- Home
- Law Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Juvenile Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- Woman Law
- Lack of Anti-Drone Teams: A Growing Threat to VVIP Security
- The Romeo–Juliet Exception: Decriminalisation of Consensual Adolescent Relationships.
- The Fiduciary Duty of Promoters under RERA: Strict Compliance, Enforcement, and Homebuyer Safeguards
- The Transitional Evolution of Arbitration: From Conventional Models to Smart Digital Mechanisms
- Role of Election Agent, Polling Agent, and Counting Agent in Elections
- Forfeiture of Tenancy under the Transfer of Property Act
- Territorial Jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court in CAT, ECI and Central Enforcement Matters
- The Law of Diminishing Returns: Where Economic Logic Meets Legal Governance
Browsing: Indian Constitution
Author’s Note
This article critically examines the judicially evolved Essential Religious Practices (ERP) doctrine and argues for its replacement with a more constitutionally consistent and rights-based approach—the doctrine of proportionality. By drawing from key judgments of the Supreme Court of India and comparative constitutional principles, the article seeks to contribute to the ongoing discourse on reconciling religious freedom with equality, dignity, and the transformative vision of the Indian Constitution.
The views expressed herein are entirely those of the author and have not been published or submitted elsewhere for publication. The author is grateful to the faculty of Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, for their constant encouragement in pursuing academic research.
Abstract
The doctrine of essential religious practices (ERP) has long guided Indian courts in delineating the boundary between religious freedom and constitutional morality. However, landmark cases such as Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala case) and Shayara Bano v. Union of India have sparked renewed debates on the validity and relevance of ERP in a modern secular democracy. This article critically examines the origins, development, and contradictions within the ERP doctrine, arguing that it often places the judiciary in a theological role, inconsistent with constitutional secularism. Through an analysis of evolving jurisprudence and comparative perspectives, the article explores whether the time has come to replace ERP with a rights-based proportionality approach that aligns with constitutional morality and gender justice.
Doctrine of Basic Structure This article is broadly divided into 3 parts. In Part-A, we will understand the background of…
Abstract This pivotal Supreme Court pronouncement examined the interplay between statutory monopoly and constitutional freedoms in the context of commercial…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

