India SC Bans NCERT Textbook Over Chapter on Judicial Corruption

Supreme Court Objects To NCERT Class 8 Textbook Chapter On “Corruption In Judiciary”

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed strong objection to the recently released Class 8 Social Science textbook by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), which included a chapter titled “Corruption in Judiciary.” A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi termed the publication a product of a “deep-rooted conspiracy” and said those responsible must face the law.

Bench Calls For Deeper Probe

“We would like to have a deeper probe. We need to find who is responsible and we will see who are there. Heads must roll! We will not close the case,” CJI Kant remarked during proceedings.

Contempt Notices Issued

The Court issued notices under the Contempt of Courts Act to the Department of School Education and NCERT Director Dr Dinesh Prasad Saklani, asking them to explain why action should not be initiated against them or those responsible for the controversial chapter.

Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Textbooks

In addition, the Bench ordered that all copies of the textbook, whether physical or digital, be removed from public access immediately. The Court directed NCERT, in coordination with Union and State education departments, to ensure that all copies held in schools, retail outlets, or digital platforms be seized.

A compliance report is to be submitted by the NCERT Director, while principal secretaries of State education departments are required to report compliance within two weeks.

Details Sought On Authors And Meetings

The Bench also demanded details of the National Syllabi Board members who authored the offending chapter, along with the minutes of meetings in which the content was deliberated and finalised.

“Any attempt to distribute this book either physically or digitally shall be taken as a willful breach of the order of this court,” the Court said.

Court Objects To NCERT Director’s Defence

The Court expressed strong objection to the NCERT Director’s communication defending the contents after the controversy came to light, noting that it appeared to be a calculated attempt to undermine the judiciary.

“It seems to us that there is a calculated move to undermine the institutional authority and demean the dignity of the judiciary. This, if allowed to go unchecked, will erode the sanctity of judicial office in the estimation of public at large and within the impressionable minds of youth,” the Bench stated.

Court Criticises Lopsided Narrative On Judiciary

The Court criticised the chapter for presenting a lopsided narrative on the judiciary, washing over its historic contributions and the role of Supreme Court, High Courts, and trial courts in upholding democratic principles.

“The text fails to recognise the role of judiciary which upheld the basic structure doctrine. The silence is particularly egregious since so many high-ranking officers have been held accountable for corruption or misuse of public office,” the Bench noted.

Court Clarifies It Does Not Intend To Stifle Legitimate Criticism

Observing that the choice of words in the chapter appeared deliberate rather than inadvertent, the Court clarified that the proceedings were not intended to stifle legitimate critique.

“We do not propose these proceedings to stifle any legitimate critique or exercise of the right to scrutinise judiciary. Our intervention is to uphold the integrity of education and ensure students are not exposed to biased narratives that misrepresent the role of judiciary,” the Bench said.

Key Actions Directed By The Court

References:

• https://thelawreporters.com/supreme-court-ncert-class-8-textbook-judiciary-corruption-row