Abstract The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) introduces significant changes to India’s criminal justice framework, but…

Forensic Anthropology and Osteological Evidence in Law Forensic anthropology occupies a unique position at the…

“A woman’s mental health, personal autonomy, and social circumstances are valid grounds for abortion even…

Supreme Court Calls for National Policy to Address Inconsistencies in Organ Transplantation The Supreme Court…

How to Study and Interpret a Post Mortem Report A post mortem report—whether in medical,…

What is Euthanasia? The word euthanasia, originated in Greece means a good death. According to…

Introduction In legal dramas and actual court proceedings, the phrase “touch DNA” is frequently presented…

Abstract Professional misconduct in healthcare law refers to unethical or negligent behavior by medical practitioners…

Abstract Background Laws in healthcare are often enacted with the intent to safeguard patients, ensure…

“If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.” —…

The Bengaluru Propofol Murder Case: A Forensic and Legal Analysis The arrest of a Bengaluru-based…

Abstract Anesthetic deaths represent one of the most intricate and contested domains in medico-legal practice.…

Introduction Surrogacy has long been a subject of debate in India, largely due to concerns…

Abstract Drug safety remains a cornerstone of public health, yet adverse drug reactions continue to…

Excerpt: Forensic Genetics – The Crossroads of Justice and Surveillance

Forensic genetics, or DNA profiling, is a potent instrument transforming criminal justice but whose unregulated fast-track adoption threatens serious violations of basic rights. Genetic information is particularly sensitive, as it discloses not just a person’s identity but also their health predispositions and the data of non-consenting relatives.

A lack of a strong legal framework leaves room for four significant risks:

1. Invasion of Autonomy and Privacy: Unregulated collection, storage, and cross-border transfer of DNA information erodes individual autonomy and right to informational privacy.
2. Profiling and Discrimination: Representative forensic databases pose a risk of disproportionate surveillance of certain ethnic minorities, and genetic health information could be exploited by organizations such as insurers or employers.
3. Mass Surveillance: Unrestricted DNA retention of unconvicted persons threatens to establish a “genetic surveillance state,” an essential interest expressed in cases such as the ECHR’s S. and Marper v. UK (2008).
4. Identification Errors: Laboratory error, partial samples, and probabilistic evidence misinterpretation create erroneous false positives and wrongful convictions.

The Indian Supreme Court decision in Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) establishes that any use of sensitive genetic information by the state has to satisfy the high tests of legality, necessity, and proportionality. For ensuring justice and safeguarding human rights, forensic genetics needs urgent measures such as clear legislation, open regulatory scrutiny, and enforceable informed consent. Absent these restraints, this powerful technology could undermine the very freedoms it aims to secure.

What Is Forensic Science? Forensic science is the use of scientific methods to help solve…

When investigating computers for legal cases, it’s absolutely vital that any digital information we find…

Background Multi-organ failure (MOF) is a leading cause of illness and death in critical care.…

Forensic Evidence in the Indian Criminal Justice System Introduction The administration of criminal justice heavily…

The Tiny Genital Tubercle of Sonography and the Mighty PCPNDT Act: Sonologist vs Criminologist Abstract…