Author: NavneetSharma

Abstract As immersive technologies become more integrated into the legal system, this paper addresses a significant legal gap by critically examining the admissibility of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) evidence in Indian courts. Despite the fact that Indian law has gradually accepted electronic records through the Indian Evidence Act of 1872[1], it says nothing about the unique difficulties presented by AR and VR—technologies that recreate accidents or crime scenes for judicial review, but also pose new risks of emotional influence and manipulation. With comparative insights from countries like the US, UK, and Germany, where immersive evidence has spurred…

Read More