforcement-centric investigations. These technologies empower families, communities, and grassroots organizations to participate, thereby giving a voice to marginalized and historically underrepresented groups—especially Indigenous communities, tribal populations, and minorities—whose cases have frequently been neglected or deprioritized.

This evolution in forensic science, however, necessitates a corresponding rise in ethical standards. The application of genetic data must be grounded in principles of informed consent, data sovereignty, and profound cultural respect.

Initiatives like tribally controlled DNA databases and non-destructive sampling methods demonstrate how scientific progress can align with community values. To sustain and expand these advancements, it is vital to create comprehensive and representative DNA databases through voluntary participation and proactive awareness campaigns, particularly among underrepresented communities.

In India, while DNA testing has proven effective in disaster victim identification and certain high-profile criminal cases, its use in routine missing persons investigations remains significantly limited. Systemic inefficiencies stem from:

• The absence of a national DNA database
• Delays in forensic testing
• Lack of standardized procedures across states

Marginalized communities, including tribal groups, Dalits, and migrant workers, are disproportionately affected—often facing poor access to justice mechanisms and limited involvement in forensic processes.

Both the U.S. and India urgently need to expand access to FIGG technologies through investments in:

• Infrastructure
• Training
• Robust community outreach

Maintaining trust and accountability necessitates:

• Ensuring tribal and local autonomy over DNA research
• Developing culturally appropriate forensic protocols
• Implementing robust legal safeguards

Greater government funding, enhanced inter-agency collaboration, and clearer jurisdictional frameworks are crucial to bridging the current gap between scientific capabilities and investigative requirements.

Only through such comprehensive and ethically grounded approaches can DNA technologies realize their full potential—not merely to solve crimes or close cases, but to restore identities, reunite families, and finally deliver long-overdue justice.

Literature Review

1. Introduction

   Identifying missing persons presents a persistent challenge in forensic science. Traditional methods – including dental records, fingerprinting, and basic DNA profiling – are frequently insufficient, especially when remains are degraded, fragmented, or devoid of contextual information. However, recent advancements in DNA technologies, particularly rapid DNA sequencing, forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG), and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have significantly revolutionized this field. This literature review explores scholarly and applied research from 2022 to 2025, detailing how these technologies are redefining missing persons identification and considering their associated legal, ethical, and cultural implications.

2. Advances in DNA Technology

   The past few years have seen a transition from short tandem repeat (STR) analysis towards higher-resolution techniques such as Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Budowle et al. (2023) highlight that rapid DNA platforms now allow for the analysis of complex biological samples within hours, thereby increasing the feasibility of field-level identifications.

   NGS represents a significant advancement, enabling the recovery of tens of thousands of genetic markers from degraded skeletal remains, a stark contrast to the few dozen markers yielded by older technologies (Budowle B. et al., 2023). Additionally, Kling et al. (2022) point out that NGS facilitates more precise ancestry inference and phenotypic prediction. This capability allows investigators to create “DNA portraits” of unidentified individuals, estimating characteristics like eye colour, skin tone, and biogeographic ancestry even without familial references.

3. Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG)

   Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) has emerged as a potent tool in forensic science, integrating traditional DNA analysis with genealogical research. This method has been instrumental in resolving high-profile cold cases, including the Golden State Killer and Long Island Serial Killer investigations (Greytak et al., 2022). By comparing unknown DNA profiles against publicly available databases like GEDmatch and DNASolves, investigators can trace distant familial connections. Parabon NanoLabs (2024) reported successful family line matches using FIGG in 77 out of 293 forensic cases involving unidentified remains where they provided assistance.

   This methodology enables the identification of third to fifth cousins, thereby offering solutions for cases previously considered unresolvable. Nevertheless, privacy issues remain a significant concern. Curtis & Jobling (2022) advocate for more stringent ethical oversight and explicit consent mechanisms, given that most consumer DNA contributors might be unaware their data could be accessed by law enforcement.

4. Challenges in Minority and Indigenous Populations

   A recurring issue in recent literature concerns the disproportionate representation of minority populations in genetic databases. Schroeder et al. (2023) emphasize that the majority of contributors to open-source genetic databases are of European ancestry, which consequently diminishes FIGG’s effectiveness for Native American, African, and South Asian populations. Within Indigenous contexts, DNA testing also introduces intricate cultural and ethical considerations. Omeasoo & Snow (2023) underscore the necessity of culturally sensitive approaches, such as non-destructive DNA extraction methods and tribal ownership of genetic databases. Their collaborative project with the Blackfeet Tribe, which aims to develop a tribally controlled database, exemplifies a model of ethical innovation.

5. International and Comparative Perspectives

   In Europe, countries like the UK and Germany have broadened their application of familial searching and FIGG, operating under stringent regulatory frameworks (Kayser, 2023). Conversely, in India, despite the enactment of the DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, forensic infrastructure and policy integration remain insufficiently developed (Singh & Sharma, 2024). Progress is impeded by the lack of a unified national database for unidentified human remains. Comparative studies, such as that by Patel et al. (2024), advocate for the implementation of cross-linked databases that integrate First Information Reports (FIRs), morgue records, and DNA profiles.

