- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Australian Law
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Fashion Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Judge
- Judiciary
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Motor Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Services
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Trademark Laws
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- Calcutta High Court on Post-Poll Violence: Mamata Banerjee’s “Not A Bulldozer State” Remark Sparks Constitutional Debate
- Indian Explosives Pvt Ltd vs Ideal Detonators Pvt Ltd: Calcutta High Court Reinforces Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A
- Novelty and originality of Design cannot be assessed merely through superficial visual comparison
- The Kalyani Doctrine: Strategic Restraint in Police Command
- Common Intention Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: When the Law Treats Many as One
- Hajj in the Light of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh)
- TraTransborder Reputation under Indian Trademark Law
- Whether mere filing of a trademark application can amount to infringement or passing off?
Browsing: Delhi High Court
This judgment settles that in trademark disputes involving registered marks, no statutory infringement action lies against another registered proprietor under Section 28(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, but passing off remains actionable under common law via Section 27(2), provided the plaintiff proves prior goodwill predating the defendant’s use, misrepresentation, and damage.
Facts of the Case: Atomberg Technologies vs Eureka Forbes: Supreme Court Transfers Patent Case to Bombay High Court Atomberg Technologies…
Fact: Trademark Infringement Case: Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Alchem International Pvt. Ltd The plaintiff, Alkem Laboratories Ltd., is a pharmaceutical…
Facts of the Case – Bima Sugam Trademark Case – Delhi High Court Judgment (2025) The case revolves around the…
Case Overview Facts: Lifestyle Equities C.V., headquartered in Amsterdam, along with its Indian licensee, owned the registered trademark “Beverly Hills…
IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd. v/s Puma SE The case of IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd. Vs. Puma SE addresses the critical interface between…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

