Trending
- Right to Trade and Business Includes Right to Shut Down Business, Says Supreme Court
- The LaLaurie Mansion: A Haunting Legacy of Horror and History
- Delay, Acquiescence, And Waiver Can Bar Trademark Rectification Proceedings
- Role of Obiter Dictum in Indian Judicial Hierarchy
- Prima Facie Invalidity Plea Under Section 124(1)(b)(ii) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999: Legal Requirement Explained
- Judicial Clarification on Partial Setting Aside and Limited Modification under Section 34: In light of the Gayatri Balasamy Judgment.
- Therapeutic efficacy under Section 3(d) must be demonstrated through specific data
- When Lovable Action Morphs into Illegal Action
Author: Anurag Verma
Anurag Verma
Law Student | BBA-LLB (Hons.) | NFSU-MHA, Govt. of India | AI & Tech | Graphic Designer | Freelancer
How the Harinagar Sugar Mills case redefined the boundaries between entrepreneurial liberty and worker protection When Your Only Customer Walks Away Picture this: You’ve been running a business for over three decades, serving just one client faithfully. Then one day, that client walks away, leaving you with no work, mounting costs, and a workforce you can no longer sustain. The logical step? Close down. But what if the law won’t let you? This wasn’t a hypothetical scenario for Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. (HSML). For more than 30 years, their biscuit division had been the exclusive manufacturer for Britannia Industries Limited.…