6. Ethical and Legal Considerations

   Ethical considerations are central to current discussions surrounding forensic DNA utilization. Scudder et al. (2023) raise questions regarding the limits of informed consent in FIGG, while Moore (2022) emphasizes the potential for reinforcing racial bias due to unequal representation within genetic databases. New guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Justice (2023) restrict law enforcement access to consumer DNA databases in the absence of explicit consent. Consequently, Human Rights Watch (2024) advocates for an international regulatory framework to govern the collection, storage, and use of forensic genetic data, with a strong emphasis on transparency and community engagement.

7. Case Applications and Success Stories

   Numerous recent case studies underscore the transformative potential inherent in novel DNA technologies. One notable example is the identification of Daisy Mae Tallman on the Yakama Reservation, achieved through Othram’s enhanced sequencing of degraded remains 35 years post-disappearance (Othram, 2023). Similarly, Snow’s successful identification of the remains of an ancient Native American man, which were subsequently returned to his descendants, exemplifies the value of integrating scientific methods with community respect.

8. Synopsis

   The synergy among Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG), and ethical innovation is fundamentally transforming forensic identification practices. While these technologies offer immense promise, their full success hinges upon inclusive data collection, international cooperation, and culturally attuned practices. Addressing the gap between technological advancement and ethical considerations – particularly concerning marginalized populations – remains a pivotal challenge and a moral imperative for the forensic community.

Conclusion:
Modern DNA tools are revolutionizing forensic identification, offering an unprecedented ability to name the unknown and bring long-awaited answers to grieving families. Cases like Ashley Loring HeavyRunner and Daisy Mae Tallman powerfully illustrate this work’s urgent need and profound promise, underscoring Omeasoo’s apt observation: “Just getting her family closure…is the most important thing right now.” This vital field, at the intersection of science, justice, and humanity, consistently proves that, when conducted ethically, science can feel nothing short of magical. Ultimately, the successful application of these advancements hinges on a global commitment to inclusive data, robust ethical frameworks, and cross-border cooperation, ensuring no missing person, regardless of background, remains a forgotten statistic.

References:

• Budowle, B. (2023). Advances in forensic DNA sequencing [Conference presentation]. International Symposium on Human Identification.
• Budowle, B., et al. (2023). Advances in forensic DNA sequencing [Conference presentation]. International Symposium on Human Identification.
• Curtis, C., & Jobling, M. (2022). Forensic genealogy and privacy: A policy challenge. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 58, 102678.
• Greytak, E. M., Moore, C., & Armentrout, S. (2022). Genetic genealogy for cold case resolution. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 23, 119–142.
• Human Rights Watch. (2024). Privacy and protection in forensic DNA use [Policy brief].
• Kayser, M. (2023). Familial DNA searching in Europe: A balancing act. Nature Reviews Genetics, 24(3), 145–157.
• Kling, D., Tillmar, A. O., & Sjölund, P. (2022). Forensic genealogy and next-generation phenotyping. Science & Justice, 62(1), 65–74.
• Moore, C. (2022). Bias in DNA databases: An emerging issue. Journal of Law and Biosciences, 9(1), lsac008.
• (2023). National Missing and Unidentified Persons System. U.S. Department of Justice.
• National Crime Information Center. (2022). Missing Indigenous Persons Data.
• Omeasoo, H., & Snow, M. (2023). Indigenous-led forensic initiatives: A new ethical model. Journal of Forensic Anthropology, 7(2), 56–69.
• Othram Inc. (2023). Cold case solved: Yakama Nation remains identified. https://www.othram.com
• Othram Inc. (2023). Unidentified remains solved cases. https://www.othram.com
• Parabon NanoLabs. (2023). Case archive. https://www.parabon-nanolabs.com
• Parabon NanoLabs. (2024). Solving unidentified remains cases through FIGG. https://www.parabon-nanolabs.com
• Patel, V., Singh, R., & Sharma, D. (2024). Forensic DNA use in India: Gaps and potential. Indian Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 44–59.
• Schroeder, H., et al. (2023). Representation matters: Genetic genealogy and database bias. PLOS Genetics, 19(3), e1010554.
• Scudder, N., et al. (2023). Ethics of forensic genealogy: Informed consent and public trust. Forensic Science International, 348, 111541.
• Singh, R., & Sharma, A. (2024). Legislative delays in India’s DNA identification regime. The Journal of Law and Technology in Asia, 8(1), 22–36.
• Snow, M., & Omeasoo, H. (2023). Tribal DNA databases and non-destructive sampling. University of Montana.
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2023). Interim policy on forensic genealogy and DNA privacy [Policy paper].