This judgment settles that in trademark disputes involving registered marks, no statutory infringement action lies against another registered proprietor under Section 28(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, but passing off remains actionable under common law via Section 27(2), provided the plaintiff proves prior goodwill predating the defendant’s use, misrepresentation, and damage.

Facts: Pathkind Diagnostics Private Limited v/s Registrar of Trade Marks Pathkind Diagnostics Private Limited, a well-known diagnostics company, filed an…

Facts The appellant, Novenco Building and Industry is a Danish company involved in manufacturing high-efficiency industrial fans sold under the…

Facts: Trademark Case: Chaitanya Arora Vs. Shoban Salim Thakur – Suppression of Material Facts The plaintiff, Chaitanya Arora, was the…

Facts: Rolls-Royce Trademark Case: Mandatory Timelines under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Imagine a world-famous brand like Rolls-Royce, known for luxury…

Facts of the Case – Bima Sugam Trademark Case – Delhi High Court Judgment (2025) The case revolves around the…

Jamp India Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jubilant Generics Ltd. and Others Factual Background Jubilant Generics Ltd., a pharmaceutical company based…

The Appeal In this matter, the High Court of Delhi was called upon to decide an appeal by F. Hoffmann-La…

Copyright — Artistic Works (India) Introduction Artistic expression—whether via drawings, photographs, memes, or AI-generated images—is central to online creativity. However,…

Protect your brand identity with hassle-free online trademark registration Get Expert Help Now – Ph no: 9650499965 In today’s competitive…