Abstract Arbitration has long been a cornerstone of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), offering parties an…

Headquarters Do Not Confer Nationwide Jurisdiction A recurring misconception in constitutional and administrative litigation is…

The law of diminishing returns—also known as the law of diminishing marginal returns—is among the…

From Dockets to Dialogue: The Judiciary’s Transformative Role in Advancing ADR under CPC Keywords:  Alternative…

Digital Marketing Opportunities And Pitfalls For Law Firms Digital marketing presents incredible opportunities for law…

Introduction Climate change has emerged as a significant driver of human mobility across the globe.…

An Extraordinary Constitutional Dialogue In an age of polarized politics and shrinking civil discourse, few…

Urban Water Contamination And Constitutional Concerns The contamination of drinking water reported from parts of…

Abstract The relationship between human rights and environmental law has emerged as a critical area…

Abstract The paper deals with how the Indian Apex Court interprets the Arbitration and Conciliation…

The commencement of arbitral proceedings is a foundational step in the arbitration process, governed by…

The Legal Context: Section 46 CCA Following the 2017 Harper Reforms, Section 46 of the…

Case listing is the backbone of judicial administration in India. It determines when, before whom,…

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that convictions under the POCSO Act need not fail for want of medical evidence if ocular testimony is credible and consistent. In Dinesh Kumar Jaldhari v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025), the Court upheld a conviction for aggravated sexual assault on a four-year-old child, relying on consistent parental testimony and trauma-induced behaviour, despite the absence of external injuries. The ruling underscores that medical evidence is corroborative, not substantive, and that courts must adopt a sensitive, victim-centric approach where child victims may be unable to fully articulate their trauma. This jurisprudence ensures that justice is not defeated by technical gaps in forensic proof.

Case Brief There is a need to provide the acquisition of land to a company…

In common usage, the terms lawyer and advocate are often used interchangeably. However, under Indian…

Startup India Registration: Overview If you are planning to kick off your entrepreneurial journey or…

India’s ambition to become a global arbitration hub received a major push with the 2019 and 2021 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, aimed at promoting institutional arbitration. This article examines whether that legislative vision has translated into practice by analyzing key Supreme Court decisions, the stalled Arbitration Council of India, and the growing role of institutions such as MCIA, DIAC and IAMC Hyderabad.

Introduction Contracts form the backbone of every economy by facilitating commerce, investment and governance. When…

India’s approach to arbitration is becoming more flexible and practical. Disputes involving fraud, intellectual property, and employment are no longer automatically excluded from arbitration. Instead, courts now examine whether the dispute concerns private contractual rights between parties or broader statutory rights that affect the public at large. This approach strengthens party autonomy while ensuring that matters of public interest remain protected. Overall, it shows India’s growing alignment with global pro-arbitration practices, even though some legal uncertainties still remain.