- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Australian Law
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Copyright Law
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Fashion Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Judge
- Judiciary
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Motor Laws
- Patent
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Services
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Trademark Laws
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- When Must a GST Tax Invoice Be Issued? Section 31, Rule 47 and Advance Payments
- The Law of Defamation: Libel, Slander, Defenses, and the Limits of Free Expression
- Understanding the Law of Passing Off: Protecting Your Business Identity
- Foundation of Tortious Liability: From Salmond’s Narrow Theory to Pollock’s Wider View
- Judicial and Extra-Judicial Remedies & Kinds of Damages
- 50% Wage Rule Under Code on Wages 2019: Impact on Salary, PF, Gratuity & Take-Home Pay
- Keepers of Dangerous Animals: Duties, Liability, and Legal Responsibility
- Safe Spaces, Legal Stakes: Understanding the Duties and Liabilities of Occupiers of Premises
Browsing: Delhi High Court
This judgment settles that in trademark disputes involving registered marks, no statutory infringement action lies against another registered proprietor under Section 28(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, but passing off remains actionable under common law via Section 27(2), provided the plaintiff proves prior goodwill predating the defendant’s use, misrepresentation, and damage.
Facts of the Case: Atomberg Technologies vs Eureka Forbes: Supreme Court Transfers Patent Case to Bombay High Court Atomberg Technologies…
Fact: Trademark Infringement Case: Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Alchem International Pvt. Ltd The plaintiff, Alkem Laboratories Ltd., is a pharmaceutical…
Facts of the Case – Bima Sugam Trademark Case – Delhi High Court Judgment (2025) The case revolves around the…
Case Overview Facts: Lifestyle Equities C.V., headquartered in Amsterdam, along with its Indian licensee, owned the registered trademark “Beverly Hills…
IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd. v/s Puma SE The case of IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd. Vs. Puma SE addresses the critical interface between…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

